Connect with us

Crypto

Crypto-CEO Faces US Extradition In Crypto Asset Fraud.

Published

on

Crypto-CEO Faces US Extradition In Crypto Asset Fraud.

Crypto-CEO Faces US Extradition In Crypto Asset Fraud.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed fraud charges against three companies and nine individuals implicated in schemes aimed at manipulating the cryptocurrency market. These schemes were designed to distort the markets for several crypto assets that were offered and sold as securities to retail investors. The accused are said to have misled investors by fabricating the illusion of vibrant trading markets for these assets, enticing them to make purchases based on artificially inflated trading volumes and prices.

The SEC summary highlighted that “This action arises from the defendants’ unregistered and fraudulent offers and sales of crypto assets being offered and sold as securities to the investing public and their manipulative trading of those securities.”

Fraudulent Crypto Market Scheme

The complaints filed by the SEC detail that the promoters of crypto assets—Russell Armand, Maxwell Hernandez, Manpreet Singh Kohli, Nam Tran, and Vy Pham—worked in conjunction with three firms, ZM Quant, Gotbit, and CLS Global, which purported to act as market makers. Manpreet Singh Kohli, 43, appeared via video-link at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London at an early stage of his fight against extradition to the US.

Advertisement

These entities are accused of engaging in activities to manipulate the trading behavior of crypto assets. It is alleged that they offered “market-manipulation-as-a-service” to artificially enhance both the trading volume and price of the crypto assets that the promoters marketed to retail investors through unregistered transactions.

As outlined in the filings of the SEC, ZM Quant and Gotbit, acting on behalf of the promoters, engaged in market manipulation by creating artificial trading volume through self-trading, commonly known as wash trading. This practice entails the buying and selling of the same asset to fabricate the appearance of market activity.

The SEC further asserted that CLS Global executed a comparable scheme concerning another cryptocurrency developed under the supervision of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as part of a distinct investigation into manipulation within the crypto asset market.

The SEC indicated that these deceptive practices misled retail investors into believing that the crypto assets were experiencing active trading and exhibited significant market demand, when, in fact, the trading activity was contrived and lacked any genuine economic purpose. In certain cases, the defendants utilized algorithms or trading bots that generated an enormous volume of transactions, resulting in up to quadrillions of transactions and billions of dollars in artificial trading volume daily on major cryptocurrency trading platforms.

Related: Granbury residents sue Marathon Digital Holdings over noise from crypto mine

Advertisement

SEC Statement

The actions taken by the SEC are designed to ensure that those responsible for fraudulent activities are held accountable, particularly as these schemes have reportedly victimized retail investors by luring them with misleading promises of profitability in the unpredictable cryptocurrency markets. Sanjay Wadhwa, Deputy Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, underscored the importance of these charges, stating: “Today’s enforcement actions reaffirm that retail investors are being exploited by fraudulent practices perpetrated by institutional players in the crypto asset markets.

With so-called promoters and self-proclaimed market makers collaborating to mislead the investing public with false profit assurances, investors must remain vigilant, as the odds may be stacked against them.”

The SEC has raised alarms regarding the increasing susceptibility of the crypto asset market to manipulation, particularly as these assets are continuously marketed and sold to the public as securities. Jorge G. Tenreiro, Acting Chief of the Division of Enforcement’s Crypto Asset and Cyber Unit (CACU), voiced his concerns regarding the extent of the deception: “The individuals behind these fraudulent schemes are reaping substantial profits at the cost of investors who have been misled into these markets, resulting in the loss of their hard-earned savings. We are dedicated to identifying and addressing such misconduct, especially when it pertains to securities.”

Legal Action and Charges

The five complaints filed by the SEC were submitted to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. These complaints allege that all defendants have breached the antifraud and market manipulation provisions of U.S. securities laws, with some defendants also accused of failing to meet registration requirements.

  • The SEC is pursuing various forms of relief in these matters, which include:
  • Permanent injunctions to prevent the defendants from further violations of securities laws.
  • Conduct-based injunctions to restrict specific actions related to market manipulation.
  • Disgorgement of illicit profits, along with interest, to recover earnings obtained through unlawful activities.
  • Civil penalties aimed at deterring future infractions.

Bars against certain officers and directors to prevent them from holding leadership roles in any companies regulated by the SEC.

In a notable development, three principal defendants — Armand, Hernandez, and Pham — have consented to settle the charges through bifurcated settlements. This settlement, which awaits court approval, would impose a permanent injunction against them for any further violations of federal securities laws and enforce conduct-based injunctions. Moreover, they would be prohibited from serving as officers or directors of any public companies. The court will subsequently determine the final amounts for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties applicable to these defendants.

Advertisement

Related: Legal Strategies for Mitigating Risks in Cryptocurrency Investments

FBI and Criminal Actions

In a concurrent criminal investigation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts have initiated actions against the individuals implicated in these fraudulent activities. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has commended the collaboration among agencies, which has facilitated both civil and criminal actions against the offenders.

These cases exemplify a comprehensive approach by regulatory and law enforcement bodies to combat market manipulation within the increasingly popular and occasionally volatile realm of cryptocurrency assets. As the SEC persists in its efforts to monitor and investigate fraudulent practices in the cryptocurrency sector, these enforcement actions serve as a cautionary message to potential manipulators that their conduct will be scrutinized and met with consequences. Investors are advised to exercise vigilance and conduct thorough research on cryptocurrency market offerings prior to investing their funds.

Related: FTX Founder and Celebrity Backers Sued Amid Crypto Collapse

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

US and Bolivia Target the ‘Modern Pablo Escobar’ in Massive Crypto Laundering Probe

Published

on

US and Bolivia Target the ‘Modern Pablo Escobar’ in Massive Crypto Laundering Probe

Key Takeaways

Bolivian Officials Meet With US DEA to Tackle Drug-Linked Crypto Money Laundering

World regulators are strengthening their integration and collaboration to tackle the use of cryptocurrency for illicit purposes, such as drug-related money laundering.

On Tuesday, Bolivia’s anti-drug czar, Ernesto Justiniano, and the director of the Bolivian Special Anti-Narcotics Force (FELCN), Frans William Cabrera Quispe, traveled to Washington and met with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to strengthen the cooperation of both countries in the fight against drug trafficking and criminal organizations involved with these groups.

The main focus of this travel would be to coordinate an investigation into the criminal networks behind Sebastian Marset, called the modern Pablo Escobar, who was captured on March 13 in Bolivia, in addition to other criminal drug groups that operate in Latam. Among these are the First Capital Command (PCC) and the Red Command (Comando Vermelho), two Brazilian groups that have been accused of laundering millions using digital currencies.

Marset, currently under U.S. custody, is being accused of laundering millions using “couriers and tokens to covertly deliver bulk illicit currency, typically in euros,” according to an unsealed indictment.

Talking to local media, Justiniano stated that, in addition to the funds coming from the sale of these narcotics, they were “also looking into the matter of companies that may have been diverting chemicals” and “money laundering—specifically, companies that have received funds via cryptocurrencies.”

Advertisement

Mirko Sokol, General Commander of the Bolivian Police, stressed that intelligence indicated that Marset carried out transactions “primarily in cryptocurrencies, rather than in physical currency,” and the investigations are following this lead.

Cryptocurrency money laundering has been on the rise, with investigators sounding the alarm about the rising use of crypto assets for these illicit activities. Chainalysis, a blockchain intelligence firm, stated that cryptocurrency laundering volumes rose to $82 billion in 2025, with Chinese groups at the helm.

Volumes have grown 8x since 2020, when Chainalysis registered only $10 billion.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Bitcoin, Cerebras IPO mania, and the SpaceX speculation angle traders are watching | investingLive

Published

on

Bitcoin, Cerebras IPO mania, and the SpaceX speculation angle traders are watching | investingLive

Bitcoin is trading near $81,750, up around 2.5% at the time of publication, after rising almost 3.5% from today’s open to its session high. The move comes on the same day that Cerebras Systems (CBRS) delivered one of the most aggressive AI IPO debuts of the year, reinforcing a broader risk-on mood across speculative technology assets.

Cerebras priced its IPO at $185 per share, raising about $5.55 billion by selling 30 million shares, according to Reuters. The stock began trading on Nasdaq under the ticker CBRS, opened sharply higher, and traded as high as $385, more than 100% above the IPO price. (Reuters)

That matters beyond the semiconductor sector. A debut like this tells traders that the market is still willing to pay extreme premiums for scarce AI-related growth assets. When that happens, the same speculative psychology can spread into adjacent themes: AI infrastructure, private-market mega-valuations, Elon Musk-linked companies, and sometimes Bitcoin.

Why does the Cerebras IPO matter for Bitcoin sentiment?

The direct link between Cerebras and Bitcoin is weak. Cerebras is an AI semiconductor company, not a crypto company. But the sentiment link is more interesting.

A 108% intraday IPO move suggests that investors are again rewarding high-growth, high-narrative assets. Bitcoin often responds well when markets move into a risk-on liquidity environment, especially when the leadership is coming from technology, AI, and speculative growth.

Advertisement

This does not mean the Cerebras IPO “caused” Bitcoin to rally. It means the IPO may be part of the same broader market condition: investors are willing to chase upside when the narrative is powerful enough.

How does SpaceX fit into the Bitcoin story?

The confirmed SpaceX-Bitcoin connection is simple: Elon Musk said in July 2021 that SpaceX owned Bitcoin. During “The B Word” event with Jack Dorsey and Cathie Wood, Musk said he personally owned Bitcoin, Tesla owned Bitcoin, and SpaceX owned Bitcoin. (CoinDesk)

However, there is no confirmed operational SpaceX-Bitcoin integration. SpaceX does not appear to use Bitcoin for launches, Starlink is not known to be built on Bitcoin rails, and there has been no confirmed public disclosure showing that Bitcoin is central to SpaceX’s business model.

The stronger factual connection is treasury exposure, not infrastructure.

A second important point is that in 2023, the Wall Street Journal reported that SpaceX had written down the value of its Bitcoin holdings by $373 million across 2021 and 2022 and had sold Bitcoin, based on internal financial documents reviewed by the publication. (The Wall Street Journal)

Advertisement

So the clean timeline is:

Year SpaceX and Bitcoin development
2021 Musk publicly says SpaceX owns Bitcoin
2023 Reports say SpaceX wrote down and sold Bitcoin exposure
2025-2026 Crypto-market speculation continues around possible wallet activity and Musk-linked payment infrastructure, but wallet attribution is not audited corporate confirmation

Why is the SpaceX IPO angle relevant now for crypto investors and traders?

SpaceX is widely viewed as one of the most anticipated potential IPOs in global markets. Some market commentary has discussed possible trillion-dollar valuation scenarios, although investors should treat specific valuation numbers carefully unless confirmed through official filings or reliable primary reporting. (Capital.com)

The connection for Bitcoin is not that SpaceX itself is necessarily buying Bitcoin today. The connection is more psychological:

  1. Cerebras shows that AI and deep-tech IPO demand is extremely strong.

  2. SpaceX would likely be seen as an even bigger narrative asset if it lists.

  3. Elon Musk remains strongly associated with crypto markets.

  4. Bitcoin can benefit when speculative capital rotates into scarce, high-conviction assets.

In other words, a huge Cerebras IPO does not prove anything about SpaceX or Bitcoin, but it does support the idea that the market’s appetite for mega-narrative assets is alive.

What is the most actionable Musk crypto angle?

For traders, the more actionable Musk-related crypto optionality may be X Money, not SpaceX.

Advertisement

Reuters reported in March 2026 that Musk said X Money would enter early public access in April, as part of the broader effort to turn X into a payments-enabled “everything app.” X previously partnered with Visa for payment functionality. (Reuters)

That does not confirm Bitcoin integration. But if X Money ever adds Bitcoin, Dogecoin, or broader crypto rails, that would likely be more directly relevant to crypto-market pricing than a speculative SpaceX IPO narrative.

Bitcoin trading read today

Bitcoin’s move to around $81,750 keeps the short-term tone constructive. The day is positive, the market is reacting well to broader risk-on signals, and the Cerebras IPO adds another data point showing that investors are willing to chase high-growth narratives.

Still, traders should separate confirmed facts from speculative fuel:

Factor Confirmed? Bitcoin relevance
Cerebras priced IPO at $185 Yes Shows strong AI risk appetite
CBRS traded up to $385 Yes Reinforces speculative momentum
SpaceX has owned Bitcoin Yes, based on Musk’s 2021 comments Real but historical balance-sheet link
SpaceX sold or reduced Bitcoin exposure Reported by WSJ in 2023 Reduces certainty around current exposure
SpaceX IPO will directly lift Bitcoin No Speculative sentiment link only
X Money may eventually support crypto Not confirmed More actionable if verified

Make or Break for Bitcoin: Inside the Psychological Battle at the 200-Day Moving Average and What It Means for the Broader Trend

BTSUSD (spot) daily chart with the 200 SMA indicator

Advertisement

Why Bitcoin traders watch the daily chart first

Short-term traders often live on the 1-minute, 5-minute, or 15-minute chart. That makes sense if they are scalping small moves. But for the bigger Bitcoin picture, the daily chart is still the main reference point.

The daily chart matters because it filters out a lot of the noise.

On smaller timeframes, Bitcoin can look bullish in the morning, bearish two hours later, and neutral by the end of the day. A single headline, a liquidation flush, or a short-term algorithmic move can distort the picture. The daily candle gives a cleaner view because it compresses the full trading day into one clear message: who controlled the session, buyers or sellers?

That is why the daily chart tends to carry more weight for serious market participants. Large funds, institutional desks, and longer-term crypto investors are not usually making major allocation decisions based on a 5-minute pattern. They are looking at the broader trend, the key daily levels, and whether Bitcoin is being accumulated or distributed over several sessions.

There is also a crowd psychology element. Because so many traders and investors look at the daily chart, the levels on that chart become important simply because everyone is watching them. When Bitcoin approaches a major daily moving average, a prior daily high, or a key daily support zone, it often attracts real order flow. Traders place entries there, stops gather there, and algorithms react there.

Advertisement

In crypto, that matters even more because Bitcoin trades 24/7. The daily chart gives the market a shared reference point in a market that never really sleeps.

Why the 200-day SMA matters more than a random moving average

There is nothing magical about the number 200 from a pure math perspective. A 157-day moving average, a 180-day moving average, or a 220-day moving average can sometimes fit price better during a specific period.

But markets are not driven by math alone. They are driven by human behavior, institutional habits, and widely followed reference points.

That is why the 200-day simple moving average matters.

It is one of the most watched long-term trend indicators in global markets. Stocks, commodities, crypto, ETFs, and indexes are all judged against it. When Bitcoin trades above the 200-day SMA, many market participants view it as healthier. When Bitcoin trades below it, the tone often becomes more cautious.

Advertisement

For many traders, the 200-day SMA acts like a macro line in the sand:

Bitcoin vs. 200-day SMA Common market interpretation
Above the 200-day SMA Trend looks healthier, dips may attract buyers
Below the 200-day SMA Market remains more defensive, rallies may be sold
Testing the 200-day SMA from below A major trend-repair test
Rejecting from the 200-day SMA Bears may still control the bigger structure

This does not mean Bitcoin automatically becomes bullish the moment it touches the 200-day SMA. It means the market starts paying closer attention.

Why not use a 157-day SMA instead?

A 157-day SMA might look good on a backtest. It might even fit Bitcoin perfectly for a few months. But it does not have the same market weight.

The 200-day SMA has a network effect.

That means it matters because so many people use it. Retail traders watch it. Fund managers watch it. Analysts talk about it. Financial media report on it. Trading systems often include it. Risk models may also reference it.

Advertisement

A 157-day SMA does not have that same crowd behind it. If Bitcoin touches a 157-day SMA, most of the market will not notice. There are probably fewer orders around it, fewer stops around it, and less emotional reaction around it.

But when Bitcoin tests the 200-day SMA, the market notices.

That is why Bitcoin can often pause, reverse, accelerate, or consolidate around this level. It is not because the line itself has power. It is because the market gives it power.

Why the Golden Cross and Death Cross still get attention

The 200-day SMA is also important because it is part of two of the most famous long-term trend signals:

Signal What it means
Golden Cross The 50-day SMA crosses above the 200-day SMA. This is usually viewed as a bullish macro signal.
Death Cross The 50-day SMA crosses below the 200-day SMA. This is usually viewed as a bearish macro signal.

These signals are not perfect. They can arrive late. They can also fail. But they still matter because they are widely followed and often reported by mainstream financial media.

Advertisement

In Bitcoin, these signals can influence sentiment, especially when they appear near major price levels, after a long correction, or during a broad risk-on move in tech and crypto.

What Bitcoin’s current 200-day SMA test means

Bitcoin is now testing the underside of its declining 200-day SMA. That makes this a major trend-repair moment.

A clean daily close above the 200-day SMA would not guarantee a new bull market, but it would send an important message: Bitcoin is trying to neutralize the broader downtrend. That could encourage more buyers to step in, especially if the breakout is supported by volume, stronger risk appetite, and follow-through in the next few sessions.

On the other hand, if Bitcoin fails at the 200-day SMA and rolls over, the market may read that as a sign that the bigger trend is still not fully repaired. In that case, traders may treat the move as another rally into resistance rather than a confirmed bullish shift.

For now, the key point is simple: Bitcoin is not just testing another moving average. It is testing one of the most watched macro trend lines in the market. That is why the reaction around this level matters

Advertisement

Today’s takeaway for Bitcoin investors and traders

Bitcoin’s positive session is not only about crypto. It is happening during a broader moment of aggressive risk appetite, with the Cerebras IPO showing how much capital is willing to chase AI and scarcity-driven growth stories.

The SpaceX angle is worth monitoring, but it should not be overstated. The confirmed connection is historical Bitcoin ownership. The speculative connection is that a future SpaceX IPO, especially one linked to Elon Musk, AI, Starlink, space infrastructure, and private-market scarcity, could strengthen the broader “Musk premium” across speculative assets.

For now, Bitcoin bulls want to see today’s strength hold into the close. A sustained hold above the current acceptance area would support the view that buyers are still in control. A failure to hold the day’s gains would suggest that the Cerebras-SpaceX-Bitcoin narrative is more of a sentiment spark than a durable driver.

Always do your own research and trade Bitcoin at your own risk only. The above is for educational purposes only.

Join our free investingLive Telegram channel for more market updates, trade ideas, and other gems: https://t.me/investingLiveStocks

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

ADI Foundation and Settlemint Launch ADGM Tokenization Rail for $30.9B RWAs

Published

on

ADI Foundation and Settlemint Launch ADGM Tokenization Rail for .9B RWAs

Integrated Infrastructure for Institutional Adoption

ADI Foundation and Settlemint announced a partnership on May 13 to launch a new digital securities infrastructure on the ADI Chain, aiming to streamline the tokenization of assets within the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) regulatory framework.

The collaboration integrates ADI Foundation’s compliance-ready Layer-2 blockchain with Settlemint’s digital asset lifecycle platform (DALP). The combined system is designed to handle the entire lifespan of a digital security, from initial token creation and on-chain recording to post-trade servicing and management.

The move addresses a primary hurdle for institutional investors: the difficulty of coordinating issuance, trading, settlement, and custody across fragmented jurisdictions. By providing an integrated architecture, the partners aim to offer a unified pathway for institutions to move traditional assets onto the blockchain.

“The future of investment and trading will not only be digitized, but also available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,” said Andrey Lazorenko, CEO of ADI Foundation. “Our partnership brings together market infrastructure, institutional-grade blockchain, and a digital asset lifecycle platform to tokenize equities and trade them on secondary platforms.”

According to a media statement, the platform utilizes Settlemint’s implementation of the ERC-3643 standard—a protocol specifically designed for security tokens to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. While the partnership is initially focusing on equity tokenization, the infrastructure is built to support a variety of other tokenized securities and financial instruments, pending regulatory approval.

The announcement comes as institutional interest in real-world assets ( RWAs) on-chain continues to accelerate. According to data from RWA.xyz, tokenized RWAs currently represent approximately $30.92 billion in on-chain value, with tokenized U.S. Treasuries accounting for roughly $15.20 billion of that total. Market analysts expect this trend to scale significantly. A 2026 analysis by BCG suggests the digital asset market could surge from $0.6 trillion in 2025 to $18.9 trillion by 2033.

Advertisement

Matthew Van Niekerk, co-founder and president of Settlemint, characterized the partnership as a “blueprint” for the broader financial industry.

“This partnership proves that regulated, multi-asset tokenization at national scale on public blockchains is not just feasible, but live,” Van Niekerk said. He added that the infrastructure is intended to be a model that central securities depositories (CSDs), exchanges, and clearing houses can adopt to integrate digital assets into existing operations.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending