Connect with us

Business

Trump Faces Blowback Over Plans for Crypto Reserve

Published

on

Trump Faces Blowback Over Plans for Crypto Reserve

Cryptocurrencies are again riding high, after President Trump announced that he would create a national crypto reserve with five tokens, including three lesser-known and highly volatile ones.

It’s the latest boost that Trump has given the crypto industry, which spent some $130 million backing him and other Republicans. But the news drew criticism from many, including conservatives and even ardent crypto backers, over many concerns: giveaways to an already wealthy community, delegitimizing the digital currency industry and more.

“I will make sure the U.S. is the Crypto Capital of the World,” Trump declared on his Truth Social network on Sunday in announcing the reserve, which would involve the federal government stockpiling five tokens: two well-established ones (Bitcoin and ether) and three newer and more thinly traded ones (XRP, solana and cardano).

Proponents say a reserve would help taxpayers benefit from crypto’s price growth. It’s still not clear how such a reserve would work or when it would be introduced, though a Republican-authored bill in the Senate would direct the government to buy one million Bitcoins — worth about $92.6 billion at today’s prices — over five years.

The plan is music to the ears of many in the crypto industry, who have already benefited significantly from Trump moves like picking regulators who will go easier on digital currencies. The price of Bitcoin alone has jumped 36 percent since the election in November.

Advertisement

Critics of all political stripes decried the move. Some Republicans raised questions about spending taxpayer money on risky assets instead of paying down the national debt. Joe Lonsdale, a friend of Elon Musk’s, wrote on X: “It’s wrong to steal my money for grift on the left; it’s also wrong to tax me for crypto bro schemes.”

Some protested the seeming latest conflict of interest involving Trump and crypto, noting that Trump profited from promoting the so-called memecoin $Trump before his inauguration. (The S.E.C. last week said memecoins wouldn’t be subject to regulatory oversight.) “This is getting egregious,” the software developer Nikita Bier replied to Lonsdale’s post. “Every 2 weeks there is a kickback to the family. Completely delegitimizes all the work DOGE is doing.”

Others questioned whether David Sacks, the investor who is Trump’s crypto czar, also stands to benefit from such a reserve. Sacks wrote on X that he had sold his cryptocurrency holdings, but didn’t address any holdings his investment firm has in crypto start-ups. Sacks will chair a first-of-its kind crypto White House summit on Friday intended to discuss ways to spur innovation and growth in the sector.

This poses a longer-term question. Judging by Sunday’s rally in crypto assets, this could vastly benefit crypto investors, who showed that they’re willing to inject huge sums into politics. Could such an explicitly beneficial policy for crypto give them even more ammunition to influence future elections, further reshaping government in their favor?

Consulting firms lobby Washington to save their contracts. Ernst & Young and Booz Allen are among those trying to persuade the Trump administration not to ditch their work agreements, The Wall Street Journal reports. Meanwhile, a new CBS News poll shows Americans are split on whether the so-called U.S. DOGE Service is good; The Times found more errors with DOGE’s contract-cutting math; and President Trump appears to be cautious about cutting Medicaid.

Advertisement

Andrew Cuomo officially enters the New York mayoral race. The former governor, who left Albany in 2021 amid sexual harassment charges, has already picked up two union endorsements and emerged as the new front-runner to unseat Mayor Eric Adams. Cuomo has vowed to crack the city’s homeless problem, and rebuild its police department, but steered clear of mentioning Adams or Trump.

“Anora” scores big at the Oscars. The film took home five Academy Awards, including best picture, director, actress and original screenplay. It has pulled in just $41 million globally, one of the lowest grossing films ever to win best picture, but it illustrated how smaller distributors like Neon, which released the movie, and A24, which was behind “The Brutalist,” outshined bigger studios in awards this year.

European defense stocks are rallying on Monday, along with the euro, after the region’s leaders vowed to take on “the heavy lifting” of defending Ukraine from Russia. It’s the latest development in the three-year-old war after Friday’s Oval Office blowup put President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine on the outs with President Trump.

But behind the investor enthusiasm lies the question: Can Europe, facing high debt loads, chronically low growth and looming tariffs imposed by Trump, afford more military spending?

Ending the Russia-Ukraine war carries a high cost. Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain rolled out a four-point plan this weekend at a gathering of European leaders and Zelensky.

Advertisement

It includes an Anglo-French “coalition of the willing” to defend any eventual deal for Ukraine, which could mean “boots on the ground and planes in the air.” Britain also lent £2.26 billion ($2.86 billion) to Ukraine to help bolster its military forces.

Even before the summit, credit agencies had warned about Europe’s finances. For example, increasing NATO members’ defense spending to 3 percent of G.D.P. — which is still short of the 5 percent that Trump wants — could force European governments to make unpopular spending cuts that weaken social safety nets, Fitch Ratings has warned.

Other political options include loosening fiscal rules to allow for greater defense, rerouting unspent NextGenerationEU funds to military buildup and or raising taxes.

Borrowing would carry a hefty cost, too. European bond yields ticked higher on Monday, a sign that investors were growing worried about potential growth in public spending. Analysts are divided on whether such commitments could muddle the European Central Bank’s plans to cut interest rates; the central bank meets later this week.

The stakes are huge. Failure to help Ukraine could eventually push European nations into accepting a deal that favors President Vladimir Putin of Russia. That could test E.U. cohesion, analysts say — but might be welcomed by those interested in seeing a divided Europe.

Advertisement

“Trump, Putin (and possibly Elon Musk?) all seem to dislike the European Union,” Holger Schmieding, an economist at the German bank Berenberg, wrote in a research note this on Monday. “They would prefer to deal one-by-one with a panoply of minnows and middling countries than with a union that represents the second biggest market in the world.”


In recent years, SoftBank of Japan had sought to make its Vision Fund unit — home to three large financial vehicles that defined a once-heady era of tech investing — more conservative.

But the desire of Masa Son, SoftBank’s C.E.O., to become a lead investor in the artificial intelligence race is driving the company to spend heavily again, and raises questions about how the Vision Funds fit into that vision.

The funds’ C.E.O., Alex Clavel, gave DealBook’s Michael de la Merced his first interview since assuming sole leadership of the unit in January about that, and more.

The new vision: The funds, which gained notoriety for pouring hundreds of millions into companies like WeWork and the robot-aided-pizza-maker Zume, are now meant to make minority investments in start-ups where someone else is in control, Clavel said. (SoftBank’s $3.5 billion investment in OpenAI is part of Vision Fund 2.)

Advertisement

How the Vision Funds are doing: The division reported a nearly 310 billion yen ($2 billion) loss in the fourth quarter, as the paper value of holdings like the e-commerce company Coupang fell. But Clavel noted that the division over all grew last year, with its fair value rising by $5 billion and distributing about $66 billion via I.P.O.s and other cash-out events.

A survey of the Vision Funds’ hundreds of portfolio companies, whose results were shared first with DealBook, found that many of their C.E.O.s were:

  • more optimistic about the economy and their businesses’ prospects compared with a year ago — though they’re also feeling more stressed;

  • worried about inflation, high interest rates and ongoing market volatility;

  • and focused on organic growth, but also on conserving cash and stabilizing their companies.

The A.I. factor: A majority of Vision Fund portfolio company C.E.O.s are using the technology in their core products, a reflection of the overall focus of SoftBank on becoming a leader in the field. “We do see A.I. as a secular trend, a revolution,” Clavel told DealBook.

That has meant investing in prominent A.I. companies like OpenAI and the data intelligence provider Databricks at increasingly soaring valuations. (The Databricks C.E.O., Ali Ghodsi, told DealBook that “we’re at peak bubble territory for A.I.”)

Clavel acknowledged that “valuing world-beating companies in revolutionary times is not an easy thing to pinpoint.” But, he added, paying up big was the cost of entry. “We’re really convinced that this is a revolution,” he added.

Advertisement

What’s next: The Vision Funds are betting that it will become easier to take companies public this year, allowing the SoftBank funds to start selling their holdings and locking in gains. “We’re looking forward to the I.P.O. market opening back up,” Clavel said.

One thing not to expect anytime soon, he added, was outside investors returning to the Vision Funds. (While the first Vision Fund counted Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi as investors, the second Vision Fund is all SoftBank money.) “We don’t have any plans to do that,” Clavel said, noting that SoftBank itself has added money to Vision Fund 2 when required.


A major presidential address, jobs, and tariffs — here’s what’s in focus this week.

Tomorrow: President Trump will address Congress, outlining his policy agenda. His administration’s tariffs against Canada, Mexico and China are scheduled to go into force hours earlier. Stocks in Europe and Asia on Monday are mostly higher after Howard Lutnick, the U.S. commerce secretary, suggested on Sunday that the levies could be lower than expected, reviving hopes that Trump’s trade war threats aren’t set in stone.

Wednesday: The Fed’s “beige book” survey of regional economic activity is scheduled to be published.

Advertisement

Friday: It’s jobs day. Despite the deep Elon Musk-led cuts within the federal government, economists forecast that employers added about 160,000 jobs in February. Inflation hawks will closely watch data on wages.

Deals

Artificial intelligence

Best of the rest

We’d like your feedback! Please email thoughts and suggestions to dealbook@nytimes.com.

Advertisement

Business

Another tech company says it will cut hundreds of jobs amid pivot to AI

Published

on

Another tech company says it will cut hundreds of jobs amid pivot to AI

Layoffs have continued with another tech company saying it was cutting people to enable it to use more artificial intelligence.

Groupon announced in a security filing this month that it will cut up to 400 jobs, or nearly 25% of its worldwide workforce, as part of a broader restructuring plan to make the platform AI-native. The Chicago company plans to carry out the layoffs in the coming months.

Earlier the company’s Chief Executive Officer Dušan Šenkypl had said the company “fell short of our expectations” last quarter.

Since 2022, more than 800,000 tech workers have been laid off, according to Layoffs.fyi, a website that tracks job cuts.

The surge in pink slips started in 2023, when companies that had gone on hiring sprees during the COVID-19 pandemic began to cut back. From January to April this year, U.S. tech employers announced 85,411 job cuts, up 33% from the same period last year, according to global outplacement and executive coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

Advertisement

Groupon said in the filing that the decision to shift toward an AI-based company is to “better deliver on our mission, serving both customers and merchants.”

The company said the layoffs will cost it as much as $13 million, but save it more than $20 million per year.

This announcement comes as many e-commerce companies are shifting their business models to AI to reduce costs by automating many roles.

Artificial intelligence has also triggered fierce competition for top talent and is also fueling tens of thousands of layoffs this year. The result is that the class divide is widening in Silicon Valley as a tiny group of employees are landing unprecedented packages for AI skills, while many others struggle to find work.

The have-nots are doing everything that used to guarantee great jobs — refreshing resumes, optimizing LinkedIn profiles and doing interviews — but companies are much more picky these days. The tech jobless are rethinking their lives. Some are taking pay cuts, while others are leaving tech. Some are going back to study or launch startups. Some have retired.

Advertisement

Groupon shares, which have fallen 27% over the last 12 months, slipped 1% on Thursday to $21.20.

Continue Reading

Business

ABC files applications ‘under protest’ for early renewal of TV station licenses

Published

on

ABC files applications ‘under protest’ for early renewal of TV station licenses

Walt Disney Co.’s ABC has filed renewal applications with the Federal Communications Commission “under protest” after an order mandating a years-early review of the network’s eight television station licenses.

The criticism was part of the network’s applications for the FCC review, which were filed ahead of a deadline Thursday. In an objection to the early renewal, Disney’s New York station WABC called the FCC order “unlawful, arbitrary and unconstitutional” and said it was “legally indefensible.”

“The Commission had not demanded early renewal in over five decades,” the station wrote in its filing. “And it has never before demanded simultaneous license renewal applications from a group of stations commonly owned with a network as it has here. The order has no legitimate purpose.”

The licenses for the eight ABC-owned TV stations, including KABC in Los Angeles, were originally scheduled for renewal between 2028 and 2031.

Advertisement

The FCC order came shortly after ABC late-night host Jimmy Kimmel made a joke about First Lady Melania Trump looking like an “expectant widow” days before a gunman tried to breach the White House Correspondents’ Assn. gala last month that President Trump attended.

Trump has frequently threatened to have TV station licenses pulled when he is unhappy with their coverage, but the order is the first time the government has acted on his wishes, sparking anger from free speech advocates. The FCC has said the order is part of an investigation into whether Disney’s diversity and inclusion policies violate federal law and the agency’s rules against “unlawful discrimination.”

In its response, WABC said the “only plausible reason” to issue the order was to “punish the station for speech the government does not like.”

“The ultimate injury here is not to the station or its parent company. It is to the public,” WABC wrote. “When a broadcaster must weigh regulatory retaliation before making editorial decisions, the public loses access to journalism that is free from government influence.”

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said in a statement Thursday that Disney filed its applications to renew its broadcast licenses only after the company was told its previous answers were “disingenuous, deficient and improper.”

Advertisement

“Contrary to Disney’s claim that the FCC called in their broadcast licenses for early renewal for no reason, the record shows something very different,” Carr said. “Broadcast licensees have a unique obligation to operate in the public interest. The FCC will follow the facts and law wherever they may lead.”

FCC Commissioner Anna M. Gomez, the panel’s only Democrat who has backed Disney in its fight, cheered the Burbank media and entertainment company’s filing, saying in a post on X that she was “glad to see them expose the FCC’s actions as nothing more than naked political retribution and an unlawful assault on free speech and a free press.”

Times staff writer Meg James contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

The Google Insider Trading Case Hits Polymarket

Published

on

The Google Insider Trading Case Hits Polymarket

Andrew here. Warning: If you bet on prediction markets about things you could know about from your work, it may be insider trading. That’s the lesson from new charges against an employee of Google.

Also, Jamie Dimon is thinking about spending $20 billion on acquisitions; we go through some possible targets. And take our quiz about the U.F.C. fight scheduled to take place at the White House.

In the public’s view, prediction markets are a way to bet on the N.B.A. playoffs, the Texas Senate race or what Costco executives will say on their next earnings call.

They’re also often seen as a hive of insider trading, a view reinforced by charges filed on Wednesday against a Google employee who made more than $1 million on Polymarket. The case raises more questions about how these platforms are policed — and who should do the policing.

What happened: The Google employee, Michele Spagnuolo (who used the handle AlphaRaccoon), was accused of betting on what people were searching for on Google — wagers he was sure to win because he had access to internal search data.

Advertisement

“Spagnuolo correctly predicted virtually all of the outcomes on these positions,” the Commodity Futures Trading Commission wrote in its complaint.

A Google representative said in a statement that using confidential information for making these kinds of bets was “a serious breach of our policies.”

Spagnuolo isn’t the only person charged with insider trading on Polymarket. Federal prosecutors in Manhattan last month accused Master Sgt. Gannon Ken Van Dyke, a U.S. Special Forces soldier, of betting on the capture of Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela, an operation he participated in.

Insider trading is an increasing problem for prediction markets. Polymarket has faced significant scrutiny because its unregulated offshore platform has long made it easy to bet anonymously. (Kalshi, which is regulated in the U.S., has also suffered from insider trading.)

Polymarket has started clamping down on that practice, according to The Information — though some longtime users have chafed at those efforts. “Polymarket will go down the drain if they make KYC mandatory,” one user wrote on the company’s Discord discussion forum, referring to “know your customer” practices.

Advertisement

What are policymakers doing? Critics have accused the C.F.T.C., the primary American regulator of prediction markets, of failing to adequately police the industry. (Mike Selig, the commission’s chairman, told ABC News that his agency actively patrolled for wrongdoing.)

Some lawmakers are seeking to crack down on insider trading, including Representative James Comer, the Kentucky Republican who leads the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and several bipartisan groups of senators.

Why it matters: Prediction markets have become big businesses. (Kalshi was most recently valued at $22 billion.) But a growing perception that they’re rife with cheating could threaten their popularity.

The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to fund U.S. drone companies. Shares in Unusual Machines, a drone start-up in which Donald Trump Jr. is an investor and advisory board member, are soaring in premarket trading after The Wall Street Journal, citing unnamed sources, reported on the potential investments. (The Times hasn’t independently confirmed the report.) The deals, aimed at bolstering domestic production, are still in the negotiation stage — equity stakes are a possibility — as the Pentagon vets the companies, The Journal adds.

Investors brace for Thursday’s inflation data. The Personal Consumption Expenditures report for April, which will be closely watched by the Fed, is expected to show on Thursday that headline inflation hit a three-year high of 3.9 percent. The wartime energy spike is a big culprit, and that’s likely to tie the Fed’s hands on interest rates. Lisa Cook, a Fed governor whom President Trump has tried to fire, is the latest policymaker to say that there’s even a rate increase in the cards.

Advertisement

Jensen Huang reportedly agrees to join the board of a Chinese university. Huang, the Nvidia C.E.O., is expected to be the latest U.S. business leader to join the advisory board of Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management, The Financial Times reports. Tim Cook, Apple’s departing C.E.O., is the chairman, and Michael Dell and Elon Musk are members. (Nvidia is trying to jump-start business in China as the Washington-Beijing trade war continues.) Laura Loomer, a right-wing agitator, quickly seized on the Huang news, calling it “a massive scandal!!!!” on social media, and a national security risk.

Jamie Dimon, the C.E.O. of JPMorgan Chase, is sitting on a pile of cash and says he’s open to a deal. He even put a number on it: up to $20 billion.

While that’s not a big sum relative to the bank’s assets, it got us thinking: Where could JPMorgan, whose last major acquisition was First Republic during the 2023 regional-banking crisis, go fishing for a company to buy? Brian O’Keefe asked Mike Mayo, a banking analyst at Wells Fargo.

Here are three possibilities:

Wealth management. Driven by solid margins and lucrative high-net-worth customers, this area of finance has experienced an M.&A. boom in recent years. (The First Republic deal already bolstered JPMorgan’s wealth-advisory ranks.) Such a move would tick a lot of boxes, Mayo said, adding, “It could be a high-end private bank, it could be kind of a mass-affluent brokerage firm, it could be wealth advisory.”

Advertisement
  • Mary Erdoes, who runs JPMorgan’s wealth management division, told analysts in February that her unit had reviewed 25 potential deals last year and passed on all of them.

Payments. JPMorgan has invested heavily in new payment platforms, including in JPM Coin, a digital token it has tested with Coinbase and Mastercard. The bank handles between $5 trillion and $10 trillion in transactions daily, Mayo said. “There could be more opportunities to enhance the efficiency, the effectiveness, the timeliness or the geographic reach in the payments area,” he added.

Digital banking. Dimon recently singled out Revolut, the British banking app that is plotting expansion into the U.S., as an emerging competitive threat. “To the extent that an acquisition could help JPMorgan become the next Revolut outside the United States, that would seem to be attractive,” Mayo noted.

There are some big asterisks to consider. Because of its size, JPMorgan would most likely be barred from buying another U.S. lender on antitrust grounds. For that reason, Mayo thinks that a deal, if there is one, would probably happen abroad.

Dimon himself is being coy. The bank may have amassed ample capital for acquisitions, but “it’s not burning a hole in our pocket at all,” Dimon said on Wednesday at an investor conference. “If it sits there for a while, no problem,” he added.

Dimon did not suggest any potential targets on Wednesday.

Advertisement

Here are some guesses:

  • Aberdeen Group, Invesco or Julius Baer in wealth management?

  • Revolut is too big, but how about Wise or Toast in payments?

  • Or what about Monzo or Bunq, fintech banks that have grown rapidly in Europe?


Meta will begin charging customers for access to its A.I.-powered chatbot, a big change for a company best known for its free products — and the latest sign that even deep-pocketed companies are wrestling with the enormous cost of artificial intelligence.

On Wednesday, we looked at how companies were reining in the costs of consuming A.I., including by switching to cheaper models. Meta’s move shows that the companies supplying A.I. models are also reckoning with ballooning costs, and seeking revenue to make up for those losses.

Meta is spending a fortune on A.I. Last month the company increased its 2026 capital expenditure forecast to as high as $145 billion, and Meta’s C.E.O., Mark Zuckerberg, said it would spend at least $600 billion on A.I. infrastructure in the next few years.

Some investors have looked skeptically on that plan. The company’s stock is down 2.3 percent this year.

Advertisement

Meta will use paid subscriptions to offset some of its A.I. investment. The basic tier of the chatbot, Meta One Plus, will be $7.99 per month. A premium version, Meta One Premium, will cost $19.99. From Bloomberg, which reported the subscription news earlier:

Meta has long argued that its A.I. investments are already paying off in the form of highly targeted and efficient advertising, which is improved thanks to A.I. models. But the company is also looking for other ways to recoup its A.I. spending, and consumer chatbot subscriptions have become popular with several other A.I. competitors, including Alphabet Inc.’s Google and OpenAI. Both rivals offer similarly priced subscription tiers.

The company has sought to expand its subscription business, testing plans for WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook. It has also tried to cut costs in other corners of its business. This month, Meta laid off 10 percent of its employee base, about 8,000 workers.

Investors, eager to see revenue gains from A.I., cheered Meta’s subscription-chatbot plan. The company’s stock price was up 3.7 percent at the market close on Wednesday.

  • Elsewhere, shares in the software maker Snowflake are soaring in premarket trading on Thursday after it reported strong quarterly results that suggested that A.I. agents weren’t clobbering its core subscription business. Salesforce’s analyst call on Wednesday, however, renewed fears that this sector was still vulnerable to A.I. disruption.

This question comes from a recent Times article. Click an answer to see if you’re right. (The link will be free.)

President Trump is getting ready to celebrate his 80th birthday — and America’s 250th — with an evening of mixed martial arts. Preparations are underway to host Ultimate Fighting Championship matches in an octagon on the White House’s South Lawn on June 14. Construction of the temporary arena, along with a 90-foot-tall arch known as “The Claw,” featuring LED lights and audio equipment, began this week.

Advertisement

U.F.C. plans to spend around $60 million on the event, said Mark Shapiro, the president and chief operating officer of TKO Group Holdings, U.F.C.’s parent company, on a recent earnings call. (He added that U.F.C. would lose about $30 million on the event but that it would be “an investment for the long term.”)

The expenses include about $700,000 to repair the lawn after the fight, Dana White, the U.F.C. president and chief executive, told Sports Business Journal.

How many people will the temporary arena hold for the U.F.C. event at the White House?

Deals

  • “SpaceX-Tesla Merger Is ‘Only a Matter of When,’ Early Investor Says” (Bloomberg)

  • Shares in the European food-delivery company Delivery Hero are down sharply on Thursday after Uber, which is pursuing a takeover bid for the company, raised its stake to nearly 37 percent. (WSJ)

Politics, policy and regulation

Advertisement
  • The attorneys general of New York and New Jersey subpoenaed FIFA over soaring World Cup ticket prices. (WSJ)

  • Gov. Gavin Newsom of California said he would impose a 100 percent tax on payouts to state residents from the $1.8 billion fund tied to the Justice Department’s settlement with President Trump. (Politico)

Best of the rest

We’d like your feedback! Please email thoughts and suggestions to dealbook@nytimes.com.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending