Connect with us

Business

Trump Faces Blowback Over Plans for Crypto Reserve

Published

on

Trump Faces Blowback Over Plans for Crypto Reserve

Cryptocurrencies are again riding high, after President Trump announced that he would create a national crypto reserve with five tokens, including three lesser-known and highly volatile ones.

It’s the latest boost that Trump has given the crypto industry, which spent some $130 million backing him and other Republicans. But the news drew criticism from many, including conservatives and even ardent crypto backers, over many concerns: giveaways to an already wealthy community, delegitimizing the digital currency industry and more.

“I will make sure the U.S. is the Crypto Capital of the World,” Trump declared on his Truth Social network on Sunday in announcing the reserve, which would involve the federal government stockpiling five tokens: two well-established ones (Bitcoin and ether) and three newer and more thinly traded ones (XRP, solana and cardano).

Proponents say a reserve would help taxpayers benefit from crypto’s price growth. It’s still not clear how such a reserve would work or when it would be introduced, though a Republican-authored bill in the Senate would direct the government to buy one million Bitcoins — worth about $92.6 billion at today’s prices — over five years.

The plan is music to the ears of many in the crypto industry, who have already benefited significantly from Trump moves like picking regulators who will go easier on digital currencies. The price of Bitcoin alone has jumped 36 percent since the election in November.

Advertisement

Critics of all political stripes decried the move. Some Republicans raised questions about spending taxpayer money on risky assets instead of paying down the national debt. Joe Lonsdale, a friend of Elon Musk’s, wrote on X: “It’s wrong to steal my money for grift on the left; it’s also wrong to tax me for crypto bro schemes.”

Some protested the seeming latest conflict of interest involving Trump and crypto, noting that Trump profited from promoting the so-called memecoin $Trump before his inauguration. (The S.E.C. last week said memecoins wouldn’t be subject to regulatory oversight.) “This is getting egregious,” the software developer Nikita Bier replied to Lonsdale’s post. “Every 2 weeks there is a kickback to the family. Completely delegitimizes all the work DOGE is doing.”

Others questioned whether David Sacks, the investor who is Trump’s crypto czar, also stands to benefit from such a reserve. Sacks wrote on X that he had sold his cryptocurrency holdings, but didn’t address any holdings his investment firm has in crypto start-ups. Sacks will chair a first-of-its kind crypto White House summit on Friday intended to discuss ways to spur innovation and growth in the sector.

This poses a longer-term question. Judging by Sunday’s rally in crypto assets, this could vastly benefit crypto investors, who showed that they’re willing to inject huge sums into politics. Could such an explicitly beneficial policy for crypto give them even more ammunition to influence future elections, further reshaping government in their favor?

Consulting firms lobby Washington to save their contracts. Ernst & Young and Booz Allen are among those trying to persuade the Trump administration not to ditch their work agreements, The Wall Street Journal reports. Meanwhile, a new CBS News poll shows Americans are split on whether the so-called U.S. DOGE Service is good; The Times found more errors with DOGE’s contract-cutting math; and President Trump appears to be cautious about cutting Medicaid.

Advertisement

Andrew Cuomo officially enters the New York mayoral race. The former governor, who left Albany in 2021 amid sexual harassment charges, has already picked up two union endorsements and emerged as the new front-runner to unseat Mayor Eric Adams. Cuomo has vowed to crack the city’s homeless problem, and rebuild its police department, but steered clear of mentioning Adams or Trump.

“Anora” scores big at the Oscars. The film took home five Academy Awards, including best picture, director, actress and original screenplay. It has pulled in just $41 million globally, one of the lowest grossing films ever to win best picture, but it illustrated how smaller distributors like Neon, which released the movie, and A24, which was behind “The Brutalist,” outshined bigger studios in awards this year.

European defense stocks are rallying on Monday, along with the euro, after the region’s leaders vowed to take on “the heavy lifting” of defending Ukraine from Russia. It’s the latest development in the three-year-old war after Friday’s Oval Office blowup put President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine on the outs with President Trump.

But behind the investor enthusiasm lies the question: Can Europe, facing high debt loads, chronically low growth and looming tariffs imposed by Trump, afford more military spending?

Ending the Russia-Ukraine war carries a high cost. Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain rolled out a four-point plan this weekend at a gathering of European leaders and Zelensky.

Advertisement

It includes an Anglo-French “coalition of the willing” to defend any eventual deal for Ukraine, which could mean “boots on the ground and planes in the air.” Britain also lent £2.26 billion ($2.86 billion) to Ukraine to help bolster its military forces.

Even before the summit, credit agencies had warned about Europe’s finances. For example, increasing NATO members’ defense spending to 3 percent of G.D.P. — which is still short of the 5 percent that Trump wants — could force European governments to make unpopular spending cuts that weaken social safety nets, Fitch Ratings has warned.

Other political options include loosening fiscal rules to allow for greater defense, rerouting unspent NextGenerationEU funds to military buildup and or raising taxes.

Borrowing would carry a hefty cost, too. European bond yields ticked higher on Monday, a sign that investors were growing worried about potential growth in public spending. Analysts are divided on whether such commitments could muddle the European Central Bank’s plans to cut interest rates; the central bank meets later this week.

The stakes are huge. Failure to help Ukraine could eventually push European nations into accepting a deal that favors President Vladimir Putin of Russia. That could test E.U. cohesion, analysts say — but might be welcomed by those interested in seeing a divided Europe.

Advertisement

“Trump, Putin (and possibly Elon Musk?) all seem to dislike the European Union,” Holger Schmieding, an economist at the German bank Berenberg, wrote in a research note this on Monday. “They would prefer to deal one-by-one with a panoply of minnows and middling countries than with a union that represents the second biggest market in the world.”


In recent years, SoftBank of Japan had sought to make its Vision Fund unit — home to three large financial vehicles that defined a once-heady era of tech investing — more conservative.

But the desire of Masa Son, SoftBank’s C.E.O., to become a lead investor in the artificial intelligence race is driving the company to spend heavily again, and raises questions about how the Vision Funds fit into that vision.

The funds’ C.E.O., Alex Clavel, gave DealBook’s Michael de la Merced his first interview since assuming sole leadership of the unit in January about that, and more.

The new vision: The funds, which gained notoriety for pouring hundreds of millions into companies like WeWork and the robot-aided-pizza-maker Zume, are now meant to make minority investments in start-ups where someone else is in control, Clavel said. (SoftBank’s $3.5 billion investment in OpenAI is part of Vision Fund 2.)

Advertisement

How the Vision Funds are doing: The division reported a nearly 310 billion yen ($2 billion) loss in the fourth quarter, as the paper value of holdings like the e-commerce company Coupang fell. But Clavel noted that the division over all grew last year, with its fair value rising by $5 billion and distributing about $66 billion via I.P.O.s and other cash-out events.

A survey of the Vision Funds’ hundreds of portfolio companies, whose results were shared first with DealBook, found that many of their C.E.O.s were:

  • more optimistic about the economy and their businesses’ prospects compared with a year ago — though they’re also feeling more stressed;

  • worried about inflation, high interest rates and ongoing market volatility;

  • and focused on organic growth, but also on conserving cash and stabilizing their companies.

The A.I. factor: A majority of Vision Fund portfolio company C.E.O.s are using the technology in their core products, a reflection of the overall focus of SoftBank on becoming a leader in the field. “We do see A.I. as a secular trend, a revolution,” Clavel told DealBook.

That has meant investing in prominent A.I. companies like OpenAI and the data intelligence provider Databricks at increasingly soaring valuations. (The Databricks C.E.O., Ali Ghodsi, told DealBook that “we’re at peak bubble territory for A.I.”)

Clavel acknowledged that “valuing world-beating companies in revolutionary times is not an easy thing to pinpoint.” But, he added, paying up big was the cost of entry. “We’re really convinced that this is a revolution,” he added.

Advertisement

What’s next: The Vision Funds are betting that it will become easier to take companies public this year, allowing the SoftBank funds to start selling their holdings and locking in gains. “We’re looking forward to the I.P.O. market opening back up,” Clavel said.

One thing not to expect anytime soon, he added, was outside investors returning to the Vision Funds. (While the first Vision Fund counted Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi as investors, the second Vision Fund is all SoftBank money.) “We don’t have any plans to do that,” Clavel said, noting that SoftBank itself has added money to Vision Fund 2 when required.


A major presidential address, jobs, and tariffs — here’s what’s in focus this week.

Tomorrow: President Trump will address Congress, outlining his policy agenda. His administration’s tariffs against Canada, Mexico and China are scheduled to go into force hours earlier. Stocks in Europe and Asia on Monday are mostly higher after Howard Lutnick, the U.S. commerce secretary, suggested on Sunday that the levies could be lower than expected, reviving hopes that Trump’s trade war threats aren’t set in stone.

Wednesday: The Fed’s “beige book” survey of regional economic activity is scheduled to be published.

Advertisement

Friday: It’s jobs day. Despite the deep Elon Musk-led cuts within the federal government, economists forecast that employers added about 160,000 jobs in February. Inflation hawks will closely watch data on wages.

Deals

Artificial intelligence

Best of the rest

We’d like your feedback! Please email thoughts and suggestions to dealbook@nytimes.com.

Advertisement

Business

Disney’s ABC challenges FCC, escalating fight over free speech

Published

on

Disney’s ABC challenges FCC, escalating fight over free speech

Walt Disney Co.’s ABC is forcefully resisting Federal Communications Commission efforts to soften the network’s programming, accusing the federal agency of an overreach that violates 1st Amendment freedoms.

Last week, the FCC took the unusual step of calling in the licenses of eight Disney-owned television stations for early review. The move — widely interpreted as an effort to chill the network’s speech — came a day after President Trump demanded that ABC fire late-night host Jimmy Kimmel over a joke about First Lady Melania Trump.

The FCC separately has taken aim at ABC’s daytime discussion show, “The View,” which delves deeply into politics.

The FCC has questioned whether the show, which prominently features Trump critics Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar, could continue toclaim an exemption to rules that require broadcasters to provide equal time for opponents of political candidates.

In its response this week to the FCC, Disney’s Houston television station raised the stakes in “The View” dispute, calling the commission’s actions “unprecedented” and “beyond the Commission’s authority.” The ABC station’s petition for a declaratory ruling said “The View,” has long qualified as a “bona fide” news interview program with freedom to conduct interviews of legally qualified political candidates.

Advertisement

“The Commission’s actions threaten to upend decades of settled law and practice and chill critical protected speech, both with respect to The View and more broadly,” the Houston station KTRK-TV said in the filing.

The network’s firm stance sets up a clash with the Trump administration, including the president’s hand-picked FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, who has made no secret of his disdain for Kimmel and other ABC programming. Earlier this year, Carr announced that decades-old exemptions from the so-called “equal time rule,” for some programs, including “The View,” were no longer valid.

In a statement, the FCC said it would “review Disney’s assertion that ‘The View’ is a ‘bona fide news program’ and thus exempt from the political equal time rules,” according to a spokesperson.

“Decades ago, Congress passed a law that generally prohibits broadcast television programs from putting a thumb on the scale in favor of one political candidate over another,” the spokesperson said. “The equal time law encourages more speech and empowers voters to decide the outcome of elections.”

ABC’s strenuous arguments mark a turning point for the Disney-owned outlet.

Advertisement

In December 2024, a month after Trump was elected to a second term, the network quickly settled a lawsuit over statements made by news anchor George Stephanopoulos that Trump found offensive. ABC agreed to pay Trump $15 million to end his legal fight — sparking an outcry among free speech advocates, who accused the network of caving on a case it may have won.

But, over the past year, the network has weathered several storms, including a threat by Carr in September to punish ABC if it didn’t muzzle Kimmel for comments he made in the wake of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s death. ABC briefly benched Kimmel to allow tensions to cool but, during the week his show was off the air, protesters loudly bashed Disney, demanding the legendary company stand up for free speech.

Thousands of consumers canceled their Disney+ and Hulu subscriptions in protest.

Protesters swarmed Hollywood Boulevard, protesting ABC’s move to bench Jimmy Kimmel in September over comments he made about the shooting of right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk.

(Genaro Molina/Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Some conservatives, including Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and commentator Ben Shapiro also criticized Carr’s handling of 1st Amendment issues.

“The days of the FCC as a paper tiger are numbered,” the FCC’s lone Democrat, Anna M. Gomez, said Friday in a statement. “What the public will remember is who complied in advance and who fought back. I’m glad Disney is choosing courage over capitulation.”

The high-profile dispute presents an early challenge for Disney Chief Executive Josh D’Amaro, who succeeded longtime chief Bob Iger in March.

ABC has asked for the full commission — a three member panel of Carr, Gomez and Commissioner Olivia Trusty, a Republican — to rule on the equal time exemption for “The View.” ABC said that, in 2002, it received a ruling from the FCC that granted the exemption, and the show’s format has not changed. “The View” is produced by ABC News.

Advertisement

“Some may dislike certain — or even most — of the viewpoints expressed on The View or similar shows,” the station said in its filing. “Such dislike, however, cannot justify using regulatory processes to restrict those views.”

ABC described a logistical nightmare of providing equal time for political opponents by pointing to California’s crowded primary field of gubernatorial candidates. “Affording equal time would mean accommodating over 60 legally qualified candidates, regardless of their perceived newsworthiness,” the station wrote.

The network said it makes show bookings based on newsworthiness, not partisan politics. It also noted it has invited politicians from both sides of the aisle to appear on “The View,” but some, including Vice President J.D. Vance, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of State Marco Rubio and entrepreneur Elon Musk, have declined the invitation.

The station also noted that, while the FCC has questioned the exemption for “The View,” the agency hasn’t shown interest in regulating programs on other networks, “including the many voices — conservative and liberal — on broadcast radio.” The FCC also oversees radio station licenses.

“The danger is that the government will simply decide which perspectives to regulate and which to leave undisturbed,” ABC said.

Advertisement

On April 28, Carr called for a review of Disney’s broadcast licenses, including for the Houston station and KABC-TV in Los Angeles, two years before any of them were set to expire. The FCC said the review was part of the agency’s year-old inquiry into Disney’s diversity, equity and inclusion policies and whether they violated federal anti-discrimination rules.

In its Thursday petition, ABC said it had fully complied with the FCC’s request for documents related to its diversity and hiring.

The company has produced more than 11,000 pages of documents to comply with the request, Disney said.

The same week that Disney sent documents to the FCC, Kimmel made a joke on his show about Melania Trump, comparing her glow to that of “an expectant widow.” On April 25, a gunman tried to breach security at the Washington Hilton, where the first couple were on stage for the White House Correspondents’ Assn. Dinner. Shots were fired outside the ballroom.

Three days later, the FCC announced it was requiring early license renewal applications for the Disney-owned stations.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

U.S. Targets Iran’s Missile and Drone Program With Sanctions

Published

on

U.S. Targets Iran’s Missile and Drone Program With Sanctions

The United States on Friday announced a flurry of new sanctions intended to increase pressure on Iran’s economy, targeting people and companies in China and Hong Kong that have been helping the Iranian military gain access to supplies and war equipment.

The sanctions came ahead of a major summit between President Trump and China’s leader, Xi Jinping, in Beijing next week. China’s support for Iran has become a flashpoint with the Trump administration, which has been trying to compel independent Chinese refineries to stop purchasing Iranian oil.

China is Iran’s biggest buyer of oil, and the Trump administration has said that it is sponsoring terrorism by propping up the Iranian economy.

The new sanctions are aimed at Iran’s military industrial supply chain, and are intended to make it harder for Iran to secure access to the material it needs to build drones and missiles. In addition to China, the sanctions also target people and companies based in Belarus and the United Arab Emirates.

“Under President Trump’s decisive leadership, we will continue to act to keep America safe and target foreign individuals and companies providing Iran’s military with weapons for use against U.S. forces,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement.

Advertisement

The Trump administration has been looking for ways to squeeze Iran’s economy and pressure the Iranian government to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a conduit for the flow of global oil. Oil tankers have had sporadic access to the critical waterway since the war started earlier this year, and the United States and Iran have been fighting over who should control it.

U.S. warships that have been trying to transit the strait have been attacked by Iranian forces. The United States on Friday fired on and disabled two Iranian-flagged oil tankers as they tried to reach an Iranian port.

The Treasury Department has also imposed sanctions on the Chinese “teapot” refineries this month. The independent refineries are major purchasers of Iranian oil. But China invoked a domestic policy ordering its companies to disregard the sanctions.

Mr. Bessent said earlier this week that he expected Mr. Trump to urge Mr. Xi to use the country’s leverage over Iran to pressure it to allow oil cargo to travel.

“Let’s see if China — let’s see them step up with some diplomacy and get the Iranians to open the strait,” Mr. Bessent told Fox News on Monday.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

General Motors to pay $12.5 million to settle claims that it illegally sold California driver data

Published

on

General Motors to pay .5 million to settle claims that it illegally sold California driver data

General Motors has agreed to pay $12.5 million dollars to settle claims that the automaker illegally sold location and driving data of hundreds of thousands of Californians, state officials said Friday.

The settlement is an example of how automakers are facing more scrutiny over allegations that they share driver data with the insurance industry, influencing how much people pay for coverage. California, though, has a law that bars insurers from using driving data to set rates.

“If we get word that a company is illegally collecting, storing or selling consumer data, we won’t hesitate to look under the hood and hold them accountable to the law,” California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said in a news conference.

The settlement is the largest California Consumer Privacy Act penalty in the state’s history, Bonta said.

The act gives California consumers the right to request that businesses disclose what data they collect. They can also opt out of the sharing or sale of their personal information and request that businesses delete their data.

Advertisement

Investigators found that from 2020 to 2024, GM sold driver data, including names, contact information, location data and driving behavior data, to data brokers Verisk Analytics Inc. and LexisNexis Risk Solutions. The data came from a driver’s use of OnStar, which is owned by GM and provides roadside assistance, navigation and other services.

GM said the agreement addresses a product called OnStar Smart Driver that the company discontinued in 2024. The product was meant to help improve people’s driving but faced privacy concerns from consumers. In 2024, GM also ended its partnership with the two data brokers and said it would enhance privacy controls.

“Vehicle connectivity is central to a modern and safe driving experience, which is why we’re committed to being clear and transparent with our customers about our practices and the choices and control they have over their information,” a GM spokesperson said in a statement.

Various district attorneys throughout the state, including in Los Angeles and San Francisco, were involved in the investigation and settlement.

Technology has been playing a bigger role in the auto industry, but the data collected from drivers can reveal personal information about people’s daily habits, including where they drop off their kids and doctor visits.

Advertisement

The California Privacy Protection Agency in 2023 started investigating the privacy practices of connected cars. As the state was looking into the automakers, the New York Times reported in 2024 that GM was sharing consumer driving behavior with insurance companies. Nationwide, GM reportedly made roughly $20 million from selling data to Verisk and LexisNexis.

The state’s privacy protection agency has taken action against other automakers before. Ford Motor Company was fined $375,703 in March and Honda was fined $632,500 in 2025 for privacy violations.

Under the GM settlement, which still needs court approval, the automaker would delete any driving data the company kept within 180 days and request that the two data brokers do the same. They would also stop selling driving data to consumer reporting agencies for five years and develop a privacy program that includes assessing and mitigating the risks of data collected from OnStar.

California’s settlement with GM came after the Federal Trade Commission in 2025 also took action against the automaker and OnStar for its privacy practices, barring them from disclosing location and driver behavior data to consumer reporting agencies for five years.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending