Judge refuses to strike down Elon Musk’s settlement with the S.E.C. over his Twitter posts.

Elon Musk might quickly personal Twitter, however his personal use of the platform will stay constrained by a 2018 settlement he signed with securities regulators.

A federal choose in New York denied a request by Mr. Musk to finish the settlement, which requires him to run his social media posts by an organization lawyer if the statements contained materials details about his electrical automobile firm, Tesla.

Mr. Musk had argued that the settlement to settle accusations of securities violations infringed on his proper to freedom of speech and that the Securities and Change Fee had used the settlement as an excuse to “launch infinite, boundless” investigations of his public statements. He claimed he accepted the settlement within the first place solely as a result of the litigation would have put an excessive amount of monetary strain on Tesla.

“Not one of the arguments maintain water,” Choose Lewis J. Liman of the U.S. District Court docket for the Southern District of New York wrote in a ruling issued Wednesday that dismissed Mr. Musk’s claims.

Mr. Musk’s assertion that he agreed to the S.E.C.’s circumstances due to the monetary burden was “wholly unpersuasive,” Choose Liman wrote. Mr. Musk, the choose mentioned, “was already a multibillionaire in 2018 and one of many wealthiest people on the planet.”

Alex Spiro, a lawyer on the agency Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan who represents Mr. Musk, advised that an attraction was possible.

“Nothing will ever change the reality, which is that Elon Musk was contemplating taking Tesla personal and will have — all that’s left some half decade later is remnant litigation which can proceed to make that fact clearer and clearer,” Mr. Spiro mentioned in an announcement, including, “Keep tuned.” He declined to remark additional.

The choice got here two days after Twitter’s board agreed to promote the corporate to Mr. Musk for $44 billion — a transaction that also has to win the approval of shareholders. He had beforehand criticized the social community of censoring free speech and has mentioned he thinks individuals ought to be allowed to talk extra freely on Twitter, which lately has sought to limit misinformation, hate speech and different problematic statements on its platform.

Tesla shareholders, who don’t get to vote on the Twitter acquisition, seem to not be in favor of Mr. Musk’s proposed acquisition. Tesla’s inventory worth has fallen 17 p.c for the reason that starting of April. The drop displays investor concern about Mr. Musk’s use of Tesla shares as collateral for financial institution loans and the danger that overseeing Twitter might distract him from the automobile enterprise.

The courtroom ruling was the newest spherical in Mr. Musk’s long-running battle with the S.E.C., an company he has incessantly mocked. The dispute at problem Wednesday has its roots in a Twitter put up by Mr. Musk in 2018 asserting he had “secured” sufficient cash to take Tesla personal. It was later revealed that he had solely had preliminary discussions with buyers. The S.E.C. sued him for fraud.

As a part of an settlement to settle that civil go well with, Mr. Musk agreed to clear his social media posts with firm legal professionals. Mr. Musk, infamous for his freewheeling public statements, clearly chafed on the restriction and was accused of violating it a number of occasions.

Mr. Musk can’t get out of the settlement “by merely bemoaning that he felt like he needed to comply with it on the time however now — as soon as the specter of the litigation is a distant reminiscence and his firm has grow to be, in his estimation, all however invincible — needs that he had not,” Choose Liman wrote.