Oregon
Farm groups oppose Oregon recycling fees with ‘no public oversight’ | Capital Press
Farm groups oppose Oregon recycling fees with ‘no public oversight’
Published 8:00 am Friday, June 12, 2026
Agriculture groups claim an Oregon program meant to increase recycling of product packaging is eating into farm profits and want state regulators to suspend its enforcement.
Lawmakers passed the state’s “Recycling Modernization Act” in 2021 but it only became effective last year and critics argue its implementation has been “lackluster.”
Certain growers and other product producers are required to raise money through fees to ensure their packaging materials are recycled under the program.
But the Oregon Farm Bureau and the Oregonians for Food and Shelter agribusiness group argue the fees are set by a “third-party entity” using a “confidential, proprietary methodology” with “no government accountability.”
“There’s no public oversight over who is getting charged how much, or what the overall budget should be,” said Katie Murray, executive director of Oregonians for Food and Shelter. “It’s not how our members should be paying into a regulatory program.”
A designated “producer responsibility organization” — the Circular Action Alliance nonprofit — sets the fee formula, which lacks transparency and doesn’t protect farmers from “arbitrary or unrecoverable costs,” according to the agriculture groups.
A representative of the Circular Action Alliance was not available for comment as of press time.
Farmers who pack their own crops, such as berries, are subject to the fees directly, but they also may end up paying more for inputs, such as pesticides, whose manufacturers are also subject to the fees, Murray said.
“Growers are going to get hit from multiple directions for multiple stacked-up fees from this program,” she said.
Proponents of the Recycling Modernization Act, which passed as Senate Bill 582 five years ago, argued that it’s an extension of the same approach that Oregon uses for recycling cans and bottles, which also initially faced resistance but has since been widely embraced.
“Polls show that our constituents support recycling and are not happy with the current status,” said former Sen. Lee Beyer, D-Springfield. “They don’t like the idea of their recycling going into the dump. This bill begins to address those concerns.”
The program’s opponents counter that farmers oftentimes already contribute to recycling efforts, such as with clamshell containers for berries that incorporate recycled materials, so the fees are duplicative of those efforts.
“The fees could exceed what the average berry farmer earns in a year, putting some farms at risk of closure and driving up food costs for Oregon families,” said Lauren Kuenzi, government and political affairs director for the Oregon Farm Bureau, during a legislative hearing earlier this year.
Farm groups asked lawmakers to exempt certain packaging for berries and meat from the fees earlier this year, which was opposed by the program’s supporters, who argued it would saddle other manufacturers with higher costs.
That proposed exemption, House Bill 4030, was approved by the House Climate, Energy and Environment Committee but ended up dying in the House Rules Committee earlier this year.
Meanwhile, the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors filed a lawsuit against the program last year and in February won an injunction blocking Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality from enforcing the program against its members.
A federal judge approved that preliminary injunction after finding the lawsuit raised “serious questions” about the merits of the plaintiff’s arguments and determining there’s a “likelihood of irreparable injury” from the program.
A five-day trial in the case is scheduled for July 13, so critics want Oregon regulators to “pause” its enforcement more broadly at least until the matter of the program’s legality is cleared up.
“Place the program on hold until the courts can make a ruling,” Murray said.
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — Nearly half of Oregon counties are now in emergency drought status as the state adds a high-tech tool to its firefighting arsenal.
The Oregon Department of Forestry says the new multi-mission aircraft could help crews find fires before they grow out of control.
The aircraft is packed with artificial intelligence, thermal imaging and night vision, and uses advanced mapping software to detect heat and track new fire starts.
When lightning strikes in remote parts of Oregon, officials say the race to find a fire begins immediately. The plane then flies in behind the storm, scanning the landscape for hot spots and early signs of fire.
“It’s a new tool in the toolbox to help us identify, detect and get firefighters to new fire starts around the state as quickly as possible,” said Kyle Williams, ODF’s deputy director of fire operations.
Williams said the aircraft can pick up heat from new fires even before flames are visible.
“And minutes matter. Seconds matter,” Williams said. “This plane is cutting those minutes and seconds down significantly.”
That information goes straight to crews on the ground, helping them prioritize the most dangerous fires.
Officials say rapid response is key to keeping new fires from spreading before they get out of control.
The aircraft replaces a plane that has been in service for more than 40 years and is part of a $13.23 million investment funded through state bonds and contributions from forest landowners.
Officials say the project has been in the works since 2018.
Fire officials add dry conditions are already developing in parts of the state, raising concerns about a challenging summer fire season.
“The fire starts that do happen are going to require rapid response,” Williams said. “This is going to help us with aggressive initial attack.”
Officials say the goal is simple — find fires fast, keep them small and protect Oregon communities before the next big fire takes off.
The Oregon Health Authority published new, stricter guidelines this week for scheduling youth sports and other outdoor activities when air quality gets unhealthy.
The agency says the change reflects “increasing scientific evidence” that smoke can harm children’s health at levels lower than previously thought.
The guidance is supposed to help youth-serving organizations, such as schools and athletic leagues, make decisions about participation in outdoor activities amid wildfire smoke and other air pollution events.
The guide relies on the Air Quality Index, the system by which health authorities assign a color—green, yellow, red and so on—to reflect smoke and air pollution at a given place and time.
Now, when the AQI arrives in the yellow (moderate) range, the OHA encourages caution for youth with health conditions participating in short-to-medium-duration activities. This replaced the former guideline which stated: “It’s a good day to be active outside.”
The agency made similar modifications to its “Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups”—or orange—range. On orange days, the OHA now advises all youth to limit activity intensity and consider canceling or moving the event if the intensity cannot be limited. This is a change from the previous guideline, which on orange days focused on participants with health conditions.
Lastly, the “Unhealthy,” or red, classification has been raised to follow the same guidelines as the “Very Unhealthy” and “Hazardous” categories, which now all recommend that outdoor activities be canceled.
Though Portland historically sees few days of air quality in the orange Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups range or worse (only about 3.3 days per year on average), OHA’s tightened guidelines could affect outdoor activities for participants under 18, particularly in the summer months.
Aside from the categorical changes, OHA has widened the range of a “medium-length activity” to be one to four hours, rather than one to two. The agency also added language to its guidelines emphasizing less obvious points of exposure to be aware of, such as walking to school or riding on school buses with the windows down.
“We fully recognize the importance of outdoor time and exercise for the physical and mental health of children and youth,” said Gabriela Goldfarb of OHA’s Public Health Division in a written statement. “We offer this guide to support adults making decisions that balance those needs with the reality that children are more likely to be affected by health threats from smoke, because their airways are still developing and because they breathe more air per pound of body weight than adults.”
Willamette Week’s reporting has real-life impact that changes laws, forces action by civic leaders, and drives compromised politicians from public office.
Support WW.
-
Connecticut59 seconds agoChildren’s miniature toys recalled in Connecticut due to lead hazard
-
Delaware4 minutes agoThird Circuit Dismisses Delaware Appeal in DHS Records Clash
-
Florida9 minutes agoLEGOLAND Florida shows out for the World Cup
-
Georgia16 minutes agoBest downtown in Georgia? WorldAtlas recommends visiting 8 small towns
-
Hawaii19 minutes agoEl Nino officially arrives — with warning – Hawaii Tribune-Herald
-
Idaho24 minutes agoIdaho Prepares to Make Firing Squad Primary Execution Method
-
Illinois31 minutes agoSevere storm is forecast in Illinois this weekend
-
Indiana34 minutes agoHigh school baseball matchups for semi-state weekend
