Connect with us

Ohio

Twisted logic means an Ohio domestic abuser can get his gun back | Opinion

Published

on

Twisted logic means an Ohio domestic abuser can get his gun back | Opinion



An Ohio common pleas court ruled that a man with two misdemeanors and one felony domestic violence conviction couldn’t have his right to bear arms restored. the Supreme Court disagreed.

Advertisement
play

Ray Marcano is a Columbus Dispatch contributing columnist.

A bill working its way through the Ohio House would create a repeat domestic violence offender registry that’s patterned after Tennessee’s recently passed law.

Now, the bill’s proponents should go further and include a measure that prohibits anyone convicted of domestic violence from owning a firearm or getting those rights restored.

This issue surfaced after the Allen County Court of Common Pleas ruled that, under federal law, a man convicted of two misdemeanors and one felony count of domestic violence couldn’t have his right to bear arms restored.

Advertisement

An appeals court and now the Supreme Court disagreed, and the case is heading back to Allen County, which will decide whether the man, Patrick Heffley, can get his guns back.

The laws that govern how a citizen can lose the right to possess firearms and the appeals process for regaining that right are complicated.

They shouldn’t be, at least not in Ohio.

Just say no.

Flaw in our law must be fixed

Under federal law, anyone convicted of a domestic violence misdemeanor charge can’t possess a firearm.  But Ohio law doesn’t automatically take away guns in these cases, so courts decide whether to restore rights.

Advertisement

That shouldn’t be.

Currently, judges determine whether an offender has been reformed and is likely to continue leading a law-abiding life. Maybe the person has turned over a new leaf and has become a respected, productive community member. That would be great.

Just say no.

Advertisement

Those are three easy words, especially since 157 people died as a result of domestic violence in the 12 months ending June 2025, the most in a decade, according to the Ohio Domestic Violence Network.

More than eight in 10 deaths involved a firearm, showing there’s no way someone convicted of domestic violence should own a gun, even if the offense happened decades ago.

So, this gives the bill’s sponsors an opportunity to fix a flaw in the law.

I know the arguments that would justify inaction. There’s no guarantee that mirroring federal law will stop deaths here. We’re a society of second chances and should embrace those who have repented.

That’s true, but society also has laws with consequences for disobeying them. One should be straightforward.

Advertisement

If you beat up your partner in an act of violence, you lose the ability to own a weapon that can be used to perpetrate more violence.

Ohio’s proposed law, House Bill 846, by Rep. Phil Plummer, R-Butler Twp., and Rep. Cecil Thomas, D-Cincinnati, would mandate repeat offenders register for anywhere for two to 10 years with their name, photo, date of birth and location.

Plummer and Thomas should add to their bill and ban these offenders from having firearms.

That should be.

Advertisement

Ray Marcano is a Columbus Dispatch contributing columnist. The longtime journalist is the former national president of the Society of Professional Journalists, a two-time Pulitzer juror, and a Fulbright fellow.



Source link

Ohio

Ohio freezes new behavioral health provider applications amid fraud concerns

Published

on

Ohio freezes new behavioral health provider applications amid fraud concerns


The Ohio Department of Behavioral Health is cracking down on fraud and abuse within its system, announcing a temporary freeze on new behavioral health and rehabilitation provider applications statewide.

Officials said the move comes as the state works to rein in oversight issues in a rapidly expanding addiction recovery industry.

Across Ohio, there are thousands of addiction recovery facilities. While many are helping people overcome addiction, state leaders said others are falling short.

“We have more waste and abuse,” Rep. Justin Pizzulli, R-Scioto, said. “The recovery system grew so quickly that our oversight never caught up.”

Advertisement

Pizzulli said that is now beginning to change. The Department of Behavioral Health has implemented a temporary freeze on new providers while developing a stricter review process for incoming applications. The goal is to ensure facilities meet consistent standards before being approved.

Part of the concern stems from questionable billing practices uncovered in some facilities.

“We have a facility that was billing Medicaid in Portsmouth for activities such as pickleball, nap times, hanging Christmas lights and even aromatherapy and other recreational services,” Pizzulli said. “Taxpayers are very confused.”

Officials said the lack of consistent standards has allowed wide variation in the quality of care being offered.

“There’s an issue because there’s a lot out there and there are different degrees of effectiveness,” Pizzulli said.

Advertisement

Some in the treatment community support the crackdown. Kevin Dennis, CEO of Field of Hope, an addiction recovery facility in Gallia County, said increased oversight will ultimately strengthen the system and improve outcomes for patients.

“One of the secrets to success is keeping the rehabilitation of the client first and foremost,” Dennis said. “That’s what’s important and I’m not sure everybody does that.”

State leaders said the new approach will focus on accountability and measurable results.

“This is going to begin a more thorough review process for new behavioral health and rehab provider applications,” Pizzulli said.

One of the key goals is to create clear standards to determine whether facilities are effective and using taxpayer money appropriately. The application freeze is expected to last about one year.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Ohio auditor describes how widespread Medicaid fraud affects taxpayers | Fox News Video

Published

on

Ohio auditor describes how widespread Medicaid fraud affects taxpayers | Fox News Video


Lawrence Jones questions Ohio State Auditor Keith Faber about the widespread Medicaid fraud affecting taxpayers. Faber explains that big government programs like Medicaid, operating on a trust-based system, are easily exploited. He highlights disproportionate home healthcare utilization by the Somali community in Columbus, emphasizing that inadequate controls allow people to lie, steal, and cheat the system.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Ohio State reaches $100 million settlement with nearly 300 sex abuse survivors | CNN

Published

on

Ohio State reaches 0 million settlement with nearly 300 sex abuse survivors | CNN


Ohio State University has reached a $100 million settlement with nearly 300 former students who had accused the school’s campus doctor of sexually assaulting them decades ago, the school and a lawyer for the victims said on Wednesday.

The settlement with 279 of the 280 former students was ratified by the university’s board on Wednesday. It followed years of litigation overaccusations of decades of abuse by Richard Strauss.

The abuse occurred from 1978 to 1998, the year he retired from the faculty.

“The mediation and its confidentiality are continuing as the parties work to finalize the details of the settlements, and additional information will be shared as appropriate,” the school and a lawyer for the victims said in a joint statement.

Advertisement

In February, the university reached eight additional settlements, bringing the total to 304 survivors and more than $60 million.

Strauss, who killed himself in 2005, was employed by Ohio State’s athletic department and medical staff for nearly two decades.

A 2019 report detailing the investigative findings said that Strauss had sexually abused at least 177 men, nearly all of whom were students, and that university staff who knew of the abuse failed to act. The abuse included groping and fondling of the students’ genitals and other acts under the guise of a medical examination.

News of the investigation and its findings prompted more than 500 plaintiffs to sue Ohio State, alleging they had been sexually abused by Strauss and that the school had shown deliberate indifference.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending