Lifestyle
Having Trouble Choosing the Right White for Your Wedding? This Color Analyst Can Help.
Megan Bentley, a color analyst, knows that picking a wedding dress is more than choosing a white dress you love; it’s also about the right white.
The hue you choose will either complement or work against your complexion and the silhouette of your dress, said Bentley, the founder of The Color Countess, based in Columbus, Ohio. “White is one of the most difficult colors to get right,” she said. “While it is universally bridal, you need the right hue to honor your features. The differences are subtle, but the impact is significant.”
Using color analysis, a method grounded in color theory that looks at how hues interact with people and teaches them how to identify their most flattering color palette, or season, Bentley helps brides find their ideal white for their wedding dress. And as more brides are wearing multiple looks on their wedding day, as well as for their wedding-related celebrations, Bentley is also being asked to help them build their wedding wardrobe around their color palette.
Bentley became interested in color analysis in 1992 when she was 12 years old, through her mother’s best friend, who was a certified color analyst. “I was told I was a True Spring — a palette of warm, light and bright hues including coral, lime green and aqua. I loved it,” she said. As color analysis started gaining traction again in 2024 on social media, it felt familiar to her, Bentley said, and she started formal education in the method through the Association of Image Consultants International.
Bentley began color analysis as a side business while working as a client director at Gartner, a corporate consulting firm based in Stamford, Conn., where she worked with Fortune 10 executives. In 2024, she started incorporating color analysis into her work before making The Color Countess her full-time career in 2025. “Color became a strategic tool I would use to help leaders walk into a room with more authority and confidence,” Bentley said. “Then it took off on my social media in a way I did not expect.”
She offers color analysis through in-person, 75-minute sessions, for $449, and virtual sessions, starting at $99, where she identifies her clients’ undertone (whether their skin reads warm, cool or neutral) and color season and teaches them how to dress within it. “A virtual analysis can be a great option for brides when timing matters,” Bentley said, adding that these consultations are best before trying on gowns at a bridal salon.
Here, Bentley gives a quick lesson in color analysis and how to lean into your best hues to find the right white and elevate your bridal wardrobe.
The interview was edited and condensed for clarity.
What do you think attracts brides to color analysis?
When you are preparing for one of the most photographed and important days of your life, you want to look your absolute best. Once a bride realizes there is a way to find her perfect hue of white for her dress and the right color for the groom’s suit, color analysis becomes an obvious step in their wedding planning process.
Color is one of the biggest visual decisions for a wedding. A color analysis removes the guesswork out of what hues complement you and what works together. The couple will look more refined and the photos more cohesive. It also brings confidence. When you know you are in the right colors and tones, you feel present.
What are you looking at when matching a bride or groom with their color palette?
I am always looking at the individual first. I look at their undertone, value — how light or dark their features are — and intensity — bright and reflective features versus soft and opaque. These are what determine their most harmonious colors. If the couple already has wedding colors in mind, we evaluate whether those colors are in harmony with each other. If they are not, we find the closest, most complementary versions, so that everything feels cohesive.
Time of year and décor can absolutely influence the color direction. If a wedding is in the fall or winter, we can lean into richer, deeper tones within their palettes. If the event is in the spring or summer, we may choose lighter, brighter options.
What are brides specifically asking for in a color analysis?
The number one focus is the white dress. From there, they want guidance on how everything works together — what the groom should wear, how the colors photograph and how to create a cohesive look across the entire day.
There is also a lot of interest in the full wedding wardrobe — the rehearsal dinner, welcome party, honeymoon. Once they understand their colors, they want to make confident decisions across all of their wedding-related events.
What is the science behind finding the right hue of white to complement the bride and the style of her dress?
The key is identifying your undertone, then you can determine whether you need a cooler, warmer, or more neutral white. The right hue is what makes your skin look clear and luminous, so that you stand out, rather than the dress wearing you.
It is not about matching your complexion; it is about your undertone. It can be fair, tan, rosy, golden or olive. Your undertone is the temperature beneath the skin and that is what determines which whites will be most harmonious. For example, the actress Mindy Kaling often appears very warm on the surface, but she has a cool undertone. If she leans too warm in her clothing, it can compete with her rather than support her.
On the flip side, someone like actress Emma Stone is very fair, but she has a warm undertone. Fair skin does not automatically mean cool, just like deeper or more golden skin does not automatically mean warm, such as with model Naomi Campbell, who has a cool undertone.
Does the hue of white affect the look of the silhouette and fit of a wedding dress?
Yes, color is what brings the entire look into balance first. It can completely change how a silhouette is perceived.
The right white sharpens the entire look of a gown. The right hue will enhance the structure of the garment, highlight proportions and direct where the eye goes.
When the hue is off, it creates shadows, pulls focus from your face and breaks the line of the silhouette, making the dress look heavier or less refined.
What are your tips for putting together the rest of a wedding wardrobe?
I like to anchor everything around four colors: your best white, your strongest neutral, an eye-enhancing hue that brings out your features and a pop color, which is your favorite shade within your palette. This combination gives you structure, variety and cohesion. Everything mixes and matches, everything photographs well and most importantly, everything keeps you in harmony, so that you look polished and intentional across every event leading up to and after the wedding.
Lifestyle
How should we behave online? : It’s Been a Minute
Lifestyle
Chanel’s Bruno Pavlovsky on Reengineering an Iconic Brand
Lifestyle
They were world-class tennis rivals. Now friends, they’ve teamed up against cancer
Once rivals on the tennis court, Martina Navratilova, left, and Chris Evert have become close friends in retirement. They are pictured above at the French Open in 1986.
Trevor Jones/Getty Images Europe
hide caption
toggle caption
Trevor Jones/Getty Images Europe
Chris Evert and Martina Navratilova were the most successful women’s tennis champions of their generation. Both were 18-time Grand Slam tournament winners — and each other’s greatest rivals.
Evert, a Florida native, became a tennis star in her teens. Navratilova was born in communist Czechoslovakia, and emerged as a player after Evert was established. They first faced off during a match in Akron, Ohio, in 1973, when Evert was 18, and Navratilova was 16. Evert won, but Navratilova left an impression.
“I remember thinking to myself, holy cow, when this young girl gets into better shape, she is going to be a force to be reckoned with,” Evert says. “She had so much talent. Her hands were quick, she had a big first serve, she had a big forehand, and she just was so powerful.”

Two years later, on the day she lost a semifinals match to Evert at the U.S. Open, Navratilova defected to the U.S. In the years that followed, her tennis game improved. Though she and Evert had initially been friendly, the friendship cooled as their rivalry heated up.
“Playing Chris was difficult because how can you not like Chris? What’s not to admire?” Navratilova says. “She was like the epitome of cool.”
The new Netflix documentary Chris & Martina: The Final Set tells the story of how Evert and Navratilova re-established their friendship and how they both faced cancer in retirement. Evert was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2021; Navratilova was diagnosed with throat and breast cancer in 2022.
“I can’t get away from her,” Evert jokes. “We had a 15-year career, and then we got cancer at the same time. It really is freaky, but I always say: If I want someone to be in the trenches with me, it’s Martina because she has been so supportive and so understanding.”

Navratilova agrees: “We have such a level of trust that we know whatever we say to each other, it stays there. We give each other the best advice we know how to. And there is no ulterior motive, no playing games.”
At the time that this interview was taped, Evert and Navratilova were both in remission from cancer. But late last week, Evert disclosed she’d recently been diagnosed with a recurrence of ovarian cancer.
“We know whatever we say to each other, it stays there,” Martina Navratilova says of her friendship with Chris Evert.
Netflix
hide caption
toggle caption
Netflix
Interview highlights
On supporting each other through cancer
Evert: There are a lot of phone calls between us. … I don’t cook, but Martina would bake bread for me, and her wife Julia would cook, make some chicken soup. … I got a lot of food from Martina. She got a necklace from me.
Navratilova: I get jewelry from Chris, she gets food from me.
Evert: Martina’s and my relationship — because we’ve had one for 50 years — is not the type where we have to talk to each other every day to maintain the closeness. I always knew she was there. She always knew I was there if we needed to talk, and that was that.
On the weakness they experienced with cancer
Navratilova: Chris’ diagnosis and treatment was much more life-threatening than mine, percentage wise, but my treatment was more difficult physically. … I was in New York for seven weeks and I literally sat on a yoga mat, maybe half an hour of the seven weeks, and did some stretching. I couldn’t even do the down dog pose because I would have fallen down. I had absolutely zero strength left.
Evert: The chemo kicked my butt, let’s put it that way. … It left me very weak, very, very weak. After chemo I would have three or four days of intense nausea and I just would feel tingling in my body and it just wasn’t nice. I didn’t have the energy. To walk six blocks was a big deal for me. And it was foreign. You know, it felt like it wasn’t my body, for sure.
On watching the old footage of their matches together for the documentary
Navratilova: For me, it was fun watching with Chris, because we had different reactions to what happened on the court. But what impressed me is how well we played with those wooden rackets. Because you know what? Those rackets are not easy to play with. But you try to put yourself in there physically, what it was like, mentally, what it is like. And it’s like, “Oh, I should have gone down the line,” or, “I can’t believe I missed that shot.” Or “Chris, you had such a great pass.” It was amazing. So it was impressive. … I wish I could still have that six-pack, but anyhow.

Evert: I remember feeling genuinely happy for her. I remember it was her first Wimbledon. That’s always been her dream since she defected. Her family couldn’t be there to watch her. She was all alone. And I just was happy for it. And I knew that this was gonna be one of many for her to win.
On defecting to the U.S. in 1975 when she was 18 years old
Navratilova: I was thrilled to be in the States. I always loved American cars. And when you ordered a ham sandwich, you got, like, two inches of ham and two slices of bread. Whereas growing up, you had thick bread and one slice of ham. So I thought I was in heaven. And it was $2.30 for that sandwich. I still remember it. I couldn’t believe how much ham I was getting.
Lauren Krenzel and Nico Gonzalez Wisler produced and edited this interview for broadcast. Bridget Bentz, Molly Seavy-Nesper and Beth Novey adapted it for the web.

-
Los Angeles, Ca26 minutes agoLeBron James informs Lakers he will play elsewhere next year
-
Detroit, MI41 minutes ago5 realistic cornerback trade targets for the Detroit Lions after Terrion Arnold’s release
-
San Francisco, CA53 minutes agoHeadlines, June 30 – Streetsblog San Francisco
-
Dallas, TX56 minutes agoLIVE | Ivory Coast, Norway meet for World Cup knockout match at Dallas Stadium
-
Miami, FL1 hour agoEvery Dolphins head coach’s start in Miami from worst to best
-
Boston, MA1 hour agoHistorian clears up one of the biggest myths about the Boston Tea Party
-
Denver, CO1 hour ago
Nemanja Jokic, the older brother of\u00a0Denver …
-
Seattle, WA1 hour ago3 Seahawks Rookies Who Must Step Up Right Away