Connect with us

Alaska

Sen. Sullivan defends approach to Trump administration during address to Alaska Legislature

Published

on

Sen. Sullivan defends approach to Trump administration during address to Alaska Legislature


Alaska Republican U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan delivers his annual address to the Legislature on Wednesday, Feb. 18, at the state Capitol in Juneau. (Mari Kanagy / ADN)

JUNEAU — U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan defended his stance on the administration of President Donald Trump in response to questions from Alaska lawmakers after his annual address Wednesday, even as he called on them to unanimously adopt a resolution opposing one of Trump’s policy ideas.

“In terms of the president and his team, my North Star, in terms of my dealing with those guys, is what’s good for Alaska and what’s good for our country,” Sullivan said. “When they do things that I don’t like, there’s times that I will beat them up in public.”

Sullivan made the comment in response to a question from Anchorage Democratic state Sen. Forrest Dunbar, after a speech in which Sullivan, who is up for reelection this year, extolled Trump and declared Alaska was experiencing a “comeback” under his leadership.

“You said ‘yes’ to Trump many times,” Dunbar said. “I’m wondering if you’re willing to say ‘no.’”

Advertisement

“You want to put out a tweet, smashing them on certain issues or criticizing them?” Sullivan asked in response. “Sometimes that works, but sometimes, if you want results, that’s not always the best way to get results.”

Sullivan listed federal funding freezes and worker layoffs as areas where he disagreed with Trump in recent months. He said his office “made huge impacts on all of those issues,” though he has often refrained from speaking publicly about those topics or responding to questions from reporters about them.

“I push back publicly and in private on all kinds of things — with always the North Star for me, how to be effective for all of you, for the people I represent and for my country,” said Sullivan.

Sullivan’s speech surveyed many familiar themes. He decried former President Joe Biden’s past environmental policies, which he said hindered resource development in Alaska; he celebrated Trump’s executive order seeking to expand the state’s resource industries; he promised progress on a long-sought natural gas pipeline; he praised a GOP-backed bill that extended tax cuts first enacted in 2017; he downplayed lawmakers’ concerns over cuts to Medicaid enacted to pay for those tax cuts; he criticized Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, for blocking legislative provisions that would have benefited Alaska; and he lauded a new rural health program that he said would direct more than $1 billion in new federal funding to the state.

Sullivan’s speech focused primarily on areas where he said he agrees with the president. But he called on the Legislature to pass a resolution opposing Trump’s move to charge $100,000 for visas that are used by educators coming to Alaska from other countries, primarily the Philippines, to fill vacant teaching positions in rural districts.

Advertisement

Alaska has increasingly relied on teachers from other countries amid stagnant school funding and other concerns that have made attracting educators to the state from the Lower 48 increasingly difficult. Sullivan said he is working with other members of Alaska’s congressional delegation to seek an exemption to Trump’s visa surcharge.

Protesters gather outside the Alaska State Capitol in Juneau ahead of U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan’s annual address to the state Legislature on Wednesday, Feb. 18. (Mari Kanagy / ADN)

Around three dozen protesters gathered outside the Capitol ahead of Sullivan’s address, speaking against several of his policy positions. Some lined the hallways as Sullivan entered the Alaska House chamber, holding signs reading, “We the People Do Not Consent.”

“When I entered the U.S. military, 60 years ago, I took an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution,” Juneau resident Paul DeSloover said. “Sen. Sullivan, when he entered the Marines, took the same oath, and he likes to say ‘Semper Fi’ because he’s a Marine. But (it) should be, ‘Semper Timidus,’ because he is a timid coward.”

Erin Jackson-Hill, member of the left-leaning activist group Stand Up Alaska, criticized Sullivan’s support of the SAVE Act, a bill that would require proof of citizenship to vote. Alaska Republican U.S. Rep. Nick Begich also supports the legislation, whereas Alaska Republican U.S. Sen Lisa Murkowski opposes it.

“I call on Sen. Sullivan to show a modicum of the bravery shown by our other senator and stand up and say the SAVE Act is wrong. It will disenfranchise people,” Jackson-Hill said.

Sullivan said in a press availability after the speech that he believes “voting should be easy, and cheating should be hard.” He said he does not believe voter fraud is widespread in Alaska, but that it is elsewhere in the country.

Advertisement

“I think having an ID requirement that makes sure that the people who are voting in our country are Americans is not unreasonable,” Sullivan said. “Even though it’s not a big issue here, it is a big issue in other parts of the country. And I’m a senator for Alaska, but I’m also a senator for America.”

Reviews both nationwide and in Alaska have found that voting by noncitizens is exceedingly rare.

In response to a question from a reporter, Sullivan criticized U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations in Minneapolis. He said he supports “deporting illegals with violent criminal records.”

“ICE needs to refine its techniques and tactics. It was horrendous, regardless of the situation, in my view, that two Americans were killed,” said Sullivan. “That should not have happened. I think there’s practices that they need to learn from. At the same time, I strongly support our law enforcement.”

The Daily News’ Iris Samuels reported from Anchorage and Mari Kanagy reported from Juneau.

Advertisement





Source link

Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday

Published

on

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – The Supreme Court of Alaska will be taking up the case of the State of Alaska, Division of Elections v. Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.

The oral arguments will be held Monday at 10 a.m. via Zoom, according to an order and opening notice.

The document also specifies that a decision is expected to be made before noon on Tuesday.

According to documents from the Division of Elections, the state must start printing ballots at noon on the same day.

Advertisement

This comes after an Anchorage Superior Court Judge ordered Dan J. Sullivan on to the ballot Friday.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake

Published

on

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake


An engine and firefighters from the Division of Forestry & Fire Protection’s Mat-Su Area are responding to a fire near Flat Lake.

A caller reported a fire on an island in Flat Lake, with 2 foot flame lengths and structures near by.

The engine crew responding will be shuttled by boat to the fire. The fire is currently reported as .1 acre, creeping and smoldering.

Advertisement

Additional updates will be shared as they become available.

‹ Pioneer Peak Hotshots, Gannett Glacier Crew Join Fight Against 2 Fires Near Ruby

Categories: Active Wildland Fire

Tags: #FireYear2026 #2026AKFIRESEASON, 2026 Alaska Fire Season



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Opinion: Alaska’s $10,000 question: Leave or stay?

Published

on

Opinion: Alaska’s ,000 question: Leave or stay?


A new home under construction in Potter Valley in Anchorage. (Loren Holmes / ADN)

This June, two very different offers reach Alaska families, and both amount to the same thing: $10,000. The difference is everything.

Bill Walker, running for governor, would hand every eligible Alaskan a one-time $10,000 check and then end the Permanent Fund dividend for good. Ask one question: Where does his $10,000 come from?

It comes from the Permanent Fund, the people’s own money and the savings Alaskans built for their children. Walker would spend that endowment once to pay Alaskans to give up the yearly dividend forever.

Think about what that does. It cancels the annual check that gives a family a reason to keep an Alaska address and replaces it with a single payout. You hand people their own savings, call it a gift and cut the tie that held them here in the same motion. It is the oldest mistake in governing money: raid what you have saved to buy a moment’s applause and call the spending generosity.

Advertisement

A plan that spends the people’s savings to send the people away is not bold. It is foolish.

Now consider the other $10,000. Through Alaska Housing Finance Corp., the state offers families up to $10,000 to build a new, energy-efficient home. AHFC raids nothing. It earns its own way. Over the years, it has returned more than $2 billion to the state treasury, and it spends some of that income the way any good business does: to win a customer.

Here, the customer is an Alaskan who wants to own a home, put down roots and stay.

That is the oldest sound move in business: Invest a little of what you earn to bring in someone who stays. The homeowner remains, the community gains a family and the corporation keeps earning. The money spent comes back. A plan that puts earnings to work to bring people home is not charity. It is clever.

Same amount. Opposite source. Opposite wisdom. One spends savings; the other spends earnings. One pays Alaskans to leave; the other pays them to stay. One empties the state; the other fills it.

Advertisement

This Homeownership Month, the choice is the size of a single check, and the whole question is where the check comes from and what it asks of you. Ten thousand dollars of your own fund, to wave you goodbye. Or $10,000, earned and reinvested, to help you stay and build.

Evan Swensen is the publisher of Publication Consultants in Anchorage and the author of “What’s the Money For: A Permanent Fund Mortgage Proposal.”

• • •

The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending