Connect with us

Indianapolis, IN

14 things to watch as streaking Colts offense takes on reeling Pittsburgh defense

Published

on

14 things to watch as streaking Colts offense takes on reeling Pittsburgh defense


The toughest stretch of the Indianapolis schedule begins with a trip to a place that has been an intermittent house of horrors for the Colts over the years.

Indianapolis hasn’t won in Pittsburgh since 2008.

Daniel Jones, Jonathan Taylor and the rest of the Colts will try to end that streak at 1 p.m. Sunday in Acrisure Stadium (WTTV-4) against a reeling Steelers team hoping to bounce back from disheartening losses to Cincinnati and Green Bay.

Advertisement

Plenty is at stake for both teams. Indianapolis (7-1) placed itself in the driver’s south for the AFC South title and potentially the No. 1 seed with its fast start, and Pittsburgh (4-3) is trying to hold onto the lead in an ugly AFC North this season.

1. Pittsburgh is typically known for defense. Not this Steelers team. These Steelers rank 30th in the NFL in yards allowed (386.0 per game), 32nd in passing yards (273.3), 18th against the run (112.7), and they’re not much better on a per-play basis. Pittsburgh ranks 22nd in scoring defense, giving up 24.1 points per game, but the wheels are coming off there, too — the Steelers allowed 33 and 35 points in their last two games. Their reward is facing a Colts offense that is the No. 1 attack in the NFL, leading the league in yards (385.3) and points per game (33.8) while sitting in the top 10 in essentially every major category.

2. The Steelers made a trade to upgrade their defense this week, picking up strong safety Kyle Dugger from New England for a low pick. Dugger was once considered one of the NFL’s best up-and-coming safeties, earning him a four-year, $58 million extension from the Patriots, but he’s fallen out of favor in New England due to issues in coverage. Pittsburgh may need Dugger to play right away; normal starting strong safety DeShon Elliott is out with a knee injury this week.

3. Rookie tight end Tyler Warren should be licking his chops. Warren leads all NFL tight ends with 492 receiving yards through the first eight games, averaging an impressive 13.3 per catch, and now he gets to go up against a Pittsburgh defense that will likely counter with Dugger and free safety Chuck Clark, who is allowing opposing quarterbacks to produce a 144.4 quarterback rating when he’s the nearest defender in coverage. Pittsburgh has given up 555 yards to tight ends this season, the third-worst mark in the league, and the Steelers are susceptible to players who can make plays downfield like Warren.

Advertisement

4. Then again, Indianapolis wide receivers Michael Pittman Jr., Alec Pierce and Josh Downs are going to get their opportunities. Pittsburgh has allowed the third-most catches and sixth-most yards in the NFL to wide receivers this season. The Steelers doubled down on experience by picking up aging star cornerbacks Jalen Ramsey and Darius Slay, but both players are allowing opposing quarterbacks to post ratings of more than 100 when they’re the nearest player in coverage. Indianapolis can beat secondaries in a variety of ways with Pittman, Pierce and Downs, and Jones has been excellent at spreading the ball around, making the Colts’ tendencies difficult to gauge.

5. Pittsburgh’s old defensive formula was to overwhelm offenses with the pass rush, and the Steelers are tied for eighth in the NFL in sacks this season with 22, but the pressure has been far from consistent. Pittsburgh ranks 14th in the league in pressure rate, getting pressure on 35% of dropbacks, and the Colts have been one of the league’s best at avoiding sacks this season, giving up just nine sacks through the first eight games.

6. The edge tandem of T.J. Watt and Nick Herbig drives the Pittsburgh rush. Herbig has 4.5 sacks, Watt has four of his own and the two outside linebackers each have 27 pressures this season, a number that ranks firmly within the top 10. Indianapolis will counter with the excellent tackle tandem of Bernhard Raimann and Braden Smith, who have been solid in pass protection all season long.

7. With Jones at the helm, Indianapolis simply hasn’t turned the ball over this season. The Colts have committed just four turnovers (three interceptions, one fumble), trailing only Philadelphia and Green Bay for the NFL’s top spot. Pittsburgh has forced 10 turnovers, tied for eighth in the NFL and a big reason why the Steelers’ tendency to hemorrhage yards hasn’t hurt them as bad as it could have this season. If Pittsburgh is going to make life tough on this Indianapolis offense, the Steelers are going to have to force a few Jones mistakes, but when Pittsburgh took on the Packers last week, Green Bay quarterback Jordan Love carved up the Steelers instead of turning the ball over.

Advertisement

8. Taylor has forced his way into the MVP discussion this season because he’s been remarkably consistent, producing something special in almost every game. Pittsburgh’s run defense is probably better than its numbers; the Steelers have been solid in five games this season, giving up big days on the ground to only the Jets and Bengals. Taylor’s a different kind of test, though; the Colts superstar leads the NFL with 850 rushing yards and 14 total touchdowns even though he’s faced five defenses ranked higher in rush defense than Pittsburgh.

9. With Taylor on the ground and Jones finding Taylor, Warren, Downs and Pittman through the air, the Indianapolis offense has been a nightmare for opposing linebackers this season, and according to the numbers, Pittsburgh’s primary passing tandem of Patrick Queen and Payton Wilson looks ripe for the picking. Queen has allowed a rating of 132.7 when he’s the nearest defender in coverage, and Wilson isn’t far behind at 111.9. Expect Jones to attack the soft underbelly of the Pittsburgh defense as often as possible.

Can the Colts stop Aaron Rodgers?

10. Aaron Rodgers could be a problem for the Indianapolis defense. Decimated by injuries at the cornerback position, the Colts have struggled against the pass this season, ranking 29th in the NFL in passing yards allowed per game (252.0) even though they’ve been 13th in yards per dropback (6.4). Rodgers has been good, completing 68.3% of his passes, averaging 7.2 yards per attempt and posting a 104.4 quarterback rating while taking just 12 sacks through the first seven games. Green Bay was able to put Rodgers under fire in the second half last week, but the Packers pass rush is far more dominant than Indianapolis has been. Making matters worse, defensive coordinator Lou Anarumo is going to have a hard time confusing Rodgers, who has seen just about everything in his career by this point.

11. D.K. Metcalf is a problem for young Colts cornerbacks Mekhi Blackmon, Johnathan Edwards and Cameron Mitchell. Metcalf is volatile, but he’s also racked up 461 yards and five touchdowns on just 27 catches this season, and his combination of size and speed makes the former Seahawk a difficult matchup for any Indianapolis cornerback. If third-year cornerback Jaylon Jones is finally ready to make his defensive debut after missing the first half of the season due to recurring hamstring injuries, he will help, but it will also be his first action of 2025.

12. Indianapolis has Warren at tight end. Pittsburgh has Jonnu Smith (22 catches, 134 yards), Pat Freiermuth (16 catches, 200 yards) and mammoth red-zone target Darnell Washington (9 catches, 84 yards). The Colts have struggled against tight ends, allowing the third-most catches and second-most yards to the position. With Rodgers at the helm, Indianapolis safeties Nick Cross and Camryn Bynum must be on top of their games.

Advertisement

13. Pittsburgh’s running game has been fairly pedestrian this season. Running backs Jaylen Warren and Kenneth Gainwell are both averaging 4.5 yards per carry, but the Steelers rank just 22nd in the NFL in yards per carry (4.07) and 25th in rushing yards per game (94.3). If Indianapolis can jump on Pittsburgh early, it might take the running game out of it entirely, but if the Colts start a little slow, nose tackle Grover Stewart might be able to take the Pittsburgh running game out of it by himself.

14. The Steelers have been incredible in the red zone, converting 73.68% of their chances into touchdowns, the third-best mark in the league. Indianapolis has been a middling defense in the red zone, allowing scores on 61.54% of its chances to rank 18th, and Anarumo is going to need a plan to limit Rodgers when Pittsburgh starts sniffing the goal line.

Joel A. Erickson and Nathan Brown cover the Colts all season. Get more coverage on IndyStarTV and with the Colts Insider newsletter.



Source link

Advertisement

Indianapolis, IN

IMPD officer charged with operating vehicle while intoxicated after showing up to work smelling of alcohol

Published

on

IMPD officer charged with operating vehicle while intoxicated after showing up to work smelling of alcohol


INDIANAPOLIS — An officer with the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department has been charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OVWI).

According to a news release from IMPD, Bryan Gibson, an officer with the department, arrived at the department’s southeast district in his personal vehicle on the evening of Dec. 10 for a scheduled administrative duty shift.

When Gibson arrived, the department alleges that Gibson smelled like alcohol. After an investigation from the department’s OVWI unit, the special investigations unit and internal affairs, the release said that Gibson was determined to be under the influence of alcohol.

On Dec. 11, IMPD Chief Chris Bailey suspended Gibson without pay and recommended his termination to the department’s civilian police merit board.

Advertisement

The release said that at the time of the incident, Gibson was assigned to administrative duty. Officials said that Gibson did not have police powers while under administrative investigation for an unrelated personnel matter.

On Wednesday, the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office officially filed charges against Gibson for:

  • Operating a vehicle while intoxicated
  • Operating a vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or higher.

Gibson’s initial hearing is scheduled for Jan. 20, 2026, the release said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indianapolis, IN

6 former IU Indianapolis men’s basketball players sue university over alleged abuse they suffered under now-fired coach Paul Corsaro

Published

on

6 former IU Indianapolis men’s basketball players sue university over alleged abuse they suffered under now-fired coach Paul Corsaro


INDIANAPOLIS — Six former members of the Indiana University Indianapolis men’s basketball team are suing the school over abuse they claim they suffered under now-fired head coach Paul Corsaro.

Previous reporting indicates the university terminated Corsaro in May. He later indicated that his termination came at the end of a university investigation into the alleged mistreatment of men’s basketball players.

On Monday, six members of Corsaro’s 2024-25 IU Indy men’s basketball team filed a lawsuit against the university, and thus made their allegations against their former coach public.

The 12-page complaint, which was filed in Marion County Superior Court, alleges Corsaro’s actions led all six players to suffer irreparable harm, including physical injury, loss of name, image and likeness (NIL) deals, loss of scholarship opportunities, loss of future NIL revenue and compounding of medical bills.

Advertisement

The players involved in the lawsuit directed explosive allegations toward Corsaro. They allege he subjected them to physical and emotional abuse that drove some of them to contemplate suicide. Other players claimed they struggled to sleep at night because the trauma inflicted upon them by Corsaro caused them to get night sweats and experience jarring nightmares.

One player reportedly called the suicide hotline on at least two occasions while playing for Corsaro. Another player indicated that his parents and members of the men’s basketball team’s staff staged an intervention because they were worried he would harm himself.

One of the players also claimed that an athletic trainer ordered him to undergo an EKG and have bloodwork done in addition to other medical examinations. The underlying medical symptoms the player experienced were, according to court filings, the result of stress and anxiety that playing for Corsaro created.

Allegations against Corsaro

All six players indicated that Corsaro would routinely direct derogatory slurs at them. Those slurs ranged in scope, targeting people’s intellectual ability, sexuality and more.

In the complaint, one player claimed he suffered a concussion while playing for Corsaro. That player finished practice the day he sustained the concussion and did not seek medical treatment until the next day because he feared retribution from Corsaro.

Advertisement

Once the player sought medical treatment, he was formally diagnosed with a concussion. The player indicated that, after he suffered the concussion, Corsaro ridiculed him and called him a “soft p****.” That player also alleged that Corsaro told him, “real men play through concussions.”

Another player claimed Corsaro “branded” him with a marker. The player reported that Corsaro drew a large “P” on his skin after he missed a free throw. The “P,” according to the player, stood for “p****.”

According to the lawsuit, when one of the players rolled his ankle and was slow to return to play, Corsaro told him his mother “must have raised a real b****.”

Additional filings in the case indicate one player sustained a foot injury during the 2024-25 season. That player was urged back to full action too quickly by Corsaro, and that player later suffered a more significant, career-ending injury.

Players also alleged that Corsaro did not hesitate to humiliate them in front of others. One player claimed Corsaro instructed him to “grab his balls and squeeze” to make sure they were still there. The player indicated that Corsaro made that comment in front of the entire IU Indy women’s track team.

Advertisement

Additional documentation filed in the case also reports that one of Corsaro’s outbursts was so large in scope that the IU Indy volleyball team froze during one of their team lifts. Court records indicate the IU Indy volleyball team was shocked by Corsaro’s actions.

One player indicated that he was punched by one of his teammates during a conditioning drill. That player reported that Corsaro appeared to have instigated the violence because he continually pinned the team needing to complete extra sprints on him. After the player was punched, Corsaro seemed to be pleased by the act of violence, according to case filings.

The complaint alleges that Corsaro met with his players’ parents on numerous occasions to talk about the team’s mental health struggles. During those meetings, Corsaro reportedly pledged his support to struggling players. That support, however, never actually came, per the players.

One player even claimed that Corsaro weaponized a meeting he had with parents publicly. That player indicated that, in front of the entire team, Corsaro said, “This is why I have to have a meeting with mommy and daddy.”

That player reported that his parents met with Corsaro because the physical and mental abuse he allegedly endured caused him to lose 10 pounds in a week.

Advertisement

In the complaint, the players alleged that Corsaro’s abuse had on-court ramifications. He reportedly told one player, “You better find a new girlfriend because you are not going to be here next year.” He also dismissed another player implicated in the lawsuit from the team and cut the playing time of another who brought concerns to his attention.

One player, who was not part of the lawsuit, is quoted in the complaint as saying Corsaro told him he needed to start playing “like a Black player and not a white player.” Other documents filed in the case indicate Corsaro asked a player if he was “afraid of Black guys” during an exhibition game.

The players also alleged that, in addition to the psychological abuse, Corsaro physically harmed them. One player indicated that Corsaro choked him and punched his sternum. Another player claimed Corsaro routinely bumped, shoulder slammed and shoved members of his team.

When one player was injured in a crash, Corsaro did not allow him to be around the team while he was recovering, according to case filings. That same player claimed Corsaro called him “useless” and a disappointment to his parents. The player also indicated that he was the only player Corsaro did not text a happy birthday message to last season.

One Black player alleged that Corsaro also threatened to call the police when he could not finish a sprint.

Advertisement

Documents filed in the case allege that Corsaro instructed his assistant coaches to delete practice footage that might have captured some of the alleged moments of abuse, like his kicking of basketballs, throwing of clipboards and berating of team managers.

Lawsuit claims IU Indy is responsible for harm athletes endured

The former players’ lawyers allege that IU Indy was negligent in its hiring of Corsaro. The lawyers’ filings criticize the university’s hiring practices and the school’s infrastructure for monitoring the behavior and activity of its coaches.

The lawsuit alleges that IU Indy allowed Corsaro to continue coaching and cause harm to student-athletes throughout the 2024-25 season. The lack of accountability, according to the players’ lawyers, led to the student-athletes effectively losing a year of collegiate eligibility playing under Corsaro.

The players’ filings also claim some members of the university’s staff are required to report certain types of abuse to proper school channels. Corsaro’s assistant coaches, team managers and other support staff, according to documents filed in the case, would all fall into that category. Coaches of other sports that may have witnessed Corsaro’s alleged actions would also be among those required to report inappropriate behavior.

Corsaro’s assistants deleting footage only exacerbates their inaction in what they witnessed, according to court documents. The complaint also alleges that coaches supported players’ grievances with Corsaro privately and acknowledged that what he was doing was wrong. Still, they did not report his behavior to the university, per case filings.

Advertisement

The players also claim the university breached a contract with them. In the players’ eyes, they entered into a contract with the university to play basketball in exchange for payment of tuition, room and board and other education-related expenses.

The players believe the contract was breached when Corsaro allegedly violated the university’s codes of conduct, but he remained the head coach for the entire 2024-25 season.

Fallout

A letter the players’ lawyers sent IU Indy in June urged the school to pay more than $2.4 million in damages to the players for the abuse they allegedly suffered under Corsaro.

Court records indicate the university later rejected the claims set forth in the players’ June letter. IU Indy also told the players’ lawyers they did not intend to engage in settlement talks.

The university sent its response to the letter on June 17, according to court documents. The players’ lawyers filed their complaint against the school on Monday.

Advertisement

All six of the players left IU Indy at the end of the 2024-25 season.

Additional legal action taken by Corsaro

IU Indy is now sandwiched in the middle of two legal cases related to Corsaro.

A report from October indicates Corsaro filed a tort claim against IU Indy. In that claim, Corsaro indicated that IU Indy defamed him and effectively ensured he’d never be hired as a coach again when they terminated him.

In the claim, Corsaro reported that he wasn’t made aware of the allegations that were brought against him until he received a letter from the university. Corsaro also claimed that the university’s athletic director repeatedly assured him he likely wouldn’t lose his job at the end of the school’s investigation of the allegations brought against him.

Corsaro also indicated that the report IU Indy produced during its investigation only corroborated two of the allegations brought against him. The two substantiated incidents included in the report related to Corsaro cursing during team practices and bumping a player during a practice.

Advertisement

“The Final Report provided absolutely no discussion, and certainly made no finding, that the ‘substantiated’ allegations amounted to ’cause’ sufficient to terminate Corsaro for-cause,” Corsaro’s tort reads.

Corsaro also claimed that IU Indy’s athletic director repeatedly endorsed his use of profanity during practice. He also indicated that the time he bumped a player happened during a drill in which he was teaching his team to “properly absorb contact when attempting to score under the basket.”

Corsaro’s tort claims the university turned its back on him because it feared a lawsuit might be filed. The tort was filed fewer than three months before Corsaro’s ex-players lodged their complaint against the university.

In a statement provided to IndyStar, IU Indy Athletics cited the allegations brought forth by former players as the reason for Corsaro’s dismissal.

“Based on the complaints, the IU Office of Vice President and General Counsel conducted an investigation and concluded that Corsaro’s behavior did not meet the university’s values and standards regarding the treatment of student athletes,” IU Indy’s statement to IndyStar read in part. “Based on these conclusions, IU Indianapolis has dismissed Paul Corsaro. The search for a new coach will begin immediately.”

Advertisement

Corsaro claimed the university’s statements were “plainly false” in his tort. He indicated that the school asserted, without evidence, that he mistreated his players. Corsaro alleged the university’s final report did not support the termination decision IU Indy ultimately came to.

Where are we now?

Corsaro went 10-22 overall and 6-14 against Horizon League opponents during his tenure as head coach of the Jaguars. Ben Howlett was tapped to replace Corsaro as the head coach of the IU Indy men’s basketball team.

Howlett is the third coach the Jaguars have had in the last five seasons. Corsaro was preceded in the role by Matt Crenshaw, who coached the team from the 2021-22 season and 2023-24 season.

The assistant coaches on Corsaro’s staff are no longer with the team. The Jaguars are currently 3-9 on the 2025-26 season.

The status of Corsaro’s tort claim against IU Indy is currently unclear. Some subpoenas have been filed in the ex-players’ case against the university, but not much additional action had been taken as of this article’s publication.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Indianapolis, IN

Tony award-winning musical ‘MJ’ to stop in Indianapolis

Published

on

Tony award-winning musical ‘MJ’ to stop in Indianapolis


INDIANAPOLIS — One of the most famous Hoosiers of all-time, Michael Jackson, really is coming back to Indiana! Well, through a Tony award-winning musical anyway.

The world-wide touring musical, MJ, will play from Jan. 13 – Jan. 18, 2026, at the Old National Centre.

The show will center around the making of the 1992 Dangerous World Tour, and while it will feature dancing and singing, it looks to further explore Jackson’s creative mind and collaborative spirit.

To learn more about the show, and purchase tickets view here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending