Connect with us

Nevada

Why not incentivize housing instead of Hollywood? | Pat Hickey

Published

on

Why not incentivize housing instead of Hollywood? | Pat Hickey


play

Recently, two headlines caught my eye. The first: Nevada plans to roll out the Hollywood red carpet with public tax breaks for private studio companies — Sony Pictures and Warner Bros. The other: The University of Nevada, Reno plans a new 400-unit public-private apartment complex near campus for faculty, staff and students.

Advertisement

Both proposals utilize tax-credit financing to incentivize businesses to meet Nevada’s needs.

To my mind, if it becomes a question of what is our most pressing priority, I would pick an affordable supply of homes for our Nevada towns over the lure of Tinseltown coming to our southern desert.

When I think of the future of a Nevada film industry, I don’t see it becoming a blockbuster. Gone is the glamour and dream-like entity that once was embodied by Hollywood. A successful sequel to the magic of movie-making success seems unlikely — whether it’s located in Studio City, California, or Summerlin, Nevada.

The curtain appears have come down on that once glorious period. Like the end of the the Old South’s saga in Hollywood’s “Gone with the Wind,” a bygone era of mystique and dominance is likely no more. 

The slow death of cinemas

Hollywood was once the symbol of creative genius. Movies served as the vehicle for global storytelling. It was the place where human’s dreams were brought to life. Films in local movie theaters were once the crown jewel of the film industry. It’s hardly the case these days.

Advertisement

For me, it’s partly because the two cinemas where Shin and I used to spend Friday nights — dinner and a movie — are now shuttered. Reno’s downtown Riverside Theatre and Lake Tahoe’s Heavenly Cinema have both closed amid declining ticket sales, increased competition from streaming services and changing consumer habits, such as favoring movies at home. More than 1,000 U.S. theater screens have closed since 2019, and total box-office revenue remains well below pre-pandemic levels.

Hollywood’s demise has a lot to do with what has appeared on movie screens in recent times. Instead of creative, bigger-than-life sagas of the human spirit in all its varied forms — in war, peace, romance and even crime — today’s Hollywood films typically rely upon remakes, sequels and prequels of past glories, computer-generated comic book super heroes extravaganzas or horror flicks designed to frighten, or simply disgust. Call me old-fashioned. The fact is, this once avid filmgoer has become just plain disinterested. Many of my younger friends seem much the same, for their own reasons.

Even famed Oscar-winning Hollywood film director Martin Scorsese has soured on all the comic book super-hero types now frequently served-up by today’s bottom-line studios. In an interview with GQ Magazine, Scorsese says, “Superhero movies are “not cinema,” comparing them to theme parks rather than the art form of human emotion and psychological experience. He argues that they prioritize spectacle and commercial interests over artistic expression and that Hollywood’s financial dominance by these “franchise pictures” is pushing other types of films to the margins. The Oscar-winning director went on to say: “Theaters have become amusement parks.”

The last time I checked — some of those theme parks are closing as well.

Advertisement

Is a Nevada film industry a good investment?

In a recent Wall Street Journal story titled “L.A.’s Entertainment Economy Is Looking Like a Disaster Movie,” the newspaper reports: “The entertainment industry is in a downward spiral… Work is evaporating, businesses are closing, longtime residents are leaving and the heart of L.A.’s creative middle class is hanging on by a thread. Hollywood’s downturn has rippled through the region’s economy.”

Which is why some Nevadans believe luring struggling Hollywood film studios here could be a wise pursuit. As reported by The Nevada Independent, a PAC funded with $1 million by a coalition of building trades unions is preparing “to spend big to shape public and legislative opinion to pave the way for film tax legislation” if a special session is convened by the governor.

Incentives to motivate companies to relocate to Nevada have always been a tax tool in the state’s arsenal. A low-tax, limited-regulatory business environment has benefitted Nevada’s growth spurts throughout its history.

Transferable tax credits were a device to bring the Teslas of the world to Nevada. Acting like coupons that could be sold to other companies to help offset a company’s initial investment, they’ve worked effectively to attract major new industries and sports franchises to Nevada — even though libertarian organizations like the Nevada Policy Research Institute have consistently opposed having government “pick winners and losers.” Pick we did in the case of Tesla, and overall, I believe Nevada ended up a winner with the electric-vehicle company that helped usher the state into the era of advanced manufacturing.

I’m not so sure bringing Hollywood studios here would yield the same return on investment. Beyond the turmoil in California’s film industry, other states — such as New York and Georgia, with far larger economies and infrastructure, and nearby New Mexico and Utah — are already far ahead of Nevada in attracting films to be made outside of Hollywood.

Advertisement

While I support the livelihoods of construction workers — whose well-being is tied to the state’s overall health and the ancillary benefits of growth and development — I believe there are more pressing needs and far better opportunities for Nevada than becoming another annex for an on-the-ropes Hollywood.

Why not incentivize housing instead of Hollywood?

Two times, movie studio executives have tried to pass legislation to expand Nevada’s film tax credit program. They hope a Special Session, expected to be called soon, may be their third-time charm.

Should the public, through its elected representatives from both political parties, fail to get on board with the latest “central casting” call from Hollywood executives, I’d recommend another way to get creative.

Like UNR just did.

The national housing crisis manifests in many forms, but most impactful is the severe shortage of affordable housing units. State and local municipalities are increasingly taking action to build and preserve affordable housing. Localities can deploy a wide range of tools and investments: tax abatements and exemptions, tax increment financing, payments in lieu of taxes, public land contributions, low-interest rate loans, voucher deployment and more.

Advertisement

Instead of $1.4 billion over the next 15 years in tax credits for a film studio complex and related businesses, why not use those potential transferable tax credits as an economic development tool to help finance and provide a source of equity to fund construction of housing or rehabilitation for affordable housing for key segments of the economy, such as teachers, medical professionals and seniors. Large industrial partners like Tesla could be incentivized or make good on the “housing and infrastructure” promise Elon Musk made to the region and his own employees.

Better we do things for Nevadans who are already here than for those we hope to migrate here from Los Angeles.

Legendary Hollywood filmmaker Frank Capra (“It’s a Wonderful Life”), once said, “Only the daring should make films. Only the morally courageous are worthy of speaking to their fellow men for two hours, and in the dark”.

Nevada could use a little of that daring and courage. Hollywood may not be the answer. But the housing needs of many of our own families certainly are.

Advertisement

Your thoughts? At: tahoeboy68@gmail.com.

“Memo from the Middle” is an opinion column written by RGJ columnist Pat Hickey, a member of the Nevada Legislature from 1996 to 2016. 



Source link

Advertisement

Nevada

2026 lunar eclipse visible in Nevada. How to watch

Published

on

2026 lunar eclipse visible in Nevada. How to watch


play

A lunar eclipse will be in Nevada skies late Monday night — or, more accurately, early Tuesday morning, March 3.

The downside is the hour: you’ll have to be up very late or very early, depending on your perspective.

Advertisement

Unlike a solar eclipse, which occurs when the moon passes between the Earth and the sun, a lunar eclipse happens when Earth casts its shadow on the moon, creating a rusty red hue.

If you’re looking to see the lunar eclipse, here’s everything you need to know about viewing it in Nevada.

What eclipse is in 2026?

If you live in the U.S., you will be able to see the lunar eclipse starting at 12:44 a.m. PST Tuesday, March 3, 2026, according to NASA. During the night, you’ll see the moon in a reddish hue, or a blood moon.

Totality lasts for a little more than an hour before the moon begins to emerge from behind Earth’s shadow, according to the popular site timeanddate.com. As the moon moves into Earth’s shadow, also known as the umbra, it appears red-orange or a “ghostly copper color,” hence its name: blood moon, NASA says.

Advertisement

“During a lunar eclipse, the moon appears red or orange because any sunlight that’s not blocked by our planet is filtered through a thick slice of Earth’s atmosphere on its way to the lunar surface,” NASA says. “It’s as if all the world’s sunrises and sunsets are projected onto the moon.”

Countdown clock to the 2026 total lunar eclipse

If you live in the U.S., you will be able to see the eclipse starting at 12:44 a.m. PST Tuesday, March 3, 2026.

The entire eclipse will last about six hours. People in Nevada can see the lunar eclipse during the early morning hours of Tuesday, March 3, 2026. The total lunar eclipse will be visible in North America, South America, Eastern Europe, Asia, Australia and Antarctica.

Everything will be over by 6:23 a.m. PST on March 3, 2026. Below is a countdown clock for the 2026 total lunar eclipse.

Where are the best places to see the lunar eclipse near Reno?

Though the Biggest Little City has an abundance of light pollution, darker skies are less than an hour from Reno.

Advertisement
  1. Fort Churchill State Park: The park provides a dark night sky ideal for evening astronomical events among the ruins of Fort Churchill. Park entrance costs $5 for Nevada residents and $10 for nonresidents.
  2. Pyramid Lake: A popular spot for Renoites seeking a night of stargazing, the lake is less than an hour from The Biggest Little City. It offers beautiful natural wonders and dark skies that give a clear view of the lunar eclipse.
  3. Lake Tahoe: Multiple locations around the lake are excellent for stargazing that are less than an hour from Reno.
  4. Cold Springs or Hidden Valley still get light pollution from the Biggest Little City, but have clearer skies than the middle of town.
  5. Driving down the road on USA Parkway will likely also give you the dark skies to see the lunar eclipse without having to make a significant drive outside of town.

Carly Sauvageau with the Reno Gazette Journal contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

How the strikes on Iran could impact gas prices in northern Nevada

Published

on

How the strikes on Iran could impact gas prices in northern Nevada


The United States and Israel launched targeted attacks on Iran on Saturday. The move brought new uncertainty into global energy markets, as northern Nevadans could be paying more at the pump in the coming weeks.

Following the strikes, oil prices increased. Brent crude, the international benchmark, jumped to roughly $73 a barrel, while the national benchmark, West Texas Intermediate, traded above $67.

Much of the concern centers around the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman. which carries about a fifth of the world’s oil supplies.

Patrick de Haan, head of petroleum analysis with GasBuddy, a price tracking company, spoke on the current questions in the region.

Advertisement

“The known would reduce oil prices if there becomes clarity, but it’s the unknown that is stoking fears…. If there is some sort of clarity in the days ahead, whether from Iran, the United States, or Israel, on how long this would last. We’d be able to put potentially an end date for the potential impacts that we’re seeing,” said de Haan.

Experts say for every $5 to $10 increase in oil prices, drivers could pay 15 to 25 cents more per gallon.

According to Triple-A, the average price of a gallon of gas in Nevada on Sunday comes in at $3.70, which comes in above the national average of roughly $2.98.

Over at the Rainbow Market on Vassar Street, prices sat just below four dollars a gallon on Sunday. Reno resident Abran Reyes talked about gas prices potentially going up.

“Whether it’s to work, to maybe run errands, to do stuff that helps you, gas is essential…. That gas price really hits, especially in today’s economy, where gas prices are extraordinary…. I just hope everyone’s safe. I hope our soldiers and all of our troops can be okay,” said Reyes.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada debuts public option amid federal health care shifts

Published

on

Nevada debuts public option amid federal health care shifts


More than 10,000 people have enrolled in Nevada’s new public option health plans, which debuted last fall with the expectation that they would bring lower prices to the health insurance market.

Those preliminary numbers from the open enrollment period that ended in January are less than a third of what state officials had projected. Nevada is the third state so far to launch a public option plan, along with Colorado and Washington state. The idea is to offer lower-cost plans to consumers to expand health care access.

But researchers said plans like these are unlikely to fill the gaps left by sweeping federal changes, including the expiration of enhanced subsidies for plans bought on Affordable Care Act marketplaces.

The public option gained attention in the late 2000s when Congress considered but ultimately rejected creating a health plan funded and run by the government that would compete with private carriers in the market. The programs in Washington state, Colorado, and Nevada don’t go that far — they aren’t government-run but are private-public partnerships that compete with private insurance.

Advertisement

In recent years, states have considered creating public option plans to make health coverage more affordable and to reduce the number of uninsured people. Washington was the first state to launch a program, in 2021, and Colorado followed in 2023.

Washington and Colorado’s programs have run into challenges, including a lack of participation from clinicians, hospitals, and other care providers, as well as insurers’ inability to meet rate reduction benchmarks or lower premiums compared with other plans offered on the market.

Nevada law requires that the carriers of the public option plans — Battle Born State Plans, named after a state motto — lower premium costs compared with a benchmark “silver” plan in the marketplace by 15% over the next four years.

But that amount might not make much difference to consumers with rising premium payments from the loss of the ACA’s enhanced tax credits, said Keith Mueller, director of the Rural Policy Research Institute.

Advertisement

“That’s not a lot of money,” Mueller said.

Three of the eight insurers on the state’s exchange, Nevada Health Link, offered the state plans during the open enrollment period.

Insurance companies plan to meet the lower premium cost requirement in Nevada by cutting broker fees and commissions, which prompted opposition from insurance brokers in the state. In response, Nevada marketplace officials told state lawmakers in January that they will give a flat-fee reimbursement to brokers.

The public option has faced opposition among state leaders. In 2024, a state judge dismissed a lawsuit, brought by a Nevada state senator and a group that advocates for lower taxes, that challenged the public option law as unconstitutional. They have appealed to the state Supreme Court.

Federal Policy Impacts

Recent federal changes create more obstacles.

Advertisement

Nevada is consistently among the states with the largest populations of people who do not have health insurance coverage. Last year, nearly 95,000 people in the state received the enhanced ACA tax credits, averaging $465 in savings per month, according to KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News.

But the enhanced tax credits expired at the end of the year, and it appears unlikely that lawmakers will bring them back. Nationwide ACA enrollment has decreased by more than 1 million people so far this year, down from record-high enrollment of 24 million last year.

About 4 million people are expected to lose health coverage from the expiration of the tax credits, according to the Congressional Budget Office. An additional 3 million are projected to lose coverage because of other policy changes affecting the marketplace.

Justin Giovannelli, an associate research professor at the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, said the changes to the ACA in the Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law last summer, will make it more difficult for people to keep their coverage. These changes include more frequent enrollment paperwork to verify income and other personal information, a shortened enrollment window, and an end to automatic reenrollment.

In Nevada, the changes would amount to an estimated 100,000 people losing coverage, according to KFF.

Advertisement

“All of that makes getting coverage on Nevada Health Link harder and more expensive than it would be otherwise,” Giovannelli said.

State officials projected ahead of open enrollment that about 35,000 people would purchase the public option plans. Of the 104,000 people who had purchased a plan on the state marketplace as of mid-January, 10,762 had enrolled in one of the public option plans, according to Nevada Health Link.

Katie Charleson, communications officer for the state health exchange, said the original enrollment estimate was based on market conditions before the recent increases in customers’ premium costs. She said that the public option plans gave people facing higher costs more choices.

“We expect enrollment in Battle Born State Plans to grow over time as awareness increases and as Nevadans continue seeking quality coverage options that help reduce costs,” Charleson said.

According to KFF, nationally the enhanced subsidies saved enrollees an average of $705 annually in 2024, and enrollees would save an estimated $1,016 in premium payments on average in 2026 if the subsidies were still in place. Without the subsidies, people enrolled in the ACA marketplace could be seeing their premium costs more than double.

Advertisement

Insights From Washington and Colorado

Washington and Colorado are not planning to alter their programs due to the expiration of the tax credits, according to government officials in those states.

Other states that had recently considered creating public options have backtracked. Minnesota officials put off approving a public option in 2024, citing funding concerns. Proposals to create public options in Maine and New Mexico also sputtered.

Washington initially saw meager enrollment in its Cascade Select public option plans; only 1% of state marketplace enrollees chose a public option plan in 2021. But that changed after lawmakers required hospitals to contract with at least one public option plan by 2023. Last year the state reported that 94,000 customers enrolled, accounting for 30% of all customers on the state marketplace. The public option plans were the lowest-premium silver plans in 31 of Washington’s 39 counties in 2024.

A 2025 study found that since Colorado implemented its public option, called the Colorado Option, coverage through the ACA marketplace has become more affordable for enrollees who received subsidies but more expensive for enrollees who did not.

Colorado requires all insurers offering coverage through its marketplace to include a public option that follows state guidelines. The state set premium reduction targets of 5% a year for three years beginning in 2023. Starting this year, premium costs are not allowed to outpace medical inflation.

Advertisement

Though the insurers offering the public option did not meet the premium reduction targets, enrollment in the Colorado Option has increased every year it has been available. Last year, the state saw record enrollment in its marketplace, with 47% of customers purchasing a public option plan.

Giovannelli said states are continuing to try to make health insurance more affordable and accessible, even if federal changes reduce the impact of those efforts.

“States are reacting and trying to continue to do right by their residents,” Giovannelli said, “but you can’t plug all those gaps.”

Are you struggling to afford your health insurance? Have you decided to forgo coverage? Click here to contact KFF Health News and share your story.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending