Connect with us

Midwest

Missouri factory worker found dead inside industrial oven, police say

Published

on

Missouri factory worker found dead inside industrial oven, police say

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Guatemalan national working under an alias was found dead inside an industrial oven at a cereal plant in Missouri last week, authorities say.

Nicolas Lopez Gomez, 38, who was working under the name Edward Avila, was located by officers, emergency medical services personnel and firefighters, the Perryville Police Department said. 

Officers were sent to the Gilster-Mary Lee Perryville Cereal Plant for a man “stuck in an industrial oven that was shut down,” police said. By the time they got to Gomez, he was already dead. 

The Perry County coroner was called in shortly after to assist.

Advertisement

MAN ARRESTED IN CONNECTION TO FERTILITY CENTER BOMBING IN CALIFORNIA DIES IN FEDERAL CUSTODY

Gilster-Mary Lee sign seen on top of the mix plant in Perryville, Missouri, which is right across the street from the company’s cereal plant, where a worker died on June 26, 2025. 

“OSHA [Occupational Safety and Health Administration] has been contacted concerning this accident and will be conducting its investigation,” Perry County Coroner Meghan Ellis said in a statement. “Our offices will work with them to determine how this occurred.”

“The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has an open and ongoing investigation into this incident,” a statement to Fox News Digital said. “No other information will be available until the investigation has been completed.”

FAMILY OF MOM MURDERED IN RITZY DC SUBURB DECADES AGO GETS JUSTICE AS PERP NOBODY EXPECTED PLEADS GUILTY

Advertisement

A Gilster-Mary Lee truck sits outside the Perryville Mix Plant on Old St. Mary’s Road in Perryville, Missouri. The cereal plant is right across the street. (Google Maps)

Fox News Digital reached out to the Gilster-Mary Lee Corporation for comment, but they did not immediately respond.

Gilster-Mary Lee Corporation operates 11 locations across three Midwestern states, its website says. The company has been in operation for 125 years, manufacturing “safe, quality food products” that are sold under private labels and by food service companies. 

Employment office for Gilster-Mary Lee locations in Perryville, Missouri. The company’s cereal and mix plants are right across the street from each other on Old St. Mary’s Road.  (Google Maps)

Advertisement

In Perryville, the company’s cereal and mix plants are right across the street from each other on Old St. Mary’s Road, Google Maps shows. 

Read the full article from Here

North Dakota

Port: On the demise of an important cultural bridge to North Dakota’s past

Published

on

Port: On the demise of an important cultural bridge to North Dakota’s past


MINOT — It’s hard to describe how important a cultural event the Norsk Hostfest was.

I say “was,” using the past tense, because news this week is that the annual event, which had just completed its 46th year, is coming to an end.

The event was important to me as a descendant of Scandinavian immigrants. My maternal great-grandparents came to America from Norway, and homesteaded a farm near the Ryder area. The Hostfest was a way for me to connect to their cultural traditions, from food and music to the history of the Norwegian diaspora.




Image and PDF Viewer

Advertisement

Click the image above to view the PDF document.

The event was also important to my family. We spent years attending and working at the event. We were a host family for Scandinavian performers who traveled to Minot to entertain at the event. We even got some local media coverage in 2004 about four generations of my family volunteering.

I have so many memories from the Hostfest. For a while, when I was a paperboy for the Minot Daily News, I would go out to the festival early in the morning to sell newspapers door-to-door in the RV campgrounds. My grandma would tell me stories about her immigrant parents.

Advertisement

And the food! I once ate so much

rommegrot

— a Norwegian dessert pudding — that the resulting gastro-intestinal pyrotechnics are still a thing of family lore.

I even met famed political consultant Karl Rove at the Hostfest one year.

He was there to be inducted into

Advertisement

the Scandinavian-American Hall of Fame,

and was being escorted around by former Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem. Apparently the two of them were friends from their College Republican days. They ran across me working at a booth. I was a part-time political blogger then. I hadn’t yet begun my full-time writing career.

I have so many happy memories from the Hostfest.

Now, it’s over.

“In recent years, the festival has faced significant increases in the cost of nationally recognized performers, as well as insurance, facilities, labor, and logistics,”

Advertisement

a press release from the Hostfest board said.

“At the same time, attendance levels have not rebounded to pre-pandemic levels, creating ongoing financial challenges that cannot be responsibly overcome.”

The pandemic certainly didn’t help the festival, and I think we can fairly blame some mismanagement, too. As the generation the event originally catered to began to die out there was little effort made to draw the interest of younger generations. It was expensive, too, making it cost prohibitive for younger families to begin the traditions of attendance that cultural event like the Hostfest depends on.

But it’s hard to ignore the involvement of Epic Companies,

which took over management of the event

Advertisement

for a couple of years post-pandemic before the company’s spectacular financial collapse prompted its exit from the arrangement. Epic had tried to take the event in a new direction, away from its cultural roots and toward some sort of a modern music festival, and it just didn’t work.

After years of failing to adapt to modern audiences, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and poor management by Epic Companies, Minot and North Dakota are losing a treasure.

A bridge to our past.

A preservation of an important part of our state’s history.

I’d like to think that the Hostfest will be replaced with something new that will continue to preserve Scandinavian heritage in our area, but it probably won’t be. To be clear, some preservation continues. The

Advertisement

Scandinavian Heritage Association,

which maintains the Scandinavian Heritage Park in Minot, will endure, and that’s a good thing. They do wonderful work.

It’s just not the same.

It feels like we need things like the Hostfest now more than ever. So many in our society, nearly all of them descendants of previous waves of immigration, have adopted a pronounced hostility to new generations of immigrants. They’ve committed themselves to making it clear that those new immigrants aren’t welcome. Which is why it’s important for us to remember our own immigrant past. The joys and the struggles and the warts.

The Hostfest was a part of that. Now it’s gone. So it goes.

Advertisement
Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.





Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

How difficult is Ohio State football’s 2026 schedule? See breakdown

Published

on

How difficult is Ohio State football’s 2026 schedule? See breakdown


Just how difficult is Ohio State’s 2026 football schedule? And how does it stack up against other Big Ten opponents’ schedules?

After an early matchup against Texas, the Buckeyes have a difficult stretch of Big Ten opponents including games against Oregon and Indiana, two 2025 College Football Playoff teams.

After a bye week, the Buckeyes will also travel to Los Angeles to play USC, which owns the top recruiting class in 2026 according to 247Sports.

Advertisement

See how Ohio State’s schedule might stack up against other Big Ten opponents.

2026 Big Ten opponents’ 2025 conference winning percentage

While college football teams look vastly different year to year due to graduating players and transfers, Ohio State’s 2026 Big Ten opponents combined have a stronger 2025 conference win-loss percentage than any other team’s opponents. The other 2025 CFP teams, Oregon and Indiana, rank fifth and sixth on the list.

  • Ohio State – 0.629
  • Northwestern – 0.580
  • Michigan – 0.568
  • Nebraska – 0.568
  • Oregon – 0.556
  • Indiana – 0.531
  • Washington – 0.531
  • USC – 0.519
  • Iowa – 0.506
  • Michigan State – 0.494
  • Purdue – 0.493
  • Minnesota – 0.481
  • Rutgers – 0.469
  • UCLA – 0.469
  • Illinois – 0.444
  • Maryland – 0.432
  • Penn State – 0.420
  • Wisconsin – 0.346

Ohio State football 2026 games against 2025 College Football Playoff teams

Including Ohio State, three Big Ten teams made the 2025 College Football Playoff. Indiana and Oregon, the other two teams that played against each other in the CFP semifinals, are on Ohio State’s schedule next season. While the Buckeyes will face Oregon at home, they will face the reigning national champion in Bloomington, Indiana.

Three teams in the conference – Northwestern, Nebraska and USC – will have to play all three 2025 CFP teams next season.

Advertisement

Teams facing three 2025 CFB teams:

Teams facing two 2025 CFB teams

  • Ohio State (Oregon, Indiana)
  • Illinois (Ohio State, Oregon)
  • Michigan (Ohio State, Oregon)
  • Washington (Oregon, Indiana)
  • Indiana (Ohio State, Oregon)

Teams facing one 2025 CFB team

  • Indiana (Ohio State)
  • Iowa (Ohio State)
  • Maryland (Ohio State)
  • Michigan State (Oregon)
  • Oregon (Ohio State)
  • Purdue (Indiana)
  • UCLA (Oregon)

Teams facing no 2025 CFB teams

  • Minnesota
  • Penn State
  • Rutgers
  • Wisconsin

2026 Opponents on USA Today’s way-too-early top 25 list

Since the end-of-the-year rankings fail to accurately represent how a team projects for the 2026 season, USA TODAY’s way-too-early top-25 poll can be used to judge Ohio State’s opponents.

Among Big Ten teams, Ohio State plays the most teams included in the top-25 list: Texas (No. 1), Iowa (No. 21), Michigan (No. 13), USC (No. 12), Oregon (No. 9) and Indiana (No. 4). The Buckeyes are No. 2 spot in the rankings.

Advertisement

See what matchups the rest of the conference has below:

  • Ohio State – 6 (Texas, Iowa, USC, Oregon, Indiana, Michigan)
  • Northwestern: – 5 (Indiana, Oregon, Ohio State, Iowa, Penn State)
  • Michigan – 5 (Ohio State, Iowa, Penn State, Indiana, Oregon)
  • Washington – 5 (Indiana, Oregon, Penn State, USC, Iowa)
  • Nebraska – 4 (Indiana, Oregon, Ohio State, Iowa)
  • USC – 4 (Indiana, Ohio State, Oregon, Penn State)
  • Purdue – 4 (Notre Dame, Penn State, Indiana, Iowa)
  • Rutgers – 4 (USC, Indiana, Michigan, Penn State)
  • Wisconsin – 4 (Notre Dame, Penn State, USC, Iowa)
  • Oregon – 3 (USC, Ohio State, Michigan)
  • Indiana – 3 (USC, Ohio State, Michigan)
  • UCLA – 3 (Oregon, Michigan, USC)
  • Illinois – 3 (Iowa, Ohio State, Oregon)
  • Maryland – 3 (Ohio State, USC, Penn State)
  • Michigan State – 3 (Notre Dame, Michigan, Oregon)
  • Penn State – 3 (USC, Michigan, Iowa)
  • Iowa – 2 (Ohio State, Michigan)

Ohio State ‘cross-country’ trips compared to Big Ten opponents

Last season, the Buckeyes had one trip to the West Coast, to open up Big Ten play against the Washington Huskies. This season, Ohio State once again has one West Coast trip, to face USC, but the Buckeyes will be coming off a bye entering the game.

USC, on the other hand, has a trip to Wisconsin before facing Ohio State the following week. Ohio State will also travel during its nonconference season to play Texas, which is 1,237 miles away.

No eastern Big Ten travels to play a West Coast Big Ten opponent more than once in the 2026 season. West Coast teams (USC, Washington, Oregon, UCLA) travel at least three times for road matchups against eastern Big Ten opponents. USC has the most road matchups in the Midwest: Wisconsin, Indiana, Rutgers and Penn State.

2026 Ohio State football schedule

All times TBD

Advertisement
  • Sept. 5: vs. Ball State
  • Sept. 12: at Texas
  • Sept. 19: vs. Kent State
  • Sept. 26: vs. Illinois
  • Oct. 3: at Iowa
  • Oct. 10: vs. Maryland
  • Oct. 17: at Indiana
  • Oct. 24: OFF
  • Oct. 31: at USC
  • Nov. 7: vs. Oregon
  • Nov. 14: vs. Northwestern
  • Nov. 21: at Nebraska
  • Nov. 28: vs. Michigan

Dan Aulbach covers breaking and trending sports for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at daulbach@dispatch.com and follow along X for more.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

From a South Dakota stage to a national platform: The winding road that got Tina Peters on the President’s radar

Published

on

From a South Dakota stage to a national platform: The winding road that got Tina Peters on the President’s radar


Mesa County’s former Clerk and Recorder has for months been a subject of national fascination, as well as a source of consternation for Colorado election officials. But it didn’t start out that way. 

Tina Peters first made national headlines in the summer of 2021, when the state started looking into the tampering of the county’s voting machines. Almost immediately, the county District Attorney’s office and the FBI began an investigation into the release of information from Mesa County’s Dominion voting election system and the role Peters played in it.

At the start of the investigation, Peters was attending a cybersecurity conference headlined by Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, and a leading purveyor nationally of false claims about election security. She quickly became a cause celebre on the right in President Donald Trump’s MAGA world, when people like Steve Bannon defended her right to investigate claims of election rigging. But for four years, Trump himself remained silent on Peters, even as his allies continued to claim she was innocent. 

“I’m not overly surprised that he didn’t have much to say during that time just because there was so much unknown, although that hasn’t stopped him in other ways,” said Republican Matt Crane, the executive director of the Colorado County Clerks Association, which has long pushed back against Peters’ efforts to try to prove election fraud. 

Advertisement

Peters was indicted by a grand jury from Mesa county and a Republican district attorney prosecuted the case. A jury of her peers later found her guilty on seven counts, including four felonies. 

“Ms. Peters has made this community a joke. She’s made respecting law enforcement a joke, made respecting court orders a joke. She’s not accepted any responsibility and considers this a badge of honor,” said Mesa County DA Dan Rubinstein during Peters’ sentencing hearing.

But even after her conviction and sentencing in the fall of 2024, still no word from Trump. 

“I had hoped that somebody smart was in his ear telling him that all of this was a facade,” said Crane. “She found no evidence of fraud. This is not a person worth getting behind or using calories on because she didn’t find any fraud, and she was a useful idiot for grifters and bad actors.”

Meanwhile, Peters’ supporters wanted Trump to speak out and take action. Scott Bottoms, a Republican representative in the Colorado Statehouse and now candidate for governor, said a team comprised of Peters’ attorneys, members of her inner circle and people like himself staged a campaign to alert the president to her cause. 

Advertisement

Bottoms thinks Trump didn’t initially weigh in because it was a state issue and also because he thinks the media was biased against Peters. 

“The media has been very quiet or very one-sided on the issue.” He said that contributed to Trump not being directly engaged. 

“I mean, how would he hear about a county clerk in Mesa County at the White House unless people had to just be beating on his door with it, and finally he opened his eyes and said, ‘Hey, this is a serious issue going on.’”

Peters’ conviction and sentence have stood out because other legal efforts related to 2020 election tampering have faltered. On Trump’s first day in office in his second term, he commuted the sentences of some of the people convicted of crimes stemming from the U.S. Capitol attack, and pardoned more than 1,200 people for crimes related to the January 6 riot. 

Then, in March, the administration turned some attention to Peters. The U.S Department of Justice decided to review her case, and in May of 2025, President Trump released his first social media post calling for her release. 

Advertisement

He referred to Peters as a hostage “being held in a Colorado prison by the Democrats, for political reasons. ” He asked the state to release her. 

“FREE TINA PETERS, NOW!” Trump wrote to punctuate his message. 

Trump has since ramped up efforts to secure her release, at one point telling state leaders to “rot in hell” and using Peters as a reason to punish the blue state, from efforts to cut federal funds to shutting down the National Center for Atmospheric Research and denying disaster emergency funding requests. Trump issued a symbolic federal pardon for her crimes, and Peters’ supporters are pushing for Democratic Gov. Jared Polis to commute her sentence. 

Crane is urging the governor to hold firm and resist pressure from Trump and said any special treatment for Peters would invite people to do nefarious things in the name of proving fraud or “stopping the steal.”

“It shows that you can try to undermine our election community, that you can commit these types of crimes, and that there’s no significant consequence to it … It becomes open season on our elections and our election personnel that you can have somebody now and go and listen to some disinformation, not know their jobs and say, hey, ‘we’re going to go and prove this.’”

Advertisement

But for Peters’ supporters, like Bottoms, Trump’s involvement has been welcome news. Though Bottoms said he is discouraged that federal funding for Colorado is being taken away, he said it’s because of the “leftists and the Marxists who control our state,” and is glad Trump is stepping in. 


Here is a timeline of Trump’s involvement in the Tina Peters case:

Aug. 12, 2024: A guilty verdict

After more than four hours of deliberation, a Mesa County jury finds Peters guilty on 7 charges, including four felony counts. 

Oct. 3, 2024: Prison time for ‘a charlatan’

21st Judicial District Judge Matthew Barrett sentences Peters to more than 8 years in prison. At sentencing, 21st Judicial District Attorney Dan Rubinstein argued for a strict sentence given Peters’ refusal to take accountability for her actions. 

Advertisement

“Ms. Peters has made this community a joke. She’s made respecting law enforcement a joke, made respecting court orders a joke. She’s not accepted any responsibility and considers this a badge of honor,” said Rubinstein.

Barrett lambasted Peters’ behaviour before handing down the prison time, noting that she was “as defiant a defendant as this court has ever seen.” 

“You are no hero,” Barrett told Peters. “You’re a charlatan who used, and is still using, your prior position in office to peddle a snake oil that’s been proven to be junk time and time again.” 

Mar. 3, 2025: Department of Justice gets involved

The federal government’s law enforcement arm wades into the Peters issue, announcing plans to review the state conviction. The Department of Justice submitted a statement of interest in district court. In it, the DOJ notes concerns about whether the case was political. 

Advertisement

Mar. 10, 2025: Colorado GOP leader calls for federal government to hold back funds

While campaigning to lead the Colorado GOP, Darcy Schoening tells 9News the federal government should pull funding from projects in Colorado, specifically citing Peters’ sentence as rationale.

May 5, 2025: The Truth (social) comes out

President Donald Trump pours fuel onto the Peters issue with a social media post calling for her release. In it, Trump describes Peters as a political prisoner and directs the Department of Justice to “take all necessary action to help secure” her release. 

Aug. 21, 2025: Trump takes aim at Colorado again, threatens harsh measures

Advertisement

Trump again calls for Peters’ release, this time while with a threat of consequences should she stay in prison. 

Sept. 2, 2025: Space command move announced, signs of a pressure campaign begin

Trump announces he is moving Space Command to Huntsville, Alabama. The President did not mention Peters in the announcement, but Colorado Democrats called the decision “political.” 

Nov. 12, 2025: Feds look to move Peters out of state custody

The Federal Bureau of Prisons sends a letter to the Colorado Department of Corrections requesting Peters’ be transferred to a federal facility. Such transfers from state to federal custody are rare and usually are reserved for cases involving long-term safety and security needs. 

Advertisement

Colorado’s Attorney General Phil Weiser and 21st Judicial District Attorney Dan Rubinstein would later co-author a letter to the governor asking Polis to reject the request, saying it was an attempt to circumvent the prison sentence Peters received. 

Dec. 8, 2025: Federal court rejects Peters’ habeas petition

A federal judge declines to consider Peters’ appeal, saying the state courts must settle the matter first. Peters’ legal team had been arguing that she should be eligible to post bond while the state appeal played out. 

Dec. 11, 2025: Peters pardoned, kind of

Trump claims on social media to have pardoned Peters. The action is met with skepticism as Peters was convicted on state charges, and the presidential pardon is commonly understood to be limited to federal crimes. 

Advertisement

Peters’ attorneys argue they have found a new read of the presidential pardon powers that could be read to apply to state charges as well. 

Dec. 16, 2025: Trump administration vows to dismantle NCAR, Dems think Peters issue to blame

In another blow to federal funding in Colorado, the Trump Administration announces plans to cut funding to the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder. Rep. Joe Neguse, a Democrat whose district includes Boulder, suggests it’s retaliation for Peters still being in prison. 

Dec. 24, 2025: Peters’ attorneys ask appeals court to review presidential pardon

Just ahead of scheduled oral arguments, Tina Peters’ attorneys ask the Colorado Court of Appeals to consider whether they still have jurisdiction over the clerk’s case in light of Trump’s pardon. 

Advertisement

Dec. 30, 2025: Trump vetoes Arkansas River Valley conduit

The bipartisan legislation would have helped finish a critical water project to benefit southeastern Colorado by giving local communities 100 years to pay back no-interest loans. 

Dec. 31, 2025: ‘May they rot in hell’

Trump takes to social media to call Gov. Jared Polis a “scumbag” and says Rubinstein, the district attorney in Mesa County, is “disgusting.” He concludes the post: ‘May they rot in Hell. FREE TINA PETERS!” 

Jan. 6, 2026: More cuts, more pressure from Trump Administration

Advertisement

The federal government freezes some childcare and food funding intended for Colorado. 

Jan. 8, 2026: Colorado AG ratchets up legal challenge

Weiser expands the scope of a lawsuit against the federal government, arguing that the cuts to Colorado funding amounted to a pattern of unlawful behavior. 

Jan. 8, 2026: Polis renews attention of his clemency powers with “harsh” comment

After publicly calling Peters’ prison sentence “harsh,” Polis kicks off a new wave of speculation that he might commute some of her sentence. 

Advertisement

Jan 9, 2025:

Tina Peters’ attorney, Peter Ticktin, tells CPR News that her legal team has applied for clemency.  The Governor’s office later told CPR that it could not confirm a request for clemency for Peters because and said under state law that clemency applications are not a public record. 

Jan. 14, 2026: Peters’ case heard by Colorado appellate court 

A panel of three Colorado Court of Appeals judges hears arguments as to whether Peters received a fair trial and sentence at the district court level. 

Jan. 18, 2026: Peters is involved in a prison scrap 

Advertisement

Peters is seen involved in a tussle with another inmate at the La Vista Correctional Facility in Pueblo.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending