Colorado
Colorado’s revived startup scene looks a lot like it did 20 years ago
“This,” said Danny Newman, a serial entrepreneur while on stage at a monthly networking dinner at The Pearl in Denver last month, “is game changing.”
Newman’s contribution to the local startup community that evening was to lead a group of founders in something he’d never quite done before: Crowdsource an idea, develop a sellable product, create a marketing plan and go live with a new company — all before dessert.
His highly interactive session involved vibe coding, which essentially gives anyone the ability to dream of something, say it or type it (i.e.: “prompts”) and leave the grunt work to artificial intelligence tools. It was a big hit, at least among the three dozen or so humans who shouted out business pitches: “Uber for helper monkeys,” “Amazon tariff price tracker,” “a chat bot that gets to know you” and takes your place at awkward meetings.
The winning idea? An “Uber of poop,” based on the crowd’s cheers and squeals for an on-demand pet waste pickup service.
Newman then took the audience through AI tools like Open AI’s o3, Anthropic’s Claude, Lovable, Manus and so many others to get the computer systems to handle market research, suggest a company name, develop a logo and web app, as well as set up pricing and a payment system. Within the hour, the on-demand pooper-scooper service for Denver’s busy professional appeared to be a good fit and The Turdminator was ready for business. Girl Scout cookies were served.
“Electric” was how attendee Ala Stolpnik described the evening, even as she pointed out that the reality of starting a tech company requires much more thought about security and user data. It needs real customer feedback that is absent in an AI vacuum. And what about staff? “It’s not something that is going to replace engineers or build software anytime soon,” she said.
But Newman’s contribution that evening wasn’t just to show off some trendy new tech. It was more about supporting the local startup scene.
A successful founder who sold his retail-tech company Roximity and is now behind restaurant-tech service Switchboard, Newman had practically been raised by local entrepreneurs, who he hung out with as a teenager. The pandemic put an instant end to in-person events and a return has been slow. He’s figuring out how to get the band back together and meet new founders. Earlier this year, he turned an old warehouse he owns in RiNo into a coworking space called ID345, where he hosts vibe coding meetups every other week.
“I thought stuff was happening and I just wasn’t connected,” said Newman, now a father in his 40s. “In reality, everyone was just kind of craving this but not getting it. I do think a lot of folks who are community minded, the folks working on creating stuff, we’re all like, ‘Hey, I remember how to do this. And everyone really does need all of this again, so let’s get back together.’”
And it’s not just the old-timers.
Stolpnik, an ex-Googler who moved to Boulder three years ago and founded AI startup Wisary last year, has ventured down the turnpike about a half-dozen times to attend the monthly Thunderview CEO Dinners in Denver. They’re organized by Eric Marcoullier, a veteran of the Colorado startup scene known for co-founding companies that either went public or were later acquired by industry titans like Yahoo, Twitter and News Corp.
While Stolpnik’s quite busy running her own startup, she said it’s been worth her time and effort to attend.
“This has been really, really great,” she said. “I’ve made connections, I’ve made some friends. It’s kind of lonely to be a CEO and especially a cofounder.”
After in-person events were quashed by COVID, founders are finding one another again, as they did more than two decades ago in Boulder and later Denver.
It’s a little different now. The community is larger and more diverse. Gatherings seem more intentional, and often with an industry or technical focus, like artificial intelligence, quantum computing or vibe coding. There are a lot of new founders wandering around plus an increase in investors interested in keeping their money local. There are also a lot of familiar faces.

“Post pandemic, events went to almost zero and then kind of year by year, the really great organizations that were involved in the community have started to chisel their way back,” said Erik Mitisek, former Colorado Technology Association CEO and a cofounder of Denver Startup Week. “There’s been some new ones too, like the AI Builders Meetup, which has like 600-plus people every month. That’s brand new based on our AI economy. The work that’s happening with Elevate Quantum — totally new. Elevate Quantum didn’t exist two years ago and they’ve got a huge following, tens of thousands who are excited about the quantum economy in the state.”
Marcoullier, now a startup coach and investor, prefers to gather in person. He began hosting his own events to give back to the community and support founders. Besides the monthly dinners, which debuted in March 2023, he has “office hours” on Mondays at the Rayback Collective food truck park in Boulder and on Fridays at Union Station in Denver.

But COVID really disrupted the startup community. He misses the cohesiveness of the smaller network in Boulder, the city he landed in to start Gnip, which was acquired by Twitter. COVID changed the community, but he’s doing what he can to bring something back.
“I feel like there is some sort of fundamental restructuring of how people engage in communities these days that is less focused on in-person interaction. I have no idea what that does to communities, but I certainly feel like it takes the place out of place,” Marcoullier said. “There are probably just as many, if not more, entrepreneurs in Boulder than there ever was. But that doesn’t mean they’re showing up to all the events.”
Getting back startup momentum
Whether it’s coincidence, fate or just life, changes have been afoot in the past year. When the Boulder-bred Techstars business accelerator announced last year it was leaving town and ending the Boulder program, the last Demo Day was well attended. Local mentors and alums also began strategizing on how to bring it back.

A controversial artificial intelligence bill that passed by state lawmakers last year, caught the tech industry by surprise. Conversations ensued and busy founders volunteered for committees as the tech industry coalesced over potential harm to all businesses, not just tech startups.
In March, Denver’s annual entrepreneurial fest, touted as the nation’s largest entrepreneurial event of its kind, changed its name to Colorado Startup Week because “when you actually dissect all the parts, the participants and the panels, we were telling the story of Colorado so that’s why we changed the name,” Mitisek said.
“We lived through the golden ages of Denver where we were on the top five of every single list in the United States — best place to start up, best place to build a business, fastest growing economy,” he added. “The communities continue to recalibrate after the pandemic.”
Smaller, targeted events have popped up all over the metro. Over at Endeavor Colorado, which launched in September 2019 to help companies scale larger faster, they organize exclusive events often held at a board member’s home.
New York transplants like Eric Shu, a principal at Access Venture Partners in Denver, recently teamed up with newish Boulder-based VC firm Massive Capital Partners to organize the inaugural Deep Tech Summit in May to get investors connected to research-intensive technologies like robotics, space tech and quantum computing.
Something is different right now.
“I think it’s momentum,” said Nicole Glaros, a former Techstars executive and investor who spent the past two years “soul searching.”
She’s back in the tech startup scene. Last month, she joined the highly regarded Matchstick Ventures as a partner and reconnected with her former Boulder Techstars colleagues. They’re also working to relaunch the Boulder Techstars that will return its original business model — relying on local investors, mentors and alums.
“I think one of the things that we got right in the early days was it was a community-funded program,” said Glaros, who stayed busy during her hiatus — she initiated the grassroots effort to get a National Women’s Soccer League franchise in Denver.
“The capital really came out of local investors,” she said. “Those angel investors are individuals who then also got involved as mentors. What happened was there was a beautiful alignment between the people in the community that were funding the programs, the entrepreneurs that were in the program, the staff of the program. Everybody had it in their best interest to see these companies succeed.”
Techstars, which started in 2006, expanded nationally and globally and as it grew, the connection to Boulder seemed to diminish.
“Techstars started raising very large institutional dollars. There were people from all over the country with these very large checks that were funding these local programs,” Glaros said. “They had returns on their mind. But they weren’t living in these communities. Their kids weren’t going to soccer practice together. And so we’re really bringing that piece back.”
It’s all about the money
But what has probably changed more so in the past 10 to 15 years is the money and its attitude.
Promising Colorado startups once headed to the coasts to raise capital, which often meant moving the headquarters closer to investors. Colorado would lose companies. That’s rarely the case nowadays, credited to the decades-long efforts to build on the area’s startup reputation and perhaps even to COVID, which has given rise to what Kirk Holland, managing director at Access Venture Partners in Denver, calls the “shadow talent market.”

“When I think of the positive impacts (of COVID), the optimist in me and for Colorado in particular, we got an influx of talent, not only the kind just moving to Colorado but joining companies in Colorado,” Holland said. “I call it the shadow talent market. We have just a ton of amazing talent here in the mountains and all over Colorado that are working for the big companies, the FANGs, or maybe startups in other parts of the country. That’s a pool that we haven’t even fully tapped.”
According to the latest tech industry report from the Colorado Technology Association, the number of technology workers in the state grew 11% between 2021 and 2023, a greater rate than the state’s overall workforce growth of 6.1%. The number of tech-related businesses grew 24.3%, or double the rate of overall businesses. About 10% of the state’s workforce is employed in technology.
And companies in the state tend to attract more than their fair share of venture funding. According to PitchBook data, which tracks investments, Colorado ranked 12th last year in the amount of capital invested. Venture funding has fallen nationwide since the peak in 2022 with both the U.S. and Colorado seeing total capital raised last year cut more than half in two years.
Likewise, the number of venture investors based in Colorado is also up from where it was 15 years ago — up 168% to 99, as of this week, according to PitchBook. The state’s active community though has followed national trends, which has seen a significant decline since 2022 as investors pulled back due to economic uncertainty.
“People do not realize how many investment firms are all of a sudden active and on the ground and even domiciled in Colorado,” said Dan Caruso, who sold his last telecom startup Zayo Group for $8.4 billion plus debt in 2019 and recently wrote a book about the industry, called “Bandwidth.”
Caruso, who invests through his family fund Caruso Ventures and is on the board of Endeavor Colorado, is a major force in the local ecosystem. He also has been very intentional about promoting the region by making himself available to media, producing a podcast and speaking up in front and behind the scenes to grow quantum, AI, space tech and other deep tech.
Something’s working and the state is seeing additional payoffs. Boulder just lured the Sundance Film Festival away from Utah.
“I think it’s the collective momentum of those investors who are getting momentum. They’ve raised their first fund, they’ve raised their second fund and may be on their third. … In some cases, it’s people who’ve moved from Silicon Valley and planted their roots here as investors, which is a big deal,” he said. “Sundance could be an amplification of that or a contributor to that.”
Denver Ventures is a new VC that debuted this month with a $20 million fund. But the folks behind it have been around since 2016, and were known as Denver Angels. The term “angels,” which typically refers to wealthy individuals who invest in companies, no longer seemed appropriate as more investors got involved. Amounts grew larger and the group wanted something more organized. So David Prichard, who started as CEO in 2019 when there were about 100 members, began organizing.
Now Denver Ventures numbers around 850 members. “Over 500 members have actually written a check and the other ones intend to,” Prichard said. Some investments are in the seven figures, like a $4 million investment in Centennial-based Boom Supersonic, which is developing a passenger aircraft to fly at supersonic speeds. And more investors want in.
“We get about 10 new investors a month engaging with our organization. And that’s completely organic. We’ve never done anything to market or try to bring them in,” Prichard said. “I think that’s a great testament to how many people in Colorado really do want to invest in these entrepreneurs.
Long-time Colorado VCs, like Access Ventures, have also recruited new blood like Eric Shu from New York. Shu took the lead and worked with Massive VC, a relatively new VC in Boulder, to put on the inaugural Colorado Deep Tech Summit at the School of Mines in May.
“As someone relatively new to the region, it’s been a privilege to join a startup community with so much depth,” Shu said in an email. “And what I think is even more exciting is that the tech community here is constructively competitive, actively pursuing and building coalitions and initiatives.”
Meanwhile, prominent Boulder venture capitalist Brad Feld emerged from a two-year hibernation (his words) in April.

Feld is like the papa of the community, having moved to Boulder in 1995 when few venture capitalists paid any attention to middle America. He’s a cofounder of The Foundry Group, which helped many young Colorado startups with a financial boost.
He’s the guy who wrote “Give before you get” in a book where he coined the term “startup communities.” It wasn’t about altruism but creating a positive feedback loop. The ethos was simplified to #GiveFirst at Techstars, which he cofounded with current CEO David Cohen, David Brown and now-Gov. Jared Polis.
Even though Feld checked out publicly for two years, mostly out of exhaustion, he said he responded behind the scenes when asked — helping the state get designated as an official U.S. hub for quantum computing. He also put his name on a letter opposing the state’s new controversial artificial intelligence law, passed last year.
“I haven’t been visible, but I think I’ve been helpful,” said Feld, who has a new book out on GiveFirst, and is back blogging, responding to emails and showing up. “I am encouraged by the number of next-generation founders who are now rolling into and playing leadership roles and defining their version of where this goes.”
He points to local tech CEOs, like Bryan Leach of Ibotta and Lee Mayer of Havenly, who grew their companies without leaving Colorado. And the newer venture firms like Matchstick Ventures headed up by Natty Zola and Ryan Broshar, and Denver-based Range Ventures cofounded by Chris Erickson and Adam Burrows.
Last year, Foundry announced it had raised its final fund. Feld said that doesn’t mean he’s done. It’ll take several years to invest the fund and even longer to manage it. He’s sticking around, he said. But he’s not planning to be in the spotlight.
“I really firmly believe that a vibrant startup community stays vibrant because the old people get out of the way,” Feld said, while attending the Techstars Workforce Demo Day in Denver earlier this month. “I’m about to be 60. I’ve been here for 30 years. I can continue to be involved and be engaged but the leadership needs to evolve.”
Colorado
Northern Colorado town to increase water and sewage rates 26% in 2026
As the demand for drinking water in Colorado continues to rise, a Northern Colorado community is planning to increase the price of its water and sewage services by 26% in 2026.
The town of Windsor, a rapidly growing community of more than 45,000 residents, plans to start increasing its prices in April of next year.
Town Manager Shane Hale told CBS Colorado the town and council had no other option but to rapidly increase their prices. He attributed it to a need for more services while also improving existing ones.
“We certainly are (aware of the sticker shock),” Hale said. “The town board lives in town. They are going to see these costs as well.”
Hale said the town needs to replace an aging infrastructure for their water distribution.
“We had a major distribution line for water that broke a couple times last year,” Hale said.
Also, to meet growth demand and EPA standards, the town also needs to completely replace its existing sewar treatment plant in the southeast corner of the community.
“We are not just building an expansion,” Hale said. “We have to build a brand-new plant.
Windsor originally hoped to build the new plant in 2020. Hale said, if they would have been able to do so, it would have cost around $50 million to complete.
However, since then, the cost of labor and supplies has inflated so significantly that the price for the same plant is projected to be three times more expensive than planned for.
CBS Colorado asked Hale why the town didn’t slowly increase rates over the years instead of completing one drastic spike of 26% in 2026.
“That is a great question. I will tell you we have been gradually increasing our rates each year,” Hale said. “The challenge that we had, especially on the sewer side, were our costs were increased by three times.”
In order to lower the price tag, the town has also reduced the size of the plant it’s going to build. Hale said the current plant can operate 2.8 million gallons of water per day. They hoped to build one that could accommodate 6.3 million gallons per day. However, to offset costs some while also meeting demand of the growing town, they now plan to build a plant that can manage 4.2 million gallons a day.
Hale said the town is at the mercy of the cost of construction and the price of getting machinery into their possession. He also said many of the items they need are only made internationally, meaning they are in line with others to get the product without much room for negotiation.
“Unfortunately, in order to manage our infrastructure and maintain it, the town doesn’t really have a choice,” Hale said.
Hale said the increased prices should be reflected in bills that arrive for residents in March of 2026. Not all residents will be impacted the same, as some are served water by other water providers.
Hale believes, if it weren’t for inflation, the town would not have increased the price of sewage treatment or water distribution in 2026.
Colorado
Power shutoffs likely in Colorado as ‘high impact wind event’ expected Wednesday
DENVER – Two big weather stories will play out Wednesday in Colorado’s High Country and portions of the plains and I-25 corridor as high winds are expected to batter portions of the state. The wind and low humidity will also create conditions for the rapid spread of any fire along the I-25 corridor including the Denver metro area.
“It will be another unseasonable warm day on Tuesday, which is day 8 of 60 degree plus temps,” said Lisa Hidalgo, Denver7 chief meteorologist. “Unfortunately with the warmer, dry and windy conditions, we’re looking at higher fire danger.”
“Damaging winds will blow down trees and power lines. Widespread power outages are expected. Travel will be difficult, especially for high profile vehicles. Strong winds will likely lead to rapid fire growth of any new fire,” wrote National Weather Service (NWS) forecasters in Boulder.
Denver7
A high wind warning starts at 11 a.m Wednesday and will be in effect until midnight.
“Strong downslope winds to impact the mountains, foothills, and I-25 corridor Wednesday afternoon into Wednesday night, with potential for widespread gusts 60-85 mph, strongest near the base of the foothills. Breezy conditions will extend into the plains through Thursday morning.”
Colorado’s mountains and foothills above 9,000 feet could see up to 85 mph wind gusts on Wednesday. Wind gusts between 50 to 70 mph are also possible for the lower foothills and communities on the western side of the I-25 corridor, wrote the NWS, which called the weather system a “high impact wind event.”
NWS Boulder
A red flag warning will go into effect starting at 11 a.m. Wednesday for the I-25 corridor to include Fort Collins, Boulder, the Denver metro, and Castle Rock through Colorado Springs.
The NWS said the “primary window of concern” will run through 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. Wednesday.
Weather News
Xcel Energy will likely shut off power Wednesday due to forecasted strong winds
Due to the wind situation, Xcel Energy customers should be advised the utility is planning for a Public Safety Power Shutoff, or PSPS, on Wednesday which means power would be proactively shut off in targeted areas for a period of time when wildfire risk is extremely high.
Before any PSPS would happen, Xcel Energy would first use another tool called Enhanced Powerline Safety Settings or EPSS.
EPSS are extra protections which allow power lines to remain active until an issue is detected such as “a tree branch or other object touching” a line, according to Xcel Energy.
Once an issue is detected, power to the line is shut off.
NWS Boulder
While Tuesday will remain mostly dry in Colorado, the weather system triggering Wednesday’s high winds will also bring snow to the higher elevations.
Hidalgo said there is a slight chance a shower could roll across the Denver metro area late Wednesday afternoon into the early evening hours.
Stay with Denver7 for updates and we will publish a live, Colorado weather blog tracking impacts on Wednesday.
Denver7’s Stephanie Butzer contributed to this report.
Denver7
DENVER WEATHER LINKS: Hourly forecast | Radars | Traffic | Weather Page | 24/7 Weather Stream
Click here to watch the Denver7 live weather stream.
Colorado
Colorado’s unaffiliated voters, who make up half the electorate, hold dim view of both parties, poll finds
Madison Osberger-Low/The Aspen Times
An overwhelming majority of Colorado’s unaffiliated voters say they reject both major parties and want to see Democrats and Republicans become more moderate, according to the findings of a new statewide poll.
Let Colorado Vote, a nonprofit founded by Kent Thiry, a multimillionaire and the former CEO of the Denver-based dialysis company DaVita, commissioned a survey of 1,210 active voters last month to gauge the sentiments of unaffiliated voters.
The poll was conducted by Keating Research from Nov. 10-17, and included 600 unaffiliated voters, 300 Democrats, 300 Republicans, and 10 others. The poll had an overall margin of error of 2.8 percentage points, and a 4 percentage point margin of error for unaffiliated voters. It had a 3.2 percentage point margin of error for likely 2026 voters.
Currently, 49.7% of all active Colorado voters are unaffiliated, a figure that has grown in recent years as political party registration shrinks. By comparison, just 25% of active registered voters are Democrats, and 23% are Republicans. Unaffiliated voters make up the majority of active voters in 21 Colorado counties, including Summit, Grand, Eagle, Garfield, Routt and Pitkin.
Thiry has been heavily involved in efforts to reshape Colorado’s political system in ways that give unaffiliated voters more voice. He was at the forefront of a successful 2016 ballot initiative that opened party primary elections to unaffiliated voters, and a 2018 measure that put redistricting in the hands of independent redistricting commissions, rather than state lawmakers.
Thiry said the results of last month’s poll dispel the theory that the state’s growing unaffiliated electorate is due to the state’s automatic voter registration. The poll found that more than 8 in 10 unaffiliated voters said they chose their status intentionally, rejecting both major parties. Most unaffiliated voters, 54%, also chose to refer to themselves as “independent.”
“Some partisans like to say, ‘Oh, independents are just too lazy, and they like to default to being an independent,” Thiry said during a virtual briefing last week on the poll results. “Not true. Look at the data — 85% of people chose to be an independent. It was a conscious decision.”

Unaffiliated voters who were surveyed said they want Democrats and Republicans to move away from the extreme flanks of their parties. Sixty-four percent said they want Democrats to become more moderate, compared to 65% who want the Republican Party to become more moderate.
When asked which party has become the most extreme, a plurality of unaffiliated voters, 45%, said Republicans, while 36% said Democrats and 14% said both. Despite their dim view of the two political parties, unaffiliated voters still tend to vote for a Democratic or Republican candidate during elections, and usually lean toward Democrats.
Thirty-five percent said they usually or always vote for the Democratic candidate, while 35% said they sometimes vote for a Democrat and sometimes a Republican. Twenty-six percent said they always or usually vote for the Republican.
Thiry is critical of Colorado’s current primary system, in which candidates from the same party compete to be their party’s nominee in a general election, arguing that it gives unaffiliated voters fewer choices, since they must choose to vote in one party’s primary.
In heavily partisan districts, the primary is often the election of consequence, with the winning candidate usually cruising to victory in the general election.
“The current system tends to drive an excessive percentage of candidates who are far-left or far-right, and it is much more difficult for an independent to pick someone who hangs around center-left or center-right,” Thiry said, adding that unaffiliated voters tend to vote for the “person, not the party.”
More than 7 in 10 unaffiliated voters said Congress is dysfunctional, not representative, and their vote doesn’t really matter. A similar number said they are frustrated with how often only a single candidate runs in primary elections.
Unaffiliated voters’ negative view of the political establishment extends from federal offices to the state level. Sixty-two percent view President Donald Trump unfavorably compared to 37% in favor, while 57% view the Colorado Republican Party unfavorably compared to 37% in favor.
They have a 56% unfavorable-to-39 % favorable view of the Colorado Democratic Party and a 48% unfavorable-to-36 % favorable view of the state legislature, which Democrats control.

Chris Keating, who runs the polling firm that conducted the survey, said the “largest defining characteristic of Colorado’s registered independent voters is that they are younger.”
Sixty-six percent of voters aged 18-34 are registered as unaffiliated. Keating’s poll found that the median age of an unaffiliated voter is 42, compared to 49 for Democrats and 54 for Republicans. Keating added that Hispanic active voters and men are slightly more likely to be unaffiliated.
Other findings from the poll include:
- The top three issues for unaffiliated voters in Colorado are housing affordability and the cost of living, taxes, spending and budget issues, and political leadership and polarization
- Fifty-two percent of unaffiliated voters say Colorado is on the wrong track, compared to 41% who say it is heading in the right direction
- Unaffiliated voters trust Republicans significantly more than Democrats when it comes to crime, and slightly more on immigration. They trust Democrats significantly more on issues of education, democracy and voting, the environment and conservation, and slightly more when it comes to inflation and the cost of living
- Sixty percent of unaffiliated voters favor keeping the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights in place as a way of keeping government spending in check and giving voters the final say on tax increases, compared to 26% who say TABOR should be repealed because it prevents the state from adequately funding schools, roads and health care
- In a generic matchup of congressional candidates, 44% of unaffiliated voters said they would vote for the Democratic candidate, compared to 38% who said they would vote for the Republican candidate if the election were held today
- Of 916 likely 2026 voters surveyed, Democrats hold a 14-percentage-point lead in the generic congressional matchup, and Trump’s favorability is minus 27 percentage points
To remedy some voter dissatisfaction and give Coloradans more choice in elections, Thiry advocated for moving to an “open” primary system, in which candidates of all political backgrounds can compete on a single ballot that is open to all voters, regardless of their party affiliation.
“I get accused all the time of wanting to destroy the two-party system — I think they’re doing a great job of destroying it themselves,” Thiry said. “What we’re proposing is to save that, to get them back to where they’re representing the core Americans who are center-left, center-right and center-center.”
Thiry pushed for open primaries in 2024 as part of Proposition 131, which sought to abolish party primaries for congressional races and state elections in favor of an open ballot. The measure would also have instituted ranked-choice voting in general elections for those same races. Unite America, a national nonprofit that Thiry co-chairs, has led similar election reform measures in more than a dozen other states. Still, Proposition 131 was ultimately rejected by voters in Colorado last year.
Curtis Hubbard, a Colorado political strategist who served as a spokesperson for the Proposition 131 campaign, said a post-election assessment found that most voters supported open primaries but were confused by ranked-choice voting.
“When voters are confused, they default to ‘No,’” Hubbard said. “The open primary is something that voters actually like. They like the idea of being able to support candidates, the best candidates, on the ballot regardless of party.”
Proposition 131 was defeated by just over 7 percentage points, with 53.5% of Colorado voters against the measure and 46.5% in favor. Thiry signaled there will be future attempts to revive the effort.
“We got awfully close, despite the complexity of our proposal,” Thiry said. “The reservoir of support was very strong, and going forward, we’re probably going to pay more attention to the fully open primary than ranked choice voting, in the short term.”
-
Iowa2 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Iowa4 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans
-
Maine20 hours agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Technology6 days agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster