Connect with us

San Diego, CA

San Diego City Council approves rollback of ADU incentives

Published

on

San Diego City Council approves rollback of ADU incentives


The San Diego City Council voted 5-4 on Monday to impose new restrictions on accessory dwelling units (ADUs), setting up a possible confrontation with state housing officials who warned the changes could violate state law.

Included in the package of reforms proposed by the City Planning Department are new fees to pay for infrastructure, parking requirements for properties far from public transit and restrictions on cul-de-sacs and in wildfire hazard zones.

The greatest change to the program is a new cap on the number of ADUs a homeowner can build in their backyard. The city’s ADU bonus program currently has no such cap, but does restrict the number of ADUs based on lot size, height limit and other zoning regulations.

Councilmember Henry Foster III proposed a cap of four ADUs for lots that are 8,000 square feet or less, five ADUs for lots between 8,001 and 10,000 square feet and six ADUs on lots of 10,001 square feet or more. The standard lot size for a single-family home in the vast majority of San Diego is 5,000 square feet.

Advertisement

An earlier motion that would have limited all properties to four ADUs failed to win a majority. Foster’s motion passed 5-4 after Council President Joe LaCava switched his vote to “yes.” Also voting “yes” were Councilmembers Jennifer Campbell, Marni von Wilpert and Raul Campillo. Councilmembers Stephen Whitburn, Kent Lee, Vivian Moreno and Sean Elo-Rivera voted “no.”

“ADUs (are) part of our housing solution,” LaCava said after more than four hours of public testimony, most of it in opposition to large ADU projects. “But it doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t be right-sized.”

Also included in the package of reforms is an allowance for homeowners to sell off ADUs separately as condominiums.

Mayor Todd Gloria and the council have been under pressure to scale back the ADU bonus program, which has led to some projects with a dozen or more ADUs on a single property. Homeowner groups say such projects reduce privacy, constrain parking supply and alter the visual character of suburban-style neighborhoods.

Neighbors for a Better San Diego, the group leading the opposition to the ADU bonus program, sent an email Monday night saying the council’s reforms were “not perfect, but definitely better.”

Advertisement

“It’s not the ‘4 is Fair Everywhere’ that we had hoped for,” the email said, referring to the group’s preference for a citywide cap of three ADUs per property in addition to the primary residence. “But it will greatly reduce the damage that has been done to neighborhoods by predatory investors under this program.”

Last Friday, the state’s Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) sent San Diego a letter threatening to find the city in violation of state law if the reforms were approved as presented. The ADU bonus program is a component of the city’s strategy to undo the racist and discriminatory housing policies of past generations, the letter argues, and reducing its scope could hinder those efforts.

City staff, who said the letter took them by surprise, swiftly revised their recommendations, agreeing to keep the ADU bonus program in place in wealthy, low-density neighborhoods such as Point Loma, La Jolla and Del Mar Heights where the program had been proposed for removal.

City staffers said they would respond to HCD in writing by the agency’s deadline of July 11.

“What the City Council approved closely aligns with the staff’s recommendation,” mayoral spokesperson Rachel Laing told KPBS. “We thank the council for their feedback and friendly amendments. We’ll continue to engage with the state’s Housing and Community Development agency to ensure San Diego’s housing element remains in compliance and that we maintain our prohousing designation.”

Advertisement

Defenders of the ADU bonus program say it has produced hundreds of lower-cost housing options in neighborhoods dominated by more expensive single-family homes, and that it’s creating affordable housing for the middle class with no subsidy from taxpayers.

“That’s incredibly meaningful to the people who live in those homes now, and I’m glad that they were built,” said Councilmember Moreno. “But it’s not enough. We still need more housing for families.”

San Diego permitted 5,720 ADUs between 2021 and 2024, according to figures shared by city staffers. Of those, 875 were permitted under the city’s ADU bonus program.

Saad Asad, spokesperson for the prohousing YIMBY Democrats of San Diego County, said the council’s reforms would make housing more expensive and harder to find.

“With one vote, City Council just made it harder to build affordable housing during a housing shortage,” Asad said. “They’ve effectively told San Diegans: Pay more to live here, or move farther out and sit in traffic.”

Advertisement



Source link

San Diego, CA

Home damaged by fire in Carmel Valley

Published

on

Home damaged by fire in Carmel Valley


Two families were displaced from their Carmel Valley townhome after it went up in flames earlier this afternoon. 

This happened just before 3 p.m. on Moratalla Terrace.  Fire investigators said the fire started inside a garage unit because of faulty electrical equipment and robotics projects.  One neighbor said she’s thankful for the quick response.

“The people that own the house were in the driveway calling 911, and within, I think within five minutes of me smelling the smoke the fire trucks were here,” said Nikki Briggs.  I’m just thankful that everyone was okay, and that it didn’t keep spreading.  Like if it would have been a wildfire, that would have been terrible.”

Firefighters say most of the damage was contained in the garage.  A total of nine people were displaced by the fire.  Five people lived inside the unit that burned.  Thankfully all of them made it out safely without any injuries.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Gossamer Bio Receives ‘Hold’ Rating from Analysts – San Diego Today

Published

on

Gossamer Bio Receives ‘Hold’ Rating from Analysts – San Diego Today


Shares of Gossamer Bio, Inc. (NASDAQ:GOSS) have received a consensus ‘Hold’ rating from the 10 research firms currently covering the company, according to a report from MarketBeat. The average 12-month price target among analysts is $5.43.

Why it matters

Gossamer Bio is a clinical-stage biotech company focused on developing therapies for immune-mediated and inflammatory diseases, as well as oncology. The ‘Hold’ rating and mixed analyst views could impact investor sentiment and the company’s ability to raise capital for further drug development.

The details

The analyst ratings for Gossamer Bio include two ‘Sell’ recommendations, four ‘Hold’ ratings, and four ‘Buy’ recommendations. Some firms have lowered their price targets on the stock, with HC Wainwright decreasing its target from $10 to $5.

Advertisement
  • Gossamer Bio released its latest quarterly earnings report on March 17, 2026.

The players

Gossamer Bio, Inc.

A clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company headquartered in San Diego, California that is focused on developing oral, once-daily therapies for immune-mediated and inflammatory diseases, as well as oncology.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

The mixed analyst views on Gossamer Bio highlight the challenges facing the company as it seeks to advance its pipeline of drug candidates through clinical trials and regulatory approvals. The ‘Hold’ rating could make it more difficult for the company to raise capital and fund its operations.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Lifeguards recover body of man believed to have drowned in Oceanside

Published

on

Lifeguards recover body of man believed to have drowned in Oceanside


Oceanside Harbor Beach. (File photo courtesy of @CityofOceanside via X)

A man apparent drowned in the waters near the Oceanside Pier Saturday morning, despite efforts by lifeguards and paramedics to revive him.

The Oceanside Fire Department’s Lifeguard Division and the Oceanside Police Department responded to a report of a missing man at about 4:30 a.m.. Officials said the man was last seen swimming in the ocean about a half-hour earlier.

Lifeguards and police immediately initiated a coordinated search effort using pier vantage points, surveillance cameras and watercraft, but the search was suspended at approximately 5:30 a.m. after no one was found, fire officials said.

“At approximately 10:50 a.m., lifeguards discovered an unresponsive adult male, matching the earlier description, in the water near Lifeguard Tower 12, at Oceanside Harbor Beach,” Division Chief Blake Dorse said in a statement. “The individual was removed from the water, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was immediately initiated.”

Advertisement

Fire and rescue personnel continued efforts to resuscitate the man on the way to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead. He is believed to be the one who was reported missing near the pier.

Authorities did not release the man’s name.

“The Oceanside Lifeguard Division reminds the public to exercise caution when entering the ocean, especially during early morning hours or when lifeguards are not actively monitoring the water,” Dorse said. “Always swim near an open lifeguard tower and avoid entering the water alone.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending