Technology

Reddit will help advertisers turn ‘positive’ posts into ads

Published

10 months ago

June 16, 2025

Reddit will help advertisers turn ‘positive’ posts into ads

Reddit is launching a new feature for advertisers that slots positive posts from Reddit users right under their ads.

The new alpha feature, called Conversation Summary Add-ons, “dynamically integrates positive content from Reddit users directly below an advertiser’s creative, putting community conversations front-and-center in the user experience and blending AI-driven efficiency with real human perspectives,” according to a post from Reddit.

As shown by Reddit, you’ll be able to scroll through the posts that appear under an ad. You’ll also see a short summary of what Reddit users are saying about the advertiser. Jackbox Games and Lucid are alpha testers of the feature.

Powering this new feature is an “engine” Reddit calls Reddit Community Intelligence. According to the company, Reddit Community Intelligence can turn the platform’s more than 22 billion posts and comments “into structured intelligence for smarter marketing decisions.”

As part of today’s announcements, which Reddit is making alongside the Cannes Lions festival, the company is also introducing a “scalable, AI-powered social listening tool” called Reddit Insights. “Informed by proprietary metadata, it provides precise, real-time insights that help marketers confidently plan campaigns, validate creative ideas, and make smarter business decisions,” Reddit says.

Technology

The Artemis Moon base project is legally dubious

Published

1 hour ago

April 1, 2026

Press Room

The Artemis Moon base project is legally dubious

With NASA planning to launch four astronauts on Wednesday on its Artemis II mission, the race to return to the Moon is back on. The current mission will see astronauts aboard the Orion capsule travel around the Moon before returning to Earth in 10 days’ time. They’ll be testing out the hardware and systems that could soon see Americans standing on the Moon for the first time in more than 50 years in the Artemis IV mission scheduled for 2028. NASA isn’t ready to land people on the Moon just yet, but that’s the aim for the next five years: to not only get people onto the Moon but establish a lengthy human presence on its surface.

That’s NASA’s selling point of Artemis, compared to the Apollo missions of the 1960s and ’70s — we won’t just be visiting the Moon for a few days, but rather inhabiting it for a long period of time. Exactly how long is still unclear, but the idea is to build a Moon base that allows astronauts to live on the lunar surface for weeks or even months at a time.

That makes logistics much more complicated, as astronauts won’t be able to bring all the supplies and resources they would need along with them. Instead, they would need to make use of the limited resources that exist on the Moon, in a process called in-situ resource utilization. Rather than hauling a huge amount of water along for the ride from Earth, for example, we’ll just go and find some ice on the Moon and melt that to use instead. Simple, right?

That’s the justification underlying much of Artemis: Resources are needed to support a Moon base, so we need to build a Moon base to search for them.

It’s really not. There’s the science. And there’s the law.

The Moon’s environment is harsh and inhospitable, with dangerous space radiation, dusty material called regolith that is sharp as glass and destroys equipment, and a different level of gravity to contend with. Though less of a fantasy than the wild Mars colonization plans promised by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, NASA’s aim to establish a base on the Moon by 2030 is still wildly optimistic. Throughout its messaging on Artemis, NASA has emphasized the importance of identifying and extracting resources from the Moon, including water for fuel, helium-3 for energy, and rare earth elements like scandium that are used in electronics. It’s hard to know how abundant these resources are until they’ve been more fully mapped and assessed, but there is at least potential value, as they are required for sustaining habitation on the Moon. And that’s the justification underlying much of Artemis: Resources are needed to support a Moon base, so we need to build a Moon base to search for them.

The agency has even described these efforts as a “lunar gold rush.” But this points to a problem with Artemis that isn’t solvable by developing new technologies: Some experts say that extracting resources from the Moon is a violation of international law.

There isn’t a huge amount of international law that applies to space exploration, but what there is is very clear in one regard: No one owns the Moon. The Outer Space Treaty (which was signed nearly 60 years ago but is still the main basis for international law in space today, if you can believe it) is very explicit regarding the principle of non-appropriation, meaning that nations can’t claim sovereignty over any body in space. But what about extracting resources? There, we get into sticky territory.

“The US considers that resource extraction is not appropriation … That is an incorrect interpretation of the Outer Space Treaty.”

“The US considers that resource extraction is not appropriation,” says Cassandra Steer, space law expert and founder of the Australasian Centre for Space Governance. Many international space lawyers, including Steer, have argued that this is unlawful. “That is an incorrect interpretation of the Outer Space Treaty. You’re trying to carve out a loophole.” After all, if a nation started digging up resources from a territory it didn’t have claim to on Earth these days, that would cause a few legal problems.

The US has been tactical in its approach to this issue, through the use of an agreement called the Artemis Accords. This is not an international treaty, but rather an agreement signed by over 60 nations about adopting high-level principles regarding space exploration and the Moon in particular. Many of these principles are sound, reasonable approaches to space exploration, covering topics like the sharing of scientific data, consideration of safety and emergency procedures, and adherence to the peaceful use of space.

But the document also includes sections specifically allowing the extraction and use of space resources, saying that this doesn’t conflict with the principle of non-appropriation, and allowing specific nations to establish “safety zones” around areas of their lunar activity where other nations cannot interfere.

That’s not exactly saying that whoever gets to the Moon first and claims a chunk of it now owns it, but it is implicitly saying that whoever starts activities like research or mining in a certain lunar region now gets to extract resources from that region and other countries can’t stop them. It’s not owning a piece of the Moon, but it is getting priority access to it by drilling, scraping, and occupying a strategic location for its potential value.

It’s hard not to draw a parallel between this approach and the history of land grabs across the American West in the 19th century, especially regarding access to key resources such as water. “I think the Artemis Accords might open the door for these sorts of access claims on the Moon,” says Rebecca Boyle, journalist and author of a book on the topic, Our Moon. “The accords do say that safety zones should be relevant to the activities at hand, but again, I think a creative attorney or a nifty legal argument could lead to a situation where someone who gets to a spot first uses the safety zone rule to lay claim to whatever is there.”

The smart move on the part of the US was integrating the accords into the Artemis program, so countries that wanted to be involved in Artemis had to sign the document. With a handful of key players like Canada, Japan, Australia, the UAE, and the UK signed on, many other countries, including France, Israel, Saudi Arabia, India, and Germany, followed suit.

“And so, it was a bit of a strong-arming of the US to say, if you want in on our program, you have to agree with our international law interpretation. It is forcing what we call opinio juris in international law,” Steer explains. The power of this consensus from so many countries is that, if resource extraction is tolerated in practice, the original intention of the treaty can be in effect overruled by a broadly accepted interpretation.

Steer summed up NASA’s approach bluntly: “You’re just trying to rewrite the treaty, and somehow you’ve convinced 60 countries to do it with you.”

“Why go to the Moon? And it is, to my mind, purely geopolitical.”

The real elephant in the room of this legal wrangling is China, which did not sign the Artemis Accords and is on course to set its own astronauts on the Moon perhaps even before the US can. China and the US have practically zero relationship when it comes to space activities, but China has been building its own international cooperations for its lunar program, including signing an agreement with Russia and carrying payloads from various European countries and Saudi Arabia on its lunar rovers. China has plans to build its own Moon base with Russia called the International Lunar Research Station, and the US is aggressively pushing its Moon program to try to beat its rivals to the punch.

“The multi-trillion- dollar question is, why go to the Moon? And it is, to my mind, purely geopolitical,” Steer says. That’s certainly what drove the US during the last space race, when the Cold War was in full swing and racing the Soviet Union to the Moon was not just a matter of political power but also an attempt to demonstrate who had the superior political ideology. Now, in the age of America First Trumpism, the US is attempting to prove its power and capability once again, but the nationalist rhetoric fails to capture the reality of space exploration, which is that it’s now dependent on international partnerships and cross-border cooperation.

Today, it’s not only prestige that is at stake but also access to space resources, from controlling cislunar orbits and lunar locations to controlling the materials required for the Moon’s further exploration, such as ice or helium-3. NASA, after all, has been notably circular in its justifications for Artemis: We need to send astronauts to the Moon to secure access to ice, because we need access to water to support human exploration. There are potential scientific justifications for a Moon mission, from learning about the formation of the Solar System to using the Moon as a base for building a powerful telescope, but these haven’t been well articulated or widely promoted by NASA.

“The real justification, the hidden one, is who gets to have political dominance,” Steer says. “Space is just another domain where geopolitics are playing out. It’s no different from the AI race, it’s no different from competition around other resources, around oil, around water … It’s another domain where the US is grasping at straws to remain the single dominant power, and discovering that actually it can’t.”

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Georgina Torbet

Technology

Banking tech data breach exposes 672K in ransomware attack

Published

2 hours ago

April 1, 2026

Press Room

Banking tech data breach exposes 672K in ransomware attack

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

If you’ve ever trusted your bank to keep your financial data safe, this incident will hit close to home.

A behind-the-scenes tech company used by banks has revealed that more than 672,000 people had sensitive personal and financial information stolen in a ransomware attack. That includes details that criminals can use to drain accounts, open loans, or impersonate you.

What makes this more concerning is that the company is not a household name, so you likely never knew your data was even there.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

HOW TO SAFELY VIEW YOUR BANK AND RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS ONLINE

More than 672,000 people had personal and financial data exposed after a ransomware attack hit Marquis, a little-known tech company used by banks. (ArtMarie/Getty Images)

All about the Marquis data breach

Marquis, a fintech company based in Texas, provides data analytics tools to hundreds of banks. Banks rely on Marquis to study customer behavior and improve services, which means Marquis has access to highly sensitive financial and personal data.

In August 2025, hackers reportedly gained access to Marquis’ systems and carried out a ransomware attack. The company now says at least 672,075 people were affected. More than half of them are in Texas, but customers across multiple regions are involved.

The stolen data reportedly includes names, dates of birth, home addresses, bank account details, debit and credit card numbers, and even Social Security numbers. That combination is enough to commit serious identity fraud.

Marquis later filed a lawsuit against its firewall provider, SonicWall, claiming that a security flaw may have allowed attackers to steal critical configuration files. According to the lawsuit, those files gave hackers a roadmap into Marquis’ network, which they used to steal data and deploy ransomware.

What the lawsuit alleges

The lawsuit goes further, alleging that SonicWall failed to properly secure its cloud backup system, which exposed firewall configuration files, encrypted credentials and detailed network architecture tied to customer environments. Marquis claims this level of access effectively gave attackers a blueprint of its defenses. Marquis also alleges that SonicWall knew its cloud backup service had been compromised but did not promptly disclose the full scope of the breach. According to the complaint, the company initially reassured customers that firewall protections were not affected, delaying Marquis’ ability to take protective action. The complaint further alleges gross negligence, arguing that SonicWall failed to uphold basic cybersecurity responsibilities expected of a security provider.

What Marquis says happened

CyberGuy reached out to Marquis for comment, and a spokesperson provided the following statement:

“In August 2025, Marquis Marketing Services identified a data security incident and immediately enacted our incident response protocols, including proactively taking affected systems offline to protect our data and our customers’ information. We engaged leading third-party cybersecurity experts to conduct a comprehensive investigation and notified law enforcement.

In September 2025, after the data security incident affected our systems, our firewall service provider, an industry-leading cybersecurity company, publicly disclosed that a threat actor had earlier in the year gained unauthorized access to its cloud backup service. Marquis had recently begun using this provider’s firewalls to help protect our network. While the provider initially reported that fewer than 5% of customers were affected, it later clarified in October 2025 that firewall configuration data and credentials associated with all customers using the cloud backup service, including Marquis, had been accessed.

We know our customers place great trust in us, and we take that responsibility seriously. Protecting information remains our highest priority, and we continue to enhance our security measures in response to the evolving cyber threat landscape. We are grateful for the cooperation, understanding and support of our employees and customers throughout this process.”

We also reached out to SonicWall for comment, but did not hear back before our deadline.

WHY SCAMMERS OPEN BANK ACCOUNTS IN YOUR NAME

A ransomware attack on Texas-based fintech firm Marquis exposed sensitive data that criminals could use to steal identities, open loans and target bank customers. (FreshSplash/Getty Images)

How the attack unfolded and why it matters to you

This attack did not target you directly. Instead, it hit a company that sits in the middle of the banking system. That is what makes it dangerous. Think of it like this: you lock your house, but someone breaks into the security company that manages keys for your entire neighborhood. Suddenly, they can unlock multiple homes without ever touching your door.

In this case, hackers reportedly gained access to firewall configuration files. These are like blueprints that show how a company’s defenses are set up. With that information, attackers can find weak spots and slip in without setting off alarms.

Security experts warn that when firewall configuration files and credentials are exposed, attackers can more easily map out a network, identify vulnerabilities and bypass protections that would normally stop an intrusion.

Once inside, they copied sensitive data and likely encrypted systems to demand a ransom. Even if the company restores operations, your data is already out there.

Criminals can use your Social Security number and financial details to open credit cards, take loans, or access your bank accounts. They can also combine your data with other leaks to create convincing scams that look legitimate. You might receive calls, emails, or messages that seem to come from your bank but are actually attempts to steal more information.

9 ways you can protect yourself from the Marquis data breach

If your information was exposed, or even if you’re not sure, taking action now can reduce your risk of fraud, identity theft, and unauthorized access to your accounts.

1) Check if your email and passwords are compromised

To see if your email was affected, visit Have I Been Pwned at haveibeenpwned.com. It is the first and official source for this newly added dataset. Enter your email address to find out if your information appears in the Synthient leak. When done, come back here for Step 2.

2) Change your passwords immediately

Start with your most important accounts, such as email, medical and banking. Use strong, unique passwords with letters, numbers, and symbols. Avoid predictable choices like names or birthdays. Never reuse passwords. One stolen password can unlock multiple accounts. A password manager makes this simple. It stores complex passwords securely and helps you create new ones. Many managers also scan for breaches to see if your current passwords have been exposed. See my review of the Best Password Managers of 2026 at Cyberguy.com.

3) Monitor your bank accounts closely

Check your transactions at least once every few days, not just when your monthly statement arrives. Look for small, unfamiliar charges because criminals often test accounts with tiny transactions before attempting larger withdrawals. Catching this early gives you a better chance of stopping further damage.

4) Place a fraud alert or credit freeze

If your Social Security number may be exposed, consider placing a fraud alert or freezing your credit. This makes it harder for criminals to open new accounts in your name. A freeze is a stronger protection because lenders must verify your identity before issuing credit.

WHY A CREDIT FREEZE ISN’T THE END OF IDENTITY THEFT

The Marquis breach shows how sensitive financial data can be exposed through third-party companies most bank customers never know exist. (sshepard/Getty Images)

5) Enable two-factor authentication (2FA)

Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) whenever possible, especially for banking and email accounts. This adds a second step, like a code sent to your phone, which makes it much harder for someone to access your accounts even if they have your password.

6) Check if your data is already circulating online

With breaches like this, your information can end up on the dark web without you knowing. If you find your information is out there, take it seriously and consider removing your data where possible or using a data removal service to limit further exposure. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com.

7) Watch out for targeted scams

With your personal details exposed in the Marquis data breach, scammers can craft messages that feel legitimate. Be cautious of calls or emails claiming to be from your bank asking for verification or urgent action. Always contact your bank directly using official numbers instead of responding to those messages. Also, avoid clicking links you don’t recognize. The best way to safeguard yourself from malicious links that install malware, potentially accessing your private information, is to have strong antivirus software installed on all your devices. This protection can also alert you to phishing emails and ransomware scams, keeping your personal information and digital assets safe. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices at Cyberguy.com.

8) Consider identity theft protection services

These services monitor your personal information across credit reports, dark web marketplaces, and financial systems. They can alert you quickly if your identity is being misused, giving you a chance to act before serious damage occurs. See my tips and best picks on Best Identity Theft Protection at Cyberguy.com.

9) Keep your devices updated and secure

Make sure your phone, computer, and apps are up to date with the latest security patches. Install trusted antivirus software to detect malicious activity. While this breach did not happen on your device, attackers often follow up with malware-based scams.

Kurt’s key takeaway

This breach highlights a growing problem you rarely see. Your data does not just live with your bank. It is shared across a network of third-party companies that you have never heard of, yet they hold enough information to expose your entire financial identity. When one of them fails, the consequences fall on you. The legal battle between Marquis and SonicWall also raises a bigger question about accountability. When cybersecurity providers themselves are accused of exposing sensitive infrastructure and delaying disclosure, it shows how quickly trust can break down across the entire system.

Should companies that handle your financial data face automatic penalties when breaches expose hundreds of thousands of people? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson is an award-winning tech journalist who has a deep love of technology, gear and gadgets that make life better with his contributions for Fox News & FOX Business beginning mornings on “FOX & Friends.” Got a tech question? Get Kurt’s free CyberGuy Newsletter, share your voice, a story idea or comment at CyberGuy.com.

Technology

Amazon’s Big Spring Sale 2026: all of the latest deals

Published

13 hours ago

April 1, 2026

Press Room

Amazon’s Big Spring Sale 2026: all of the latest deals

If you’re looking for the best time to get a deal this spring, it might very well be during Amazon’s Big Spring Sale, which runs through 11:59PM PT tonight. We’re still highlighting the best that the sale has to offer, including the many so-called “doorbuster” deals that will appear throughout the remainder of the seasonal shopping event.

Despite the fact that the sale will end in a few short hours, you can find deals on all sorts of consumer tech, from personal audio and home theater upgrades to steep discounts on video games, mobile accessories, and various doo-dads for tinkerers. Given that the sale coincides with the arrival of spring, you can also find deals on plenty of outdoor-friendly gear, including portable Bluetooth speakers, open-style earbuds, and more.

Amazon’s annual spring sale doesn’t require a Prime membership to participate in, either. Most of the deals are available to everyone, with big-name retailers like Best Buy, Walmart, and Target matching Amazon’s pricing in many instances. There are sure to be some Prime-exclusive sales in the mix, so regardless of where you plan to shop, we’ve got you covered.