Connect with us

Politics

Column: Trimming the fat from the federal budget shouldn't hurt the most vulnerable this much

Published

on

Column: Trimming the fat from the federal budget shouldn't hurt the most vulnerable this much

They’re having big problems in China.

According to the country’s health commission, roughly a third of China’s residents are overweight, with 16% considered obese. Another study found that if the trend isn’t reversed, by 2050 nearly 630 million people in China will either be overweight or obese. Alarmed by the recent findings, this week China’s National Health Commission announced plans to establish health clinics with the specific purpose of helping people better manage their weight. Officials also plan to use Olympic athletes as role models and dispense scales to hotels and other public spaces as not-so-subtle reminders of the potential harm to society.

While it’s easy for individuals to associate weight loss with vanity, the studies all make it clear that government needs to look at the impact of obesity on society through an economic lens. Not just in terms of healthcare costs — obesity can lead to diabetes, heart disease and cancer — but in productivity as well. One recent study found that obesity could drag down the global GDP by more than 3% by 2060. That’s a loss of $4 trillion because of obesity, led by China, India and the United States.

After genetics, Chinese officials listed diet, physical activity, mental health and sleep deprivation as contributing factors to the obesity epidemic. And so Beijing has set its sights on actively trying to improve people’s way of life — a noble ideal that is often overshadowed by human frailty and the ugliness of politics.

Every policy decision an elected official makes reflects how they view the purpose of government. Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence, said, “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government.” It’s important to point out that he was an enslaver, so the question of whose life is worth caring for has always been a moving target. President George W. Bush turned to those same words from Jefferson, while declaring National Sanctity of Human Life Day back in January 2002.

Advertisement

“Let us recognize the day with appropriate ceremonies in our homes and places of worship,” he said. “Rededicate ourselves to compassionate service on behalf of the weak and defenseless, and reaffirm our commitment to respect the life and dignity of every human being.”

Of course, by the time he gave that speech, Bush had already started one war. Ultimately, the collective “war on terror” would claim some 900,000 lives. In 2004, he threw his support behind a ban on same-sex marriage in an effort to fire up his base during the presidential election. So much for respecting “the life and dignity of every human being.” So much for the care of human life being “the first and only legitimate object of good government.”

Like China, we too have a big problem. Jefferson’s words are a challenge to live up to — in foreign policy, in social policy, in public health, even in decisions about a topic as seemingly impersonal as the national debt.

According to the U.S. Treasury Department, our government is more than $36 trillion in debt, the highest external debt in the world. That averages to more than $100,000 per person. A lot of extra weight to carry around.

Earlier this month, the House Budget Committee said: “If Congress does not act swiftly to confront the structural disconnect between reckless federal spending and incoming revenues, our nation will experience either slow and painful economic demise through sustained stagnation or a swift and catastrophic sovereign debt crisis whereby our creditors lose confidence in our ability to service and repay our debt.”

Advertisement

A sentiment I agree with.

Here’s where the disagreements tend to multiply: How do Congress and the Trump administration view the role of government? Which human lives do they believe are worth caring for? Whose happiness counts? Which lives should be protected from destruction?

We’re getting answers to all those questions, because the policy decisions that are being made now that Trump’s Republican Party controls the White House and Capitol Hill — the cuts to the federal budget, the firings of federal employees — are all tied to why lawmakers and the president believe government exists.

In five years, every single baby boomer will officially be a senior citizen. That’s more than 70 million Americans eligible for Medicare and Social Security. Sounds like an expensive tab to pick up, right? But a nation where millions of seniors are poor and unable to access healthcare is much worse. Look at our own history: After the stock market crashed in 1929, half of seniors ended up in the poorhouse, depended on charity or died from starvation. Prior to Social Security, only 15% of companies offered pensions. So yeah, we know what America looks like without a safety net — and it’s not pretty.

Fortunately, fiscal prudence does not require dismantling the federal government and eliminating protections for the poor and elderly. Yes, cutting our national debt is important. And it can be done with care for human life and happiness.

Advertisement

However, while China is getting its bloat under control by improving its citizens’ way of life, we seem to be taking the opposite approach.

@LZGranderson

Politics

Federal judge blocks Trump from cutting childcare funds to Democratic states over fraud concerns

Published

on

Federal judge blocks Trump from cutting childcare funds to Democratic states over fraud concerns

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal judge Friday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from stopping subsidies on childcare programs in five states, including Minnesota, amid allegations of fraud.

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, a Biden appointee, didn’t rule on the legality of the funding freeze, but said the states had met the legal threshold to maintain the “status quo” on funding for at least two weeks while arguments continue.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said it would withhold funds for programs in five Democratic states over fraud concerns.

The programs include the Child Care and Development Fund, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, and the Social Services Block Grant, all of which help needy families.

Advertisement

USDA IMMEDIATELY SUSPENDS ALL FEDERAL FUNDING TO MINNESOTA AMID FRAUD INVESTIGATION 

On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it would withhold funds for programs in five Democratic states over fraud concerns. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

“Families who rely on childcare and family assistance programs deserve confidence that these resources are used lawfully and for their intended purpose,” HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill said in a statement on Tuesday.

The states, which include California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York, argued in court filings that the federal government didn’t have the legal right to end the funds and that the new policy is creating “operational chaos” in the states.

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian at his nomination hearing in 2022.  (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Advertisement

In total, the states said they receive more than $10 billion in federal funding for the programs. 

HHS said it had “reason to believe” that the programs were offering funds to people in the country illegally.

‘TIP OF THE ICEBERG’: SENATE REPUBLICANS PRESS GOV WALZ OVER MINNESOTA FRAUD SCANDAL

The table above shows the five states and their social safety net funding for various programs which are being withheld by the Trump administration over allegations of fraud.  (AP Digital Embed)

New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, called the ruling a “critical victory for families whose lives have been upended by this administration’s cruelty.”

Advertisement

New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, called the ruling a “critical victory for families whose lives have been upended by this administration’s cruelty.” (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Fox News Digital has reached out to HHS for comment.

Continue Reading

Politics

Washington National Opera is leaving the Kennedy Center in wake of Trump upset

Published

on

Washington National Opera is leaving the Kennedy Center in wake of Trump upset

In what might be the most decisive critique yet of President Trump’s remake of the Kennedy Center, the Washington National Opera’s board approved a resolution on Friday to leave the venue it has occupied since 1971.

“Today, the Washington National Opera announced its decision to seek an amicable early termination of its affiliation agreement with the Kennedy Center and resume operations as a fully independent nonprofit entity,” the company said in a statement to the Associated Press.

Roma Daravi, Kennedy Center’s vice president of public relations, described the relationship with Washington National Opera as “financially challenging.”

“After careful consideration, we have made the difficult decision to part ways with the WNO due to a financially challenging relationship,” Daravi said in a statement. “We believe this represents the best path forward for both organizations and enables us to make responsible choices that support the financial stability and long-term future of the Trump Kennedy Center.”

Kennedy Center President Ambassador Richard Grenell tweeted that the call was made by the Kennedy Center, writing that its leadership had “approached the Opera leadership last year with this idea and they began to be open to it.”

Advertisement

“Having an exclusive relationship has been extremely expensive and limiting in choice and variety,” Grenell wrote. “We have spent millions of dollars to support the Washington Opera’s exclusivity and yet they were still millions of dollars in the hole – and getting worse.”

WNO’s decision to vacate the Kennedy Center’s 2,364-seat Opera House comes amid a wave of artist cancellations that came after the venue’s board voted to rename the center the Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts. New signage featuring Trump’s name went up on the building’s exterior just days after the vote while debate raged over whether an official name change could be made without congressional approval.

That same day, Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio) — an ex officio member of the board — wrote on social media that the vote was not unanimous and that she and others who might have voiced their dissent were muted on the call.

Grenell countered that ex officio members don’t get a vote.

Cancellations soon began to mount — as did Kennedy Center‘s rebukes against the artists who chose not to appear. Jazz drummer Chuck Redd pulled out of his annual Christmas Eve concert; jazz supergroup the Cookers nixed New Year’s Eve shows; New York-based Doug Varone and Dancers dropped out of April performances; and Grammy Award-winning banjo player Béla Fleck wrote on social media that he would no longer play at the venue in February.

Advertisement

WNO’s departure, however, represents a new level of artist defection. The company’s name is synonymous with the Kennedy Center and it has served as an artistic center of gravity for the complex since the building first opened.

Continue Reading

Politics

AOC accuses Vance of believing ‘American people should be assassinated in the street’

Published

on

AOC accuses Vance of believing ‘American people should be assassinated in the street’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is leveling a stunning accusation at Vice President JD Vance amid the national furor over this week’s fatal shooting in Minnesota involving an ICE agent.

“I understand that Vice President Vance believes that shooting a young mother of three in the face three times is an acceptable America that he wants to live in, and I do not,” the four-term federal lawmaker from New York and progressive champion argued as she answered questions on Friday on Capitol Hill from Fox News and other news organizations.

Ocasio-Cortez spoke in the wake of Wednesday’s shooting death of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good after she confronted ICE agents from inside her car in Minneapolis.

RENEE NICOLE GOOD PART OF ‘ICE WATCH’ GROUP, DHS SOURCES SAY

Advertisement

Members of law enforcement work the scene following a suspected shooting by an ICE agent during federal operations on January 7, 2026, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

Video of the incident instantly went viral, and while Democrats have heavily criticized the shooting, the Trump administration is vocally defending the actions of the ICE agent.

HEAD HERE FOR LIVE FOX NEWS UPDATES ON THE ICE SHOOTING IN MINNESOTA

Vance, at a White House briefing on Thursday, charged that “this was an attack on federal law enforcement. This was an attack on law and order.”

“That woman was there to interfere with a legitimate law enforcement operation,” the vice president added. “The president stands with ICE, I stand with ICE, we stand with all of our law enforcement officers.”

Advertisement

And Vance claimed Good was “brainwashed” and suggested she was connected to a “broader, left-wing network.”

Federal sources told Fox News on Friday that Good, who was a mother of three, worked as a Minneapolis-based immigration activist serving as a member of “ICE Watch.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Ocasio-Cortez, in responding to Vance’s comments, said, “That is a fundamental difference between Vice President Vance and I. I do not believe that the American people should be assassinated in the street.”

But a spokesperson for the vice president, responding to Ocasio-Cortez’s accusation, told Fox News Digital, “On National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day, AOC made it clear she thinks that radical leftists should be able to mow down ICE officials in broad daylight. She should be ashamed of herself. The Vice President stands with ICE and the brave men and women of law enforcement, and so do the American people.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending