Politics
Column: Trump wants to undo all kinds of race and gender progress. Here's what stands in his way
The Trump administration is hell-bent on “restoring” this country to an entirely fictional time when white people succeeded based purely on merit, people of color got ahead solely because of affirmative action and women understood that they were the inferior sex.
Trump’s hostility to social progress and civil rights is seeping into every corner of life — the armed forces, college and university campuses, public schools and corporations.
Shortly after he took office, Trump fired CQ Brown Jr., a four-star Air Force general and former fighter pilot and the second Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He also fired the highest-ranking woman in American military history, Adm. Linda Fagan, who was commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard. His Defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, canned Adm. Lisa Franchetti, who was chief of naval operations and the first woman on the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
All had stellar military careers. But they ran afoul of Trump by embracing the fundamentally American ideal that our diversity is our strength. E pluribus unum, anyone?
“Any general that was involved — general, admiral, or whatever — that was involved in any of that DEI woke s— has got to go,” Hegseth told the right-wing podcaster Shawn Ryan in November. Hegseth has stated flatly that women don’t belong in combat, and in his 2024 book, “The War on Warriors,” he questioned Brown‘s promotion to the top military job.
“Was it because of his skin color?” the future secretary asked. “Or his skill? We’ll never know, but always doubt — which on its face seems unfair to CQ.” (Who is this racist “we” of whom he speaks?)
That is quite a statement from a Fox News personality who was appointed to one of the nation’s most important jobs based on such tissue-thin qualifications as his telegenic qualities and MAGA politics. His shortcomings — including a propensity to drink himself into oblivion, according to numerous witnesses, and a $50,000 payment to a woman who accused him of sexual assault — are forgivable in Trump World. You see, he is a white man who looks good on TV.
As for college campuses, the hysteria around efforts to foster diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, is the current iteration of the panic that previously enveloped critical race theory, the nearly half-century-old precept that racism has shaped public policy and other facets of American life. And those controversies, of course, followed decades of paranoia around affirmative action, the practice of increasing employment, educational and other opportunities for individuals who belong to disadvantaged groups such as racial minorities.
The ultraconservative Supreme Court majority put the final nail in affirmative action’s coffin in 2023, ruling that colleges and universities — public and private — may not consider race as one of many factors in deciding which qualified applicants to admit. Never mind centuries of white legacy admissions and Kushner-esque purchases of admission to Harvard. Giving applicants a leg up is apparently unfair only if it advantages people of color.
Trump’s petulant and blatantly racist policies are symptoms of the ongoing American backlash against the social advances of the late 20th century. As white Americans become a minority, as women continue to make strides toward gender equality and have the audacity to stand up to sexual harassment and assault, the white male power structure has shown — over and over — that it will resist with everything it’s got. You think you control your own body, ladies? Think again!
Many of us naively thought the 2008 election of the first Black president signaled a sea change in white Americans’ attitudes about race, but that was far too cheery a view.
It was only in 2020 that George Floyd was murdered by Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin, unleashing a tidal wave of protests against police brutality and corrosive racism. That led more corporations and other institutions to embrace policies designed to advance the careers of qualified people who might have otherwise been overlooked.
And yet it took less than five years — and the second election of our Racist in Chief — for the forces of white supremacy to engineer a course correction and reverse the goodwill efforts borne of the most dramatic public lynching in modern American history.
Don’t believe me? The conservative podcaster Ben Shapiro has called for Chauvin to be pardoned. (“Something to think about,” posted the execrable Elon Musk.)
In the same racist vein, a Republican congressman from Georgia introduced a bill to withhold federal funding from the administration of Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser unless she agrees to remove the famous “Black Lives Matter” mural on a street near the White House. Last week, Bowser said she would remove it because “we can’t afford to be distracted by meaningless congressional interference. The devastating impacts of the federal job cuts must be our No. 1 concern.”
Making America great again for white people is such an integral part of the Trump agenda that only hours after he was sworn in, he signed an executive order banning DEI programs in the federal government. His order also directs federal agencies to develop plans to thwart DEI initiatives in the private sector and universities.
“It’s a marked attempt to chill DEI initiatives … placing them in the crosshairs of the federal government such that even if conducted lawfully, private employers may be forced to respond to federal probes,” the Associated Press reported.
The spineless executives of Pepsi, Google, Goldman Sachs, Target, Facebook, Amazon, McDonald’s and Walmart, among others, could not comply fast enough. All have signaled that they will backtrack on or end their DEI programs.
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has bulked up and infamously called for “more masculine energy” in his company.
Consumers are hardly powerless, though. On Wednesday, in honor of Lent, a Black Georgia pastor, the Rev. Jamal Bryant of New Birth Missionary Baptist Church, called for a 40-day “Target fast.” The length of time may be symbolic, but the call to action is not; a Lenten boycott of the retailer, says Bryant’s website, is “a spiritual act of resistance.”
The week before, a group called the People’s Union USA asked Americans to boycott Amazon and its companies, including Zappos, Ring, Whole Foods and Prime Video, for one day. On Friday, it expanded the call for an “economic blackout” to one week.
Thank God for Costco, whose shareholders rejected a proposal to end the company’s DEI policies in January. That prompted the Republican attorneys general of 19 states to threaten Costco with reprisals for its “unlawful discrimination.”
Let them try. It’s quite possible that Americans love a bargain even more than they hate racism.
Bluesky: @rabcarian.bsky.social. Threads: @rabcarian
Politics
Trump signs order to protect Venezuela oil revenue held in US accounts
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump has signed an executive order blocking U.S. courts from seizing Venezuelan oil revenues held in American Treasury accounts.
The order states that court action against the funds would undermine U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
President Donald Trump is pictured signing two executive orders on Sept. 19, 2025, establishing the “Trump Gold Card” and introducing a $100,000 fee for H-1B visas. He signed another executive order recently protecting oil revenue. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Trump signed the order on Friday, the same day that he met with nearly two dozen top oil and gas executives at the White House.
The president said American energy companies will invest $100 billion to rebuild Venezuela’s “rotting” oil infrastructure and push production to record levels following the capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro.
The U.S. has moved aggressively to take control of Venezuela’s oil future following the collapse of the Maduro regime.
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
Politics
Column: Some leaders will do anything to cling to positions of power
One of the most important political stories in American history — one that is particularly germane to our current, tumultuous time — unfolded in Los Angeles some 65 years ago.
Sen. John F. Kennedy, a Catholic, had just received his party’s nomination for president and in turn he shunned the desires of his most liberal supporters by choosing a conservative out of Texas as his running mate. He did so in large part to address concerns that his faith would somehow usurp his oath to uphold the Constitution. The last time the Democrats nominated a Catholic — New York Gov. Al Smith in 1928 — he lost in a landslide, so folks were more than a little jittery about Kennedy’s chances.
“I am fully aware of the fact that the Democratic Party, by nominating someone of my faith, has taken on what many regard as a new and hazardous risk,” Kennedy told the crowd at the Memorial Coliseum. “But I look at it this way: The Democratic Party has once again placed its confidence in the American people, and in their ability to render a free, fair judgment.”
The most important part of the story is what happened before Kennedy gave that acceptance speech.
While his faith made party leaders nervous, they were downright afraid of the impact a civil rights protest during the Democratic National Convention could have on November’s election. This was 1960. The year began with Black college students challenging segregation with lunch counter sit-ins across the Deep South, and by spring the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee had formed. The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was not the organizer of the protest at the convention, but he planned to be there, guaranteeing media attention. To try to prevent this whole scene, the most powerful Black man in Congress was sent to stop him.
The Rev. Adam Clayton Powell Jr. was also a warrior for civil rights, but the House representative preferred the legislative approach, where backroom deals were quietly made and his power most concentrated. He and King wanted the same things for Black people. But Powell — who was first elected to Congress in 1944, the same year King enrolled at Morehouse College at the age of 15 — was threatened by the younger man’s growing influence. He was also concerned that his inability to stop the protest at the convention would harm his chance to become chairman of a House committee.
And so Powell — the son of a preacher, and himself a Baptist preacher in Harlem — told King that if he didn’t cancel, Powell would tell journalists a lie that King was having a homosexual affair with his mentor, Bayard Rustin. King stuck to his plan and led a protest — even though such a rumor would not only have harmed King, but also would have undermined the credibility of the entire civil rights movement. Remember, this was 1960. Before the March on Washington, before passage of the Voting Rights Act, before the dismantling of the very Jim Crow laws Powell had vowed to dismantle when first running for office.
That threat, my friends, is the most important part of the story.
It’s not that Powell didn’t want the best for the country. It’s just that he wanted to be seen as the one doing it and was willing to derail the good stemming from the civil rights movement to secure his own place in power. There have always been people willing to make such trade-offs. Sometimes they dress up their intentions with scriptures to make it more palatable; other times they play on our darkest fears. They do not care how many people get hurt in the process, even if it’s the same people they profess to care for.
That was true in Los Angeles in 1960.
That was true in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021.
That is true in the streets of America today.
Whether we are talking about an older pastor who is threatened by the growing influence of a younger voice or a president clinging to office after losing an election: To remain king, some men are willing to burn the entire kingdom down.
YouTube: @LZGrandersonShow
Politics
Federal judge blocks Trump from cutting childcare funds to Democratic states over fraud concerns
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A federal judge Friday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from stopping subsidies on childcare programs in five states, including Minnesota, amid allegations of fraud.
U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, a Biden appointee, didn’t rule on the legality of the funding freeze, but said the states had met the legal threshold to maintain the “status quo” on funding for at least two weeks while arguments continue.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said it would withhold funds for programs in five Democratic states over fraud concerns.
The programs include the Child Care and Development Fund, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, and the Social Services Block Grant, all of which help needy families.
USDA IMMEDIATELY SUSPENDS ALL FEDERAL FUNDING TO MINNESOTA AMID FRAUD INVESTIGATION
On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it would withhold funds for programs in five Democratic states over fraud concerns. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)
“Families who rely on childcare and family assistance programs deserve confidence that these resources are used lawfully and for their intended purpose,” HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill said in a statement on Tuesday.
The states, which include California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York, argued in court filings that the federal government didn’t have the legal right to end the funds and that the new policy is creating “operational chaos” in the states.
U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian at his nomination hearing in 2022. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
In total, the states said they receive more than $10 billion in federal funding for the programs.
HHS said it had “reason to believe” that the programs were offering funds to people in the country illegally.
‘TIP OF THE ICEBERG’: SENATE REPUBLICANS PRESS GOV WALZ OVER MINNESOTA FRAUD SCANDAL
The table above shows the five states and their social safety net funding for various programs which are being withheld by the Trump administration over allegations of fraud. (AP Digital Embed)
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, called the ruling a “critical victory for families whose lives have been upended by this administration’s cruelty.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, called the ruling a “critical victory for families whose lives have been upended by this administration’s cruelty.” (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Fox News Digital has reached out to HHS for comment.
-
Detroit, MI7 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology4 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX5 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Dallas, TX2 days agoAnti-ICE protest outside Dallas City Hall follows deadly shooting in Minneapolis
-
Iowa4 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Delaware2 days agoMERR responds to dead humpback whale washed up near Bethany Beach
-
Health6 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Nebraska4 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska