Connect with us

Colorado

Has Colorado lost its shine when it comes to attracting residents from other states?

Published

on

Has Colorado lost its shine when it comes to attracting residents from other states?


Colorado has long relied on people relocating to the state to fuel its economy, and while natives may complain about more crowded roads and the lack of housing, those transplants both fill and generate jobs, making them the state’s most important import.

Since the pandemic, there has been a sharp drop in people moving to Colorado from other states minus those leaving, known as net domestic migration, and a sharp rise in international migration, or people coming to Colorado from another country, according to numbers from the U.S. Census Bureau’s “vintage estimates,” which fill the gap between the big counts that happen every 10 years.

International flows, which rose rapidly during the Biden administration, are likely to fall fast under the second Trump administration, and the rate of natural increase, or births minus deaths, is expected to head lower in the years ahead before going negative around 2050. That leaves domestic migration as key to the state’s economic fortunes, but two Census counts conflict with each other on what is happening there.

Using the latest numbers from the U.S. Census American Community Survey (ACS), StorageCafe, a storage facility search engine owned by Yardi Systems, reported that nearly 31,000 more people moved to Colorado than moved to other states in 2023, enough to rank eighth for domestic migration. Texas, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Indiana were the states ahead of Colorado on that measure.

Advertisement

“Colorado is reclaiming its popularity after a three-year slump that led to negative migration in 2022. In 2023, state-to-state migration brought a net gain of 31,000 residents, signaling a return to pre-pandemic trends– though still slightly below peak years,” StorageCafe said in its report.

The analysis found that Colorado did especially well in its popularity contest with Texas, California, Florida and Arizona. And despite having higher home prices, it did well in drawing young workers, who employers will follow, bringing with them the additional jobs that draw additional people.

“Colorado remains one of the most expensive housing markets in the U.S., ranking sixth for highest home prices. Notably, it’s the only state among the top 10 for net migration where newcomers from the primary originating state end up paying more for housing than they did before,” said Bianca Barsan, a communications specialist with StorageCafe.

Colorado ranked sixth when it came to attracting Gen Z, or the age group now graduating college and entering the workforce, and fourth among millennials, who still dominate the ranks of those coming to the state as they did last decade. Surprisingly, Colorado even ranked eighth among the Silent Generation, those born before the end of World War II, although there were far fewer of them moving.

Media outlets and other groups covered the report as support that Colorado remains an attractive destination for those on the move, especially among young adults, and a population rebound is underway after a temporary slump seen during the pandemic.

Advertisement

But state demographer Kate Watkins sounds a note of caution, based on the most recent vintage estimates, which paint a less robust picture than the ACS.

“The ACS data are drawn from a survey of the population. Further, the ACS is generally not designed to produce count estimates, but instead to provide characteristics of populations,” Watkins said.

Put another way, the ACS can provide details on the age ranges of people relocating here, how educated they are, and whether they rented or bought a home after arriving. But when it comes to giving a headcount, it isn’t as precise as vintage estimates, which use other government sources like IRS, Medicare and Social Security records.

The latest vintage numbers, released in December and through July 1, put Colorado’s net domestic migration at 5,422 and international migration at 33,227. Using the 2023 count, domestic migration was 6,341 and international migration was 27,177.

Net domestic migration in Colorado has remained fairly flat this decade per vintage estimates, moving from a high of 7,365 in 2020 to a low of 5,422 in 2024. Domestic migration has become a smaller, not higher, share of overall migration, and is now making the smallest contribution to Colorado’s overall population growth since 2010, when people hunkered down because of the Great Recession, according to a report from the Common Sense Institute, a business-funded think tank.

Advertisement

Colorado ranked 17th last year for domestic migration using the vintage estimates, which shouldn’t be taken for granted given that nearly half of all states, led by California and New York, lost more residents to other states than they gained. Since April 1, 2020, Colorado has gained a net 31,172 people from other states per Census vintage estimates, below what it would attract during single years last decade. That softening is being driven by an increase in residents leaving the state.

“In line with the national trend, international migration fueled Colorado’s population growth in 2024. Colorado gained over 33,000 people this year through net international migration alone, accounting for more than half of its population growth,” Zoey Zhang, a research analyst with the Common Sense Institute, in her analysis of the 2024 Census numbers.

Colorado’s net international migration was at 240 in 2020, reflecting pandemic restrictions as well as stricter policies under the first Trump administration. Under the Biden administration, Colorado’s net international migration went from 3,911 in 2021, to 18,507 in 2022, 27,177 in 2023 and 33,227 in 2024, per the vintage estimates.

Those are likely undercounts given the challenges the Census Bureau faces in tracking what the Pew Research Center describes as “unauthorized” immigrants. That category is broader than “illegal” and includes people awaiting a decision on their asylum requests, those who have entered as “parolees” from countries like Ukraine, Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti and Venezuela, victims of human trafficking and those with temporary protected status.

The country had about 2 million more people than expected in 2023 and the majority are likely unauthorized immigrants, according to Pew.

Advertisement

International migration counts are expected to decrease sharply as Trump carries through on campaign promises to close the southern border, deport those in the country illegally and limit asylum applications, which people apprehended at the border frequently sought in recent years.

Legal immigration isn’t being curtailed yet, but some programs like the H-1B visa used to recruit tech and professional workers are coming under increased scrutiny. A decrease in legal immigration could pose problems for the state’s labor markets, said Richard Wobbekind, an associate dean and senior economist at the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado Boulder.

“The demographic changes of slower net domestic in-migration and baby boomer retirements will tighten the labor market. I am not sure where the labor supply offset will come from,” Wobbekind said in an email.

Get more Colorado news by signing up for our daily Your Morning Dozen email newsletter.

Advertisement



Source link

Colorado

Medina Alert issued after hit-and-run crash seriously injures motorist in Denver

Published

on

Medina Alert issued after hit-and-run crash seriously injures motorist in Denver


DENVER — Authorities issued a Medina Alert Sunday following a hit-and-run crash that seriously injured a motorist.

Police said the driver of a gold 2008 BMW X3 SUV struck another vehicle at the intersection of Sheridan Boulevard and W. 17th Avenue in Denver around 4:37 p.m. Saturday.

The crash left the driver of the victim vehicle with serious bodily injuries, according to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation.

CBI

Advertisement

The BMW driver fled following the crash, traveling northbound on Sheridan Boulevard, CBI said in a bulletin.

The gold BMW X3, with Colorado license plate ECB F17, sustained heavy damage on the driver’s side from the collision.

If seen, call 911 or the Denver Police Department at 720-913-2000.

This was the second hit-and-run crash and Medina Alert in Denver on Saturday.

Earlier Saturday, a pedestrian in a crosswalk was seriously injured after being struck by a 2010 white Toyota Corolla, Colorado license plate EDM U42, at the intersection of Federal Boulevard and W. Kentucky Avenue.

Advertisement

The driver of the Corolla left the scene—heading northbound on Federal Boulevard.

No arrests have been announced.

A Medina Alert honors the memory of Jose Medina, a 21-year-old valet driver who was killed by a hit-and-run driver in 2011.

A taxi driver witnessed the event, followed the driver, and gave the police the license plate number, leading to the capture and arrest of the suspect.

Advertisement

Coloradans making a difference | Denver7 featured videos


Denver7 is committed to making a difference in our community by standing up for what’s right, listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the videos above.





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Denver shelter working to end homelessness for at risk youth, funding at risk

Published

on

Denver shelter working to end homelessness for at risk youth, funding at risk


Urban Peak is working to help Colorado youth have safe housing and support, and the organization says the community need is growing. They say 90% of the youth they assisted have been able to find safe housing and, even with funding cuts looming, it will continue to help those in need.



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

GUEST COLUMN: Principles for Guiding River Water Negotiations – Calexico Chronicle

Published

on

GUEST COLUMN: Principles for Guiding River Water Negotiations – Calexico Chronicle


Next week is the annual gathering of “water buffaloes” in Las Vegas. It’s the Colorado River Water Users Association convention. About 1700 people will attend, but probably around 100 of them are the key people—the government regulators, tribal leaders, and the directors and managers of the contracting agencies that receive Colorado River water.

Anyone who is paying attention knows that we are in critical times on the river. Temporary agreements on how to distribute water during times of shortage are expiring. Negotiators have been talking for several years but haven’t been able to agree on anything concrete.

I’m just an observer, but I’ve been observing fairly closely. Within the limits on how much information I can get as an outsider, I’d like to propose some principles or guidelines that I think are important for the negotiation process.

See also

Advertisement
  1. When Hoover Dam was proposed, the main debate was over whether the federal government or private concerns would operate it. Because the federal option prevailed, water is delivered free to contractors. Colorado River water contractors do not pay the actual cost of water being delivered to them. It is subsidized by the U.S. government. As a public resource, Colorado River water should not be seen as a commodity.
  2. The Lower Basin states of Arizona, California, and Nevada should accept that the Upper Basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming are at the mercy of Mother Nature for much of their annual water supply. While the 1922 Colorado River Compact allocates them 7.5 million acre-feet annually, in wet years, they have been able to use a maximum of 4.7 maf. During the long, ongoing drought, their annual use has been 3.5 maf. They shouldn’t have to make more cuts.
  3. However, neither should the Upper Basin states be able to develop their full allocation. It should be capped at a feasible number, perhaps 4.2 maf. As compensation, Upper Basin agencies and farmers can invest available federal funds in projects to use water more efficiently and to reuse it so that they can develop more water.
  4. Despite the drought, we know there will be some wet years. To compensate the Lower Basin states for taking all the cuts in dry years, the Upper Basin should release more water beyond the Compact commitments during wet years. This means that Lake Mead and Lower Basin reservoirs would benefit from wet years and Lake Powell would not. In short, the Lower Basin takes cuts in dry years; the Upper Basin takes cuts in wet years.
  5. Evaporation losses (water for the angels) can be better managed by keeping more of the Lower Basin’s water in Upper Basin reservoirs instead of in Lake Mead, where the warmer weather means higher evaporation losses. New agreements should include provisions to move that water in the Lower Basin account down to Lake Mead quickly. Timing is of the essence.
  6. In the Lower Basin states, shortages should be shared along the same lines as specified in the 2007 Interim Guidelines, with California being last to take cuts as Lake Mead water level drops.
  7. On the home front, IID policy makers should make a long-term plan to re-set water rates in accord with original water district policy. Because IID is a public, non-profit utility, water rates were set so that farmers paid only the cost to deliver water. Farmers currently pay $20 per acre foot, but the actual cost of delivering water is $60 per acre foot. That subsidy of $60 million comes from the water transfer revenues.
  8. The SDCWA transfer revenues now pay farmers $430 per acre-foot of conserved water, mostly for drip or sprinkler systems. Akin to a grant program, this very successful program generated almost 200,000 acre-feet of conserved water last year. Like any grant program, it should be regularly audited for effectiveness.
  9. Some of those transfer revenues should be invested in innovative cropping patterns, advanced technologies, and marketing to help the farming community adapt to a changing world. The IID should use its resources to help all farmers be more successful, not just a select group.
  10. Currently, federal subsidies pay farmers not to use water via the Deficit Irrigation Program. We can lobby for those subsidies to continue, but we should plan for when they dry up. Any arrangement that rewards farmers but penalizes farm services such as seed, fertilizer, pesticide, land leveling, equipment, and other work should be avoided.
  11. Though the IID has considerable funding from the QSA water transfers, it may need to consider issuing general obligation bonds as it did in its foundational days for larger water efficiency projects such as more local storage or a water treatment plant to re-use ag drain water.

Much progress has been made in using water more efficiently, especially in the Lower Basin states, but there’s a lot more water to be saved, and I believe collectively that we can do it.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending