Connect with us

Denver, CO

Are Denver and Colorado sanctuary jurisdictions? What to know about the immigration laws.

Published

on

Are Denver and Colorado sanctuary jurisdictions? What to know about the immigration laws.


As Denver Mayor Mike Johnston prepares to testify in Congress on March 5, many in Colorado and beyond are wondering just what the laws say about how state and local officials are to interact with the federal government on the enforcement of immigration laws.

Denver Mayor Mike Johnston announced goals for city
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston during a press conference at the Denver Central Library on Jan. 29, 2025.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images


On Jan. 27, Johnston was sent a letter by the U.S House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, stating that “Sanctuary jurisdictions and their misguided and obstructionist policies hinder the ability of federal law enforcement officers to effectuate safe arrests and remove dangerous criminals from American communities, making Americans less safe.”

Advertisement

The letter goes on to request Johnston’s in-person testimony and the turning over of documents and communications from Jan. 1, 2024, to the present day, related to the city’s alleged sanctuary status.

Since late 2023, Denver has spent more than $350 million on migrant services, as the city received and helped resettle more than 40,000 people from the southern border.

“We didn’t choose this outcome,” Johnston said, “When the governor of Texas decided to send 40,000 people on buses to Denver, we made sure we were going to serve them.”

While the city does not explicitly use the term “sanctuary” in any ordinances or proclamations, in 2017, the Denver City Council adopted its “Public Safety Enforcement Priorities Act.” It stipulates that no department or employee of the city “shall use any city funds or resources to assist in the enforcement of federal immigration laws.” It states that city contracts related to enforcement of federal immigration laws are prohibited and the ordinance limits access to secure areas of city and county jails, “unless federal immigration authorities present a warrant issued by a federal judge or magistrate.”

Colorado State Capitol with Central Business District, Denver

Advertisement

halbergman / Getty Images


In an interview with CBS News Colorado, Johnston said, “What that means for Denver is we do not ask someone’s immigration status. We don’t know your status, so we don’t share your status with other federal agencies. However, if the federal government, like U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, identifies someone in our jails and wants to deport them or take action when they’re released, we notify them when the person is being released, and they can pick them up at that point.” 

During the enforcement action on Feb. 5 at Cedar Run Apartments in Denver, Acting Director for ICE Caleb Vitello said, “Unfortunately we have to come to the communities because we don’t get the cooperation that we need from the jails. It would be so much easier and so much safer for our officers and agents if we can take these people into custody from a safe environment but if we have to come out into the community to do this, that’s what we’re gonna do.”

Johnston said that ICE did not contact the city ahead of the Feb. 5 raid at Cedar Run.

“Denver police and city authorities were not involved in these actions, nor were we given prior notice,” said Johnston. “But if they do send notice requests to the jail, we respond, and we’ve had a few over the last few weeks.”

Advertisement

A city statement published last month holds that “Denver has always given ICE officials a heads up if someone wanted for deportation proceedings is in their custody and told them the date and time of the person’s release…We are not opposed to the deportation of violent criminals who do not have a legal status to remain in the United States, but Coloradans must prepare for the possibility that ICE agents will be detaining fathers and mothers with no criminal history.”

It goes on to say that Denver police “will not detain people for ICE and will not support non-criminal immigration enforcement actions.”

In 2019, the Colorado legislature passed HB19-1124 to “Protect Colorado Residents From Federal Government Overreach.” The law allows local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement authorities in the execution of a warrant signed by a federal judge but prohibits law enforcement from arresting or detaining an individual solely on the basis of a civil immigration detainer.

A bill under consideration now by the legislature, SB25-047 seeks to reverse measures that limit enforcement of federal immigration law. “2547 helps ensure that criminals in Colorado who are unlawfully in the United States are turned over, or at least their presence alerted to federal immigration authorities,” said Sheriff Darren Weekly of Douglas County.

Douglas County filed a lawsuit in April 2024 challenging HB19-1124, as well as HB23-1100 which restricts state and local governments from participating in civil immigration detention. Other counties joining the suit included El Paso, Elbert, Garfield, Mesa and Rio Blanco.

Advertisement

In December 2024, a Denver district judge agreed with a state motion to dismiss the Douglas County claim, holding that Douglas County has not suffered injury and does not have standing. Douglas County is appealing the ruling.

“We want to be very, very clear. We support legal immigration. We don’t support illegal immigration,” said Commissioner and Board Chair Abe Laydon. “These laws prevent local governments from working with ICE to solve the national immigration crisis we’ve been experiencing. This inability to share critical public safety information puts our community at risk.”

Mayor Mike Coffman of Aurora has questioned neighboring city Denver’s policies of welcoming migrants, and the impact it has had on neighboring communities including his. Coffman said one of the nonprofits contracted by Denver to resettle migrants worked with a landlord to place them in three apartment buildings in Aurora, where police say Venezuelan gang members terrorized residents. The incidents there drew the attention of President Trump, who has promised to carry out mass deportations, or what he dubbed “Operation Aurora” during his visit to the city last October.

Coffman said Johnston has refused to say how many migrants were placed in Aurora, so he filed an open records request to obtain the contract the city signed with the nonprofit. He said the contract included a clause allowing the agency to put migrants in other cities without notifying them.

Now as President Trump has said he is dissatisfied with the pace of deportations, his “Border Czar” Tom Homan told Fox News, “Sanctuary cities [are] a sanctuary for criminals, bottom line. So, we’re going to do everything we can to find them. Regardless of what it takes, we got a strong president in the White House; he’s giving us all the authority we need. We’re coming.”

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement

Denver, CO

Grand Junction, Palisade reach Great Eight in Denver

Published

on

Grand Junction, Palisade reach Great Eight in Denver


GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (KREX) — The Class 5A Sweet 16 has arrived, and both Grand Junction and Palisade are still standing with trips to the Great Eight in Denver on the line.

At The Jungle, the No. 2 seed Grand Junction Tigers set the tone early against No. 18 Golden. Defense carried the Tigers from the opening tip as they held the Demons to nine first quarter points while scoring 16 of their own.

Advertisement

Grand Junction added eight points in the second quarter while Golden managed six, sending the Tigers into halftime with a nine point lead.

Advertisement

Golden responded in the third quarter, outscoring Grand Junction 16 to 11 to cut the deficit to five entering the fourth. The Tigers answered in the final period, attacking the rim and converting key shots to win the quarter 19 to 10. Grand Junction secured a 54 to 41 victory to protect its home court and advance to the Great Eight in Denver.

Top seeded Palisade also defended its home floor with a trip to Denver at stake. The Bulldogs opened with nine straight points to energize a packed gym, but Frederick settled in and closed the first quarter on a run to tie the game at nine.

Frederick continued to respond in the second quarter and took an eight point lead into halftime.

Advertisement

Palisade shifted momentum after the break. The Bulldogs tightened defensively, holding Frederick to 21 points in the second half while scoring 39 of their own. Palisade completed the comeback to advance to the Great Eight.

Advertisement

Colorado Mesa University Women Deliver Historic RMAC Tournament Win

In collegiate action, the top seeded Colorado Mesa University women’s basketball team defeated Colorado School of Mines 96 to 51 in the RMAC Tournament, marking the largest margin of victory in the tournament this century.

Olivia Reed-Thyne led the Mavericks with 34 points on 11 of 15 shooting, her third 30 point performance this season. Mason Rowland added 22 points and Hallie Clark contributed 10 as Colorado Mesa matched a program record with its 31st win. The Mavericks will host the semifinals Friday with a berth in the championship game at stake.

Advertisement

Colorado Mesa University Men Survive Overtime Thriller

The Colorado Mesa University men’s basketball team faced New Mexico Highlands University for the third time this season. The Mavericks scored 36 first half points and led by four at the break.

New Mexico Highlands shot 50 percent in the second half, received 21 bench points and outscored Colorado Mesa 43 to 39 to force a late push. With the season in the balance, Ty Allred hit a game tying 3 pointer to make it 75 and send the game to overtime. Allred scored seven points in the extra period as Colorado Mesa earned a 91 to 90 victory to advance to the next round.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to WesternSlopeNow.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Former Avs defenseman launches beer brand in Denver

Published

on

Former Avs defenseman launches beer brand in Denver


While most people know beers as “cold ones,” Tyson Barrie opts for a different name.

“We’ve always just called beers chilly ones,” the former Colorado Avalanche defenseman said.

Now, Barrie hopes his moniker goes mainstream with his beer brand Chilly Ones, which made its U.S. debut weeks ago in Colorado. He plans to move to the Centennial State from his home country of Canada come fall to build it out.

So far, the beer is in about 200 businesses across the state, mostly liquor stores like Bonnie Brae and Argonaut, but also eateries such as Oskar Blues.

Advertisement

The light lager is available in cans at 3% alcohol by volume. The less-than-light ABV is popular in Australia and some parts of Europe, he said, but nothing serves that segment in the U.S.

Barrie also said the brand has a nonalcoholic version “in the tanks and ready to go” at Sleeping Giant Brewing Co., the Denver facility where Chilly Ones is made. He said it’s one of the only booze-free options that could “trick” him, and he expects the version to be available by April.

“If you look at all the data that we’re seeing, these two categories – the nonalc and the low – seem to be two of the only ones in the alcohol space that are growing,” Barrie said.

Chilly Ones has been available in Canada since late 2025, and he said a 4.5% to 5% edition is also in the works, though that one won’t hit the shelves for months.

“From what we can see in Canada, people question the 3%. They say it’s not enough,” he said through a grin. “Then in the U.S., people aren’t questioning it at all. They really liked a little bit less and the moderation factor to it.”

Advertisement

That’s why he thinks the low-carb, zero sugar, under 100 calorie drink is a perfect fit for Denver. With the city’s storied history in craft beer combined with a more conscious, active lifestyle, it’s the perfect stateside launching point for his brand, Barrie believes.

Drafted by the Avs and playing in the city from 2011 through 2019, his preexisting connections also were a selling point.

“Every occasion is a little bit different, whether you’re parenting or you’re at a concert or you’ve got to get up early or you’re having two after work and you want to drive,” he said, explaining why there will be multiple versions of the drink available.

“It’s pick your own adventure. We’re not going to judge you,” he continued. “If you want to celebrate and get absolutely hammered, we’ll give you that option too. It’s just you can do it a little bit healthier.”

The idea came to Barrie when he had “a dozen” or so chilly ones during a night with friends years ago. In his phone’s notes app, he wrote that he would one day start a beverage brand with his NHL buddies and call it his colloquial name for beer.

Advertisement

He was still playing in the league at the point, but in 2024, two years after, somebody from the beverage world “very serendipitously” reached out to see if Barrie would be interested in starting a wine or whiskey company.

“And I was like, ‘Yeah, I’d do a beer,’” he recalled.

He was still in the NHL playing with the Nashville Predators but nearing the end of his career. The now-34-year-old gathered several of his fellow skaters, including Avs star Nathan MacKinnon, and other career connections like Lumineers frontman Wesley Schultz, and Chilly Ones was born.

Having that post-playing career journey already laid out has been challenging but worth it, he said.

“I have a lot of friends who have retired, and you struggle with a bit of purpose and you wake up and you’re just kind of looking around, not sure what to do with yourself,” he said. “So I feel grateful. I didn’t even have any time to reset. I was just kind of thrown in the fire.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Denver bans federal law enforcement officers from covering their faces, DHS says it won’t comply

Published

on

Denver bans federal law enforcement officers from covering their faces, DHS says it won’t comply


Denver city leaders unanimously passed a ban on all officers, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, from wearing face coverings while detaining or arresting people. That law also requires officers to wear visible identification.

It’s the second sweeping ordinance against federal officers in Denver in just a few days. Last Thursday, Mayor Mike Johnston signed an executive order banning federal immigration agents from operating on city property without a judicial warrant.

An federal immigration agent on Feb. 5, 2026 in Minneapolis.

Advertisement

Stephen Maturen / Getty Images


 It also directs Denver police, deputies and fire personnel to investigate reports of violence and criminal behavior.

The Department of Homeland Security responded calling the executive order “legally illiterate,” adding, “no local official has the authority to bar ICE from carrying out federal law on public property … and while Mayor Johnston continues to release pedophiles, rapists, gang members, and murderers onto their streets, our brave law enforcement will continue to risk their lives to arrest these heinous criminals.”

DHS didn’t mince words when responding to Denver’s new face coverings ban either, saying in part, “To be crystal clear: we will not abide by a city council’s unconstitutional ban. Our officers wear masks to protect themselves from being doxxed and targeted by known and suspected terrorist sympathizers. Not only is ICE law enforcement facing a more than 1,300 percent increase in assaults against them, but we’ve also seen thugs launch websites to reveal officers’ identity.”

On the other hand, the Denver City Council didn’t mince words when it approved the ban.

Advertisement

“It’s very disturbing to me, as an American, to see masked agents on the street,” said Councilman Kevin Flynn who represents District 2. “I don’t know what the best way is to enforce our immigration laws, but I think I know the worst way when I see it.”

“I said all along, this was a slam dunk,” added Councilman Darrell Watson of District 9.

Last month, a federal judge struck down a California law prohibiting federal agents from wearing masks. But, the city council says it made sure its ordinance is enforceable.

You have to treat all law enforcement the same,” said City Council President Amanda Sandoval. “So, our sheriffs can’t have masks. Our State Patrol can’t have masks. And federally you can’t have masks. And we delineate that within the ordinance which, that’s where California got the issue.”

Sandoval said she was monitoring the legal process and comparing the two ordinances to ensure they would be good to go.

Advertisement

Although the city council believes the ordinance is constitutional, the Denver Police Department says it’s still working to determine what implementation could look like, and provided this statement to CBS Colorado:

“Our Safety departments are working with the City Attorney and bill sponsors to determine what implementation could look like. Of utmost importance is discretion and prioritizing de-escalation when encountering these situations. Our goal is to apply this ordinance in a way that builds trust and transparency without putting officers, deputies, or the public at risk.”

Coupled with the city’s new executive order, Sandoval believes Denver now has the necessary guidelines in place.

“A map for residents to understand predictability, and that’s what I always want, is what can the residents be able to rely on.”

There are exemptions in place for the ban, for example: during an active undercover operation, when gear is required for physical safety, and for personnel performing SWAT duties.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending