Connect with us

Politics

Column: A president who won't tell the truth about California may unfairly punish the state

Published

on

Column: A president who won't tell the truth about California may unfairly punish the state

California has a problem with its elections.

Not the way they’re conducted or administered, though there’s certainly room for improvement.

The problem is with a certain pouty president who can’t get over the fact California voters just aren’t that into him.

Donald Trump lost the state by a whopping 4.2 million votes in 2016. He nursed his bruised ego by suggesting the result was tainted by “millions and millions” of fraudulent ballots — even though there’s zero evidence supporting that claim.

In November, Trump won back the White House, but still lost California by nearly 3.2 million votes. Not exactly a nail-biter, but definitely better than his showings in 2016 and 2020. Apparently, though, a gold star for progress wasn’t enough to boost our needy president’s self-esteem.

Advertisement

“I think we would’ve won the state of California,” Trump told supporters at a post-inauguration celebration, “if the state had stronger voter identification laws.” Another assertion that’s not remotely grounded in reality, but Trump’s gonna Trump.

Yes, it’s grown tiresome. But all that whining could be written off as just more gaseous venting had the president not threatened to withhold desperately needed aid to fire-ravaged Southern California.

“I have a condition,” he told reporters before touring the charred remains of Pacific Palisades: Voter ID legislation to remedy what Trump falsely described as “a very corrupt” state election system.

(He also reiterated his demand that California change its water policies, but maybe that’s been solved by the troops Trump supposedly sent to turn on the water flow from the Pacific Northwest. There were no troops and there is no such flow, but whatever.)

Predictably, House Speaker Mike Johnson chimed in with his own false election claims, asserting that Republicans lost three California House seats in November because of vote-counting chicanery. “Inexcusable,” he huffed, echoing Trump’s suggestion there may be political terms for wildfire relief.

Advertisement

There is so much wrong with those kinds of threats, including the fact they’re morally reprehensible and utterly without precedent in the American annals of natural disaster — that is, until Trump came along. But we’ll save those lamentations for another day.

There’s also a great deal that Trump, Johnson and their California-bashing allies get wrong about the integrity of the state’s election system.

For starters, repeated nationwide studies have shown that voter fraud “is vanishingly rare and voter impersonation is nearly nonexistent,” as the Brennan Center for Justice, a law and policy think tank at New York University, has noted.

That leaves us — let’s quickly do the math — millions and millions shy of the supposedly fraudulent votes that tipped California away from Trump.

As for the state’s notoriously prolonged vote-counting process, it may be a source of vexation. (Including to many within the state.) But there’s nothing nefarious going on there, either.

Advertisement

Over the years, California lawmakers have enacted policies aimed at encouraging the greatest voter turnout possible, which is a commendable goal in a representative democracy. Once votes are cast, the state makes every effort to ensure they’re properly tabulated. And there are a great many to be counted. The number of presidential ballots cast in California last November — nearly 16 million — exceeds the population of all but four states.

It takes time to ensure that each of those ballots is legitimate. (That’s how you prevent fraud.)

That may require verifying an individual’s address or checking his or her signature against the one on file. Or shipping a mail ballot that was dropped off at the wrong location to the county where it should have been cast.

A considerable number of provisional ballots also need to be processed. For instance, if someone shows up at the wrong polling place they are allowed to cast a ballot, which then must be scrutinized.

All those steps hold up the final count, which, unfortunately, has invited disingenuous claims about vote-switching and stolen House seats. There is a straightforward, perfectly innocent reason why Democratic candidates sometimes pull ahead after trailing in early returns: Election day balloting has skewed Republican in recent years while mail ballots, which are counted later, have tended to favor Democrats.

Advertisement

If you want quicker results, the state should shell out more money to pay for it. Counties are responsible for tabulating ballots, but get nothing from Sacramento for that responsibility. Let the state pay to hire more staffers. Also, lawmakers could do more to help election offices in rural California, which are cash-starved compared with those in big urban areas.

Another change worth considering: Would shifting from county-managed voter registration databases to a state-managed system boost efficiency?

Those are all relatively small modifications, however, in a system that needs no major overhaul.

“For eight years, Trump has cried wolf, pushing claims attacking the integrity of California’s elections,” Sen. Alex Padilla, the state’s former elections chief, said in an email. “There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud and Trump’s actions are an attempt to sow distrust in California’s elections because he doesn’t like the results.”

It’s said, quite rightly, that elections have consequences. So does lying about elections.

Advertisement

Bogus claims only serve to undercut faith in our democratic process and insult the many people working diligently to ensure the honesty and efficiency of our election system. They do so under increasingly stressful and sometimes dangerous conditions.

There’s no harm considering whether things can be done better.

But not by holding hostage tens of thousands of people whose lives have been devastated by wildfire. “They deserve support from their president,” Padilla rightly stated, rather than “political gamesmanship.”

And not by seeking needless fixes for a nonexistent problem conjured up by a president who’s not just a sore loser but a sore winner, as well.

Advertisement

Politics

Video: U.S. ‘Accelerating’ Military Assault in Iran, Hegseth Says

Published

on

Video: U.S. ‘Accelerating’ Military Assault in Iran, Hegseth Says

new video loaded: U.S. ‘Accelerating’ Military Assault in Iran, Hegseth Says

On the fifth day of the war in Iran, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the U.S. military operation was intensifying and that more warplanes were arriving in the region.

By Christina Kelso

March 4, 2026

Continue Reading

Politics

US submarine sinks Iranian warship by torpedo in a first since World War II

Published

on

US submarine sinks Iranian warship by torpedo in a first since World War II

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A U.S. submarine sank a prized Iranian warship by torpedo, the first such sinking of an enemy ship since World War II, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said Wednesday morning.

Hegseth joined Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine at the Pentagon to provide an update to reporters on “Operation Epic Fury” in Iran.

“An American submarine sunk an Iranian warship that thought it was safe in international waters,” Hegseth said. “Instead, it was sunk by a torpedo. Quiet death. The first sinking of an enemy ship by a torpedo since World War Two. Like in that war, back when we were still the War Department. We are fighting to win.”

Caine said that an Iranian vessel was “effectively neutralized” in a Navy “fast attack” using a single Mark 48 torpedo. He added that the U.S. Navy achieved “immediate effect, sending the warship to the bottom of the sea.”

Advertisement

WATCH HEGSETH’S ANNOUNCEMENT:

Hegseth said that the U.S. Navy sank the Iranian warship, the Soleimani. The flagship was named for Qasem Soleimani, an Iranian military officer who served in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps who the U.S. killed in a January 2020 drone strike during President Donald Trump’s first term.

“The Iranian Navy rests at the bottom of the Persian Gulf. Combat ineffective, decimated, destroyed, defeated. Pick your adjective,” Hegseth said. “In fact, last night we sunk their prize ship, the Soleimani. Looks like POTUS got him twice. Their navy, not a factor. Pick your adjective. It is no more.”

This map shows U.S. and Israeli strikes against Iranian naval forces as of March 1. (Fox News)

Hegseth also told reporters at the briefing that the U.S. and Israel will soon achieve “complete control” over Iranian airspace after Iran’s missile capabilities were drastically diminished in the four days of fighting.

Advertisement

US ‘WINNING DECISIVELY’ AGAINST IRAN, WILL ACHIEVE ‘COMPLETE CONTROL’ OF AIRSPACE WITHIN DAYS, HEGSETH SAYS

“More bombers and more fighters are arriving just today and now, with complete control of the skies, we will be using 500 pound, one thousand pound and 2,000 pound laser-guided precision gravity bombs, of which we have a nearly unlimited stockpile,” he said.

The war has killed more than 1,000 people in Iran and dozens in Lebanon, while U.S. officials said six American troops were killed in a fatal drone strike in Kuwait.

Thousands of travelers have been left stranded across the Middle East.

This map shows security and travel updates for Americans regarding countries in the Middle East region. (Fox News)

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Caine told reporters that the U.S. military is helping thousands of Americans stranded in the Middle East after the U.S. State Department urged citizens to leave more than a dozen countries.

Fox News Digital’s Ashley Carnahan contributed to this report.

Related Article

Israel says fighter jet took down Iranian warplane, the first shootdown of its kind
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Sen. Padilla preps for Trump trying to seize control of elections via emergency order

Published

on

Sen. Padilla preps for Trump trying to seize control of elections via emergency order

Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) is preparing for President Trump to declare a national emergency in order to seize control of this year’s midterm elections from the states, including by bracing his Senate colleagues for a vote in which they would be forced to either co-sign on the power grab or resist it.

In the wake of reporting last week that conservative activists with connections to the White House were circulating such an order, Padilla sent a letter to his Senate colleagues Friday stating that any such order would be “wildly illegal and unconstitutional,” and would no doubt face “extremely strict scrutiny” in the courts.

“Nevertheless, if the President does escalate his unprecedented assault on our democracy by declaring an election-related emergency, I will swiftly introduce a privileged resolution [and] force a vote in the Senate to terminate the fake emergency,” wrote Padilla, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration.

Padilla wrote that such an order — which could possibly “include banning mail-in voting, eliminating major voting registration methods, voter purges, and/or new document barriers for registering to vote and voting” — would clearly go beyond Trump’s authority.

Advertisement

“Put simply, no President has the power under the Constitution or any law to take over elections, and no declaration or order can create one out of thin air,” Padilla wrote.

The same day Padilla sent his letter, Trump was asked whether he was considering declaring a national emergency around the midterms. “Who told you that?” he asked — before saying he was not considering such an order.

The White House referred The Times to that exchange when asked Tuesday for comment on Padilla’s letter.

If Trump did declare such an emergency, a “privileged resolution,” as Padilla proposed, would require the full Senate to vote on the record on whether or not to terminate it — forcing any Senate allies of the president to own the policy politically, along with him.

Experts say there is no evidence that U.S. elections are significantly affected or swung by widespread fraud or foreign interference, despite robust efforts by Trump and his allies for years to find it.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, Trump has been emphatic that such fraud is occurring, particularly in blue states such as California that allow for mail-in ballots and do not have strict voter ID laws. He and others in his administration have asserted, again without evidence, that large numbers of noncitizen residents are casting votes and that others are “harvesting” ballots out of the mail and filling them out in bulk.

Soon after taking office, Trump issued an executive order purporting to require voters to show proof of U.S. citizenship before registering and barring the counting of mail-in ballots received after election day, but it was largely blocked by the courts.

Trump’s loyalist Justice Department sued red and blue states across the country for their full voter rolls, but those efforts also have largely been blocked, including in California. The FBI also raided an elections office in Georgia that has been the focus of Trump’s baseless claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him.

Trump is also pushing for the passage of the SAVE Act, a voter ID bill passed by the House, but it has stalled in the Senate.

In recent weeks, Trump has expressed frustration that his demands around voting security have not translated into changes in blue state policies ahead of the upcoming midterm elections, where his shrinking approval could translate into major gains for Democrats.

Advertisement

Last month, Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, “I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future. There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!”

Then, last week, the Washington Post reported that a draft executive order being circulated by activists with ties to Trump suggests that unproven claims of Chinese interference in the 2020 election could be used as a pretext to declare an elections emergency granting Trump sweeping authority to unilaterally institute the changes he wants to see in state-run elections.

Election experts said the Constitution is clear that states control and run elections, not with the executive branch.

Democrats have widely denounced any federal takeover of elections by Trump. And some Republicans have expressed similar concerns, including Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who chairs the Senate rules committee.

In the Wall Street Journal last year, McConnell warned against Trump or any Republican president asserting sweeping authority to control elections, in part because Democrats would then be empowered to claim similar authority if and when they retake power.

Advertisement

McConnell’s office referred The Times to that Journal opinion piece when asked about the circulating emergency order and Padilla’s resolution.

Padilla’s office said his resolution would be introduced in response to an emergency declaration by Trump, but hoped it wouldn’t be necessary.

“Instead of trying to evade accountability at the ballot box,” Padilla wrote, “the President should focus on the needs of Americans struggling to pay for groceries, health care, housing and other everyday needs and put these illegal and unconstitutional election orders in the trash can where they belong.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending