Connect with us

Connecticut

Three West Hartford Women Among Judicial Nominees Announced by Governor Lamont – We-Ha | West Hartford News

Published

on

Three West Hartford Women Among Judicial Nominees Announced by Governor Lamont – We-Ha | West Hartford News


Gov. Ned Lamont on Monday announced the nominations of 20 jurists to serve in positions on Connecticut’s courts.

By Ronni Newton

Gov. Ned Lamont announced multiple judicial nominations on Monday that are being forwarded to the Connecticut General Assembly for approval, including Honorable William H. Bright, Jr. as an associate justice of the Supreme Court and the Honorable Robin L. Wilson as a judge of the Appellate Court, and among the 13 he also nominated to become judges of the Superior Court, three are from West Hartford.

Advertisement

The West Hartford residents who are nominees, all women, include Kaitlin A. Halloran, Angeline Ioannou, and Latonia C. Williams.

Halloran, 41, is a graduate of New York University and obtained her Juris Doctor degree from the University of Connecticut School of Law. Since the firm she co-founded in 2010, Halloran & Halloran, merged with BBB Attorneys in 2021, she has focused on litigation of complex cases, and has also maintained an active pro bono special education practice assisting families in navigating the system and accessing services,

Ioannou, 55, is a graduate of Sacred Heart University and obtained her Juris Doctor from Widener University School of Law in Wilmington, DE (now Widener University Commonwealth Law School). She has more than 25 years experience in the litigation of complex tort and medical malpractice matters involving wrongful death and catastrophic injury, and is managing partner of the Hartford office of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith, LLP.

Williams, 41, is a graduate of Howard University and obtained her Juris Doctor degree from the University of Connecticut School of Law. As a partner at Shipman and Goodwin LLP, her practice focuses on commercial litigation matters in state and federal courts, including commercial bankruptcies, landlord-tenant disputes, and commercial foreclosures. She also serves on the State of Connecticut Judicial Branch Client Security Fund Committee and the board of directors for Statewide Legal Services of Connecticut, Inc.

Advertisement

“Nominating judges to serve on our courts is one of the most important responsibilities of a governor, especially because judges are the final authority on the interpretation of the law and the constitution, and for ensuring that justice is administered fairly and without prejudice,” Lamont said in a statement. “Judge Bright has been an excellent leader of our Appellate Court over these last four and a half years, and he has had an impressive career handling all types of cases both on the trial and appellate levels. Likewise, Judge Wilson is an incredibly well-respected member of Connecticut’s legal community, having served in the Superior Court for more than two decades. I am confident that these nominees each have the high standards and qualifications the people of Connecticut deserve to have serving for them on the bench.”

In addition to the three from West Hartford, the other 10 Superior Court judicial nominees announced by the governor on Monday are:

  • David G. Bothwell, 55, of Fairfield
  • Tracie C. Brown, 53, of Windsor
  • Michael C. D’Agostino, 53, of Hamden
  • Jesse Giddings, 43, of North Haven
  • Diana M. Gomez, 42, of Easton
  • Donald R. Green, 58, of Meriden
  • Kevin C. Kelly, 65, of Stratford
  • Daniel Shapiro, 58, of Westbrook
  • Kevin Shea, 58, of Madison
  • Yonatan Zamir, 48, of Woodbridge

According to Monday’s announcement by the governor, there were currently 22 judicial vacancies on the Connecticut Superior Court.

Lamont also is nominating two jurists to serve as family support magistrates (Benedict R. Daigle, 43, of Cromwell and LeeAnn Neal, 39, of Waterbury) and three (Michael L. Anderson, 54, of North Stonington; Christine Conley, 42, of Groton; and Colette Griffin, 66, of Newtown) as administrative law judges on the Workers’ Compensation Commission.

Advertisement

Like what you see here? Click here to subscribe to We-Ha’s newsletter so you’ll always be in the know about what’s happening in West Hartford! Click the blue button below to become a supporter of We-Ha.com and our efforts to continue producing quality journalism.





Source link

Connecticut

Connecticut agrees to settlement with Hyundai, Kia to stop vehicles from being stolen

Published

on

Connecticut agrees to settlement with Hyundai, Kia to stop vehicles from being stolen


CONNECTICUT (WTNH) — Connecticut officials and officials from 35 other states have agreed to a settlement with automakers Hyundai and Kia to come up with a plan to help prevent vehicles from being stolen. 

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong (D) and 35 other states call the settlement, which has been several years in the making, a matter of public safety. The issue concerns the number of Hyundai and Kia vehicles that have been reported stolen and crashes related to these thefts.

The settlement provides up to $4.5 million in restitution for customers whose cars had been stolen.

“This settlement points us back in the right direction to help address some of the underlining issues that have made it easier to steal vehicles,” Meriden Police Chief Roberto Rosado said.

Advertisement

Tong said that groups of young people known as “Kia Boys” were aware that Kia and Hyundai vehicles did not possess modern anti-theft technology, making those brands of vehicles more vulnerable to theft.

One such example is a 2023 incident in which a group of teens reportedly stole and crashed a Hyundai in Waterbury, resulting in the death of a 14-year-old girl. 

“Connecticut State Police have been saying for some time that they needed some assistance, that they needed help in reducing the opportunity for these vehicles to be stolen,” Connecticut Department of Emergency Services Commissioner Ronnell Higgins said.

Several states have attempted to get Hyundai and Kia to alter the way their vehicles are built in the United States, finally coming to an agreement with the two automakers to provide an anti-theft device to protect the vehicles. 

“At some point, they started offering excuses,” Tong said. “You can do just a software update, that will fix it. That didn’t work. We advocated for a recall, they refused. This settlement requires that, for all future vehicles sold in the United States, Hyundai and Kia will install, as part of their standard package, industry engine immobilizer anti-theft technology.”

Advertisement

The technology is linked to the key fob, which means that the car will not start if the smart key is not present.

Connecticut is requiring Kia and Hyundai to provide customers with a free zinc-reinforced engine cylinder protector for vehicles already on the road that are not equipped with the anti-theft technology.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

2 Powerball tickets sold in Connecticut won $50,000

Published

on

2 Powerball tickets sold in Connecticut won ,000


There were two $50,000 Powerball winning tickets sold in Connecticut for Monday’s drawing.

The winning numbers were 23-35-59-63-68 and the Powerball was 2.

The Powerplay was X4, but neither ticket had that option.

The tickets matched four white balls and the Powerball.

Advertisement

No information was available on where it was sold.

No one won the jackpot on Monday night, sending it soaring to $1.25 billion for Wednesday’s drawing.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Opinion: Flavored vapes and Connecticut’s youth: a call for action

Published

on

Opinion: Flavored vapes and Connecticut’s youth: a call for action


My generation grew up thinking we would be the ones to bring teen smoking to an end. But then came the cotton candy vapes.

They were, and still are, everywhere you look. Back in middle and high school, I remember friends had them in their backpacks and hoodie sleeves, they even used them in the school bathrooms.

This past summer, I witnessed firsthand the real impact it has had. My friends and I took a girls’ trip, and one day, we decided we wanted to blow up a pool floatie. Given that we didn’t have an air pump, the only option was to do it manually. One of my friends, who has vaped regularly for years, couldn’t get more than three breaths in before giving up. She began coughing and ran out of breath. It was funny for a second…until it wasn’t.

This was the moment that made me realize how this epidemic is hurting the people closest to us. 

Advertisement

When e-cigarettes first hit the market, companies claimed that they were safer than smoking real cigarettes and that they would help adults quit smoking, when in reality, they’ve only really done the opposite for young people. Vaping may look harmless because of the fun flavors, names, and colors on the packaging, but the reality of it is way darker. E-cigarette use can lead to cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders, and even long term damage to the airways that can make something as simple as inhaling a serious struggle. These devices push harmful chemicals deep into young people’s lungs, disrupting their bodies in ways they’re not even aware of until it’s too late. 

A Yale-led study found that one in four Connecticut high school students and one in 30 middle schoolers had already tried vaping. This may not seem like much at first glance, but the fact of the matter is that a vast majority of adolescents know at least one peer who vapes, at the very minimum. A large portion of the teens from the study preferred sweet and fruity flavors, and many students who had never smoked cigarettes before began experimenting with nicotine through vapes, which demonstrates that flavored e-cigarettes are a gateway, not a solution.

Kiara Salas

 The problem is not just about curiosity. The brain is not finished developing until about age 25. This time is critical in the development of areas like attention, memory, and decision making. The CDC mentions that nicotine exposure during these earlier years of development can impair brain chemistry, having outcomes that linger into adulthood.

Despite this, vape companies continue to sell what seems like nicotine candy to minors, disguised in bright packaging and flavors like “blue razz” or “mango blast.” When you think about it, it makes sense that as soon as companies began seeing a decline in sales, they had to figure out a way to create new products that were trendy, tasted good, and addictive. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending