Connect with us

Kentucky

Mark Pope reveals meaning behind postgame 'autopsies' for Kentucky: “Win or loss that's dead and buried”

Published

on

Mark Pope reveals meaning behind postgame 'autopsies' for Kentucky: “Win or loss that's dead and buried”


By now, you’ve probably heard Mark Pope throw around the phrase ‘autopsy’ after games. It’s his version of film review, dissecting a 40-minute battle for the Kentucky Wildcats from start to finish, figuring out what worked and what did not leading to a win or loss. That’s what he uses to prepare for future opponents and follow important trends, deciding what needs to get fixed with urgency and what his team can build upon.

What does that look like for Pope and his staff following a game, though? What answers are they searching for when they put on the rubber gloves and safety goggles? He gave a thorough description of his version of a basketball ‘autopsy’ when previewing the team’s matchup vs. No. 4 Alabama on Thursday.

What is an autopsy?

“It’s pretty extensive,” the Kentucky head coach said. “We have our own formatted report that (assistant video coordinator) Matt Santoro puts together. Over the years, we’ve developed all of the things that we really care about. We’ll get that report, we’ll get an HDI report, we’ll get the box score — we get the whole thing — and then we’ll each individually break down film, then we’ll do it together as a staff, then we’ll do it together as a team.”

It may make sense for some to find the glaring flaws in hopes of fixing them right away. That’s what everyone does, hoping to make wrongs right — especially after a loss. For Kentucky, it’s the exact opposite.

Advertisement

Instead, they put a pin in those issues and dive into everything the team did well.

“The first thing we look at is, what did we do well? You cherry pick the stuff you did well,” Pope said. “If you want to get better at something, find yourself doing it well and focus on it and show it over and over and over again. Like, that’s really true. It’s way different than I’ve ever experienced approaching the game.

“As coaches, we’re so good at — we watch 10 minutes of film and we find the 17 mistakes, and it feels like a victory. That’s actually — it’s not the way we do this. We work really hard because the things that are mistakes are glaring. They just shout at you, it’s like, everything’s fine, and you see the mistake, but I think the real skill in coaching is finding guys doing it great. Sometimes, as a coach, you just gloss over that stuff because there was nothing wrong. There’s nothing to fix, and we’re fixers, it’s what we do. We go fix the problems.”

Focusing on the good, not bad

Among the questions asked when the staff first begins an autopsy?

“What are we doing well?” Pope said. “What did we do great? What part of the game plan did we execute well? Where have we really grown? Where can we show our guys something we didn’t do well before, but we’re doing it great now? What are things that our guys didn’t even realize that they did well, that we did really well? We’ll spend a lot of time on that. We’ll spend very minimal time — certainly on video — on the things that we’re doing wrong, but we’ll take that in as a staff and really digest that as a staff.”

Advertisement

Then when it comes time to finding and correcting the mistakes, they actually circle back to moments when they did those things correctly to drive those points home. If they’re rebounding poorly, the staff finds all of the times they attacked the glass with force and intensity to come away with boards and try to recreate that magic.

That’s how they determine the next steps and how to continue to improve.

“Sometimes we’ll see something we really struggle with — which we did, we struggled in a couple areas in the last couple games. What we do is we actually go back and we’ll grab film of us doing it really well, and we’ll talk about where we’re getting ourselves in trouble, and then we’ll show them a bunch of clips of us doing it correctly, right? Autopsy is all about that,” Pope said. “The biggest part of autopsy is, like, where are we trying to grow directly over the next few weeks? What are our long-term goals? How is this new data set — how has it changed where we’re trying to head? What is it telling us about our team? What’s it telling us about our rotation? What’s it telling us about guys we have on the floor together? What’s it telling us about substitution patterns? The whole deal. It’s super fun. It’s like a puzzle.”

Games are to be ‘dead and buried’

The dictionary definition of autopsy is “a postmortem examination to discover the cause of death or the extent of disease.” If that sounds dark and deadly for basketball comparisons, it’s because it’s meant to be.

They perform autopsies because they represent games that deserve to be ‘dead and buried,’ as Pope puts it. Once one ends, it’s time to turn the page and focus on what’s next. No looking back.

Advertisement

“It’s really important. We always think about it like this: win or loss, that’s dead and buried. That’s done,” he said. “We’re going to take all the data, we’re going to take all the information we’re taking, but we’re moving on. We’re flipping the page, right? I think it’s two parts. I think one part is, we’re going to dig deep. We’re going to — I mean, I don’t want to get too tasteless, right? Everybody is about to go to lunch, but we’re digging really deep.

“We’re trying to uncover everything we have, and then it’s dead and buried. We’ve got to move on to the next thing. That’s important when — sometimes the wins are harder to get over than the losses. We’ve got to turn the page, bury it and let’s go.”

Any lingering issues?

What are the things currently plaguing this team, things that continue to pop up during autopsy sessions that aren’t getting fixed for one reason or another? Pope actually can’t thing of any — at least none that continue to linger with no sign of active growth.

That’s one beautiful part about this group: when adversity strikes, they find ways to respond.

“I don’t have a lot of things we’ve talked about for six weeks that we haven’t made progress on now,” he said. “We have a lot of things that we talk about every single day where we’re making progress and we want to make more progress. There are a lot of those. But one of the blessings of this team — I’m telling you, it’s a gift to coach this team. I’m so lucky that I get to coach this team because we don’t have a lot of things that we — there’s not a lot of times we’re pointing the guys in a direction.

Advertisement

“Sometimes we don’t see progress in a day, but over the last week or two weeks or month, there are not things where we’re like, ‘I’ve said this a thousand times’ or ‘We’ve watched this a thousand times and we’re not making progress.’ We have an unbelievably studious locker room. Like, our guys pay attention and they’re focused on growing.

“It’s super cool, man. It’s really fun to coach.”



Source link

Kentucky

Kentucky Basketball vs. Florida viewing info, what to watch for, and predictions

Published

on

Kentucky Basketball vs. Florida viewing info, what to watch for, and predictions


What an up-and-down season it has been for Kentucky Basketball, as shown by just the last two games: A dominating win over Vanderbilt, where the Wildcats led for 38+ minutes, followed by a double-digit loss to Texas A&M just 72 hours later, allowing a 27-3 run.

While locked in an at-large bid in the NCAA Tournament, the Wildcats are playing for seeding, likely a 6-7 seed in the NCAA Tournament, and anywhere from a 4-10 seed in the SEC Tournament. The last game of the regular season to ultimately decide the latter is the SEC regular-season champion, the Florida Gators.

Already having played once this season, Kentucky trailed by as many as 17 points in the first 10 minutes, but fought back to make it a five-point game in the second half.

Can the Wildcats put together a full 40 minutes together, avoid a season sweep for the first time since 2018, and guarantee themselves a bye in the SEC Tournament?

Advertisement

Here’s what to watch for in Kentucky vs. Florida, Part II.

While Florida has one of the best frontcourts in the country, one of the deciding factors in the first game was the backcourt play, as Xavian Lee and Urban Klavzar, who had two of their best performances of the season and combined for 41 points.

At this point of the season, the correlation of Kentucky’s success and the play of Otega Oweh, Collin Chandler, and Denzel Aberdeen is pretty clear. Coming off a game against Texas A&M, where they combined for 36 points, on 11-30 shooting, they need to outplay Florida’s backcourt for Kentucky to have a shot at the upset.

Given their elite frontcourt, Florida looks to give their big men plenty of touches around the basket and attack the basket for offensive rebounding opportunities. As a result, they draw fouls at one of the highest rates in the nation, nearly 20 a game.

In the first matchup, Kentucky had four players with four or more fouls, including Brandon Garrison, who fouled out. This limited Malachi Moreno to just 21 minutes, still having a team-high 11 rebounds. Backing him up, Garrison had as many fouls (5) as points, rebounds, and blocks combined.

Advertisement

Kentucky will likely face foul trouble again, and with a limited frontcourt, Mark Pope has the option of playing Malachi Moreno through foul trouble or hoping for better production from the other bigs. Pope has shown that he would rather go with the latter. Fortunately, Mo Dioubate is coming off his best game of the season, and Garrison had one of his better performances, albeit against a smaller Texas A&M team. They will need to sustain some level of production to give Kentucky a chance against Florida.

Kentucky played well for the final 30 minutes of the first matchup, outscoring Florida 66-60 during that span. It was the first 10 minutes that were the issue, where they turned the ball over 9 times and put themselves into a 17-point deficit.

Whether it be slow starts, as in the Florida game, or tough mid-game stretches like against Texas A&M, too often Kentucky puts itself in a hole with turnovers. Mark Pope has said it, turnovers are a great indicator for this team. When keeping turnovers in the single digits, Kentucky is 11-2; when that number rises to 10 or more, it is just 3-9 against power opponent teams.

Thomas Haugh 6-9, 215 lbs

  • 17.1 PPG
  • 6.0 RPG
  • 17 points and 8 rebounds vs UK on 2/14/26

Reuben Chinyelu 6-10, 265 lbs

  • 11.7 PPG
  • 4.1 APG
  • 22 points, 4-7 3P vs UK on 2/14/26
  • Time: 4:00 PM ET on March 7th
  • Location: Rupp Arena at Central Bank Center in Lexington, KY
  • TV Channel: ESPN
  • Announcers: Karl Ravech, Jimmy Dykes, and Dick Vitale will call the action.
  • Online Stream: WatchESPN and the ESPN app.
  • Radio: Tom Leach and Jack Givens have the call on the UK Sports Radio Network.
  • Replay: WatchESPN and the ESPN network (check local listings)
  • Rosters: UK | UF
  • Stats to Know: UK | UF
  • KenPom: UK | UF
  • Team Sheet: UK | UF
  • Odds: FanDuel Sportsbook has yet to release the odds for this game, so please check back later for those. The analytics have Kentucky as the underdog, giving them anywhere between a 1-3 and 1-4 chance. ESPN is the most positive in Kentucky’s chances, at a 37.2% chance to win. EvanMiya (32.3%), KenPom (29%), and BartTorvik (27%) trail behind, all within five percent of each other.
  • Predictions: The analytics show the most favorable scenario is a five-point loss, with Haslametrics (80-75) and EvanMiya (81-76) projecting that. BartTorvik and KenPom are both in agreement with a seven-point loss, 81-74. Florida is playing like a title contender, riding a 10-game win streak, while Kentucky is struggling to string back-to-back wins. With Florida’s higher level of play, I am taking them to win 85-76.

Sound off in the comments section on how you think this matchup will go.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Kentucky

Kentucky Bill Filed to Legalize Fixed-Odds Wagering

Published

on

Kentucky Bill Filed to Legalize Fixed-Odds Wagering


The legalization of fixed-odds wagering is part of a comprehensive gaming and wagering bill filed March 4 with the Kentucky House of Representatives. 

Rep. Matt Koch, a Republican from Paris, and Rep. Michael Meredith, a Republican from Oakland, are sponsors of HB 904, which creates a form of betting that sets the payout odds at the time a wager is placed and those odds do not change.

Wagering on horse racing in Kentucky is now only pari-mutuel, the traditional form for the sport in which gamblers bet against each other and odds are determined based on how much is wagered on a specific bet—for example, win, place, or show—compared with the total money in the wagering pool.

With pari-mutuel wagering, the odds change as money enters the pool and has become a sore spot with many gamblers because these changes can be dramatic due to the introduction of computer-assisted wagering. CAW betting is a form of wagering that uses computer algorithms to formulate selections and then push those bets through to pari-mutuel pools, up to six bets per second in the final minute before pools are closed. This last-minute deluge of wagers can cause a horse’s odds to fall, for example, from 8-1 as they are loading into the gate to 3-1 as the race unfolds and the tote system catches up with calculating the late wagers.

Advertisement

Offering fixed odds is seen as one solution and has already been adopted in New Jersey, Colorado, and in West Virginia last April.

Sign up for

“This basically puts it in hands of the tracks to test the waters,” said Koch, who is the co-founder of Shawhan Place in Bourbon County. “As the gambling market continues to expand, we’re exploring ways to give tracks the flexibility to introduce new and engaging products. For many who enjoy wagering, consistency is key. They want the confidence of knowing a horse’s odds will remain steady throughout the race, allowing them to enjoy the experience to the fullest. However, we recognize the uncertainty that a new product brings and want to be particularly mindful of its potential impact.”

As part of the legalization of fixed-odds wagering, the bill creates a “purse stabilization fund” that will be supported by excise taxes and fees from fixed-odds wagering. Licensed tracks would pay 15% on the adjusted gross revenue of fixed-odds wagers placed on-track and via advance-deposit wagering websites and mobile applications. This fund will be used to supplement purses at live horse racing meets annually at an amount not to exceed 10% of the fund.

“This is similar to how other states manage the revenue from fixed odds and protects the traditional purse pools,” Koch said.

Advertisement

Additionally, Koch said having outdated totalizator networks contributes to the frustration with CAW, so HB 904 includes a provision for licensed totalizator companies and licensed racetracks to accelerate the adoption of improved technologies for wagering systems and provide “commercially reasonable access to the betting odds for retail bettors by April 1, 2027.”

“Some of these totes are only updating every 30 seconds and that is contributing to the perception and frustration,” he said, referring to bettors seeing late odds changes. “Doing our research, we realize there are things we can do for tracks to update their totes and have those updated odds in seconds. We need to stay on top of the IT and that needs to be an ongoing deal.”

The bill also includes a prohibition against any track or association licensed to conduct horse racing, sports wagering, or fantasy sports being affiliated with or benefiting from any entity that offers prediction market contracts. 

Prediction market operators are a growing concern for the gambling industry because they have expanded from taking wagers on the outcome of future events, such as elections or new events, and are now including sporting events, such as horse racing. The prediction markets defend their business by claiming to take “contracts” and not “wagers.”

The threat of the prediction markets was addressed by Churchill Downs Inc. CEO Bill Carstanjen during a Feb. 26 conference call with investors and analysts and is the subject of a panel discussion this week during the National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association’s annual conference being held at Oaklawn Park.

Advertisement

READ: Prediction Markets Have the Racing Industry’s Attention

Other provisions of HB 904 include:

  • After Nov. 1 of a calendar year, the Kentucky Horse Racing and Gaming Corporation may authorize additional racing dates or make changes to racing dates awarded if requested by a licensed association, supported by the applicable horsemen’s group and “deemed in the best interest of racing.”
  • Creates a new section that legalizes and puts the regulation of fantasy contests under the authority of the Kentucky Horse Racing and Gaming Corporation. Fantasy contests are simulated games or contests with an entry fee and awards or prizes established prior to the contest. Participants compete against each other and manage a fictional roster of actual athletes and obtain scores based on real-life performances. If adopted, all fantasy contest operators must be licensed by the state and adhere to regulations that include preventing fraud and money laundering, prevent underage participation, verify customers are geographically located in jurisdictions allowing fantasy contest participation, and comply with state audits and any complaints or allegations of prohibited conduct.
  • Sets the legal age to participate in sports betting, fantasy contests, and charitable gaming at 21 but keeps the legal age for betting on horse racing at 18.





Source link

Continue Reading

Kentucky

Northern Kentucky claims 4 titles at Class 3A indoor track state meet

Published

on

Northern Kentucky claims 4 titles at Class 3A indoor track state meet


The Kentucky High School Athletic Association indoor state track meet rolled on on Wednesday, March 4. One day after Beechwood claimed the Class 1A boys team title, three Northern Kentucky big schools combined for four individual state titles in Class 3A.

Cooper’s Paul Van Laningham won the 3,200-meter run in 9:09.49 and took second place in the 1,600-meter run in 4:07.88. It was a reversal of his results at the 2025 indoor state meet and earned him his fifth overall state title. He scored all of Cooper’s points, good for ninth place in the team standings with 18 points.

Advertisement

Van Laningham’s teammate, Ava Dunn, got the day started with a shot put title, throwing the 8.82-pound ball 39 feet, 3.25 inches.

Simon Kenton’s Alexis Howard won the long jump with an attempt of 18 feet, 7.25 inches, then claimed the triple jump title with a distance of 37 feet, 4.25 inches. It is her second straight indoor long jump title and third overall as she also claimed the 2024 outdoor title. Taking fifth place in the 55-meter dash, she scored all 24 points for SK, finishing in a tie for eighth place. Cooper was right behind with 22 points.

Finally, Conner’s Avery Vanlandingham win the 800-meter run in 2:17.55, out-leaning North Oldham’s Millie Huang at the line.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending