Connect with us

Delaware

Human remains found along the Delaware River in Fishtown, police say

Published

on

Human remains found along the Delaware River in Fishtown, police say



Human remains found along the Delaware River in Fishtown, police say – NBC10 Philadelphia







Advertisement

Skip to content

Advertisement


Advertisement

Contact Us



Source link

Delaware

Unemployment claims in Delaware increased last week

Published

on

Unemployment claims in Delaware increased last week


play

Initial filings for unemployment benefits in Delaware rose last week compared with the week prior, the U.S. Department of Labor said Jan. 15.

Advertisement

New jobless claims, a proxy for layoffs, increased to 512 in the week ending Jan. 10, up from 390 the week before, the Labor Department said.

U.S. unemployment claims dropped to 198,000 last week, down 9,000 claims from 207,000 the week prior on a seasonally adjusted basis.

Tennessee saw the largest percentage increase in weekly claims, with claims jumping by 113.5%. New Hampshire, meanwhile, saw the largest percentage drop in new claims, with claims dropping by 31.7%.

USA TODAY Co. is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from the U.S. Department of Labor’s weekly unemployment insurance claims report.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

Why Delmarva Power bills have spiked in December for Delaware residents

Published

on

Why Delmarva Power bills have spiked in December for Delaware residents


The cold weather has lead to some serious sticker shock when some families in Delaware have opened their power bills recently.

Many customers who use Delmarva Power said that they are upset at the number on their bill and that the company is now looking into another rate hike.

“I track my bills year to year and month to month and just from last year this time it went up 135 dollars,” North Wilmington resident Danny Marsilii said.

Many residents on social media are pointing to the delivery charge that is so much higher than the actual cost of the electricity and gas.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for Delmarva Power said that the company has programs to help low and moderate income families with their power costs but he says they need to raise rates to keep up with aging infrastructure and expand service as needed.

“We recognize lots of people are frustrated with their power bills right now,” a Delmarva spokesperson said. “We are very prudent with our costs and make sure those projects are really needed at the time we do them.”

Meanwhile, Delaware’s public advocate, Jameson Tweedie, says that Delmarva’s reliability record is solid but he says he disagrees with the hike request as it also builds in a significant profit boost for the company.

“In this rate case, Delmarva is seeking a 10.5% return on equity. In my view that is way too high,” Tweedie said. “These are businesses that have a monopoly. They have captive customers. You can’t choose a different utility with tiny exceptions.”

In our region, we get our power from companies that want to make a profit and they answer to shareholders.

Advertisement

Plus, in Delaware the vast majority of the power is imported.

The state doesn’t make a significant amount of power which could then help handle demand.

Also, wind and solar has been very politicized so basically we are all left with very few choices when it comes to getting power.

For Arden resident Jeanette Honis, she said she is not sure how she can keep up with her small home’s bills because she is on a fixed income.

“I usually pay anywhere between $180 to $187. This bill was $300 and something,” she explained.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

New bills would require Delaware to keep DNA evidence in criminal cases

Published

on

New bills would require Delaware to keep DNA evidence in criminal cases


play

  • Delaware is one of the few states without a formal law mandating the preservation of evidence like blood, semen or hair.
  • Senate Bill 214 would require evidence to be kept as long as a crime is unsolved or a person remains in custody.
  • Two other related bills would modernize post-conviction DNA testing laws and allow challenges to convictions based on discredited forensic science.

Television crime dramas have trained audiences to believe DNA evidence is always collected, stored and available to be tested years later. In Delaware, that assumption is often wrong. A new legislative package would overhaul how the state preserves biological evidence, a change advocates say could determine whether wrongly convicted people ever get a real chance to prove it.

According to data from the University of Michigan Law School, Delaware has recorded just five known exonerations. That figure stands in sharp contrast to nearly 4,000 exonerations nationwide since 1989. Lawmakers and advocates say the disparity is evidence of a criminal justice system that makes it difficult to prove innocence after a conviction becomes final.

Advertisement

Efforts to address that concern center on Senate Bill 214, introduced by Sen. Kyra Hoffner. The bill would, for the first time, require the state to preserve biological evidence connected to criminal cases. The proposal is supported by Innocence Project Delaware, which has received nearly 200 requests for post-conviction assistance since opening in 2020 from people who say they were wrongly convicted.

Dan Signs, a staff attorney with Innocence Project Delaware, said Delaware is one of a small handful of states without a formal statute that sets clear standards for how long biological evidence must be preserved. As a result, there is no uniform system for maintaining blood, semen, hair or other material that could later be tested using DNA technology unavailable at the time of trial.

By failing to keep pace with national standards, Delaware leaves people with credible innocence claims unable to access evidence that could vindicate them.

Advertisement

What’s in Senate Bill 214?

If passed, SB 214 would mandate the preservation of all biological evidence in the state’s custody that is connected to a criminal investigation or prosecution. Evidence would have to be retained for as long as a crime remains unsolved or for as long as a convicted person remains in custody, regardless of whether the conviction resulted from a trial or a guilty plea.

The bill also spells out the when biological evidence may be destroyed. Under limited and clearly defined circumstances, destruction would be allowed only if all five of the following conditions are met:

  • More than five years have passed since the conviction became final and all appeals are exhausted.
  • The evidence is not tied to a Class A through Class E felony.
  • No other state or federal law requires the evidence to be preserved.
  • The state sends certified written notice of its intent to destroy the evidence to specified parties, including anyone still incarcerated because of that conviction.
  • No person who has received such notice files a motion for DNA testing or a written request to retain the evidence within 180 days.

For evidence that is too large or impractical to store, the state would still be required to preserve any portions likely to contain biological material. If evidence that should have been preserved cannot be produced, courts would be required to hold a hearing to determine whether its destruction was intentional.

The legislation would take effect 30 days after becoming law.

Advertisement

Legislative package to reform forensic justice

SB 214 is intended to work in tandem with two additional bills introduced by Hoffner that target other barriers to post-conviction relief.

SS1 for Senate Bill 57 would eliminate outdated technological restrictions and legal processes that hinder defendants from pursuing innocence claims. The bill would modernize Delaware’s post-conviction DNA testing law by removing time limits that prevent access for those convicted before DNA testing became routine and allow individuals to petition courts for post-conviction DNA testing.

SS1 for Senate Bill 58 would establish a formal court process for challenging convictions that relied on forensic methods later shown to be unreliable or discredited.

Advocates point to a growing list of forensic techniques once treated as authoritative but now widely questioned or rejected:

Advertisement
  • Bite mark analysis
  • Hair comparison analysis
  • Certain arson investigation methods
  • Comparative bullet lead analysis

Breakthroughs in DNA testing and forensic science have repeatedly exposed flaws in these methods, leading to exonerations in other states.

What happens next?

The two post-conviction reform bills are awaiting consideration in the Senate Finance Committee. SB 214 is expected to be heard in the Senate Corrections and Public Safety Committee later this January.

Supporters say the proposals together would mark a systemic shift in Delaware’s approach to justice. Instead of relying on procedural conclusions, the state would commit to preserving evidence and revisiting past cases when science advances or new facts emerge, allowing truth, even when delayed, a chance to come to light.

To share your community news and activities with our audience, join Delaware Voices Uplifted on Facebook. Nonprofits, community groups and service providers are welcome to submit their information to be added to our Community Resources Map. Contact staff reporter Anitra Johnson at ajohnson@delawareonline.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending