Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Will Pennsylvania’s economic rebound help deliver the crucial swing state to Kamala Harris?

Published

on

Will Pennsylvania’s economic rebound help deliver the crucial swing state to Kamala Harris?


The most recent comprehensive study of Pennsylvania’s surging economy was almost startling in its promise. The State of Working Pennsylvania report, released just before Labor Day, found that the state’s economic output was “significantly exceeding” pre-pandemic levels, unemployment rates were near 50-year lows, workers’ bargaining power was high, and working-class families were sharing in the prosperity in a more sustained way than at any point since 1980.

“Historically, if you told me these would be the numbers — employment, growth, stock market, inflation back down, all these things — I’d say, ‘Wow, slam dunk for the incumbent party,’ ” said Christopher Borick, director of the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion in Allentown. “And that’s the Democrats.”

Instead, by almost every available polling metric, the 2024 presidential race in Pennsylvania is a dead heat. And Vice President Kamala Harris’ chance of securing the state’s critical 19 electoral votes may hinge on whether the reality of the state’s bustling economy squares with the perception of its citizens.

Two weeks before the election, the answer to that is a qualified no.

Advertisement

“It’s clear to me that people in Pennsylvania were feeling better about their finances in October 2020 than they are now,” said Berwood Yost, director of the Center for Opinion Research at Franklin and Marshall College in Lancaster, which has extensively polled registered voters on issues like the economy.

“The irony of that is that how they felt in 2020 was probably from all the government subsidies they’d received around COVID,” Yost said. “But regardless, when people say things were better under [former president Donald] Trump, the data says they believe it. It’s not even close.”

Economy on the rise

Without question, Pennsylvania’s economy is on the upswing. The State of Working Pennsylvania report, produced by the Keystone Research Center, makes that much clear.

“We think — and our report says — that Pennsylvania has now restored the prosperity from before the pandemic, even despite inflation that was mostly caused by supply chain bottlenecks and corporate price gouging,” said Stephen Herzenberg, Keystone’s executive director.

Advertisement

The report found that wages for workers in almost every category have outpaced inflation over the past five to 10 years, that the state’s economy bounced back from the pandemic much faster than it did from the Great Recession, and that unemployment rates for white, Black and Hispanic workers all hit record lows within the past year.

Herzenberg said the administration of President Joe Biden and Harris “deserves credit for finishing the job” of recovery that began with bipartisan pandemic relief measures in 2020 and extended through passage of the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021. Enacted with Democratic votes that overcame Republican opposition, the rescue plan sparked what the U.S. Treasury called “one of the strongest periods of economic growth in a century,” and that growth extended to Pennsylvania.

» READ MORE: 3 Delco town hall participants tell CNN they’re now backing Kamala Harris

Further, Herzenberg said, a deeper look at the state data revealed that unemployment has dropped dramatically since the pandemic — and it has done so in every one of the state’s 67 counties, including almost pure-red rural Western Pennsylvania.

“We’ve got a situation in the state in which there are more job openings than there are unemployed workers,” Herzenberg said. “In 20-plus years, that hadn’t been the case.”

Advertisement

Union activity is also on the rise. In 2023, union membership in the broad private service sector jumped by 64,000 to a total of 280,000 statewide — a 30% increase in one year. The Economic Policy Institute has found that a unionized worker earns 10% more in wages than a peer in a nonunionized job in the same industry. “Across the board,” Herzenberg said, “workers have more bargaining power when unemployment is low, both individually and collectively.”

Herzenberg noted that the Biden/Harris administration has strongly supported unions and union membership, and most unions — both in Pennsylvania and across the country — have endorsed Harris. “The Democratic platform has very detailed policies [in support of] the ability of workers to organize,” the researcher said. “If you read the Republican platform, you will not find the word ‘union.’ There could not be a bigger difference between the two parties.”

Still, when asked by Franklin and Marshall pollsters about their overall personal financial situations, nearly half of the respondents said they felt they were worse off than they had been a year ago, a figure that has held steady for most of the past several years.

Some sectors lagging

So why the disconnect with voters? Part of the answer may be found in the subsections of the Keystone report.

Advertisement

Although employment levels in most categories have already returned to or well surpassed their numbers from before the pandemic-induced recession, both the construction and manufacturing sectors are still lagging. “Those are blue-collar jobs,” Yost noted, in a state that still identifies strongly with its roots in the iron and steel industries.

» READ MORE: Kamala Harris’ and Donald Trump’s strategies to win Pennsylvania have spanned 50 stops and $500 million in ads

Though Black and Hispanic unemployment levels sit at near 20-year lows, both saw a slight uptick during the last quarter of data included in the report. And blue-collar wages have been largely stagnant for the past two decades, the kind of detail that complicates any broader attempt to describe economic recovery.

“When you ask people what’s the problem they’re seeing in the state, it’s definitely the economy at the top of the list,” Yost said. “Even something that has been hammered home, like immigration, barely shows up when you give them an open-ended question asking what’s going on. It’s unemployment and economic concerns for sure.”

Perhaps because of that, political experts say, the Harris campaign has tread carefully with its advertising messaging, focusing on specific areas — like helping first-time home buyers, as Pennsylvania’s prices are going up faster than the national average, and expanding the child-tax credit — rather than the economic recovery as a whole.

Advertisement

“It’s a little nuanced,” Muhlenberg’s Borick said. “You don’t want to sound like you’re celebrating when some people don’t feel very positively. They walk a tightrope on that. Trump has it much safer — people feel negative about the economy, and you just stoke those feelings.”

‘Trump’s best asset’

In Franklin and Marshall’s September poll, concern about the economy was the most often mentioned problem facing the state, with nearly half of the respondents saying Pennsylvania is “off on the wrong track.” The Muhlenberg College/Morning Call poll in September, meanwhile, found that the economy and inflation were by far the most important considerations for likely voters.

Asked by Franklin and Marshall researchers who is most prepared to handle the economy, 50% of respondents answered Trump, with Harris at 39%. (Nationally, Harris has closed that gap in some recent polling.)

These economic concerns “are really Trump’s best asset” in Pennsylvania, Yost said. “I think if he were a disciplined campaigner, that is pretty much all he would be talking about.”

Advertisement

It isn’t clear, though, whether that will decide the election. Pollsters recalled the 2022 midterms, when the economy was also the most frequently cited area of concern and Biden’s approval ratings were dismal. “It should have been a Republican wipeout, and it wasn’t,” Yost said. “That’s the case this time. The contextual variables in this [year’s] race favor the Republicans; why they’re not winning is a good question.”

» READ MORE: Inside the GOP’s effort to help Donald Trump lose Philadelphia — by a little bit less

The Pennsylvania presidential election may yet be swung by a relatively small number of voters who either say they’re undecided or have a candidate in mind but still aren’t 100% sure. “If you’ve got 1% undecided and 7% who’ve made a choice but think, ‘I might still change,’ then the economic messaging could help there,” Yost said.

The polling around issues breaks dramatically along partisan lines. While 25% of registered Democrats in the Muhlenberg poll cited abortion and reproductive rights as their priority issue, only 3% of registered Republicans did. Some 21% of Republicans listed immigration as a priority; only 2% of Democrats did. And while protection of democracy and democratic norms was the top concern of 11% of Democrats, only 2% of Republicans felt the same way.

Most partisans, though, already know their vote. Less than two weeks before Election Day, it’s largely uncertain how wavering Pennsylvania voters will make their decisions. In that respect, the state’s most recent — and mostly favorable — economic news could matter greatly in the push to get Harris over the top.

Advertisement

“All the little things matter more,” said Borick. “Even a slightly more positive appraisal of the economy could be impactful.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

Trump admin rule puts reproductive health care for 160K Pa. patients at risk, lawsuit says

Published

on

Trump admin rule puts reproductive health care for 160K Pa. patients at risk, lawsuit says


Family planning and health organizations that serve tens of thousands of people across Pennsylvania could see federal funding delayed or denied by a new Trump administration policy, a new lawsuit alleges.

The suit, which includes the Cumberland County-based Family Health Council of Central Pennsylvania as a plaintiff, takes aim at a step added this year by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to applications for Title X grants, which provide local agencies with funds to aid low-income and uninsured patients with family planning and related health services.

That new process is detailed in the Title X 2027 Notice of Funding Opportunity published in April. It states that before applicants are assessed on their merits, a group of presidential appointees will conduct an “alignment review” to determine whether each application matches the agency’s “priorities.” The plan offers no opportunity to appeal the group’s decision.

To the plaintiffs in the suit, that sounded like code for evaluating applicants based on politics.

Advertisement

“The Trump administration’s attempt to condition Title X funding on political allegiance is a grave threat to public health,” Sara Rose, deputy legal director at ACLU of Pennsylvania and attorney on the case, said in a statement. “Grant decisions must be guided by objective standards to ensure that taxpayer money is spent fairly and efficiently without regard to the ideology of its recipients.”

Created during the Nixon administration to help low-income people prevent unwanted pregnancies, Title X funding has long drawn opposition from anti-abortion activists.

The Trump administration has also attempted to shift the focus of the program toward promoting more pregnancies. Officials tried and failed earlier this year to block Title X funding from reaching Planned Parenthood facilities.

The suit is filed in the federal Middle District of Pennsylvania. It names HHS, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and other agency staff as defendants.

There are four Title X grantees in the commonwealth, each serving a specific region: The Family Health Council in central Pennsylvania, AccessMatters in Philadelphia, Adagio Health in the west, and Maternal and Family Health Services in the northeast.

Advertisement

Combined, they receive more than $12.6 million in Title X funds annually to serve more than 160,000 patients in Pennsylvania, according to their grant details listed on HHS’ website. (AccessMatters is by far the largest, working with more than 90,000 people.)

These organizations offer everything from fertility care and access to contraception to screenings for cancers and sexually transmitted infections.

Nationwide, the most recent data from HHS shows Title X grantees served nearly 2.8 million people.

Also at issue in the lawsuit is that HHS already has a set of regulations, put in place during President Joe Biden’s administration, that govern Title X applications — and many of them directly conflict with stated Trump administration priorities.

The suit highlights, for instance, that the HHS website currently states that ending “ideologically-laden concepts like health equity” is a priority, while Title X rules simultaneously require grantees to “advance health equity.”

Advertisement

Another alleged conflict stems from the Trump administration’s opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, especially for transgender people. Current Title X regulations mandate that grantees ensure transgender people have access to their programming.

Brigitte Amiri, deputy director at the ACLU’s Reproductive Freedom Project, told Spotlight PA that the Trump administration could overturn the Biden-era regulations by undertaking a public notice and comment rulemaking process.

“But you can’t just do it by a funding announcement,” she said.

The new review step “subverts the integrity” of the Title X grant application process, the lawsuit argues, and enables HHS “to hijack” the Title X program to fund organizations furthering the agency’s “political agenda.”

The lawsuit also notes that Title X funds are prohibited from being used for abortions.

Advertisement

Federal Judge Jennifer Wilson, who was nominated to the bench by Trump in 2019, will hear the case.

Spotlight PA sought a comment on the lawsuit from HHS, but did not receive a response.

The Family Health Council of Central Pennsylvania was selected to join the lawsuit because it has received Title X funding since the establishment of the program in 1970, and it serves a large area, the chief executive of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association told Stateline.

Patricia Fonzi, president and CEO of the Family Health Council, said in a statement that her organization serves more than 31,000 people across a 24-county region.

“We welcome a competitive grant process and believe every applicant should be evaluated on its ability to effectively serve communities, responsibly steward federal resources, and demonstrate the experience and capacity necessary to carry out the Title X statute,” Fonzi said.

Advertisement

“At the end of the day, the success of Title X is measured by whether people can access the care they need in their own communities — and that depends on funding decisions grounded in experience, proven performance, and the ability to deliver comprehensive care where it is needed most.”

The plaintiffs are urging the court to vacate the Trump administration’s new Title X rule and declare it “unlawful.”

Title X funds are issued to agencies on a five-year basis, with annual renewal requirements. The new rule at issue was included in the process for grants under fiscal year 2027, which will begin a new five-year cycle.

___

This story was originally published by Spotlight PA and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Federal government sues Pennsylvania, others over SNAP data

Published

on

Federal government sues Pennsylvania, others over SNAP data


(WHTM) — Pennsylvania is one of four states facing a lawsuit from the federal government over SNAP applicant data.

The U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Michigan, and Minnesota. They are seeking the last five years of SNAP applicant data in the respective states.

The DOJ alleges that the four states refused to turn over data to the U.S. Department of Agriculture “so that USDA could ensure that states are properly administering and enforcing their determinations of residents’ eligibility.”

“The American people deserve a government that is transparent about how it spends their hard-earned tax dollars,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. “These four states are thwarting USDA’s efforts to ensure that the billions of dollars in SNAP benefits they distribute every year are not lost to fraud.”

Advertisement

“Stopping the rampant theft of taxpayer money demands a whole-of-government response, including strong participation at the state level,” said Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald of the Justice Department’s National Fraud Enforcement Division. “These states are happy to take hundreds of millions of federal tax dollars—much of which is exploited by fraudsters—but want zero transparency over how those tax dollars are spent.”

Get the latest Pennsylvania politics and election news with abc27 newsletters!

The Department of Justice said 28 states promptly provided data and such indicated “there are billions of dollars per year in SNAP funds going to overpayments and fraud.”

The USDA has been seeking data for the past year or so, leading to a legal battle over concerns about how the data would be used.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

House Republicans stall activity, Pennsylvania Rep. Meuser calls tactics ‘foolish’ | Fox Business Video

Published

on

House Republicans stall activity, Pennsylvania Rep. Meuser calls tactics ‘foolish’ | Fox Business Video


House Speaker Mike Johnson sent representatives home early as hardline Republicans stalled floor activities, demanding action on the SAVE America Act. President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, urging House Republicans to unify and avoid giving power to Democrats. Rep. Dan Meuser (R-PA) labels the stalling tactics ‘foolish,’ emphasizing the need for legislative progress and appropriations.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending