Connect with us

South-Carolina

David Pollack blasts SEC officiating late in LSU vs. South Carolina game

Published

on

David Pollack blasts SEC officiating late in LSU vs. South Carolina game


Biggest Takeaways for LSU vs South Carolina

ESPN analyst David Pollack spent some time rewatching games from the weekend and one takeaway he had from LSU vs. South Carolina involved the officiating.

More specifically, an unnecessary roughness penalty assessed on South Carolina at a key moment of the game shouldn’t have been called, he said.

CLICK HERE to go to PrizePicks and use code ON3 to receive a guaranteed $50 once you play $5 in lineups!

“What the heck is going on with the roughing the passers?” Pollack said. “They make an unbelievable play, (Kyle) Kennard gets to him and hits him, basically forces an INT, forces him to throw the football. Then he touches him. Like he gives him a little touch and it’s a 15-yard penalty. I’m not sure what you want him to do.”

Advertisement

The play in question occurred midway through the fourth quarter, with South Carolina protecting a 33-29 lead.

Watch College Football Games Live -Try for Free Fubo! Click HERE NOW

Save $30 on your first month of Fubo by CLICKING HERE NOW! For a limited time, you can get your first month of Fubo for as low as $49.99. Stream ESPN, ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and 200+ top channels of live TV and sports without cable. (Participating plans only. Taxes and fees may apply.)

LSU was driving, having taken over in USC territory after a Robby Ashford fumble. On third-and-11, quarterback Garrett Nussmeier dropped back to pass. He scanned the field and had to unload quickly, with Kennard closing him down.

As he did so, defensive back Nick Emmanwori picked him off. Only officials flagged Kennard for unnecessary roughness, a penalty that cost the Gamecocks half the distance to the goal. They’d punt it away four plays later.

So while the outcome didn’t necessarily shift on the call, it certainly could have. It definitely cost South Carolina some field position, at the very least.

Advertisement

The Gamecocks would eventually cough up the lead, leading to a 36-33 win for the Tigers.

But Pollack came away impressed by South Carolina.

“South Carolina fans, I would be happy where I’m at,” Pollack said. “LaNorris Sellers, if he doesn’t get hurt, that might be a different game, too. First game without the specs, kudos. He had the contact lenses and he was making big plays with his feet. He was making enough plays with his arm. If I’m a South Carolina fan I feel like I let one get away, but I also see young talent on my team making plays, transfer portal making plays. So I think I’m still very optimistic if I’m a South Carolina Gamecock.”

He also had positive things to say about LSU. In particular, he praised Nussmeier, who was beaten up pretty good during the game by the South Carolina defensive front.

“Garrett Nussmeier, tip of the cap, sir. Like, I love you,” Pollack said. “Because what you just did in that environment; he got smacked around early. They got smacked around early. South Carolina blocked a punt, turned them over, everything going that way and he slowly just took them back down the field. Got hit a bunch.

Advertisement

“LSU coaching staff, I’ve got to give a lot of credit to their OC, man. Rolling the pocket, half rolls. Getting the running game involved. Doing a really good job getting the football out of his hands quickly. He was getting hit early and they had answers to the test.”





Source link

South-Carolina

Former SC Lt. Gov. André Bauer nominated to be next US Ambassador to Belize

Published

on

Former SC Lt. Gov. André Bauer nominated to be next US Ambassador to Belize


NOTE: The above video is a livestream of WIS featuring current newscasts, Soda City Living and Gray Media’s Local News Live.

COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – Former South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer has been nominated for a position in foreign diplomacy.

The White House on Tuesday listed Bauer as a nominee to be the next U.S. Ambassador to Belize, a Central American country bordering Guatemala.

It’s unclear when a confirmation hearing will take place. WIS has reached out to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee for more information.

Advertisement

Bauer was South Carolina’s lieutenant governor from 2003-2011, serving under then-Gov. Mark Sanford. Before that, he served terms in the South Carolina House of Representatives and the South Carolina Senate.

More recently, Bauer entered the race for U.S. Senate in July 2025, looking to unseat Sen. Lindsey Graham in the Republican primary. He ended his campaign the following month.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.

Copyright 2026 WIS. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston

Published

on

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston


Six Republican candidates vying to become South Carolina’s next governor met in downtown Charleston for a wide-ranging debate that put abortion, infrastructure and the future of data centers at the center of the race.

The forum was held at the Sottile Theatre, where Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, state Sen. Josh Kimbrell, U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, Lowcountry businessman Rom Reddy and Attorney General Alan Wilson took the stage.

Questions included whether they would support a state hate crime law, how they would address concerns about growth and infrastructure, how to navigate collaboration, abortion and the future of data centers in the state.

One issue that drew near-unanimous opposition was state Senate Bill 1095, a proposed total abortion ban that passed out of committee earlier in the day. All of the candidates opposed the bill, but they differed on what they would do if it reached the governor’s desk.

Advertisement

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Norman said he would sign it.

“You know, this is an emotional issue, but I will tell you if this bill came to my desk as governor. If it passed the House and the Senate, I would sign it,” Norman said.

All of the other candidates on stage said they would veto the bill if it came across their desk as governor, with Reddy arguing the question should be decided by voters.

“The Supreme Court did not say the loudest voice in the ruling class prevails. It said it’s up to the people in the state, so let’s put it to a referendum,” Reddy said.

Advertisement

On infrastructure, candidates discussed reforming the South Carolina Department of Transportation and allowing private-sector involvement to help pay for improvements.

Wilson outlined ideas that included leasing interstate easements and expanding private express lanes.

“We privatized that grass between the interstates. We turn it into private express lanes that can be told we leased the easements on the sides of interstates to telecommunication companies and energy companies, and charge them for natural gas line and fiber optic fiber optic cables,” Wilson said.

Evette also pointed to public-private partnerships and the possibility of fast-pass lanes.

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Advertisement

“We want to make sure that we’re innovative public private partnerships coming in and creating fast pass lanes to allow people that are in a hurry to be able to utilize that,” Evette said.

The final question focused on data centers, with candidates agreeing corporations should “pay their way.”

“They should pay for their water. They should pay for their infrastructure, any roads around it, and we should look at what Governor Ron DeSantis has done in Florida with the large data centers that are coming to Florida. That should be the model in South Carolina and everywhere,” Mace said.

Kimbrell said the state should set limits to protect natural resources and guard against higher power costs for residents.

“Put parameters around data centers to ensure that the water consumption does not impact places like the ACE Basin,” Kimbrell said. “Ensuring that the Public Service Commission makes absolutely sure nobody’s power rate goes up and we try to get behind the meter energy grids in place so they can be self-sufficient.”

Advertisement

Two more debates are planned ahead of the primaries on June 9.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances

Published

on

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances


A bill that could make it a felony for doctors to perform an abortion is moving to the full South Carolina Senate with just a few weeks left in the legislative session.

The South Carolina Senate medical affairs committee continued a debate of Senate Bill 1095 on April 21 in Columbia. The bill, sponsored by State Sen. Richard Cash, R-Anderson, builds on a restrictive abortion bill that failed to progress in the fall.

The committee passed the measure in an 8-4 vote, moving it to the full Senate for consideration. Lawmakers have until May 14, the last day of the 2026 legislative session, to pass the bill for it to become law.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 1095, also called the “Unborn Child Protection Act,” bans performing an abortion or supplying abortion drugs. It makes it illegal for a woman to get an abortion, with the only exception being to save a pregnant woman’s life.

It also makes mifepristone and misoprostol Schedule IV controlled substances. Alprazolam (Xanax) and zolpidem (Ambien) are two other examples of Schedule IV substances.

Pro-Life Greenville, an anti-abortion organization based in Greenville, responded to the bill’s progress with “full endorsement” of the legislation.

“Unborn children, like all human beings, deserve to have their lives protected under law here in the Palmetto State,” Pro-Life Greenville stated. “Today’s vote by the SC Senate Medical Affairs Committee brings that urgent need one step closer to reality.”

Advertisement

Under the bill, a woman who has an abortion could face misdemeanor charges. The maximum sentence would be two years in jail with a $1,000 fine.

Those found guilty of performing an abortion or providing a pregnant woman with abortion-inducing drugs could face felony charges, a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail, and a possible $100,000 fine.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT), a firm opponent of the bill, decried the Senate committee passage. PPSAT Director of Public Affairs Vicki Ringer said in a statement that the bill will cost people their lives, and it will make it more difficult for women to get reproductive and pregnancy healthcare.

“Abortion bans have and will continue to cost people their lives,” Ringer stated. “As this ban inches closer to the governor’s desk, it is becoming increasingly clear just how many of our lives anti-abortion lawmakers are willing to endanger in service to their agenda.”

Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@gannett.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending