Connect with us

Nevada

NV Supreme Court Rules Green Party Removed From Presidential Ballot – Nevada Globe

Published

on

NV Supreme Court Rules Green Party Removed From Presidential Ballot – Nevada Globe


Nevada Democrats have been working on “saving democracy” by filing lawsuits to kick potential challengers to Kamala Harris off the presidential ballot.

Last month, facing a Democrat-led lawsuit, RFK Jr. opted to remove his independent candidacy from the ballot after reaching an agreement with state Democrats. Today, state Democrats were victorious in their lawsuit against the Green Party and their candidate Dr. Jill Stein who has previously appeared on the ballot in 2012 and 2016.

Despite the Secretary of State providing the wrong language, the Green Party failed to sway the court’s majority to their defense.

In a 5-2 decision released today (see below), the Nevada Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling and found that the Green Party’s petition contained the wrong affidavit language, thereby invalidating the estimated 30,000 signatures they had collected to appear on the November ballot. “The Green Party’s failure to use the correct circulator affidavit cannot be excused by the Green Party’s reliance on the sample petition received from the Secretary,” the ruling states.

Advertisement

The two dissenting justices Kristina Pickering and Douglas Herndon wrote that the majority’s decision violated the Green Party’s due process rights and were “deeply concerned that our decision today excuses an egregious error by the Secretary of State’s office that will result in a significant injustice.”

In a statement, the Secretary of State’s office led by Democrat Cisco Aguilar, said “providing accurate information to the public is a priority for our office, and we will continue to review and improve all guides and documentation.”

“The Secretary of State’s office was involved in this case by necessity, and took no position on the legal sufficiency of the petition under Nevada law,” the statement said. “We respect the decision of the Justices, and are working with the counties to ensure the decision is carried out.”

In a released statement, co-chair of the Nevada Green Party Margery Hanson said “I live in a swing state and I will not be voting this cycle.”

The Executive Director of the Nevada Democratic Party Hilary Barrett responded to the court’s opinion stating that the “ruling is a victory for Nevada voters and ensures that the Green Party plays by the same rules as other campaigns.”

Advertisement

Green Party reversal





Source link

Nevada

IN RESPONSE: Cortez Masto lands bill would keep the proceeds in Nevada

Published

on

IN RESPONSE: Cortez Masto lands bill would keep the proceeds in Nevada


A recent Review-Journal letter to the editor mischaracterized Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto’s Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act, also known as the Clark County Lands bill. As the former executive director of the Nevada Conservation League, I wholeheartedly support this legislation, so I wanted to set the record straight.

Sen. Cortez Masto has been working on this bill for years in partnership with state and local governments, conservation groups like the NCL and local area tribes. It’s true that the Clark County lands bill would open 25,000 acres to help Las Vegas grow responsibly, while setting aside 2 million acres for conservation. It would also help create more affordable housing throughout the valley while ensuring our treasured public spaces can be preserved for generations to come.

What is not correct is that the money from these land sales would go to the federal government’s coffers. In fact, the opposite is true.

The 1998 Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act is a landmark bill that identified specific public land for future sale and created a special account ensuring all land sale revenues would come back to Nevada. In accordance with that law 5 percent of revenue from land transfers goes to the state of Nevada for general education purposes, 10 percent goes to the Southern Nevada Water Authority for needed water infrastructure and 85 percent supports conservation and environmental mitigation projects in Southern Nevada. This legislation has provided billions to Clark County and will continue to benefit generations of Southern Nevadans. Sen. Cortez Masto’s lands bill builds upon the act’s success.

Advertisement

So here’s the good news: All of the money generated from land made available for sale under Sen. Cortez Masto’s bill would be sent to the special account created by the 1998 law. Rather than going to an unaccountable federal government, the proceeds would continue to help kids in Vegas get a better education, bolster outdoor recreation and modernize Southern Nevada’s infrastructure.

I know how important it is that money generated from the sale of public land in Nevada stay in the hands of Nevadans, and so does the senator. That’s why she opposed a Republican effort last year to sell off 200,000 acres of land in Clark County and other areas of the country that would have sent those dollars directly to Washington.

Public land management in Nevada should benefit Nevadans. We should protect sacred cultural sites and beloved recreation spaces, responsibly transfer land for affordable housing when needed and ensure our state has the resources it needs to grow sustainably. I will continue working with Sen. Cortez Masto to advocate for legislation, such as the Clark County lands bill, that puts the needs of Nevadans first.

Paul Selberg writes from Las Vegas.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Las Vegas High beats Coronado in 5A baseball — PHOTOS

Published

on

Las Vegas High beats Coronado in 5A baseball — PHOTOS