Connect with us

Vermont

ICE deports Honduran family before they can apply to stay in Vermont

Published

on

ICE deports Honduran family before they can apply to stay in Vermont


Puedes leer la versión en español aquí.

Earlier this month, Greisy Mejia, a Honduran living in the U.S. without legal permission, visited a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement service center in St. Albans with her 9-year-old daughter and infant son for what she was told was a routine check-in.

The next day, Mejia and her children were in Honduras, deported before her lawyer could even contact her.

Catalina Londono, a law student and legal fellow for the farmworker advocacy group Migrant Justice, was working on helping Mejia apply for a stay of removal – a temporary, discretionary order granting protection from deportation.

Advertisement

“I’m in a state of shock,” Londono said after learning of the news. “How did all this happen in less than 24 hours?”

The speed of Mejia’s deportation, the circumstances under which ICE detained her, and the fact that the agency targeted a mother for removal before she could apply for a stay of removal, have shocked members of Vermont’s migrant community and Mejia’s supporters.

But while her case is exceptional in many ways, it’s part of a trend of stricter immigration enforcement in the state, which has driven deportations to the highest levels on record.

Gone in 24 hours

Mejia arrived at the St. Albans Department of Homeland Security facility early Tuesday morning with her two children and Londono.

She had a check-in scheduled later that month, but said ICE asked her to come in earlier and insisted she bring her two children, with the stated reason of ensuring they were still in her care. The agent even floated the idea of removing her ankle monitor and reducing the frequency of check-ins if the appointment went well, Londono said. The week prior, Mejia and Londono visited the station to pick up photocopies of Mejia’s passport in order to apply for a stay of removal – a temporary protection from deportation given at ICE’s discretion.

Advertisement

“We had already planned on preparing and filing on Greisy’s behalf the stay of removal because we knew there was a possibility of her being detained, and we were trying to get ahead of it,” said Brett Stokes, Londono’s supervisor and Mejia’s attorney. “They pulled a fast one on us … before we had a chance to actually get the stay of removal filed.”

Things began normally at the meeting, Londono said. Mejia handed over documents requested by ICE. Then they were told to wait for a supervisor to conduct some kind of interview. What kind, the ICE agent could not say. And so they waited, without food, for hours.

Eventually, Londono stepped out to update Migrant Justice and Stokes, her supervising attorney. When she returned, Mejia and her children were gone; the guard told her they were taken for the interview.

But, Mejia said, there was no interview.

“The agents just waited for [Londono] to step outside, they took me inside with my kids to an office. I was told they would interview me, but no one spoke to me. They simply told me that I was arrested and that I was going to be deported,” Mejia told Vermont Public in Spanish. “I cried. I begged. I couldn’t go back to Honduras. I told them that it didn’t matter if they only took me. But officers told me that if I kept insisting for [my kids] to stay, they would put them up for adoption.”

Advertisement

Briefly separated from her kids, Mejia was fingerprinted and photographed. Then, the three were placed in a black car and driven to an airport, where they had their shoes, phones, and other belongings confiscated before being put on a plane to San Antonio, Texas, Mejia said.

‘You’re not going to start crying’

Inside the facility in St. Albans, Londono sat in the lobby for about an hour, unaware of what was going on on the other side of the building. Eventually, she said, an ICE agent informed her that, based on the interview with Mejia – which Mejia says did not occur – the supervisor decided to detain the family.

Londono informed Migrant Justice, and the organization quickly set up a rally outside the station, holding signs and chanting in English and Spanish. Stokes, who had been on vacation at the time, drove down to St. Albans to try to speak to Mejia.

Courtesy

Advertisement

/

Migrant Justice

Migrant Justice held a rally outside the DHS site in St. Albans.

The rally was short-lived, however, when they learned Mejia was no longer at the station. Where she was was a mystery. ICE would not give Stokes any information on her location, even after he filled out a required form certifying himself as Mejia’s attorney.

Migrant Justice assumed Mejia was moved to a detention facility that held children, of which there are none in Vermont. They planned to publish a petition the following morning publicizing her case, while Stokes planned to file for the stay of removal in Boston.

Not knowing she was already in the process of being ferried out of the country, Mejia’s supporters were somewhat hopeful they could stay her deportation.

Advertisement

“If ICE is following their own procedures, they cannot deport her immediately,” Will Lambeck, a spokesperson for Migrant Justice, said at the time. “Even though she has been detained, she has the legal right for what is known as a ‘reasonable fear screening’ and they should not deport her without giving her that reasonable fear screening.”

A reasonable fear screening or interview is a process which allows an immigrant facing deportation to have their removal stayed if they can demonstrate a reasonable fear of torture or persecution in their country.

But no one heard from Mejia until around 7 a.m. the following day. After arriving in San Antonio, Mejia said, she and her children were put in another car. She begged a woman in plainclothes, who Mejia believed worked with ICE or as a police officer, to call her partner in Vermont.

“And she said to me, ‘I’ll let you do one call… You’re not going to start crying, don’t say where you are, just say you are going to Honduras,’” said Mejia in Spanish. “So I called my [partner] and said, ‘I’m going to Honduras and I can’t say any more. Send someone to pick me up.’ That is all I could say.”

Later that day, Mejia called Londono for the first time since her detainment, confirming the news. She, and her children, were in Honduras.

Advertisement

ICE’s Boston Field Office, which covers Vermont, did not respond to multiple emails and phone calls for comment on the case.

‘Like during the Trump administration’

Mejia and her children, facing organized crime in their native country, fled to the U.S. in 2023 declaring themselves for asylum at the southern border. They were then deported under a process called expedited removal, which allows a low-level immigration official to order a deportation. It’s supposed to give the person an opportunity to apply for asylum if they have what the government calls credible fear of danger in her native country, but Mejia says her pleas were ignored.

That isn’t uncommon, said Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, D.C.

“Migrants report [expressions of fear being ignored] often and that’s been a major concern of immigrant advocates right now,” Bush-Joseph said. “They’re saying it’s actually gotten way worse with Customs and Border Protection allegedly not giving people the opportunity to be referred for a credible interview when they’re expressing fear, and then they’re being removed through expedited removal very quickly.”

Mejia returned to the U.S. last year, where she and her children were kidnapped and held for ransom, said Stokes. They were able to reach a police officer and escape and, upon being handed over to Border Patrol, were placed under an order of supervision, requiring Mejia to wear an ankle monitor and report to ICE. She moved to Vermont where her partner lives.

Advertisement

Mejia’s kidnapping case is being investigated by Homeland Security Investigations, a separate part of ICE than Enforcement and Removal Operations, said Jill Martin Diaz, executive director of the Vermont Asylum Assistance Project and co-counsel in Mejia’s case. The kidnapping, and Mejia’s participation in the investigation, make her eligible for a T visa, for victims of human trafficking, Diaz said.

The fact that one division of ICE was working with Mejia to prosecute kidnappers and the other deported her is an example of how Mejia’s case stands out, Diaz said – the first they can recall in their 10-year career.

“It’s a strange practice, because it’s inconsistent with the agency’s own policy,” Diaz said. “And frankly, it is very resonant of what the standard of practice was like during the Trump administration.”

Another violation of agency policy: ignoring Mejia’s declaration of fear of returning to her country.

The fact she was deported previously meant Mejia was ineligible for a credible fear interview, even though she wasn’t given one originally. But she was eligible for a reasonable fear interview, a separate, more rigorous process which can’t grant asylum but can stave off deportation. Mejia said she clearly expressed fear of returning to Honduras at the station, even asking to be deported to other nearby countries, to no avail.

Advertisement

Stokes and Londono said they will continue to work on getting Mejia a T visa so she can return to and live in the country as a resident.

Record levels of deportations

While immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility, frontline officers have broad discretion in which cases they choose to pursue. In the past, Diaz said, ICE offices in Vermont, staffed by longtime community members, were more amenable.

“We had lines of communication so that we could engage respectfully, making sure that there’s a holistic view of every case,” Diaz said. “So that there wouldn’t be one branch trying to deport someone while another branch was trying to investigate the trafficking they suffered, for example.”

Data going back to 2003 show deportations in Vermont reached record levels in the last two years. Over two-thirds of those who were removed were not convicted of any crime.

Nationwide, deportations have risen to pre-pandemic levels since the end of Title 42 in May 2023, said Bush-Joseph.

Advertisement

“When the Biden administration stopped using Title 42, the pandemic-era health measure, they ramped up enforcement under Title 8, the normal immigration laws of the U.S., and they were increasing deportations in conjunction with that,” Bush-Joseph said.

Diaz believes pandemic-era attrition hollowed out the offices, and the temporary staff who filled those roles, having little to no connection to the community, are more aggressive in enforcement. Their hope is that permanent staff will be willing to return to the previous era of enforcement and removal.

ICE did not respond to a request for comment on the staffing issue, or the rise in deportations.

For now though, they’re on high alert for clients they wouldn’t expect to be targeted for removal in years prior. For Mejia, whether or not ICE violated its policy will not bring her back; her only hope is a T visa.

According to Stokes, Mejia’s attorney, the Vermont congressional delegation — Sens. Bernie Sanders and Peter Welch and Congresswoman Becca Balint — are aware of her case. He is asking Mejia’s supporters to contact them as well as state representatives.

Advertisement

Stokes said they don’t have the power to grant Mejia and her children visas, but they can put pressure on U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to expedite the process.

María Aguirre provided translation assistance for quotations.

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message. Or contact the reporter directly at corey.dockser@vermontpublic.org.





Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

Friends, family rally behind Vermont veteran charged with domestic terrorism

Published

on

Friends, family rally behind Vermont veteran charged with domestic terrorism


NEWPORT, Vt. (WCAX) – Friends and family of a Vermont veteran charged with domestic terrorism rallied in Newport Thursday, saying the charges stem from a mental health crisis and are unwarranted.

Vermont State Police say Joseph “J.J.” Millett, 38, of Newport, called a veterans crisis line in February, making suicidal statements and threatening a mass-casualty event.

Court records say Millett had guns and wrote what investigators call a manifesto. He turned himself in, and state police say they disarmed him at the barracks. He pleaded not guilty and was never formally arrested or placed in jail. He is currently in a treatment facility.

Supporters say the threats were the result of new medication and a mental health crisis. “But all the way to domestic terrorism for a man that fought overseas — he wasn’t a terrorist. He’s been fighting terrorists half his life,” said Chad Abbott, a friend who served with Millett overseas.

Advertisement

Abbott said he believes the charges could have unintended consequences for veterans seeking help. “These hotlines that they put out for us is to kind of get us the help we need. And now, none of us are going to want to call that,” he said.

Millett’s sister, Courtney Morin, said her brother served in the Vermont Guard for nearly 10 years and has struggled with mental health since returning home. “He suffers from depression, anxiety — he has PTSD. So, he’s actually been seeking help for his mental health for probably as long as he’s been home,” Morin said.

Orleans County State’s Attorney Farzana Leyva said the charge is warranted and that Millett was not calling for help when he contacted the crisis line. “He called the crisis helpline to make the threats. I think we have to be very clear about that. Those were threats. He did not call the crisis helpline for help. He called anonymously,” Leyva said.

She said the evidence — including repeated threats — Millett’s access to guns, and a manifesto justifies the charge and protects the public. “My priority is public safety, which is the highest priority that I have right now,” Leyva said.

Morin said she believes her brother was trying to get help. “I think he was seeking help. I mean, it’s all a trail of him seeking help, being on different meds. You know, we’re not in his head. We don’t know what he’s dealing with. And especially if you’re dealing with it alone,” Morin said.

Advertisement

Millett continues to receive treatment and is due back in court later this month.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont high school playoff scores, results, stats for Thursday, March 5

Published

on

Vermont high school playoff scores, results, stats for Thursday, March 5


The 2025-2026 Vermont high school winter season has begun. See below for scores, schedules and game details (statistical leaders, game notes) from basketball, hockey, gymnastics, wrestling, Nordic/Alpine skiing and other winter sports.

TO REPORT SCORES

Coaches or team representatives are asked to report results ASAP after games by emailing sports@burlingtonfreepress.com. Please submit with a name/contact number.

Contact Alex Abrami at aabrami@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter: @aabrami5.

Advertisement

Contact Judith Altneu at JAltneu@usatodayco.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter: @Judith_Altneu.

THURSDAY’S H.S. PLAYOFF GAMES

D-III GIRLS BASKETBALL SEMIFINALS

At Barre Auditorium

No. 5 Vergennes (17-4) vs. No. 1 Hazen (18-2), 5:30 p.m.

No. 3 Oxbow (16-6) vs. No. 2 Windsor (16-6), 7:30 p.m.

Watch Vermont high school sports on NFHS Network

Advertisement

D-I BOYS BASKETBALL QUARTERFINALS

Games at 7 p.m. unless noted

No. 8 Mount Mansfield (10-11) at No. 1 Rice Memorial (17-3)

No. 12 Essex (5-16) at No. 4 Rutland (15-6)

No. 7 Burr and Burton (13-8) at No. 2 South Burlington (15-5), 6 p.m.

No. 6 BFA-St. Albans (13-8) vs. No. 3 Burlington (15-5) at Colchester, 7:30 p.m.

Advertisement

D-II GIRLS HOCKEY QUARTERFINALS

No. 8 Stowe (5-16) vs. No. 1 U-32 (13-6-1) at Kreitzberg Arena, 5 p.m.

(Subject to change)





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

19 Vermont school budgets fail as education leaders debate need for reform

Published

on

19 Vermont school budgets fail as education leaders debate need for reform


MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – Most Vermont school budgets passed Tuesday, but 19 districts and supervisory unions saw their spending plans rejected — an uptick from the nine that failed in 2025, though well below the 29 that failed in 2024.

Some education leaders say the results show communities are largely supportive of their schools.

“We’re starting to kind of equalize out again towards the normal trend of passage of school budgets each year,” said Chelsea Meyers of the Vermont Superintendents Association.

Sue Ceglowski of the Vermont School Boards Association said the results send a clear message. “Vermont taxpayers support Vermont’s public schools,” she said.

Advertisement

Meyers said the results also raise questions about the scope of education reform being considered in Montpelier. “If we are going to reform the system, it might not require sweeping broad changes as are being considered right now, but a more concise approach to consider that inequity,” she said.

But in districts where budgets failed, officials say structural changes are still needed. In Barre, where the budget failed, Barre Unified Union School District Board Chair Michael Boutin said the Legislature must, at a minimum, create a new funding formula. “We have to have that in order to avoid the huge increases and decreases — the huge increases that we’ve seen in the last couple years,” Boutin said.

He said the rise in school budgets is separate from why property owners are seeing sharp tax increases. The average state increase in school budgets is 4%, but the average property tax increase is 10%, driven by cost factors including health care. “There’s a complete disconnect, and that’s a product of the terrible system that we have in Vermont with our funding formula,” Boutin said.

Ceglowski says the state should address health care costs before moving forward with rapid education policy changes. “Addressing the rapid rise in the cost of school employees’ health benefits by ensuring a fair and balanced statewide bargaining process for those benefits,” she said.

The 19 districts that did not pass their budgets will need to draft new spending plans to present to voters, which often requires cuts. Twelve school districts are scheduled to vote at a later date.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending