Connect with us

Politics

News conference gives Biden a lifeline and Democrats a dilemma

Published

on

News conference gives Biden a lifeline and Democrats a dilemma

Many Democrats are now in a perverse position in which seemingly good news for Biden — a decent news conference Thursday and a good poll Friday — feels like bad news for the prospects of winning the election.

“He did as well as he could do last night and, on the foreign policy stuff, was very strong,” David Axelrod, who served as political advisor to former President Obama, said in an interview Friday. “But anything that encourages him to believe that his situation is anything other than grave, relative to this election, isn’t necessarily good news.”

Early reviews of Biden’s Thursday news conference were mixed. Voters who watched the entire 59 minutes, particularly supporters, saw a veteran of foreign affairs who could speak with authority about wars in Gaza and Ukraine, with a bit of rambling in between. But many more people likely saw viral clips of him calling former President Trump his vice president — instead of Kamala Harris — and in the hours before, introducing Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky as Russian President Vladimir Putin, the man who invaded his country.

“My gosh, when he does a press conference where he mistakes Zelensky for Putin and Trump for Kamala Harris and everyone goes, ‘Great job’? I mean, blech,” Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) said.

Smith, one of the highest-ranking Democrats to ask Biden to withdraw, said he continues to have great respect for the president and his tenure, but is increasingly worried that people around him have “fought dirty” and “aggressively” to prevent a serious conversation because they are more invested in his personal fate than keeping former President Trump out of the White House.

Advertisement

“The bar for what’s considered good for Joe Biden has been lowered considerably for roughly 20% of the country, and that is the 20% who are dyed-in-the-wool Joe Biden fans, come hell or high water,” he said. “The bar hasn’t been lowered at all for the other 80% of the country.”

Biden sounded again in Thursday’s news conference like a man determined to stay in the race, even as the number of Democrats in Congress calling for him to pull out grew to about 20 and polls continued to show majorities in both parties want him to step aside.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York told House Democrats in a letter Friday that he had met privately with Biden after the news conference to relay their concerns, a sign that pressure on Biden has not abated. Biden, hoping to hold off more defections, joined two virtual meetings Friday with members of the Hispanic and Asia-Pacific congressional caucuses.

“The cohort of members who are pretty close to breaking” and asking Biden to step aside “is pretty significant,” said Rep. Jared Huffman, a San Rafael Democrat.

Huffman called for a “course correction” after the debate performance two weeks ago, which he said he has yet to see, but stopped short of directly urging Biden to pull out.

Advertisement

“Denying that we have a problem, kind of wishing it away, is not the answer,” he said. “Pretending that we can just keep doing more of the same is not the answer. If we really believe that this is the most critical election of our lifetimes, and we’ve got to win it, we need to be more circumspect and sober.”

Rep. Mike Levin of San Juan Capistrano became the latest Democratic lawmaker to join the group on Friday.

“In private and on the text chains, there’s a real sense of despair” about Democrats’ chances, said Rep. Scott Peters, a San Diego Democrat who urged Biden to drop out Thursday night after seeing the Cook Political Report on Tuesday downgrade Biden’s chances of winning six battleground states, including Arizona and Nevada.

“It’s hard for Californians to understand that, but in the swing states, people are actually thinking about voting for Trump,” he added.

In the aftermath of his calamitous debate performance, Biden said it would take “Lord Almighty” to keep him from running for reelection.

Advertisement

On Thursday he amended that, saying he would leave only if his advisors told him “there’s no way you can win.”

Then, in a dramatic stage whisper, he added: “There’s no one saying that. No poll says that.”

Friday provided some validation for that case. A new Marist poll conducted for NPR and PBS showed him leading Trump 50% to 48% among registered voters nationally. But other polls have shown Trump with bigger leads, nationally and by wider margins in important swing states. And Biden barely won the electoral college vote in 2020 despite winning the popular vote by 4 percentage points.

Biden dismissed polls as inaccurate Thursday but Axelrod and others argued that they can’t be dismissed, especially when political experts and others who have looked at a range of data, including focus groups, see a much darker picture amid a backdrop where concerns about Biden’s age have “metastasized” to the point where Trump is no longer the central issue of the race.

“The test can’t be ‘Can he win?’ The test has to be ‘What is the probability he will win?’ and the probability isn’t good,” Axelrod said. “I think the people around him know the truth.”

Advertisement

Smith made a similar argument, asking whether a basketball team would want a 30% free-throw shooter at the line with the game at stake instead of a 90% shooter.

It remains up to Biden, however, and not everyone believes his problems are irredeemable or that the path to a potential replacement would be any easier. His allies tried to send the message that his worst problems are behind him.

“Sometimes presidents have bad debates and I promise you he’ll have a better second debate,” Ron Klain, Biden’s former chief of staff, said Friday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Biden’s favorite cable news show.

Yet even if Biden withstands the high-level pressure to drop out long enough to preclude a replacement, he will have to grind it out, said Mary Anne Marsh, a Democratic strategist.

“The challenge is the next 115 days; every day is a test that Joe Biden has to pass,” Marsh said. “But for the debate performance, we would have looked at a press conference like last night, calling Harris Trump, we would have laughed it off.”

Advertisement

Politics

House Democrats challenge new Homeland Security order limiting lawmaker visits to immigration facilities

Published

on

House Democrats challenge new Homeland Security order limiting lawmaker visits to immigration facilities

Twelve House Democrats who last year sued the Trump administration over a policy limiting congressional oversight of immigrant detention facilities returned to federal court Monday to challenge a second, new policy imposing further limits on such unannounced visits.

In December, those members of Congress won their lawsuit challenging a Department of Homeland Security policy from June that required a week’s notice from lawmakers before an oversight visit. Now they’re accusing Homeland Security of having “secretly reimposed” the requirement last week.

In a Jan. 8 memorandum, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote that “Facility visit requests must be made a minimum of seven (7) calendar days in advance. Any requests to shorten that time must be approved by me.”

The lawmakers who challenged the policies are led by Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) and include five members from California: Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Long Beach), Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana), Jimmy Gomez (D-Los Angeles), Raul Ruiz (D-Indio) and Norma Torres (D-Pomona).

Advertisement

Last summer, as immigration raids spread through Los Angeles and other parts of Southern California, many Democrats including those named in the lawsuit were denied entry to local detention facilities. Before then, unannounced inspections had been a common, long-standing practice under congressional oversight powers.

“The duplicate notice policy is a transparent attempt by DHS to again subvert Congress’s will…and this Court’s stay of DHS’s oversight visit policy,” the plaintiffs wrote in a federal court motion Monday requesting an emergency hearing.

On Saturday, three days after Renee Nicole Good was shot and killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent, three members of Congress from Minnesota attempted to conduct an oversight visit of an ICE facility near Minneapolis. They were denied access.

Afterward, lawyers for Homeland Security notified the lawmakers and the court of the new policy, according to the court filing.

In a joint statement, the plaintiffs wrote that “rather than complying with the law, the Department of Homeland Security is attempting to get around this order by re-imposing the same unlawful policy.”

Advertisement

“This is unacceptable,” they said. “Oversight is a core responsibility of Members of Congress, and a constitutional duty we do not take lightly. It is not something the executive branch can turn on or off at will.”

Congress has stipulated in yearly appropriations packages since 2020 that funds may not be used to prevent a member of Congress “from entering, for the purpose of conducting oversight, any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens.”

That language formed the basis of the decision last month by U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb in Washington, who found that lawmakers cannot be denied entry for visits “unless and until” the government could show that no appropriations money was being used to operate detention facilities.

In her policy memorandum, Noem wrote that funds from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which supplied roughly $170 billion toward immigration and border enforcement, are not subject to the limitations of the yearly appropriations law.

“ICE must ensure that this policy is implemented and enforced exclusively with money appropriated by OBBBA,” Noem said.

Advertisement

Noem said the new policy is justified because unannounced visits pull ICE officers away from their normal duties. “Moreover, there is an increasing trend of replacing legitimate oversight activities with circus-like publicity stunts, all of which creates a chaotic environment with heightened emotions,” she wrote.

The lawmakers, in the court filing, argued it’s clear that the new policy violates the law.

“It is practically impossible that the development, promulgation, communication, and implementation of this policy has been, and will be, accomplished — as required — without using a single dollar of annually appropriated funds,” they wrote.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Video: Minnesota and Illinois Sue Trump Administration Over ICE Deployments

Published

on

Video: Minnesota and Illinois Sue Trump Administration Over ICE Deployments

new video loaded: Minnesota and Illinois Sue Trump Administration Over ICE Deployments

transcript

transcript

Minnesota and Illinois Sue Trump Administration Over ICE Deployments

Minnesota and Illinois filed federal lawsuits against the Trump administration, claiming that the deployment of immigration agents to the Minneapolis and Chicago areas violated states’ rights.

This is, in essence, a federal invasion of the Twin Cities and Minnesota, and it must stop. We ask the courts to end the D.H.S. unlawful behavior in our state. The intimidation, the threats, the violence. We ask the courts to end the tactics on our places of worship, our schools, our courts, our marketplaces, our hospitals and even funeral homes.

Advertisement
Minnesota and Illinois filed federal lawsuits against the Trump administration, claiming that the deployment of immigration agents to the Minneapolis and Chicago areas violated states’ rights.

By Jackeline Luna

January 12, 2026

Continue Reading

Politics

Rep Ro Khanna demands prosecution of ICE agent in Minneapolis fatal shooting

Published

on

Rep Ro Khanna demands prosecution of ICE agent in Minneapolis fatal shooting

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., called for the arrest and prosecution of the ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Good in a residential neighborhood of Minneapolis, Minnesota on Jan. 7.

Khanna also urged Congress to back his legislation with Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, to require ICE agents to wear body cameras, display visible identification, stop wearing masks during operations and be subject to independent oversight.

In a post shared on X, the former Obama administration official said: “I am calling for the arrest and prosecution of the ICE agent that shot and killed Renee Good.”

“I am also calling on Congress to support my bill with @JasmineForUS to force ICE agents to wear body cameras, not wear masks, have visible identification, and ensure ICE has independent oversight,” Khanna added.

Advertisement

MINNESOTA BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION DROPS OUT OF ICE-INVOLVED SHOOTING INVESTIGATION

An ICE agent shot and killed the 37-year-old Minneapolis woman during a federal enforcement operation in south Minneapolis. Federal officials have said agents were attempting to make arrests when the woman tried to use her vehicle as a weapon against officers, prompting an ICE agent to fire in self-defense.

Good’s death sparked widespread protests in Minneapolis and across the U.S. as demonstrators called for changes to federal immigration enforcement.

Renee Nicole Good moments before she was shot and killed by a federal agent in Minneapolis.  (Obtained by Fox News)

Local officials, including Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, criticized the federal account of the incident and rejected the claim that the officer acted in self-defense. Minnesota has since sued the Trump administration, claiming the immigration enforcement surge in the state is “unlawful” and “unprecedented.”

Advertisement

“What we are seeing right now is not normal immigration enforcement,” Frey said. “The scale is wildly disproportionate, and it has nothing to do with keeping people safe.”

The Trump administration pushed back sharply against the lawsuit, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) accusing Minnesota leaders of undermining public safety and obstructing federal law enforcement.

MINNESOTA SUES TRUMP ADMIN OVER SWEEPING IMMIGRATION RAIDS IN TWIN CITIES

Federal officials, including DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, maintained that the agent fired in self-defense.

Renee Good’s crashed car after the shooting. (Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Noem critisized Democrats on Sunday amid an Illinois lawmaker’s push to impeach her following the deadly shooting.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“These law enforcement officers are trained to be in situations that are dangerous, and they rely on that training each and every day to make the right decisions,” Noem said during “Sunday Morning Futures.” 

Fox News Digital’s Greg Wehner contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending