Connect with us

New Hampshire

An Alternative Thought on the I-95 Bridge Between Maine and New Hampshire

Published

on

An Alternative Thought on the I-95 Bridge Between Maine and New Hampshire


Maine NH Bridge

We see it a lot more often during tourist season than outside of it, but regardless of the time of year or whether it’s from a tourist or local, the same sentiment is constantly echoed.

The I-95/Piscataqua River Bridge that connects Maine and New Hampshire always seems to stir up emotions. And, for the most part, it depends on which direction you’re driving.

Constantly in various Facebook groups, multiple posters and commenters will echo the sentiment that as they cross the bridge from New Hampshire into Maine, they feel at home with a full heart, and as they cross it going the opposite way, they feel a slight emptiness and sadness.

But I’d like to offer a different, alternative, possibly controversial view — it’s possible to feel at home no matter the direction you cross the bridge.

Advertisement

Welcome to Maine

I get the feeling, too. You take that final bend toward the right along 95, having passed the final Portsmouth, New Hampshire, exit a few miles back, and see that spectacular green steel structure in your path.

You feel the slight bump as your vehicle leaves the concrete above the ground and enters the concrete of the bridge. You look up, see that “Welcome to Maine” sign, and smile a bit. A few seconds later, you feel another bump, leaving the bridge, finding your vehicle on the concrete above the ground once again.

But this time, you’re in Maine, and suddenly your soul feels lighter and you get that “I’m home,” feeling. Because for a lot of us, Maine is the state we call home every day.

Welcome to NH

But here’s the thing. Other than a couple of years in Oklahoma, I’ve lived in New England my entire life, and most of those years were spent in New Hampshire. So, while others feel a sense of sadness, emptiness, and heaviness when they cross the bridge leaving Maine, I don’t.

That same feeling I described above as you cross the bridge entering Maine? I get that same feeling when I cross the bridge leaving Maine and entering New Hampshire, too. Because both states feel like home to me. Both states are home to me.

Advertisement

And maybe I’m one of the lucky, rare ones. Because, yes, the Piscataqua River Bridge/I-95 Bridge/Whatever-You-Call-It-Personally Bridge — it brings on a lot of emotion. But for me, no matter whether I’m driving north or south or heading into Vacationland or the Granite State…

…that emotion is always, “I’m home.”

Mainers Share 20 Things That Make Maine the Best State in the US

Gallery Credit: Sean McKenna

See the Must-Drive Roads in Every State

Gallery Credit: Sarah Jones





Source link

Advertisement

New Hampshire

Sen. McGough: Too Early To Discuss Report On ICE Plans To Hold Immigrants in Merrimack, NH

Published

on

Sen. McGough: Too Early To Discuss Report On ICE Plans To Hold Immigrants in Merrimack, NH


By NANCY WEST, InDepthNH.org

To speed up deportations, the Trump administration plans to hold 80,000 immigrants in warehouses across the country, including in Merrimack, NH, according to a story published Wednesday in the Washington Post.

Quoting internal U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement documents, the Post said the plan includes seven large-scale holding centers to stage 5,000 to 10,000 people for deportation each and 16 smaller ones such as in Merrimack to hold between 500 and 1,500, and would include renovating industrial warehouses.

State Sen. Tim McGough, R-Merrimack, said he has not received any direct communication from Homeland Security, ICE or any federal agency regarding a proposed facility in Merrimack, but would work with local and state officials should more information emerge.

State Rep. Wendy E.N Thomas, D-Merrimack, said she is against any ICE building in Merrimack.

“I am opposed to any ICE building in our town. We don’t need warehouses to detain thousands of people, many illegally. ICE has already racked up many human rights violations and they have terrorized people across the nation. ICE is not welcome in our town or even in NH,” Thomas said Thursday evening.

McGough responded to InDepthNH.org by email Thursday evening saying: “Beyond the general reference in the Washington Post article, there is very little concrete information available to town or state officials that I am aware of. Given that, it is far too early to draw any conclusions or offer definitive commentary about what this might mean.”

Gov. Kelly Ayotte didn’t respond to questions about the Post story Wednesday or on Thursday.

Advertisement

McGough said, “Until there is more specific, verified information about an actual proposal, scope, location and process, any discussion would be purely speculative.

“What I can say is that if anything of this nature were to be formally proposed, Merrimack’s local officials – including town administration, law enforcement, the Planning Board and Town Council – would operate within the law and in accordance with all applicable planning, zoning and regulatory requirements.

“I am confident that the town would also ensure appropriate transparency and public notice as required.

“Public safety would also be paramount. I would expect that any discussion would involve close coordination with local municipal, county and state law enforcement officials to ensure they are satisfied at every phase of the process, and to ensure that Merrimack and all District 11 residents are kept safe and treated fairly,” McGough said.

“As the state Senator representing Merrimack, my role would be to make sure that any required state level processes are followed and that residents are kept informed as facts become available.

Advertisement

“Public engagement and adherence to established procedures would be essential. For now though there simply isn’t enough information to comment further. I’ll certainly stay engaged and work with town officials should more details emerge,” McGough said.

According to the Post story, “The large warehouses would be located close to major logistics hubs in Virginia, Texas, Louisiana, Arizona, Georgia and Missouri. Sixteen smaller warehouses would hold up to 1,500 people each,” including one in Merrimack, N.H, the only one listed for New England.

“The draft solicitation is not final and is subject to changes. ICE plans to share it with private detention companies this week to gauge interest and refine the plan, according to an internal email reviewed by The Post. A formal request for bids could follow soon after that,” the Post reported, adding Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, said she “cannot confirm” its reporting and declined to answer questions about the warehouse plan.

“The majority of the planned warehouses are in towns, counties and states led by Republicans supportive of Trump’s immigration policies. Two of the largest warehouses are planned for towns with Democrat-led local governments: Stafford, Virginia, and Kansas City, Missouri,” the Post reported.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Ghislaine Maxwell Purchased New Hampshire Estate Using Alias and LLC

Published

on

Ghislaine Maxwell Purchased New Hampshire Estate Using Alias and LLC


Ghislaine Maxwell’s former Bradford, N.H. hideout is back on the market, this time the 156-acre estate is selling for $2.495 million. Maxwell was arrested there in 2020. Boundless Estates photo

By RAY CARBONE, InDepthNH.org

BRADFORD – The latest information released by the US Department of Justice this week reveal new details about how Ghislaine Maxwell purchased a mountaintop residence here and what happened the day she was finally arrested.

Maxwell was the longtime associate of notorious financier and child sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein, who died of suicide in jail awaiting trial in 2019.

Advertisement

Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking and other related offenses and is now serving a 20-year prison sentence and is seeking a new trial.

Authorities say that she was seeking to evade capture when she purchased the 156-acre estate in a sparely populated area of Bradford.

Documents released under the federal Epstein Files Transparency Act shortly after midnight Tuesday morning say that Maxwell bought the property under a false name; earlier information said that the deal was actually made using a limited liability company or LLC, a business entity that can protect the identity of owners or investors.

The new documents state that a local realtor met Maxwell and a male companion, who identified themselves as Scott and Janet Marshall. The couple had British accents and said Janet Maxwell was a journalist who highly valued her privacy.

Advertisement

It wasn’t until after the arrest that the realtor recognized Maxwell’s face and notified authorities.

The documents also add some details about Maxwell’s arrest the morning of July 2, 2020. Authorities say they knocked on the door of her mansion on East Washington Road in Bradford around 8:30 a.m. but when no one answered, they forced it open. Maxwell then ran to an interior room where she was found and taken into custody.

A cell phone on a nearby desk was wrapped in tin foil, an apparent attempt to neutralize the exact tracking system that led investigations to her location.

Like most people in Bradford, Police Chief Ed Shaughnessy said he wasn’t aware of Maxwell’s stay in his town before the 2020 arrest. “Do you think that if I knew she was there, I wouldn’t have come up to get her,” he asked rhetorically, reflecting on her apprehension.

Shaughnessy may have been the only local person who was at the scene that day. He said he received a phone call at 4:30 a.m. that muggy morning telling him about the pending arrest and inviting him to take part in Maxwell’s capture.

Advertisement

“I didn’t know a lot about her at the time,” he recalled. “Then I got up and googled
her.”

Shaughnessy drove his cruiser eastwards to the Market Basket parking lot in Warner, where he met up with other law enforcement officials for a pre-arrest briefing. Then his vehicle led about 14 others in a caravan heading westward on the two-lane Rte. 103 about 30 minutes back into Bradford, up Center and West roads, and then left onto East Washington Road.

Shaughnessy said that when he arrived around 8:30 a.m., about 30 law enforcement aircrafts overhead. “I don’t know if they were small planes or helicopters,” he said, but the they were definitely related to the police activity and not to the media that flooded the town later that day.

The large police presence was likely related to court records showing that officials believed Maxwell had both the financial resources and social mobility to flee the country if she wasn’t arrested.

Much of what happened during Maxwell’s arrest wasn’t initially made public. Official reports said that she was taken into custody “without incident,” but later information said that she refused to open the front door and she was seen through a window fleeing into an interior room. Officers forced their way into the
home and then into the room where they found Maxwell.

Advertisement

Chief Shaughnessy said that his local department had no role in the arrest but he did see officers escorting Maxwell into a cruiser. She was held at the Merrimack County Corrections Facility in Boscawen for several days before being sent to New York where she stood trial for her crimes.

That morning, the chief also learned that members of Maxwell’s onsite security team were former British secret service personnel. They said she never left the Bradford property. “Her security team did the food shopping, ran the errands,” the chief recalled.

The former Maxwell estate is for sale again. This summer Four Seasons Sotheby’s International Realty-New Hampshire listed the property at $2,495,000. Maxwell purchased the residence in 2019 for $1 million in cash using a limited liability company, according to paperwork filed by federal prosecutors.

Town records recently listed the property assessment at $1,829,005 with an annual tax of $30,353. The asking price on the land was recently dropped $30,000 to $2,365,000.

The mountaintop estate is not visible from the road but a careful observer can find the dirt road entrance off East Washington Road, across from a modest brown home and adjacent to a utility pole.

Advertisement

About one-quarter of the way up the incline a wire fence blocks traffic and announces that one should “Beware of Dog.”

A security keypad sits a few feet in front of the fence. The newly released documents say that there was a full security system in operation when Maxwell lived there.

On various real estate websites, photographs and descriptions depict an extravagant estate. One realtor called it a “privacy lovers dream.”

The main 4,365-sq ft. residence is a timber-framed two-story structure that includes a Great
Room with a fieldstone fireplace and floor-to-ceiling windows. A second structure is a 1800s cape house, with a barn and fireplace. Spectacular views abound and one description calls it the dream of a “hunter, farmer, horse lover, (or) hiker.”

This is not the first time Maxwell’s former residence has been sold. A couple purchased the property last year but later decided to resell it. One local woman said the couple from southern New England might have found central New Hampshire winters too severe.

Advertisement

The newly released photos and documents have been made public because of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which President Trump signed into law last month.

One released photo of New Hampshire businessman and entrepreneur Dean Kamen, inventor of the Segway, showed Kamen sitting with businessman Richard Branson and Epstein walking behind them. Another more recently released photo showed Kamen and Ghislaine Maxwell riding a Segway. Kamen has not been accused of any wrongdoing in the Epstein matter.

Kamen, the founder of DEKA Research and Development, told WMUR that he was a speaker at the TED Conference in Monterey, California a number of times, including February 2002 (https://www.ted.com/talks/dean_kamen_to_invent_is_to_give).

Kamen told WMUR: “If I had to guess, based in part on helpful reminders from friends, I would say that this photo was taken at that conference (or some similar conference) shortly after the launch of Segway where I gave I rides to many, if not most, of the TED conference attendees.

“Unfortunately, Jeffrey Epstein was a central figure in the TED community for many years. I have no specific memory of this photo or any other interaction with Ghislaine Maxwell and had only limited interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. I hope that it goes without saying that those interactions in no way involved any wrong-doing and, in hindsight with what I now know, I regret even those limited interactions. Again, I have no knowledge of any of the horrific actions of Jeffrey Epstein (or Ghislaine Maxwell) other than what I have learned from news reports,” Kamen said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

NH Lottery Powerball, Lucky For Life winning numbers for Dec. 24, 2025

Published

on


The New Hampshire Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2025 results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from Dec. 24 drawing

04-25-31-52-59, Powerball: 19, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lucky For Life numbers from Dec. 24 drawing

03-05-07-17-34, Lucky Ball: 09

Advertisement

Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from Dec. 24 drawing

Day: 1-3-3

Evening: 0-1-0

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from Dec. 24 drawing

Day: 4-9-2-4

Advertisement

Evening: 5-5-9-2

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Megabucks Plus numbers from Dec. 24 drawing

06-14-23-27-37, Megaball: 06

Check Megabucks Plus payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Gimme 5 numbers from Dec. 24 drawing

03-07-18-23-39

Advertisement

Check Gimme 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

When are the New Hampshire Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Pick 3, 4: 1:10 p.m. and 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Mega Millions: 11:00 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Megabucks Plus: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
  • Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Winning lottery numbers are sponsored by Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network.

Where can you buy lottery tickets?

Tickets can be purchased in person at gas stations, convenience stores and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets.

You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network, in these U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington D.C., and West Virginia. The Jackpocket app allows you to pick your lottery game and numbers, place your order, see your ticket and collect your winnings all using your phone or home computer.

Jackpocket is the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue for audience referrals to Jackpocket services. GAMBLING PROBLEM? CALL 1-800-GAMBLER, Call 877-8-HOPENY/text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 18+ (19+ in NE, 21+ in AZ). Physically present where Jackpocket operates. Jackpocket is not affiliated with any State Lottery. Eligibility Restrictions apply. Void where prohibited. Terms: jackpocket.com/tos.

Advertisement

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a New Hampshire managing editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending