Yes.

Though rules differ, several South Dakota reservations allow hunting on tribal lands. 

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, located in north-central South Dakota and parts of North Dakota, allows hunting on its 1.6 million acres. The tribe uses a lottery system for tags for deer, antelope and elk and also offers guided hunts.

The Oglala Sioux Tribe, which includes Pine Ridge in southwestern South Dakota, requires non-members to have a guide who is certified with the reservation. The Yankton Sioux Tribe requires a guide for non-Indians.

The South Dakota Game Fish and Parks has memorandums of understanding with five of the reservations, allowing sharing of information, season recommendations, managing resources and providing law enforcement assistance when requested. 

The South Dakota Department of Tribal Relations says hunters should reach out to each individual tribe to learn about their rules and regulations and whether they require guides. 

This fact brief responds to conversations such as this one.

Source

SDGF&P, Tribal relations

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Game & Fish Department

Oglala Sioux Parks and Recreation Authority, 2024 Hunting Guidebook

Yankton Sioux Tribe, Hunting regulations

South Dakota Department of Tribal Relations, Hunting on tribal lands

South Dakota News Watch partners with Gigafact to publish fact briefs that refute or confirm a claim with supporting information and additional evidence and context.

This story was produced by South Dakota News Watch, an independent, nonprofit organization. Read more stories and donate at sdnewswatch.org and sign up for an email to get stories when they’re published. Contact Michael Klinski at michael.klinski@sdnewswatch.org.

There won’t be any South Dakota high school state basketball championships in Sioux Falls in 2026, breaking a 65-year run of South Dakota’s largest city hosting one of the state’s premier high school sporting events. 

The Class AA and A boys tournaments will be in Rapid City at The Monument, with the AA boys in the ice arena and the A boys in Summit Arena from March 19 to 21. The Class B boys will still be at the Barnett Center in Aberdeen on the same dates. 

The AA girls will also be at Summit Arena at The Monument in Rapid City on March 12 to 14, the Class A girls will be at the Watertown Civic Arena and the Class B girls will be at First Bank & Trust Arena in Brookings. 

The South Dakota High School Activities Association (SDHSAA) updates its website to reflect the next year’s state tournament schedule, but the organization knew well in advance that Sioux Falls would be without a championship in 2026. 

South Dakota lawmakers are gunning to ban lab-grown meat.

A panel of state House legislators has advanced legislation that would ban artificial meat in the state, setting up a pointed debate over food safety, consumer choice and whether lawmakers should block products that aren’t yet on grocery shelves.

Earning support from the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee with a 9–3 vote Tuesday, Jan. 27, House Bill 1077 would classify cultivated-protein products — meat grown from animal cells in laboratories — as “adulterated food” under state law, effectively prohibiting their sale in South Dakota.

Supporters described the bill as a preemptive food-safety measure and a defense of the state’s livestock industry.

“This is more about a philosophy,” bill sponsor Rep. Julie Auch, R-Yankton, told the committee.

MORE: SD Senate advances Rohl’s legislative term limit proposal

She argued the state should draw a firm line against products she said are manufactured in laboratories using undisclosed processes and proprietary ingredients.

Auch also questioned federal oversight of cultivated protein, noting that companies developing the products provided their own research to regulators.

“We don’t even know what’s in it,” she said, referring to growth serums used in production.

Some cattle producers not concerned about lab-grown mean, Wittman says

Several lawmakers pressed Auch on why the Legislature should ban a product that is not currently sold in South Dakota.

Wittman

“I’m having a hard time understanding how us banning a product that isn’t on our shelves currently will help our cattle producers compete,” said Rep. Kadyn Wittman, D-Sioux Falls, during committee questions.

Wittman later said some producers are not worried about competition from lab-grown meat. She told the committee that she’s spoken with a cattle producer who said, “I am confident that my beef will speak for itself in the future.”

Opponents warned the proposal repurposes food-safety statutes to block a product on principle and could invite retaliation against South Dakota agricultural products in other states. Apprehensions about consumer choice and the precedent set by labeling a product adulterated based on how it is made rather than measurable health risk also generated committee debate.

MORE: More should qualify for senior, disabled assessment value freezes, Loeschke says

Rep. Kevin Van Diepen, R-Huron, said South Dakota is home to increasingly diverse communities with different food traditions.

“If someone else wants to eat that, why are we going to stop them?” Van Diepen asked. “That should be their choice.”

Worries about interstate retaliation were also cited, with critics contending HB 1077 could spur more politically progressive states to restrict the sale of conventionally raised livestock products.

“We all collectively can say that is bad policy,” said Rep. Drew Peterson, a cattle producer who cited California’s Proposition 12 and similar laws in Massachusetts that restrict some pork products from being sold in those jurisdictions. “If we don’t want them to do that in those states, how can we do it to them in this state?”

Supporters countered that cultivated protein represents an unresolved health experiment and a long-term threat to rural economies.

Rep. Kaley Nolz, R-Mitchell, said she views the issue through a food safety lens and does not want another generation to serve as a test case.

“I really don’t want to see another generation of Americans be an experiment for a health product,” Nolz said.

HB 1077 will next be considered on the House floor.