Iowa
Iowa restaurant wanted to help teens. Now it could close
Amari Thigpen was 14 when he received his first job serving food, busing tables, greeting customers, mopping floors and cleaning bathrooms at Sugapeach Chicken & Fish Fry in North Liberty.
It was willing to work around his schedule as a student-athlete. After school, he would practice with the football team until about 6 p.m. Then he would head to the fast-casual southern cuisine restaurant, where he’d work for an hour or more, sometimes past 7 p.m.
“It was just to make a little extra money after practice,” Amari, now 19 and a student at Western Illinois University, told The Gazette. “But it also made me accountable and responsible, and taught me teamwork (as well as) how to manage my time and the importance of having a strong work ethic.”
He would bring his homework to the restaurant, where owners Carol Cater-Simmons and Chad Simmons would help tutor when needed.
The restaurant felt like a second home. He worked alongside some of his teammates, and was treated like family.
“It also made me grow, having a connection with Mr. Chad and Mrs. Carol and helping me with school or a problem I had,” Amari said. “They were right there to support me. … They always showed positivity and love to us.”
The restaurant’s owners, however, now face roughly $65,000 in fines for letting teens like Amari work longer hours than permitted under federal law. It’s an amount they say will put them out of business.
“It felt like we were being hit by a truck,” owner Chad Simmons said.
Restaurants hit with fines of up to $180,000
Iowa Restaurant Association President and Chief Executive Officer Jessica Dunker said several Iowa restaurant owners are facing steep fines ranging from $50,000 to $180,000 for following a new state law loosening work requirements for teens that conflicts with federal child labor regulations.
State lawmakers last year passed a law allowing teens to work longer hours and at more jobs, including those formerly off-limits as being hazardous. The state law includes a provision allowing 14- and 15-year-olds to work as late as 9 p.m. on school nights and as late as 11 p.m. during the summer.
Federal law specifies younger teens can work only until 7 p.m. during the school year and until 9 p.m. during the summer.
Supporters have said the state law provides more opportunities for young Iowans who want to work, and could help address the state’s shortage of workers.
Democrats, labor unions and others criticized the bill for conflicting with federal law, putting young Iowans at risk in dangerous jobs and creating contradictory rules for Iowa businesses to follow.
Governor decries ‘excessive fines’
Gov. Kim Reynolds and Dunker have decried the federal fines as “excessive.”
Dunker asserts the U.S. Department of Labor is being heavy handed and singling out Iowa, noting it is one of 21 states with employment laws related to minors that don’t comply with federal law.
The Labor Department denies singling out Iowa, and says it is dealing with violations nationwide. So far this year, the department says it has found child labor violations in 16 states, with ongoing investigations in several others.
Last fiscal year, the department concluded 955 investigations, identifying child labor violations affecting nearly 5,800 children across the country. Penalties assessed exceeded $8 million.
Federal labor officials had warned lawmakers and the governor that employers covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act who follow the less-restrictive Iowa law would be subject to penalties.
| Fiscal year | State | Child labor violation cases | Cases with penalties | Civil money penalties |
| 2019 | Iowa | 19 | 16 | $75,189 |
| 2020 | Iowa | 9 | 6 | $22,062 |
| 2021 | Iowa | 19 | 18 | $106,415 |
| 2022 | Iowa | 9 | 9 | $157,802 |
| 2023 | Iowa | 8 | 7 | $74,529 |
| Grand total | Iowa | 64 | 56 | $435,997 |
| Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor |
‘I knew I was in a safe environment’
A Labor Department spokesperson declined to comment on the fines against Sugapeach, stating the case still is considered open.
Simmons said the restaurant has appealed and are negotiating to have the fines reduced.
In a statement provided to The Gazette, the Department of Labor said no child should be working long hours, doing dangerous work or be employed in unsafe conditions.
“It’s dangerous and irresponsible that amidst a rise in child labor exploitation in this country, Iowa’s governor and state legislature have chosen to repeatedly undermine federal child labor protections despite the Labor Department’s clear guidance,” the statement said.
Since 2019, federal investigators have found an 88 percent increase in children being employed in violation of federal labor provisions.
Labor officials note the restaurant industry has a high rate of violations and often employs vulnerable workers who may not be aware of their rights or employment rules.
“The U.S. Department of Labor is working every day to ensure that children seeking their first work experiences are doing so in a safe and responsible way,” a spokesperson said. “But under our watch, that will not include allowing children to be exploited.”
Amari, the former Sugapeach employee, said he never felt unsafe or exploited working at the restaurant. “I knew I was in a safe environment. It was a positive environment,” he said.
He said he was never forced by the business to work past 7 p.m. on a school night. In instances when he did, “that was on me, because he had started or was in the middle of a task he wanted to finish.
Enhanced penalties
Last year, the Department of Labor announced it was launching a national initiative to uncover child labor violations, which included changing the way it fines employers for violations.
Previously, employers were fined on a per-child basis based on the size of the business and gravity of the violation. Now, employers are fined per violation. For instance, if there are three separate violations related to a child’s employment, the employer is fined for three separate penalties, each of which can reach the statutory maximum.
Federal law allows for a fine of up to $15,138 for child labor violations and up $68,801 for violations that cause death or serious injury of an employee under the age of 18. Fines can be increased or decreased based on the nature of the violations, the age of the child, the size of the business, whether the violation was willful or repeated, the length of illegal employment and hours worked.
The Department of Labor said it is committed to using all its enforcement tools, including assessing monetary penalties, to ensure that when children work, the work does not jeopardize their health, well-being or education.
‘Innocent bystanders in a fight some else created’
Chad Simmons said he was trying to help his community by supporting young teens, many of whom came from single-parent households.
The restaurant owner hired 14- and 15-year-olds as part of a program called “Scholars Making Dollars,” which works with the Alpha Phi Alpha chapter in Iowa City. Under the program, the high school students receive mentorship provided by the chapter and part-time work experience through the restaurant.
Simmons said the aim was to provide a safe after-school environment where the teens could learn valuable job skills, while putting a little money in their pocket.
Students worked one day during the week and one day on the weekend from about 4:30 to 8:30 p.m., with a 30-minute dinner break and free meal provided by the restaurant. He said they were paid $8 an hour, a guaranteed tip of $3 and additional incentives that could bump their total pay to $13 an hour for busing tables, greeting customers, serving food, mopping floors and cleaning bathrooms.
“My wife and I were there with them and working beside them. They were never doing anything unsafe,” Simmons said.
Most of the six to seven teens employed by the restaurant were student athletes looking for a job with flexible scheduling, he said. At the same time, the program helped the restaurant fill positions during the pandemic at a time when many workers were leaving the industry, finding jobs with higher pay or weren’t looking for work because of unemployment benefits.
Simmons said he was contacted by the Department of Labor in early August 2023 requesting payroll records and employee timesheets for the last two years. Investigators also interviewed employees under the age of 16.
He said he does not know why his business was selected, but speculates it may have arisen as a result of national news coverage of the restaurant’s use of high schoolers to fill a worker shortage during the pandemic.
And while the violations predate the 2023 change to state law (Simmons said the business was simply unaware of the limits for 14- and 15-year-olds), Simmons faults lawmakers and the Iowa Restaurant Association for advocating “a policy to purposely antagonize the federal government and the Department of Labor.”
He said his interactions with the Department of Labor throughout the process have been positive, calling them “great civil servants.”
“This is not a train wreck that we started,” Simmons said. “We are innocent bystanders in a fight someone else created” between the state and federal government.
But it’s a fight Simmons said could result in a killing blow for his restaurant “for trying to do the right thing.” As a result of the fines, he said the restaurant no longer employs workers under the age of 16.
“As a Black-owned business trying to be supportive of the community, it breaks my heart that the only way for us to survive is to not employee 14- and 15-year-olds and not to provide support to our youth,” Simmons said.
Parent: Feds should loosen work rules for teens
As the old saying goes, raising a child takes a village, said Eric Thigpen, Amari’s father.
As a divorced father who grew up in a single-parent household, Thigpen said he understands how difficult it can be for working parents to raise a child — to have the time and resources to make sure they’re surrounded by positive role models, engaged in constructive activities and taking advantage of opportunities to grow and learn.
“For me, as a parent, I didn’t have any issue with it,” said Thigpen, a former Hawkeye football player and member of the local Alpha Phi Alpha chapter involved in the “Scholars Making Dollars” program.
“The life lessons we instill in these kids will catapult them monumentally in the future,” Thigpen said.
A March 2023 Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll showed that a majority of Iowa parents with children under 18 ― 57 percent ― supported relaxing child labor laws, with 32 percent opposed and 11 percent unsure.
“Being a student-athlete and working around his schedule, it was great for him,” Thigpen said. “It didn’t affect my child’s academics or extracurricular activities. It was a bonus. … It was a win-win for myself and my son.
“You have these kids out here that are eager to learn and do good things. … They want to do their school work and be good students, but they also want to work and put a little change in their pocket.”
He and his son said federal officials should loosen regulations on the hours young people can work.
“I think it’s ridiculous,” Thigpen said of the $65,000 fine against Sugapeach. “You have a business owner and restaurant trying to do positive things for the community.”
Amari agreed.
“They were giving us work opportunities and to make money and pushing us to go to college,” he said. “ … I feel if teenagers want to put in the work and work those hours, they should be able to.”
Comments: (319) 398-8499; tom.barton@thegazette.com
Iowa
Iowa voters shifted left in 2025. Is a blue wave coming in 2026?
In five of six legislative special elections last year, Democrats overperformed by more than 20 percentage points compared with the 2024 presidential election.
Here are the top 2026 midterm races to follow in Iowa
Des Moines Register Chief Politics Reporter Brianne Pfannenstiel breaks down Iowa’s top races ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Iowa Democrats ended 2025 on a high note, winning a Dec. 30 special election in Des Moines’ western suburbs by a wider margin than during the presidential election.
That capped off a year in which Democrats won four of the six legislative special elections and ended Republicans’ supermajority in the Iowa Senate.
In five of those six special elections, Democrats overperformed by more than 20 percentage points compared with 2024.
They’ll look to build off the momentum going into the pivotal 2026 midterms that will include open races for governor and U.S. senator as well as regular Iowa congressional and Legislature elections.
Whether 2025’s Democratic Party victories are bellwethers or blips will play out this year.
Democrats saw Iowa special elections consistently tilt left
Though Republicans won in two special elections in 2025s, their margins of victory were significantly smaller than 2024.
Republican Wendy Larson won December’s special election for the vacant seat in House District 7 by 40 points. That’s a wide margin, but wide margins are expected for Republicans in that part of the state: The party holds strong advantages in voter registration totals in Calhoun, Pocahontas, Sac and Webster counties, where the district is located.
And even that 40-point margin represented a shift toward the Democrats.
In the 2024 presidential election, Republican Donald Trump defeated Democrat Kamala Harris by 50 points in House District 7. Democrats didn’t even field a candidate for the district’s legislative seat that year.
The 10-point shift toward Democrats from the 2024 presidential election to the 2025 special election in House District 7 was the smallest of any legislative district that held a special election last year.
Each of the five other districts shifted toward Democrats by more than twice as much.
Moreover, those special elections were spread across the state.
Democrats consistently gathered a greater share of votes from Senate District 1 in the northwest part of the state to House District 100 in the state’s southeast corner, ranging from 10 to 26 percentage points.
The two seats Democrats flipped in special elections — Senate Districts 1 and 35 — each shifted to the left by more than 20 points compared with the 2024 presidential election.
In Senate District 1, Trump outpaced Harris by 11 percentage points in 2024, while Democrat Caitlin Drey won the seat there by more than 10 points in August.
In Senate District 35, Trump’s victory margin in Senate District 35 was more than 21 points. In January 2025, Democrat Mike Zimmer won the district’s Senate seat by 3½ points.
In 2022, Republicans won both those seats by even wider margins than Trump in 2024.
Should Democrats expect momentum to carry over to 2026?
Pushing voters to the left in six isolated special elections is one thing. Parlaying those successes into November’s midterm elections is quite another.
Turnout was key in 2025’s special elections, and it will be again in 2026.
The numbers of votes cast in 2025’s special elections equaled roughly one-quarter to one-third the votes cast in the 2024 presidential election in those districts.
Turnout should be higher in November’s midterms.
Since 2000, the percentage of Iowa’s registered voters who have participated in the midterm elections typically has hovered around 55%. (About 75% of registered Iowans usually vote in presidential elections.)
But what determines an election is less about the number of people who show up and more about who those people are.
An increased share of those who went to the polls in the special elections were Democratic voters — or, perhaps more accurately, a greater number of Republican voters stayed home.
Republicans will be working to get those voters back to the polls this November.
Republicans maintain advantage in Iowa voter registration data
The leftward shift in last year’s special elections has yet to materialize in Iowa’s voter registration numbers.
Over roughly the past 15 years, voter registrations in Iowa have swung heavily toward Republicans.
Democrats, conversely, have lost 200,000 voters in that time, and Republicans have opened up an overall advantage of more than 10 percentage points.
Despite their victories at the ballot box in 2025, Democrats have not chipped into Republicans’ significant lead in voter registrations.
Last year was the first since at least 2000 when the share of active voters who were Republicans was at least 10 percentage points higher than the share who were Democrats throughout the entire year.
Republicans began 2026 with nearly 200,000 more active registered voters than Democrats, among their largest leads this century.
Those two parties do not comprise the entirety of Iowa’s electorate — a large share of Iowa’s active voters are not registered to a party, and a smaller amount are registered to other parties, including Libertarians.
And just because a voter is registered as a Democrat or Republican doesn’t mean they’ll vote for their party’s candidates.
But the large voter deficit indicates Democrats are starting from a less favorable position.
Their special election victories in 2025 proved they can win elections, but they’ll need to make up some ground to replicate that success in 2026.
Tim Webber is a data visualization specialist for the Register. Reach him at twebber@registermedia.com and on Twitter at @HelloTimWebber.
Iowa
Iowa football lands commitment from FCS Freshman All-American receiver
Video: Kirk Ferentz reacts to Iowa’s ReliaQuest Bowl win over Vanderbilt
Kirk Ferentz meets with media after Iowa football’s 34-27 win over Vanderbilt in the ReliaQuest Bowl.
IOWA CITY — Furman transfer receiver Evan James has committed to Iowa football, he announced Jan. 11.
James, who is listed at 6-feet and 175 pounds, will come to the Hawkeyes with three seasons of eligibility remaining.
James, a 3-star prospect in the 2025 high school recruiting class, had a standout true freshman season at Furman. In nine appearances, James accumulated 65 receptions for 796 yards and seven touchdowns. He also rushed seven times for 72 yards and one touchdown.
James was named an FCS 1st team Freshman All-American by Phil Steele.
James hauled in at least five catches in each of his nine appearances last season and went over 100 yards three times. James had a career-high 10 receptions against Campbell. He had a career-high 146 yards receiving against Chattanooga, which included a 61-yard catch.
James is the second FCS first-team Freshman All-American receiver that Iowa football has landed this transfer portal cycle.
The Hawkeyes also got a commitment from UT Rio Grande Valley receiver Tony Diaz. The addition of Diaz, who held offers from Alabama, Illinois, Kentucky, Arkansas, Virginia Tech and others, was a major recruiting win for the Hawkeyes. Diaz hauled in 68 receptions for 875 yards and 11 touchdowns as a redshirt freshman last season.
The Hawkeyes are seeing the departure of some serious contributions from their 2025 receiver room. Three of the team’s top five leaders in receiving yards during the 2025 season are moving on: Jacob Gill, Sam Phillips and Kaden Wetjen. Not to mention Seth Anderson, who was tied for second on the team lead in receiving touchdowns last season with two.
On top of that, there’s a level of uncertainty regarding what Iowa’s quarterback play is going to look like in the post-Mark Gronowski era.
But there are some pieces to inspire some hope.
The Hawkeyes have done commendable work in the transfer portal to bolster the receiver room, getting a pair of productive players at a position of need. What makes it even sweeter is that they each have three seasons of eligibility remaining, giving them time to grow and develop in the program.
Reece Vander Zee is the most prominent name that can return to the wide receiver room in 2026. Dayton Howard and KJ Parker were rotational guys in 2025 and could take a step forward next season.
The tight end room appears loaded — with the return of Addison Ostrenga, Iowa’s 2025 leading receiver DJ Vonnahme and Thomas Meyer — but the Hawkeyes still need reinforcements on the outside to get the passing game where it needs to be.
The Hawkeyes will look to sustain momentum on the offensive side of the ball in coordinator Tim Lester’s third season with the program.
Follow Tyler Tachman on X @Tyler_T15, contact via email at ttachman@gannett.com
Iowa
Where to watch Iowa women’s basketball vs. Indiana today, TV, time
Looking for a second road win this week, No. 14 Iowa women’s basketball heads to Indiana for today’s 4 p.m. contest inside Assembly Hall. BTN will televise the game.
The Hawkeyes (13-2, 4-0 Big Ten Conference) remained perfect in league play with a 67-58 win at Northwestern on Jan. 5, a game in which Iowa survived despite enduring heavy foul trouble.
Meanwhile, Indiana (11-6, 0-5) has reached desperation territory. The Hoosiers have dropped four straight, including two at home, during this extended skid.
Here’s how to watch today’s game.
Watch Iowa vs. Indiana on Fubo (free trial)
What channel is Iowa women’s basketball vs. Indiana on today?
Iowa vs. Indiana time today
- Date: Sunday, Jan. 11
- Start time: 4 p.m. CT
- Location: Assembly Hall in Bloomington, Indiana
Dargan Southard is a sports trending reporter and covers Iowa athletics for the Des Moines Register and HawkCentral.com. Email him at msouthard@gannett.com or follow him on Twitter at @Dargan_Southard.
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology6 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX3 days agoAnti-ICE protest outside Dallas City Hall follows deadly shooting in Minneapolis
-
Delaware3 days agoMERR responds to dead humpback whale washed up near Bethany Beach
-
Dallas, TX7 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Iowa6 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Montana2 days agoService door of Crans-Montana bar where 40 died in fire was locked from inside, owner says
-
Health1 week agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits