Connect with us

South

How many people on the terrorist watchlist are coming into the United States?

Published

on


Some Republican lawmakers are flagging Hamas’ attack on Israel as an example of why more security is needed at the southern U.S. border. Hamas militants breached a border fence and attacked Israeli villages bordering the Gaza Strip on Oct. 7.

“Potential terrorists are attempting to cross our southern border. In September alone, 18 illegal immigrants on the terror watchlist were caught at the border,” U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., posted Oct. 21 on X, formerly Twitter. “The attack on Israel should serve as a warning as to why we must secure the border.”

The next day, U.S. Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., also mentioned the terrorist watchlist on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Advertisement

“We just caught 18 people, just last month, on the FBI terrorist watchlist, coming across our border,” McCarthy said. “More than 160 have done it this year.”

U.S. immigration officials have encountered rising numbers of people on the watchlist. But not everyone on the list is a terrorist, and not everyone encountered is allowed to enter the country.  

Terrorism and immigration experts say the threat of attacks in the U.S. and Israel are not comparable.  

“People aren’t crossing the border to conduct terrorist attacks or take over parts of the United States,” David Bier, an immigration expert at the libertarian Cato Institute, previously told PolitiFact. “A very small percentage may come to commit ordinary crimes, like selling drugs, but overwhelmingly, they are coming for economic opportunity and freedom.”

Advertisement

McCarthy’s office did not respond to our request for more information. A Blackburn spokesperson pointed us to a Fox News reporter’s post on X. Customs and Border Protection did not confirm whether 18 people were stopped in September.

Here’s what we know about who is on the terrorist watchlist, and what the data can and can’t tell us:

What is the terrorist watchlist and who is on it?

The terrorist watchlist, run by the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center, is a federal database of people who are either known or suspected terrorists. 

“Known terrorists” include people who have been charged, arrested, indicted or convicted of a terrorism-related crime or who belong to a foreign terrorist organization. 

“Suspected terrorists” are people who are “reasonably suspected to be” involved in terrorist activities. 

Advertisement

U.S. government agencies nominate people to the terrorist watchlist, and those names are vetted by the National Counterterrorism Center or the FBI. 

For years, civil liberty groups have cited concerns about the nomination process and its lack of transparency. People are not told they are on the watchlist and are not privy to the evidence that landed them on it. The standard for being included, “reasonable suspicion,” allows intelligence analysts to rely on rational inferences, not jus facts, when deciding if someone has ties to terrorism, the Congressional Research Service wrote in a 2016 report. 

Most encounters with people on watchlist happen at northern border

U.S. Customs and Border Protection releases the number of times immigration officials encounter a known or suspected terrorist each fiscal year. While there is a lot of information the government doesn’t disclose, such as the nationality of people apprehended, the available data do not support the impression of routine terrorist crossings at the southern border. 

Most of the 736 encounters in fiscal year 2023 (which ended Sept. 30) happened at the northern border at official checkpoints (484 in total). There were 80 encounters at official checkpoints at the southern border.

Encounters between ports of entry along the southern border were higher in 2023 (169) than in 2022 (98) and 2021 (15).

Advertisement

But CBP says it’s “very uncommon” for border authorities to encounter people on the terrorist watchlist. At the southern border between ports of entry in 2023, for example, such encounters represented 0.0083% of all the 2 million encounters.

What the numbers don’t say

Data on encounters represent events, not people. If one person tries to come in three times in a year and is stopped each time, that counts as three encounters.

Additionally, border officials can deny entry to people on the terrorist watchlist. An encounter does not equal an entry into the country. 

A Customs and Border Protection spokesperson told PolitiFact the agency vets everyone who is encountered. People who pose a threat to national security or public safety are denied admission, detained, removed or referred to other federal agencies for possible prosecution.  

It means “that potential terrorists are not getting through but rather are being detected,” even when they try crossing between official ports of entry, said Denise Gilman, immigration clinic co-director at the University of Texas School of Law. 

Advertisement

People on the list are “subject to extremely high scrutiny and are almost certainly detained indefinitely by CBP while they determine what to do with them,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director for the American Immigration Council, an immigrants’ rights group. “They are not just waved on through.”

Even if people on the watchlist were allowed into the country to apply for asylum or any sort of immigration protection, they would be sent to immigration detention while a judge hears their case, said Adam Isacson, defense oversight director at the Washington Office on Latin America, a research and human rights advocacy group.

Flaws in watchlist data make it a bad indicator of threat

Some people on the watchlist have not been deemed terrorists by the U.S. government, but they might be affiliated with people, such as family members, who are known or suspected terrorists, according to CBP.

Additionally, some people on the list might be affiliated with a designated foreign terrorist organization that does not pose a threat to the U.S., such as inactive domestic guerrilla groups, said Alex Nowrasteh, the Cato Institute’s vice president for economic and social policy studies. 

Nowrasteh recently testified to Congress that none of the people involved in U.S. terrorist attacks from 1975 to 2022 had crossed the southern border illegally.

Advertisement

The federal government’s encounters data can include false positives of matches on the terrorist watchlist, such as people who were added to the watchlist because they share the same name or birthdate as someone listed.

A ‘false analogy’

Experts dismissed the idea that Hamas’ attack on Israel is in any way analogous to U.S. border security concerns.

There isn’t a terrorist movement in Mexico, Central America or South America that targets the U.S. or compares with Hamas targeting Israel, Nowrasteh said. Hamas’ charter calls for the destruction of Israel.

Ernesto Castañeda-Tinoco, director of American University’s Center for Latin American and Latino Studies, said, “There is no evidence of members of Hamas in Mexico preparing attacks on the U.S. The geopolitical situation at the U.S.-Mexico border is different from the one between Israel and Palestine.”

Jason M. Blazakis, director of Middlebury College’s Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism, said the comparison was a “false analogy.”

Advertisement

“The vast majority of people who are at the southern border are trying to escape criminal gangs and drug trafficking organization violence,” he said.

Our sources

  • PolitiFact, Hamas militants ‘pouring’ across U.S. southern border? Donald Trump’s claim is Pants on Fire!, Oct. 12, 2023
  • NBC News, Full McCarthy: I don’t need the speakership ‘title. I’m going to help in any way I can’, Oct. 22, 2023
  • X, post, Oct. 21, 2023
  • Congressional Research Service, The Terrorist Screening Database: Background Information, June 17, 2016
  • FBI, Frequently Asked Questions, April 11, 2016
  • U.S. State Department, Foreign Terrorist Organizations, accessed Oct. 24, 2023
  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection, CBP Enforcement Statistics Fiscal Year 2023, accessed Oct. 24, 2023
  • Cato Institute, Terrorist Entry Through the Southwest Border, Sept. 13, 2023
  • CBS News, Are terrorists trying to enter the U.S. through the southern border? Here are the facts., Oct. 11, 2023
  • Fox News, Iranian illegal immigrant caught at border not on terror watchlist after further vetting: DHS official, Feb. 1, 2023
  • Council on Foreign Relations, What Is Hamas?, Oct. 9, 2023
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Threat Assessment 2024, September 2023
  • Legal Information Institute, inference, accessed Oct. 26, 2023
  • Legal Information Institute, reasonable suspicion, accessed Oct. 26, 2023
  • FBI, Terrorist Screening Center, accessed Oct. 26, 2023
  • The Washington Post, The FBI’s terrorism watch list violates the Constitution, federal judge says, Sept. 5, 2019
  • American Civil Liberties Union, Discriminatory Profiling, accessed Oct. 26, 2023
  • X, Post, Oct. 21, 2023
  • Email exchange, Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director for the American Immigration Council, Sept. 19, 2023
  • Email exchange, Adam Isacson, Director for Defense Oversight at the Washington Office on Latin America, Sept. 19, 2023
  • Email exchange, Denise Gilman, co-director of the immigration clinic at the University of Texas School of Law, Oct. 25, 2023
  • Email exchange, Stephen Yale-Loehr, professor of immigration law at Cornell Law School, Oct. 25, 2023
  • Email exchange, Ernesto Castañeda, director for the Center for Latin American and Latino Studies at American University, Oct. 25, 2023
  • Email exchange, spokesperson for Sen. Marsha Blackburn, Oct. 25, 2023
  • Email exchange, U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesperson, Oct. 25, 2023





Source link

Texas

Texas needs at least $174 billion to avoid water crisis, state says

Published

on

Texas needs at least 4 billion to avoid water crisis, state says


AUSTIN (Texas Tribune) — Texas communities will need to spend $174 billion in the next 50 years to avert a severe water crisis, a new state analysis revealed Thursday. That’s more than double the $80 billion projected four years ago, when the Texas Water Development Board last passed a state water plan.

The three-member board presiding over the agency authorized the highly anticipated draft blueprint Thursday, the first administrative step toward adopting the water development board’s plans for the next 50 years. The plan, released every five years, encompasses the projects that 16 regional water planning groups in Texas said are the most urgent, water development board officials said. 

The board’s latest estimates come as the state’s water supply faces numerous threats. Growing communities across Texas are scrambling to secure water, keep up with construction costs and cope with a yearslong drought. This week, Corpus Christi officials said the city may be just months away from declaring a water emergency. Meanwhile, other rural cities by the Coastal Bend are rapidly drilling wells to avoid a crisis. Residents in North Texas have also been bracing for groundwater shortages.

In an effort to restrain the crisis, lawmakers last year called an election in which voters approved a $20 billion boost for communities to use on water-related expenses. The water development board’s estimate shows that what lawmakers proposed on the ballot falls dramatically short of the needed cash, experts said.

Advertisement

“What this number tells me at the end of the day is if we don’t get serious about (funding water projects), there are going to be serious consequences for Texas,” said Perry Fowler, executive director of the Texas Water Infrastructure Network. “Even with the billion-dollar-a-year plan kicking in, it’s not going to be enough to offset the costs of the projects that are going to have to be executed.”

The new estimate accounts for 3,000 projects, from regional infrastructure upgrades to smaller endeavors such as drilling new water wells. Texas’ water supplies are expected to drop by roughly 10% between 2030 and 2080, according to the water plan. In that same time frame, the maximum amount of water communities can draw is also expected to decline by 9%.

The 80-page plan notes approximately 6,700 recommended strategies that would add water to the state’s dwindling portfolio. The recommendations — which are not accounted for in the cost — include developing new supplies from aquifer storage and recovery, brackish groundwater, desalination and recycled water. It also calls for water conservation.

The report suggested that if Texas does not implement the plans and recommendations, the state is one severe drought away from an estimated $91 billion in economic damages in 2030.

The state’s plan attributes a variety of reasons for the bigger price tag, such as higher costs of construction due to inflation, impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on supply chains, and a growing backlog of water supply projects.

Advertisement

“There’s a plan that can meet our needs,” said Matt Nelson, deputy executive administrator for the Office of Planning at the water development board, adding that they take their cues from the regional planning groups. “These are local projects that folks need to implement; they’re needed regardless of how they’re funded. It’s important to remember these are not top-down projects or state projects.”

Experts told The Texas Tribune that the board’s estimate is only a fraction of what Texas communities will need to ensure they have water in 50 years’ time, saying growth and development are outpacing the state’s ability to keep up.

“This is a bigger water plan in terms of volume strategies and capital costs compared to anything we’ve ever seen before,” said Jeremy Mazur, the director of infrastructure and natural resources policy at think tank Texas 2036.

Mazur suggested that the $174 billion only covers water supply projects and does not account for updating aging infrastructure, adding that the actual price could amount to a quarter of a trillion dollars.

“There’s a substantial magnitude with regard to the capital investment needed to both fix our aging and current systems and potentially develop the water infrastructure, water supply projects that we need.“

Advertisement

The report largely confirmed what many water experts have warned regarding threats to the state’s water supply, said Sarah Kirkle, director of policy at the Texas Water Association.

“Population growth, extreme weather, and economic development needs are all increasing demands on our infrastructure, and the state is going to need more water, sooner,” Kirkle said. “This is all while water projects are becoming more costly and complex because the easiest and cheapest local projects have already been developed.”

Fowler, with the infrastructure network, said he expects the Texas Legislature to take up the issue next year, when lawmakers meet for the 90th legislative session. He said the state should take a bigger role in ensuring that communities can afford their respective water projects.

“It’s going to have to be a top-down priority, there’s no way around it,” he said. “The challenges are so immense that it’s going to take all hands on deck.”

Texas residents have until the end of May to comment on the proposal. Water development board officials must adopt it by January 2027.

Advertisement

Alejandra Martinez contributed to this story.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at www.texastribune.org. The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans – and engages with them – about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

Parachutist Slams into Jumbotron at Virginia Tech Spring Game

Published

on

Parachutist Slams into Jumbotron at Virginia Tech Spring Game


  • Ryan Reynolds on Business Ventures, Blake Lively and ‘Deadpool’

    08:02

  • Ryan Reynolds and Willie Geist Talk Dads With Parkinson’s Disease

    04:17

  • Jim Whittaker, First American to Summit Mt. Everest, Dies at 97

    02:12

  • Couple Goes Viral After Heated Discussion at NBA Game

    03:37

  • Ryan Reynolds Snaps Sunday Mug Shot With Fans at Sitdown Live

    02:03

  • Pope Leo and President Trump Clash Over Iran War

    04:56

  • Now Playing

    Parachutist Slams into Jumbotron at Virginia Tech Spring Game

    00:24

  • UP NEXT

    United Airlines Flight Diverted Due to ‘Potential Bomb’

    00:33

  • Millions Clean up Destructive Aftermath of Severe Midwest Storms

    02:03

  • NBC News Poll: 67% Disapprove of Trump’s Handling of Iran War

    02:06

  • Trump Says Iran ‘Got a Little Cute’ During Executive Order Signing

    01:30

  • Iran Reasserts Control Over Strait of Hormuz as Negotiations Stall

    02:02

  • Look Back at a Decade of Willie Geist’s Sunday Sitdowns

    10:48

  • Willie Geist Celebrates New Chapter With Sunday Sitdown Live

    03:54

  • See How Sunday TODAY Gets Put Together Every Week

    04:28

  • Willie Geist Celebrates Fans’ Globe-Spanning Sunday Mug Shots

    04:12

  • Artemis II Crew Shares Emotional Address After Historic Mission

    02:02

  • Rep. Eric Swalwell Faces Multiple Sexual Misconduct Allegations

    00:25

  • US and Iran Fail to Reach Peace Deal: What It Means for the War

    03:16

  • US and Iran Fail to Reach Deal After 1 Day of Peace Talks

    02:06

A skydiver dropping into the Virginia Tech spring football game slammed into the stadium jumbotron and got stuck. The parachutist was attempting to land right at the 50-yard line but was stranded for about 20 minutes before first responders rescued him.



Source link

Continue Reading

West Virginia

The 2026 WVU Tommy Nickolich Award Goes to a Parkersburg Native

Published

on

The 2026 WVU Tommy Nickolich Award Goes to a Parkersburg Native


During the Gold-Blue spring game on Saturday, the West Virginia coaching staff named wide receiver Cyrus Traught the recipient of the 2026 Tommy Nikolich Award.

The award, which is always given out at the end of spring ball, recognizes a walk-on team member who has distinguished himself through his attitude and work ethic. The award is presented in memory of Tommy Nickolich, a former WVU player (1980-82) who passed away from cancer in 1983.

Traugh is a Parkersburg native and graduate of Parkersburg South High School. He began his career at Youngstown State before transferring back home to play for the Mountaineers last season. In his final year with the Penguins, he logged 36 receptions, 409 yards, and a team-leading five touchdowns, two of which came against Pitt.

Advertisement

During the 2025 campaign with the Mountaineers, he saw action against Robert Morris and Kansas, playing 10 snaps against the Jayhawks, but did not record any stats.

Advertisement

Head coach Rich Rodriguez has mentioned him twice this spring as someone who has been doing some good things and making progress. Wide receivers coach Ryan Garrett also showed him some love during his press conference last week.

The Mountaineers completely revamped the wide receiver room this offseason, upping the level of talent at both inside and outside receiver spots, but perhaps Traugh can work his way into the mix if he puts together a strong summer and fall camp. If he’s not a regular in the rotation, he’ll serve as a quality depth piece who can play special teams.

Advertisement

Past Nickolich Award winners:

2025: Clay Ash, RB

Advertisement

2024: Avery Wilcox, S

2023: C.J. Cole, WR

2022: Nick Malone, OL

2021: Graeson Malashevich, WR/H

Advertisement

2020: Osman Kamara, S

Advertisement

2019: Jake Abbott, LB

2018: Evan Staley, K

2017: Nick Meadows, LS

2016: Jon Lewis, DL

Advertisement

2015: Justin Arndt, LB

Advertisement

2014: Michael Calicchio, OL

2013: Connor Arlia, WR                     

2012: Tyler Anderson, DE

2011: Ryan Nehlen, WR

Advertisement

2010: Matt Lindamood, FB

Advertisement

2009: Josh Taylor, DL

2008: Adam Hughes, LS

2007: Andy Emery, LB

2006: Tim Lindsey, LS

Advertisement

2005: George Shehl, H/DB

Advertisement

2004: Jeff Noechel, LB

2003: John Pennington, WR

2002: Moe Fofana, RB

2001: Jeremy Knapp, TE

Advertisement

2000: Ben Collins, LB

Advertisement

1999: Bryan Lorenz, LB

1998: Mark Corman, TE

1997: David Lightcap, DB

1996: Matt Ceresa, OL

Advertisement

1995: Rob Keys, DB

Advertisement

1994: Randy Fulmore, DB

1993: Matt McCulty, WR

1992: Brett Parise, WR, Ray Wilcox, LB

1991: Keith Taparausky, RB

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending