Connect with us

Midwest

Ashley Madison reveals top 20 American cities for adulterous behavior: ‘Something is going on in the Midwest’

Published

on

Ashley Madison reveals top 20 American cities for adulterous behavior: ‘Something is going on in the Midwest’

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

Please enter a valid email address.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Having trouble? Click here.

FIRST ON FOX — Some Ohio residents may want to watch their spouses closely this summer.   

Controversial online dating service Ashley Madison, which caters to married people and uses the slogan “Life is short. Have an affair,” examines which cities have the most signups per capita across America on an annual basis. Ashley Madison chief strategy officer Paul Keable provided Fox News Digital with an exclusive look at the 20 cities across America that are “hot spots for non-monogamy.”

Advertisement

“We saw that Columbus, Ohio, had the No. 1 most signups per capita for any city across America, which was fascinating because they weren’t even in the top 20 of our list last year,” Keable told Fox News Digital. 

“Clearly, something is going on in Ohio because, in fact, there are two other cities in the top 20 from Ohio,” he added, referring to No. 7 Cincinnati and No. 13 Cleveland. 

VALENTINE’S DAY DOESN’T REFLECT POPULARITY OF NON-MONOGAMY, ACCORDING TO ADULTERERS ON ASHLEY MADISON

Controversial online dating service Ashley Madison, which caters to married people and uses the slogan “Life is short. Have an affair,” examines which cites have the most signups per capita across America on an annual basis.  (Ashley Madison)

“Something is going on in the Midwest,” Keable said. 

Advertisement

Keable said the data helps “would-be adulterers and cheaters” determine which cities have the most “action going on.” He believes the results prove “adultery and infidelity are everywhere.”

“We have red states and blue states and purple states represented really, really well. We have tourist destinations — Sin City, Las Vegas drops in at No.4, which probably isn’t too surprising,” Keable said. “But then when you have Buffalo, Baton Rouge, Tucson, Arizona, what does that really tell you about America? It tells me that infidelity is ubiquitous against your income, against your industry and your location.” 

Top 20 U.S. hot spots for non-monogamy, according to Ashley Madison:

  1. Columbus, Ohio
  2. Miami, Florida,
  3. Orlando, Florida
  4. Las Vegas, Nevada
  5. Atlanta, Georgia
  6. Richmond, Virginia
  7. Cincinnati, Ohio
  8. Minneapolis & Saint Paul, Minnesota
  9. Tampa, Florida
  10. Buffalo, New York
  11. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  12. Spokane, Washington
  13. Cleveland, Ohio
  14. Denver, Colorado
  15. Baton Rouge, Louisiana
  16. Tucson, Arizona
  17. Colorado Springs, Colorado
  18. Austin, Texas
  19. Boise, Idaho
  20. Wichita, Kansas

Richmond, Virginia stood out to Keable, which landed at No. 6, because it’s not exactly what would be considered a “hotbed of adultery.” However, Keable said any city within driving distance of the nation’s capital could be ripe for scandalous behavior. 

“Given that a lot of people who reside there probably work in Washington, DC, or work within the political environment there. That is an industry in a space, in a type of city that we often see high membership in,” he said. 

ADULTERERS ON ASHLEY MADISON REVEAL WHAT THEY ARE FAITHFUL TO, 87% WOULD CHEAT ON THEIR PARTNER BEFORE TAXES

Advertisement

Controversial online dating service Ashley Madison, which caters to married people, uses the slogan “Life is short. Have an affair.”  (Ashley Madison)

“In fact, our business is based in Canada, and we’ve always seen in our capital city, Ottawa, a very high percentage of users,” Keable continued. “So, it isn’t surprising to us.”

Miami fell from No. 1 in the last edition to No. 2, but Keable noted the Sunshine State “continues to have great representation in the top 20” with Orlando and Tampa also making the list. 

As for large population centers such as New York City, Los Angeles and Houston, Keable said they’re some of Ashley Madison’s “biggest membership cities” based on signups, but ranking areas on a per capita basis against the population in each city is much more helpful. 

ONLYFANS EMERGES AS CULTURAL PHENOMENON WITH EVERYONE FROM TEACHERS TO CELEBS PROFITING OFF RISQUÉ CONTENT

Advertisement

Ashley Madison chief strategy officer Paul Keable provided Fox News Digital with an exclusive look at the 20 cities across America that are “hot spots for non-monogamy.” ((iStock))

“It’s a better representation of that city’s desire and leanings towards infidelity,” Keable said. 

“If you look at pure numbers, LA, Houston, New York, they’re going to be at the top of lists,” he continued. “But when you balance it out against the size of the actual population, that’s a truer indication of whether or not that city has adulterous leanings.”

Fox News Digital’s Ramiro Vargas contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Illinois

Keaton Wagler scored 19 points and No. 16 Illinois holds off No. 19 Iowa in 75-69 victory

Published

on

Keaton Wagler scored 19 points and No. 16 Illinois holds off No. 19 Iowa in 75-69 victory


Keaton Wagler scored 19 points, Andrej Stojakovic and Kylan Boswell each had 17 and No. 16 Illinois continued to win on the road in the Big Ten Conference, holding off No. 19 Iowa 75-69 on Sunday. The Illini (13-3, 4-1) won their fifth consecutive game and stayed tied for third place in the conference. Three of Illinois’ wins in conference play have come on the road — the Illini also won at Ohio State and Penn State.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Who has more 5-star recruits? Indiana football or Miami? Take a look

Published

on

Who has more 5-star recruits? Indiana football or Miami? Take a look


BLOOMINGTON — Indiana football’s roster is on more equal footing with Miami, even though the star rankings have meant little to the final results in this year’s CFP.

The No. 1 Hoosiers (15-0) beat Alabama and Oregon by a combined score of 94-25 despite having no former 5-star players in the starting lineup and just one former top 100 recruit.

The No. 10 Hurricanes (13-2) will have a pair of former 5-star recruits in their starting lineup but are only starting a total of three former top-100 prospects. It’s a sharp drop off in top talent from the likes of Alabama (14), Ohio State (10) and Oregon (eight).

Advertisement
Category Indiana Miami Oregon Ohio State Alabama
5-stars 0 2 2 3 9
4-stars 2 7 11 16 9
Top 100 recruits 1 3 8 10 14
2-stars or below 9 4 2 1 2

Indiana’s starting lineup still leads the way in overlooked recruits — it will start nine players that ranked 2-stars or below, including starting quarterback Fernando Mendoza — but Miami almost has more (four) than IU’s past three opponents combined (five).

The Hurricanes also has a more of a transfer laden starting lineup (11) than any of Indiana’s postseason opponents.

Here’s a position-by-position breakdown of the recruiting rankings for this year’s participants in the CFP championship game:

Re-live IU’s 2025 season

Advertisement

Indiana football’s quarterbacks vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Quarterback Fernando Mendoza (2022) 2-stars (No. 2,149) Carson Beck (2020) 4-stars (No. 254)

Indiana football’s skill positions vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Wide receiver Elijah Sarratt (2022) 0-stars (N/A) Malachi Toney (2025) 4-stars (No. 359)
Wide receiver Omar Cooper Jr. (2022) 4-stars (No. 299) Keelan Marion 2-stars (No. 3,390)
Wide receiver E.J. Williams Jr. (2020) 4-stars (No. 69) CJ Daniels (2020) 3-stars (No. 2,450)
Running back Roman Hemby (2021) 3-stars (No. 1,767) Mark Fletcher Jr. (2023) 4-stars (No. 149)
Tight end Riley Nowakowski (2020) 0-stars (N/A) Alex Bauman (2022) 3-stars (No. 1,770)

Indiana football’s offensive line vs Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Left tackle Carter Smith (2022) 3-stars (No. 730) Markel Bell (2022) N/A
Left guard Drew Evans (2022) 0-stars (N/A) Matthew McCoy (2022) 3-stars (No. 735)
Center Pat Coogan (2021) 3-stars (No. 613) James Brockermeyer (2021) 4-stars (No. 194)
Right guard Bray Lynch (2022) 3-stars (No. 1,033) Anez Cooper (2022) 3-stars (No. 1,149)
Right tackle Kahlil Benson (2020) 3-stars (No. 714) Francis Mauigoa (2023) 5-stars (No. 9)

Indiana football’s defensive line vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Defensive tackle Mario Landino (2024) 3-stars (No. 2,398) Ahmad Moten Sr. (2022) 3-stars (No. 558)
Defensive tackle Tyrique Tucker (2022) 0-stars (N/A) Justin Scott (2024) 5-stars (No. 10)
Defensive end Mikail Kamara (2020) 0-stars (N/A) Rueben Bain (2023) 4-stars (No. 62)
Defensive end Stephen Daley (2022) 3-stars (No. 1,987) Akheem Mesidor (2020) 3-stars (No. 636)

Indiana football’s linebackers vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Linebacker Aiden Fisher (2022) 0-stars (N/A) Wesley Bissainthe (2022) 4-stars (188)
Linebacker Rolijah Hardy (2023) 0-stars (N/A) Mohamed Toure (2019) 3-stars (No. 1,024)

Indiana football’s secondary vs. Miami

Position Indiana (Year) Rating (National rank) Miami (Year) Rating (National rank)
Cornerback D’Angelo Ponds (2023) 3-stars (No. 1,966) OJ Frederique Jr. (2024) 3-stars (No. 784)
Cornerback Jamari Sharpe (2022) 3-stars (No. 826) Ethan O’Conner (2023) 3-stars (No. 673)
Safety Louis Moore (2020) 0-stars (N/A) Zechariah Poyser (2023) N/A
Safety Amare Ferrell (2022) 3-stars (No. 578) Jakobe Thomas (2021) 3-stars (No. 2,048)
Rover Devan Boykin (2020) 3-stars (No. 833) Keionte Scott (2020) N/A

Michael Niziolek is the Indiana beat reporter for The Bloomington Herald-Times. You can follow him on X @michaelniziolek and read all his coverage by clicking here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa voters shifted left in 2025. Is a blue wave coming in 2026?

Published

on

Iowa voters shifted left in 2025. Is a blue wave coming in 2026?



In five of six legislative special elections last year, Democrats overperformed by more than 20 percentage points compared with the 2024 presidential election.

play

  • Democrats won four of six special elections in Iowa in 2025, and improved their performance over the 2024 presidential race in all six.
  • Turnout in the special elections was lower than in typical general elections.
  • Iowa Republicans, meanwhile, continued to expand their lead in active voter registration totals in 2025.

Iowa Democrats ended 2025 on a high note, winning a Dec. 30 special election in Des Moines’ western suburbs by a wider margin than during the presidential election.

That capped off a year in which Democrats won four of the six legislative special elections and ended Republicans’ supermajority in the Iowa Senate.

In five of those six special elections, Democrats overperformed by more than 20 percentage points compared with 2024.

They’ll look to build off the momentum going into the pivotal 2026 midterms that will include open races for governor and U.S. senator as well as regular Iowa congressional and Legislature elections.

Whether 2025’s Democratic Party victories are bellwethers or blips will play out this year.

Advertisement

Democrats saw Iowa special elections consistently tilt left

Though Republicans won in two special elections in 2025s, their margins of victory were significantly smaller than 2024. 

Republican Wendy Larson won December’s special election for the vacant seat in House District 7 by 40 points. That’s a wide margin, but wide margins are expected for Republicans in that part of the state: The party holds strong advantages in voter registration totals in Calhoun, Pocahontas, Sac and Webster counties, where the district is located.

And even that 40-point margin represented a shift toward the Democrats.

Advertisement

In the 2024 presidential election, Republican Donald Trump defeated Democrat Kamala Harris by 50 points in House District 7. Democrats didn’t even field a candidate for the district’s legislative seat that year.

The 10-point shift toward Democrats from the 2024 presidential election to the 2025 special election in House District 7 was the smallest of any legislative district that held a special election last year.

Each of the five other districts shifted toward Democrats by more than twice as much.

Moreover, those special elections were spread across the state.

Democrats consistently gathered a greater share of votes from Senate District 1 in the northwest part of the state to House District 100 in the state’s southeast corner, ranging from 10 to 26 percentage points.

Advertisement

The two seats Democrats flipped in special elections — Senate Districts 1 and 35 — each shifted to the left by more than 20 points compared with the 2024 presidential election. 

In Senate District 1, Trump outpaced Harris by 11 percentage points in 2024, while Democrat Caitlin Drey won the seat there by more than 10 points in August. 

In Senate District 35, Trump’s victory margin in Senate District 35 was more than 21 points. In January 2025, Democrat Mike Zimmer won the district’s Senate seat by 3½ points.

Advertisement

In 2022, Republicans won both those seats by even wider margins than Trump in 2024.

Should Democrats expect momentum to carry over to 2026?

Pushing voters to the left in six isolated special elections is one thing. Parlaying those successes into November’s midterm elections is quite another.

Turnout was key in 2025’s special elections, and it will be again in 2026.

Advertisement

The numbers of votes cast in 2025’s special elections equaled roughly one-quarter to one-third the votes cast in the 2024 presidential election in those districts. 

Turnout should be higher in November’s midterms.

Since 2000, the percentage of Iowa’s registered voters who have participated in the midterm elections typically has hovered around 55%. (About 75% of registered Iowans usually vote in presidential elections.)

But what determines an election is less about the number of people who show up and more about who those people are.

Advertisement

An increased share of those who went to the polls in the special elections were Democratic voters — or, perhaps more accurately, a greater number of Republican voters stayed home. 

Republicans will be working to get those voters back to the polls this November.

Republicans maintain advantage in Iowa voter registration data

The leftward shift in last year’s special elections has yet to materialize in Iowa’s voter registration numbers. 

Over roughly the past 15 years, voter registrations in Iowa have swung heavily toward Republicans.

Democrats, conversely, have lost 200,000 voters in that time, and Republicans have opened up an overall advantage of more than 10 percentage points. 

Advertisement

Despite their victories at the ballot box in 2025, Democrats have not chipped into Republicans’ significant lead in voter registrations.

Last year was the first since at least 2000 when the share of active voters who were Republicans was at least 10 percentage points higher than the share who were Democrats throughout the entire year.

Republicans began 2026 with nearly 200,000 more active registered voters than Democrats, among their largest leads this century. 

Those two parties do not comprise the entirety of Iowa’s electorate — a large share of Iowa’s active voters are not registered to a party, and a smaller amount are registered to other parties, including Libertarians.

Advertisement

And just because a voter is registered as a Democrat or Republican doesn’t mean they’ll vote for their party’s candidates.

But the large voter deficit indicates Democrats are starting from a less favorable position.

Their special election victories in 2025 proved they can win elections, but they’ll need to make up some ground to replicate that success in 2026.

Tim Webber is a data visualization specialist for the Register. Reach him at twebber@registermedia.com and on Twitter at @HelloTimWebber.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending