Connect with us

Utah

Opinion: We’re still suffering the mighty consequences of Utah’s ‘Mighty 5’ campaign

Published

on

Opinion: We’re still suffering the mighty consequences of Utah’s ‘Mighty 5’ campaign


Not only is the tourism promotion relentless, it’s sometimes false advertising.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Delicate Arch in Arches National Park as the sun sets, Tuesday, May 16, 2023.

As the ski season shifts into the summer recreation season, would-be tourists are scrambling to book camp spots, entrance passes, hotel rooms and permits before they’re all gone. And as anyone who has waited in a Lagoon-like lift line at their local ski resort, or has discovered that there isn’t a Zion camp spot available until August knows, Utah is drowning in tourists.

Advertisement

The 2022-2023 ski season shattered the records for ski visits (7.1 million and a 22% increase) and money spent by out-of-state ski visitors ($2 billion). This year’s figures aren’t in yet, but despite less snow than last year’s record setting base, both in-state and out-of-state spending by skiers has increased the last four seasons, and will likely continue.

Just over a decade ago, in the spring of 2013, a 20-story “wallscape” debuted above L.A.’s Wilshire Boulevard promoting Utah’s “Mighty 5″ National Parks. “The launch (was) placed in television ads, building wraps, digital billboards, magazines and social media (all over the U.S. and worldwide) at a cost of $3.1 million, (and) coincided with a steep increase in park visitation that has continued unabated ever since.” The campaign was a runaway success.

Since that time, visitor totals at Utah National Parks have nearly doubled, yet the number of full-time employees has remained the same or declined. The same is true for Utah’s ski resorts. “Despite the gush in skier and snowboarder visits, the number of recreational jobs, including for resort workers, remains roughly the same as it was in 2015-16 when Utah saw 2.6 million fewer skier visits.”

While these data certainly challenge the idea that tourism is such a great (but low paying) job-creator, I don’t mean to suggest for a moment that we’d be better off with the fossil fuel/cattle/alfalfa economy that our anachronistic state legislature adores. Utah’s outdoor recreation economy ranks ninth in the country and utterly dwarfs extractive industries in terms of jobs and revenues.

Despite the stewardship wisdom of the prophets, though, if what you really worship is profit, as Utah’s business and political leaders do, then massive tourist numbers are desirable. If, however, you care about wildlife, air quality, water supplies, garbage and sewage, traffic, solitude, open spaces, preservation, climate change, quiet gateway communities and high-quality recreation experiences, then these exploding visitor numbers are a mighty disaster.

Advertisement

Even the tourism dollar zealots agree that the National Parks are suffering under the mob of visitors. Their solution: Push the crowds toward other national monuments and state parks, and thereby spread the same problems to areas never designed to absorb such visitation. They even have a philosophy for it: “a perpetual visitor economy.” And hokey campaign term for it: “The Red Emerald Strategic Plan.”

Who pays for all of this tourism advertising? We do. When you do a tourist thing like rent a car, book a hotel room or pay sales tax on 21 tourism-related industries, you pay into a fund that goes to the Utah Office of Tourism to encourage even more people to do the same thing. Since 2005, it has spent more than $100 million marketing Utah. That’s correct: $100 million.

Not only is the tourism promotion relentless, it’s often false advertising. Visit Utah.com’s Lake Powell homepage includes a beautiful photo of a brimming full Lake Powell instead of the two-thirds empty, bathtub-ringed reservoir that suffers from climate change and overuse. Their boating guide landing page does the same thing with an old photo. The Lake Powell Pipeline Organization promotes the same environmental mirage with a Lake Powell photo that nobody under the age of 30 will ever see in person. And Utah’s State Park’s webpage displays several once Great Salt Lake photos long before it teetered on the edge of biological collapse surrounded by toxic dust flats.

Despite a mighty long list of problems with the Mighty 5 campaign, it’s not going away. In fact, the Utah Office of Tourism has now copywritten Forever Mighty®. You can even indulge in Forever Mighty swag and logos. And despite a lot of sustainable, ethical and resilient rhetoric on their snazzy website, on nearly every page is the promotion of “growth.”

With endless growth in mind, you better make your recreation reservations soon.

Advertisement

Eric C. Ewert is a professor in and chair of Weber State University’s Department of Geography, Environment & Sustainability. His current research and teaching interests lie in environmental studies, the American West, population, historical and economic geography and geospatial technologies. Views are the opinion of the author, and in no way represent Weber State University.

The Salt Lake Tribune is committed to creating a space where Utahns can share ideas, perspectives and solutions that move our state forward. We rely on your insight to do this. Find out how to share your opinion here, and email us at voices@sltrib.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Utah Supreme Court considers defamation lawsuit over ‘Sound of Freedom’ movie

Published

on

Utah Supreme Court considers defamation lawsuit over ‘Sound of Freedom’ movie


SALT LAKE CITY — The state’s top court is considering whether to allow a defamation lawsuit to move forward over the movie “Sound of Freedom” and its portrayal of a villain in the movie.

On Wednesday, the Utah Supreme Court heard an appeal by Angel Studios, the filmmakers who created “Sound of Freedom” and Operation Underground Railroad founder Tim Ballard. They are being sued by Kely Suarez, who alleges the central villain character in the movie has defamed her and ruined her reputation.

Cherise Bacalski, Suarez’s attorney, said the character of “Katy Giselle” in the film is “a kingpin sex trafficker.”

“And she never was,” Bacalksi said of her client.

Advertisement

Before the Utah Supreme Court, Bacalski argued Suarez was a college student who was caught up in a raid that Ballard was involved with in Colombia.

A lower court allowed Suarez’s lawsuit to move toward trial. The studio and Ballard have appealed, arguing they are protected under a Utah law designed to safeguard speech and that the film is a docudrama that is “based on a true story.” The justices grilled lawyers for all sides about the level of involvement each party had and whether promotion of the film crossed any lines.

“Here it’s alleged the movie itself was defamatory and Angel Studios is the one who is putting out the movie,” Justice Paige Petersen said during Wednesday’s hearing.

Robert Gutierrez, an attorney for Angel Studios, insisted to the court that while the film may be based on Ballard’s experiences, there were disclaimers in the film.

“The Katy Giselle character was, in fact, a composite character in order to make it a subject matter the viewing public could actually watch,” he argued. “And fulfill the writer’s mission about the ugly truth of child trafficking.”

Advertisement

The justices questioned where the line is in a “docudrama” or when things are “based on a true story.”

“So under your definition is this a movie of and concerning Mr. Ballard? Or is that they happen to use the same name?” asked Justice John Nielsen.

Gutierrez replied it was a story “inspired by Tim Ballard.” Later in arguments, he noted that Suarez had actually been convicted of criminal charges in Colombia. That was something Bacalski said was not properly before the court and she argued against the veracity of it.

“We also believe the conviction is unreliable, coming from Colombia and really under suspicious circumstances,” she told FOX 13 News outside of court. “That conviction would not likely stand because of the constitutional protections we enjoy in the United States of America.”

Ballard’s attorney, Mark Eisenhut, argued that his client was not involved in the movie-making itself. Ballard was consulted as the film was being created.

Advertisement

“I do not believe there’s any evidence of him producing, writing, directing, anything of that nature,” Eisenhut argued.

The justices took the case under advisement with no timeline for a ruling. The movie, which starred Jim Caviezel as Ballard, went on to become a box office success in 2023.

“She’s very hopeful our justice system will do her justice,” Bacalski said of Suarez outside court.

Ballard faced a number of lawsuits and accusations of misconduct that led to ties being cut with Operation Underground Railroad, the anti-human trafficking organization he founded. He has denied wrongdoing and filed his own defamation lawsuit against some of his accusers.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

‘Civil war’: Utah, PA governors call out political violence in bipartisan panel

Published

on

‘Civil war’: Utah, PA governors call out political violence in bipartisan panel



Republican Governor of Utah Spencer Cox and Democratic Governor of Pennsylvania spoke in Washington, D.C. They called on Americans to stop using violence against political opponents.

play

Two of the nation’s top state leaders who have had close brushes with political violence in 2025 hosted a panel on Dec. 9 where they called on Americans to stop hating their political enemies before it leads to “civil war.”

“We’re passing all the checkpoints, well ultimately towards failed states and things like civil war, I hate to even use that phrase,” said Spencer Cox, Utah’s Republican governor whose longstanding campaign for political unity was thrust into the national spotlight with the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in September.

Cox participated in the panel alongside Pennsylvania’s Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro, whose house was firebombed in April. 

Tuesday’s panel comes at a point where in addition to the killing of Kirk and the firebombing of the Pennsylvania governor’s mansion, a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband were killed and another lawmaker and his wife were injured at their homes in June; two Israeli embassy workers were shot and killed in D.C. in May; and a National Guard member was killed and another injured in a shooting also in the nation’s capital in November.

Advertisement

The pair spoke at Washington National Cathedral, about three and a half miles northwest of the White House.

Early on in the panel, Shapiro called out President Donald Trump for stoking hate in politics.  

“When you’re a governor, when you’re a president of the United States, you’re looked to for that moral clarity,” Shapiro said, “and we have a president who fails that test on a daily basis.”

Trump at a rally in September following the killing of Kirk said that he hates his opponents. 

Advertisement

“That’s where I disagreed with Charlie,” Trump said. “I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them.”

Cox closed the panel by calling for a return to a period where political party affiliation took a backseat to aspects including profession or one’s family. 

“To my fellow Americans, to my fellow worshipers, whatever it is, whether you’re in a sacred place like this, whether you’re in a synagogue, whether you’re in a mosque, I don’t care where it is, you are are fellow Americans,” said Cox, who has been speaking about the need for political civility since first running for governor in 2020. “We need you now more than ever, this country, if we’re going to make it another 250 years, if we’re going to make it another two point five years, we desperately need you to lay down your swords and treat each other with dignity and respect again.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

University of Utah nears deal with private equity firm to help fund athletics. Here’s what it means for the Utes.

Published

on

University of Utah nears deal with private equity firm to help fund athletics. Here’s what it means for the Utes.


The U.’s board of trustees will vote on the matter Tuesday.

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Rice-Eccles Stadium on Saturday, Sept. 6, 2025.

Facing rising costs in college sports, the University of Utah hopes to put the future of its athletics department’s finances in the hands of a new for-profit company backed by a private equity firm.

The U.’s board of trustees will vote Tuesday on whether to approve the deal involving New York private equity firm Otro Capital.

The proposal calls for the creation of Utah Brands & Entertainment, a company to oversee the athletics department’s revenue sources. Otro Capital would be the minority owner of Utah Brands and handle operations such as ticket sales, media, stadium events, concessions, and trademark and licensing matters.

Advertisement

The U., through its nonprofit University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation, would have majority ownership of the company and Utah Athletic Director Mark Harlan would serve as the chairman of its board. The athletics department would continue to oversee student athletes and their scholarships, coaches, fundraising and NCAA compliance.

Otro describes itself as a company with “deep expertise across sports, entertainment, and media.”

University officials have declined to say how much Otro Capital plans to initially invest because the deal has not been finalized. Yahoo! Sports reported the partnership could bring in more than $500 million in revenue. The U. expects the deal to be completed early next year.

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Big 12 Conference logo as the Utah Utes prepare to host the Baylor Bears, NCAA football in Salt Lake City on Saturday, Sept. 7, 2024.

Private equity investors have zeroed in on college athletics in recent years.

Advertisement

In the wake of the House vs. NCAA settlement, colleges can now pay their student athletes up to $20.5 million annually.

That has contributed to significant deficits at schools around the country. Last month, the University of Colorado projected a $27 million deficit for its athletics program. Earlier this year, Ohio State University claimed a $37.7 million deficit.

The Tribune will update this developing story.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending