Connect with us

Northeast

Michael Cohen announces he won't speak about Trump on social media or on his podcast until after he testifies

Published

on

Michael Cohen announces he won't speak about Trump on social media or on his podcast until after he testifies

Michael Cohen, former President Trump’s ex-lawyer turned foe, announced Wednesday that he will not comment publicly on Trump anymore until after he testifies at his trial. 

Trump’s historic trial kicked off last week, where he faces 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The case revolves around an accusation that he improperly reimbursed former lawyer Michael Cohen for a $130,000 payoff in 2016 to porn star Stormy Daniels to stay silent about an alleged affair with Trump, which Trump denies.

“Despite not being the gagged defendant, out of respect for Judge Merchan and the prosecutors, I will cease posting anything about Donald on my X (formerly Twitter) account or on the Mea Culpa Podcast until after my trial testimony,” Cohen wrote in a post Wednesday. “See you all in a month (or more).”

Cohen, once a loyal fixer for Trump, turned against him and has called his old boss a “cheat,” “liar” and threat to the United States. On his podcast, he said, “I am the canary in the coal mine for millions of Americans mesmerized by Trump.”

CNN ANALYST SAYS TRUMP WOULDN’T BE CONVICTED IN NON-BLUE AREA, CASE RELIES ON KNOWN LIAR MICHAEL COHEN

Advertisement

Michael Cohen, President Trump’s onetime lawyer, has announced that he will not post anything about his former employer on his X account or podcast.  (Getty Images)

Cohen’s announcement was met with a mixed response online. 

“Hang in there, my friend. Thank you for once again stepping up and doing the right thing. You’re a brave dude,” popular left-wing commentator Majid Padellan, otherwise known as “Brooklyn Dad Defiant,” told Cohen. 

“If you don’t post.. you can’t lie,” radio host Joe Pagliarulo wrote. “So, that’s good.”

“Wise move Michael,” actor Mike Hamill wrote. “Much appreciated.”

Advertisement

JUDGE WON’T SANCTION MICHAEL COHEN FOR CITING FAKE CASES IN AI-GENERATED LEGAL FILING

Trump is the first former president to ever face criminal charges, and he has called the case brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, “political persecution.” The alleged crime in the case is not making a hush money payment, but rather that Trump knowingly made a campaign expenditure in far excess of legal limits that wasn’t properly reported.

Michael Avenatti, the former attorney for Stormy Daniels, criticized the gag order against Trump in New York by Judge Juan Merchan in a phone interview with Fox News Digital, and has been harshly critical of Cohen’s ability to speak out about the case ahead of the trial.

“I know what it’s like when the government comes for you,” he told Fox News Digital in a phone interview from prison this week. “Regardless of how smart you are or what your resources are, you have little to no hope of prevailing, even if you’re a former president of the United States. And I think what is happening to Trump right now is wrong, and it’s outrageous. And that is far more important to me than whether I agree with somebody about political views or not, or whether they’re a Republican or Democrat.”

Trump has called Cohen’s credibility as a witness into question numerous times over the past few months.  (Yuki Iwamura/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Trump has called Cohen’s credibility as a witness into question numerous times over the past few months. 

Cohen, who had previously pleaded guilty to tax and campaign finance violations and is currently under supervised release, has repeatedly sought to have his sentence reduced. In his most recent attempt, Cohen provided his attorney with fabricated case citations he later admitted were generated by Google’s AI chatbot, formerly known as Bard. 

Fox News’ David Rutz and Chris Pandolfo contributed to this report. 

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

‘No way to leave’: Mass. families stuck in Middle East amid war in Iran

Published

on

‘No way to leave’: Mass. families stuck in Middle East amid war in Iran


Massachusetts families are stuck in the Middle East amid the war in Iran, and Democratic Sen. Ed Markey says the State Department needs to do more to get them home.

The Trump administration is telling Americans to leave the region, and families would love to, but they haven’t been able to get out.

Stacey Schuhwerk of Hingham has been sheltering in place in a Doha hotel since Saturday.

“We hear the missiles outside,” she said. “We can see them.”

Advertisement

The Hingham mother and her son are among nearly 1,600 Americans trapped in the Middle East with no way to get home.

“Airspace is shut down. There’s no planes,” said Schuhwerk. “There’s no way to leave.”

Flights between Boston and the Middle East are canceled or delayed as travelers express anxiety over the conflict.

At first, U.S. officials told people to shelter in place and register with the State Department — something Schuhwerk did days ago.

“There’s no help there. The last time we called was 20 minutes ago, and they continue to say that ‘We don’t know anything about any plans for government help to get people out,’” she said.

Advertisement

Embassies and consulates across the region — including the U.S. Embassy in Israel — have now suspended services, saying they simply can’t get Americans out.

“They did not have a plan to conduct this war, and they clearly did not have a plan as to how to evacuate innocent families,” Markey said.

The senator says his office is hearing from Massachusetts families, and he’s pressuring the Trump administration to come up with an evacuation plan fast.

“We are going to apply that pressure on the State Department until every American who wants to leave that region is out,” he said.

Back in Doha, Schuhwerk keeps watching the war outside her window.

Advertisement

“The talk here is ‘How much defensive ammunition’s left?’ Good question, you know, because the missiles aren’t stopping,” she said. “So how long are we going to be safe here?”

With no clear end to this conflict, she’s worried she could be stuck there for weeks.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

N.H. woman accused of civil rights violation after allegedly shooting at lost man because he was Black

Published

on

N.H. woman accused of civil rights violation after allegedly shooting at lost man because he was Black


Local News

Diane Durgin, 67, is accused of shooting at a Black man who inadvertently drove to her property after a prearranged truck part sale, prosecutors said.

A New Hampshire woman is accused of violating the state’s Civil Rights Act four times after she allegedly shot at a man because he was Black, prosecutors said.

Diane Durgin, 67, of Weare, N.H. could face up to a $5,000 fine for each violation she is found to have committed, the office of New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella said in a press release Tuesday.

Advertisement

Durgin is also charged with criminal threatening against a person with a deadly weapon and attempted first degree assault with a deadly weapon, Michael Garrity, a media representative for the New Hampshire Attorney General, said in an emailed statement to Boston.com.

Durgin had a final pre-trial conference last week, Garrity said.

In a civil complaint filed Tuesday, Durgin is accused of threatening physical force against the victim, the AG said. Prosecutors asked the court to issue a preliminary injunction barring Durgin from repeating her alleged behavior and from contacting the victim and his family.

During the morning hours of Oct. 20, 2024, the victim claims, he “mistakenly” drove to Durgin’s home after a prearranged purchase of a truck part with a seller online, prosecutors wrote as part of their request for an injunction.

When the man — whom prosecutors identified in court documents as X.G. — arrived, Durgin allegedly stepped out of her home and approached his car with a gun “holstered by her waist,” prosecutors wrote. 

Advertisement

Upon noticing that X.G. was Black, Durgin allegedly “removed her gun and pointed it at X.G.,” prosecutors said in the injunction request.

While X.G. explained that he was lost, Durgin called the victim a “Black mother[expletive],” and threatened to “kill him,” prosecutors allege.

As the victim attempted to drive away, Durgin allegedly took her gun and fired two shots at the fleeing man’s car, missing both times, the AG’s office said.

While on the phone with a dispatcher, Durgin allegedly said she shot the man’s car because the victim is Black, the AG said.

“The guy is Black. And he, he…he says he’s meeting someone here and I think he’s coming here to steal,” Durgin allegedly said.

Advertisement

Police located X.G. and brought him to the Weare Police Department, stopping along the way at the correct seller’s home to complete the truck part purchase, prosecutors wrote in court documents.

To prove a violation of the New Hampshire Civil Rights Act, the AG must show that Durgin “interfered or attempted to interfere with the rights of the victim to engage in lawful activities by threatening to engage in or actually engage in physical force or violence, when such actual or threatening conduct was motivated by race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity, or disability,” prosecutors said.

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

Devils Out to Rattle the Leafs | PREVIEW | New Jersey Devils

Published

on

Devils Out to Rattle the Leafs  | PREVIEW | New Jersey Devils


THE SCOOP

The Devils began their season-high seven-game homestand with a decisive victory over the Florida Panthers on Tuesday night. The win was their second consecutive victory after picking up a win in St. Louis earlier in the week. 

There’s not a lot of runway left in the season, and stringing together a run of victories is at the top of their minds. New Jersey is 11 points out of the final Wild Card spot, and 13 out of third in the Metropolitan Division. Tuesday will mark the Devils final game before the NHL Trade Deadline, which is on Friday at 3 p.m.

The Toronto Maple Leafs are having a down year, based on where the expectations were set heading into the season. The Leafs have struggled to gain any traction in their season and sit just two points ahead of New Jersey with 64. Toronto is 12 points out of third in the Atlantic Division, and nine points out of a Wild Card spot. 

The Leafs have a tendency to give up an abundance of shots to their opponents, ranking first in the league in shots against, per game with 31.8, which bodes will for a Devils team that averages 29.4 shots per game, ranking sixth in the league. Despite their overall struggles, the Leafs do have the league’s fourth-best penalty kill, working at an 83.1 percent efficiency.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending