Michigan
Does Michigan have sanctuary cities? Here’s where and what it means
White House: Migrants bused, flown north is a ‘political stunt’
GOP governors are taking credit for busing and flying migrants and asylum seekers north in order to spotlight various immigration issues.
Scott L. Hall, USA TODAY
Immigration reform and border enforcement are once again big talking points heading into the presidential election. And the debate on immigration issues isn’t a new conversation.
In the last decade, immigration has been a hot topic, but in this election cycle, Americans now believe immigration to be the most important issue facing the United States, a Gallup poll released this week revealed. In recent months, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has been vocal about the border and keeping migrants from crossing over illegally and pushed “Operation Lone Star”— a 2021 initiative by Abbott that sent the Texas National Guard and Texas Department of Public Safety to the southern border to “fill the dangerous gaps created by the Biden Administration’s refusal to secure the border.”
The operation has also bused and flown more than 100,000 migrants from the Texas border to Washington, D.C., New York, Chicago, Denver, Philadelphia, and Los Angeles. All deemed sanctuary cities.
These larger metropolitan areas are just a handful of 100s of communities, and even some states, that have identified themselves as sanctuary areas for migrants in the United States. There are several communities in Michigan as well that have identified themselves as sanctuary areas as well.
What is a sanctuary city?
Sanctuary city is a common term now, but a sanctuary area can be classified as a city, county, or state in America that doesn’t fully comply with federal immigration enforcement efforts. Usually, this is done through municipal laws that protect undocumented immigrants from deportation or prosecution, despite federal immigration law.
Practices and laws that are in place allow agencies to refuse, or prohibit, compliance with ICE detainers and impose unreasonable conditions on detainer acceptance. Some also deny ICE access to interview incarcerated aliens and stop immigration enforcement from impeding communication or information exchanges between their personnel and federal immigration officers, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.
Is Michigan a sanctuary state?
No, Michigan is not a sanctuary state, but it does have a city and several counties that are designated as sanctuary areas, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.
What are Michigan’s sanctuary cities and counties?
- Lansing: Is the only city in Michigan that is a sanctuary city.
- Ingham County
- Kalamazoo County
- Kent County
- Wayne County
Detroit and Ann Arbor are often referred to as sanctuary cities, though they haven’t officially declared themselves as such. Detroit has multiple times proclaimed itself a “Welcoming City,” according to City Council’s Legislative Policy Division. Both cities have policies in place that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities and generally bar police from inquiring about individuals’ immigration status or engaging in profiling based on ethnicity or religion.
Migrants in Michigan
While Michigan may not be getting an influx of migrants shipped from Texas, the communities in the state are no strangers to people looking to start their lives in the U.S. here.
In 2016, Michigan was the fourth largest state for refugee resettlement, taking in more than 30,000 arrivals over the previous decade, Global Detroit reported.
Undocumented immigrants accounted for 1.2% of Michigan’s population as of 2021, per Pew Research Center analysis.
Michigan
Michigan auditor general to look into child care program performance
The challenge of low wages for child care workers in Michigan
Child care workers in Michigan, including passionate educators like Carla Brown, face low wages and limited benefits despite their crucial role in child development.
Michigan’s auditor general plans to review the state’s child care subsidy program, and among the factors for the decision is a request for an audit from State Senate Republican Leader Aric Nesbitt.
Nesbitt, who is running for governor, called for an audit of the program after Trump administration claims of widespread child care subsidy fraud in Minnesota and across the nation.
Nesbitt’s request is one of several factors that led the auditor general to put the program on its 2026 docket, which includes around 30 other programs. Other factors that inform this kind of decision include whether there’s available staff to carry out the audit, the program’s audit history and general public interest in the program, said Kelly Miller, Office of the Auditor General spokesperson, in an email.
The specifics of what the audit will cover are not yet known, since auditors have to first identify areas of concern or improvement before figuring out what the scope of the evaluation will look like, Miller wrote.
The auditor general carries out annual financial audits on each major state subsidy program using federal dollars, but given its limited time and resource, the office must be selective in which programs receive performance audits.
Financial audits make sure a program is complying with federal requirements tied to federal dollars, performance audits put a magnifying glass to some specific program element, often related to policies and procedures. Past Michigan child care subsidy performance audits have identified problems including a lack of systems to track the accuracy of payments to child care providers and insufficient background vetting of licensed providers.
The last performance audit of Michigan’s child care subsidy system came out in November 2025, though it didn’t focus on evaluating how well the program manages fraud and improper payments. Instead, it focused on an issue that continues to come up consistently for providers and families utilizing the program: poor communication practices by the state’s early childhood agency, MiLEAP, which administers the program, that leave child care providers and parents stranded when payments are late or kids can’t get turned onto the subsidy.
MiLEAP did not respond to requests for comment but department spokesperson Aundreana Jones-Poole said in a statement earlier this month that “MiLEAP has a zero-tolerance policy for fraud or abuse of funds meant to benefit Michigan families.”
Sen. Nesbitt, R-Porter Township, said in a press release that he welcomed the audit, calling it “good news for legitimate, law-abiding child care providers and the many families who struggle to find affordable childcare throughout our state. It’s time to root out waste, fraud and abuse and hold our state agencies accountable for everyone who is fighting to make it in Michigan.”
Auditor general investigations are two of several state oversight measures intended to track a program’s integrity and curb potential program fraud: MiLEAP randomly audits licensed providers across Michigan to check time and attendance records and make sure billing is accurate and the Inspector General for the Michigan Department for Health and Human Services carries out fraud investigations each year.
The federal government’s Office of Child Care also audits every state’s subsidy program. States are grouped in cohorts that are evaluated in 3-year cycles. Michigan’s next federal audit is also coming up in March 2026, according to the Early Childhood Investment Corporation, a Michigan-based early childhood nonprofit. Federal audits look at how programs tackle fraud and address subsidy payment errors.
MiLEAP did not respond to questions about how the department will prepare for both a state and federal audit falling around the same time.
Beki San Martin is a fellow at the Detroit Free Press who covers child care, early childhood education and other issues that affect the lives of children ages 5 and under and their families in metro Detroit and across Michigan. Contact her at rsanmartin@freepress.com.
This fellowship is supported by the Bainum Family Foundation. The Free Press retains editorial control of this work.
Michigan
Michigan native Erik Jones embraces change with decade of Cup Series
Watch CBS News
Michigan
Game 20: Nebraska at Michigan Recap | UM Hoops.com
In a game Michigan had to have by any means, it found a way. The Wolverines trailed for over 36 minutes at home on Tuesday night, gave up 50 points in the first half, and made just one of their final 15 3-point attempts. Somehow, Michigan won anyway, knocking off No. 5 Nebraska to keep its Big Ten title hopes healthy.
The Wolverines survived the barrage of early threes and outlasted the undermanned Huskers, recording stops on eight of the final nine possessions of the game to pull away with a game-winning 6-0 run down the stretch.
Writing this recap, I can’t help but feel like I’m on the other side of a script that I’ve written routinely on this site over the years. We’ve all seen this story before: a five-out team spreads out a bigger, more talented team and makes them look like they’ve never played basketball before with a barrage of threes and cutting layups.
In the end, the threes go cold, and the bigger team wins the game by overwhelming its opponent in areas that are impossible to outscheme: offensive rebounds, defense, and free throws.
When John Beilein’s teams lost, this is usually what it looked like. Tonight, Michigan wore the other shoe.
Nebraska played the better game, but Michigan was the bigger, deeper, and more talented team. The Wolverines went to the free-throw line 23 times, knocking down 14 of 17 in the second half, and scored 14 of their 27 second-half points on second-chance opportunities to escape with the crucial home win.
Join the UM Hoops Community
Join the only community dedicated to Michigan basketball
Get ad-free articles, recruiting, advanced stats, member-only discussion, and the most complete Michigan hoops analysis anywhere.
-
Illinois1 week agoIllinois school closings tomorrow: How to check if your school is closed due to extreme cold
-
Pennsylvania3 days agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Sports1 week agoMiami star throws punch at Indiana player after national championship loss
-
Science1 week agoContributor: New food pyramid is a recipe for health disasters
-
Technology1 week agoRing claims it’s not giving ICE access to its cameras
-
Science1 week agoFed up with perimenopause or menopause? The We Do Not Care Club is here for you
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review: In ‘Mercy,’ Chris Pratt is on trial with an artificial intelligence judge
-
Politics4 days agoTrump’s playbook falters in crisis response to Minneapolis shooting