Connect with us

Arkansas

Missouri basketball at Arkansas: Prediction, scouting report

Published

on

Missouri basketball at Arkansas: Prediction, scouting report


For Missouri basketball, a victory on Saturday would be sweet, as it would be its first victory in the Southeastern Conference and redemption over an old rival.

The Tigers (8-18, 0-13) will take on Arkansas (13-13, 4-9) at Bud Walton Arena in Fayetteville. The teams previously faced off on Jan. 31 at Mizzou Arena, where the Razorbacks, from start to finish, dominated the Tigers in a 91-84 victory, leading by as much as 23.

More: 4 things that will be at the top of the new Missouri athletic director’s to-do list

Advertisement

More: Why did Desiree Reed-Franocis leave Missouri AD job for Arizona? ‘Opportunity to come home’

On Tuesday, Missouri led and kept it close against No. 5 Tennessee before falling 72-67 for its 13th consecutive loss in the SEC.

Since playing the Tigers, Arkansas is 2-3 in February. The Razorbacks, led by head coach Eric Musselman, defeated Georgia but also fell to LSU, Tennessee, and Mississippi State. Most recently, Arkansas won 78-71 at Texas A&M on Tuesday.

Ahead of Saturday’s matchup (11 a.m., ESPN2), here are three things to keep an eye out for as the Tigers seek their first league victory against Arkansas.

Advertisement

Mabor Majak vs. Mekhi Mitchell

If Missouri wants to come away victorious on Saturday, it can’t let Makhi Mitchell flourish again. In the previous matchup, the 6-foot-10 forward scored a season-high 19 points against the Tigers. Since then, he’s topped that mark twice, each in the past two games, tallying 21 and 22 points at Mississippi State and Texas A&M. 

Protecting inside the arc will be a big test for the Tigers, and Dennis Gates will likely have to depend on center Mabor Majak. The 7-foot-2 post player from Juba, South Sudan, played a season-high 22 minutes against Tennessee, recording four defensive rebounds. 

“He’s very unselfish,” Dennis Gates said. “He’s given his body, he’s given whatever it is. It’s not even about offense. He’s out there fighting and giving us the emotional boost that most leaders do. He can do it silently, he can do it through action, and it can be the smallest things that stand out. He’s very connected to all of his teammates.”

Sean East II’s hot streak is key this time around against the Razorbacks

Advertisement

Fueling Missouri’s fight in its previous two games has been a resurgence of Sean East II. The graduate point guard has tallied 49 combined points and generated 23 attempts at the free throw line. 

East scored just 11 points in the Tigers first matchup against Arkansas before suffering a knee contusion at Vanderbilt, forcing him to miss the following two games, which MU lost by a combined 43 points. The Tigers can’t afford a no-show from their best scorer, and the past week has shown that he isn’t slowing down anytime soon.

Can Missouri keep its focused on defense?

Arkansas’ 91 points on Jan. 31 is the second-most allowed by Missouri in SEC play. 

Fast forward to Tuesday, and Missouri forced a top-50 scoring offense in Tennessee to miss its first 11 shots. The Volunteers’ offensive efficiency rating heading into their matchup with the Tigers ranked 16th in the nation according to KenPom.com.

Advertisement

“We said if our offense wasn’t there, that the defense had to pick up, it’s got to multiply. If we weren’t making shots, we weren’t going to let them make shots,” Missouri’s Noah Carter said Tuesday. “And that’s kind of what our mindset was, and it wasn’t expected to go that long. I think the score was 2-1 at the first media [timeout] and a little bit after that, but it was about getting our defense together, and if we’re not scoring, we can’t let them score.”

The Razorbacks’ offensive efficiency rating ranks 129th in the nation at 108.7. Remaining aggressive and dialed in on the defensive end is something worth watching.

Score Prediction

Arkansas 73, Missouri 67: Missouri has played better since the last time it faced the Razorbacks with inspiring efforts against Mississippi and Tennessee. But the Tigers are just 2-14 all-time at Bud Walton Arena and haven’t won in the opposing gym since Nov. 28.



Source link

Advertisement

Arkansas

End-of-year ATLAS test scores show improvements but most Arkansas students still not proficient | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

End-of-year ATLAS test scores show improvements but most Arkansas students still not proficient | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


Arkansas students’ end-of-year test scores improved across grade levels and subject areas, state officials said Thurday, but most students still aren’t meeting performance targets.

Results from the Arkansas Teaching and Learning Assessment System exam, known as ATLAS, showed students’ overall proficiency rose from 36.9% in 2025 to 42.2% in 2026, according to an executive summary of the scores.

The number of students performing at the lowest level across all subjects declined from 27.3% in 2025 to 23.1% in 2026, according to the report.

Advertisement

This is only the third year that Arkansas has used the ATLAS test, limiting direct comparisons to years before 2024. State Education Secretary Jacob Oliva has said the state shifted to ATLAS from its previous end-of-year test, the ACT Aspire, to better align measurement of student performance with Arkansas’ academic standards.

“The 2026 ATLAS exam scores confirm what we’re hearing from educators across the Natural State: Arkansas LEARNS is working and students across Arkansas are doing better because of it,” Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a news release.

Sanders’ signature legislative package on education, the LEARNS Act, mandated the state move to a new student test and adopt a new grading system for schools and districts. The state offers grants for districts to administer high-impact tutoring, and students who struggle to read can also qualify for supplemental literacy tutoring.

Under LEARNS, third grade students who don’t read at grade level will be held back, though school districts also may give students good-cause exemptions from the requirement. Early numbers suggest that large numbers of third graders in some districts will be promoted to fourth grade even though they fell short of the literacy standards.

LEARNS also includes the Educational Freedom Account program, which significantly expanded state taxpayer funding of student tuition and other costs related to private schools and homeschooling. Over 44,000 students received an Educational Freedom Account in the 2025-26 school year, the first year participation was open to all K-12 students.

Advertisement

Participants in the school choice program are not required to take the ATLAS but still must take a national, norm-referenced test each year.

In the 2024-25 school year, Arkansas students showed slight increases in subject mastery overall, with the most notable increases in math and science.

The results come roughly a month after the release of the 2026 Education Scorecard, a cross-state analysis that says schools across the nation — including Arkansas — are in the midst of a “learning recession” that began in 2013. Math and reading performance declined over the past decade in most places, according to that report. Though the longer-term trend is downward nationally, the Education Scorecard says student performance has partly rebounded from the damage done by COVID-19.

As of 2024, Arkansas’ math and reading scores continued to lag national averages on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a test often called the Nation’s Report Card.

Students who take ATLAS are classified into one of four performance levels, with level four being the highest. Level three indicates mastery of grade-level content, according to the report released Thursday. It describes each level as follows:

Advertisement

Level 4: Students demonstrate an advanced understanding of the knowledge and skills required of the grade-level standards. These students are on track for career and college, and demonstrate readiness for advanced and accelerated content at the next grade/course.

Level 3: Students demonstrate a proficient understanding of knowledge and skills and show mastery of grade-level standards. These students are on track for career and college, and demonstrate readiness for content at the next grade/course.

Level 2: Students demonstrate a basic understanding of knowledge and skills required of the grade-level standards and personalized support and intervention may be needed to access content taught in the next grade/course.

Level 1: Students demonstrate limited understanding of knowledge and skills required of the grade-level standards and will require significant support/scaffolding and intervention to access content taught at the next grade/course.

Check back for updates.

Advertisement

With support from the ADG Community Journalism Project, LEARNS reporter Josh Snyder covers the impact of the law on the K-12 education system across the state, and its effect on teachers, students, parents and communities. The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette maintains full editorial control over this article and all other coverage. View all LEARNS Act coverage at arkansasonline.com/learns



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arkansas

Arkansas pathology lab, owners to pay $30M to settle kickback allegations

Published

on

Arkansas pathology lab, owners to pay M to settle kickback allegations


A North Little Rock pathology lab and several of its current and former owners are paying $30 million to settle federal allegations that the company used unlawful kickbacks and ordered testing that wasn’t medically necessary.

Advanced Pathology Solutions PLLC, formerly known as Advanced Pathology Solutions LLC, and its management services organization, APS MSO LLC — together referred to as APS — agreed to the settlement with the United States. The agreement also includes current and former owners Kevin Hannah, Donell Burkett and Daniel Hunter Pledger.

“Healthcare referrals must be based on the best decision for patients, not the influence of kickbacks,” said Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “This settlement demonstrates the Department’s commitment to hold accountable both corporations and individuals who profit from improper kickback arrangements and who burden federal healthcare programs with claims for medically unnecessary services.”

The settlement resolves allegations laid out in a federal complaint filed April 8 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. The United States alleged that from 2015 through July 2022, APS and its owners violated the False Claims Act by providing unlawful kickbacks to gastroenterology practices to induce referrals of pathology testing to APS, resulting in false claims to federal health care programs.

Advertisement

According to the complaint, APS and its owners developed a business model that involved setting up and managing limited-purpose laboratories — known as “lean labs” — inside gastroenterology practices nationwide. Those practices could bill for preparing and staining biopsy specimen slides, while the slides were then shipped to APS’s lab in North Little Rock for pathologist interpretation and review. Federal officials alleged that in exchange for various benefits furnished by APS, the gastroenterology practices agreed to exclusively refer their patients to APS, creating improper financial relationships that amounted to kickbacks.

“Fraud against the taxpayer is rampant and insidious and when discovered must be held accountable. Engineering kickbacks to result in unnecessary medical testing which is then paid for by the United States taxpayer is unacceptable and once discovered as with APS, will result in lengthy investigation and review, and ultimately a significant settlement amount as demonstrated by this settlement,” said U.S. Attorney Jonathan D. Ross for the Eastern District of Arkansas. “Our office will continue to work with Main Justice to detect and deter any similar schemes and then hold the wrongdoers accountable under the law.”

The United States also alleged APS and its owners submitted — and caused the submission of — claims to federal health care programs for unnecessary testing. Specifically, the government said APS directed lean lab personnel to automatically order certain special tests, called “special stains,” before a pathologist reviewed a routine test, a hematoxylin and eosin stain, to determine whether additional testing was needed. The complaint alleged the protocol led to special stains that were not medically reasonable and necessary and were ineligible for Medicare coverage or reimbursement. In many cases, the government said APS also ordered additional “confirmatory” immunohistochemical testing that was not medically necessary.

“Kickbacks and medically unnecessary testing don’t just violate the law — they endanger patients and drain critical federal health care funds,” said Acting Deputy Inspector General for Investigations Scott J. Lampert of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. “Schemes like this erode trust in the health care system and divert resources away from those who truly need care. HHSOIG will move swiftly and aggressively with our law enforcement partners to uncover these abuses and hold every responsible party accountable.”

In addition to the allegations in the April 8 complaint, the settlement also resolves claims that from Nov. 1, 2018, to Nov. 30, 2020, APS and CEO Kevin Hannah knowingly and willfully provided unlawful kickbacks to Richard Sorgnard through volume-based commission payments to induce referrals for epidermal nerve fiber density testing. The United States contends APS paid Sorgnard 4% of all payments APS collected for ENFD testing he referred, and that the arrangement violated the Anti-Kickback Statute and resulted in false claims under the False Claims Act. Sorgnard previously entered into a settlement with the government to resolve related claims.

Advertisement

“Any entity that participates in health care and reaps illicit profits by taking advantage of and violating the trust given by Medicare and Medicaid programs must be held accountable,” said U.S. Attorney Troy Rivetti for the Western District of Pennsylvania. “This settlement is notice that such illegal conduct simply will not be tolerated.”

As part of the resolution, APS entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. The agreement requires APS to implement auditing and accountability provisions, including a compliance program, training and education requirements, and a review of physician referral relationships.

The complaint followed three lawsuits originally filed under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which allows private parties to sue on behalf of the United States and potentially receive a portion of the recovery. The consolidated cases are United States ex rel. Watkins v. Advanced Pathology Solutions, No. 4:20-cv-1110 (E.D. Ark.); United States ex rel. Aucoin v. Advanced Pathology Solutions, No. 4:21-cv-277 (E.D. Ark.); and United States ex rel. Paulsen v. Advanced Pathology Solutions, LLC, No. 3:22-cv-00652-JPG (E.D. Ark.).

The settlement comes after a $4.75 million settlement reached earlier this year with Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates, a former APS client.

The Justice Department’s Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas are handling the matter, along with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The matter was handled by Fraud Section attorneys Evan Ballan, Jeff McSorley and Kelley Hauser, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jamie Goss Dempsey for the Eastern District of Arkansas, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Skirtich for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

Advertisement

Officials also pointed to broader federal efforts to combat health care fraud, noting that tips about potential fraud, waste, abuse and mismanagement can be reported to HHS at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).



Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

New reporting system available for suspected New World Screwworm cases in Arkansas

Published

on

New reporting system available for suspected New World Screwworm cases in Arkansas


LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – New updates from the Arkansas Department of Agriculture are now giving Arkansas residents an option to take preventative action against New World Screwworm.

Though no detections have been reported in Arkansas, livestock and animal owners can now submit suspected reports of New World Screwworm using the department’s online reporting form.

Users will be able to upload photos and location information. After submission, staff will follow up with instructions for next steps. Suspect cases may also be reported through a veterinarian or by calling the Arkansas Department of Agriculture.

Department officials recommend isolating affected animals and avoid moving any animals off the premises if New World Screwworm is suspected.

Advertisement

The department also updated animal entry requirements in Arkansas, requiring all warm-blooded animals entering the state from an infested state to be accompanied by an Interstate Certificate of Veterinary Inspection dated within seven days of entry.

Officials said the certificate must include the statement: “All animals in shipment were inspected and found free of evidence of NWS infestation.”

The department encourages animal owners to watch for wounds that fail to heal, foul-smelling discharge, tissue damage or visible maggots in or around a wound.

Livestock animals are also encouraged to get a valid Premises Identification Number (PIN). It is required for interstate and intrastate animal movement from a New World Screwworm Infested Zone.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending