Entertainment
A live orchestra in an echoey cathedral? Hundreds of mikes? 'Maestro' sound duo is on it
It should have been an easy job for the sound team of “Maestro” — Mahler’s Resurrection Symphony played in England’s Ely Cathedral. Normally they would pre-record the music and run playback while musicians and conductor Leonard Bernstein (as played by Bradley Cooper), mime along. But that’s not how Cooper, also the co-writer and director of the film, wanted it. He’d been working on conducting for six years and felt the performance would be more authentic if he were to actually conduct the piece.
On-set sound mixer Steven Morrow recalls it as a terrifying proposition — miking 200 chorus and orchestra members performing live in an echoey cathedral. So, he huddled with re-recording mixer Tom Ozanich, with whom he’d also worked on Cooper’s “A Star Is Born.” On that film they recorded all the singing live, but this was different.
“With vocals it’s harder to fake,” notes Morrow. “With music you can fake it a little bit. But the overall experience with this performance and the orchestra playing this music, it jumps off the screen because it is real. And the whole movie is played that way where it’s real. If you cheat it, you lose some of that.”
They had three days to get it. In addition to their own Dolby Atmos mikes on timpani, horns and opera soloists, they hired Classic Sounds of London, who have miked the Ely Cathedral before. Sixteen microphones were set up in all, some suspended from above.
Bradley Cooper conducts as Leonard Bernstein in “Maestro.”
(Jason McDonald / Netflix)
“The first day was a wipeout in the conducting aspect of it,” Ozanich recalls. He is nominated twice this year, for “Maestro” and “The Creator,” bringing his total Oscar nominations to four. “Bradley was really good about having the instinct to know he wasn’t great. And the London Symphony Orchestra is good enough that they ignore him and move on and do their thing. So, he came in and said we’re going to do it again. We’re going to do one long Technocrane shot. And the orchestra came up to him after and said. ‘That was it, you really conducted it.’ So, I think that’s where the decision to go live versus faking it, because he could feel it in his own performance the day before, it wasn’t that great.”
The scene in the film is roughly the take described by Ozanich — a six-minute Technocrane shot on Cooper conducting, intercut with B-roll of musicians and choral members. It’s an uplifting and deceptively simple-seeming reproduction of the original 1973 performance with the camera moving in time with the music.
The movie’s other great challenge came with party scenes, of which there are many. The usual method is to mike the principals and lay in group effects in post. Not on “Maestro.” Group scenes here required everyone to be miked. Cooper had seen a movie Morrow and Ozanich made with Jason Reitman called “The Front Runner,” on which they miked everyone in crowd scenes, and requested the same.
“When you ask people to fake talk, they over-exaggerate when they’re doing it because they’re not actually doing it,” notes Morrow. With so many people talking at once, they bleed into each other’s mikes, creating headaches for him. “Other mikes are picking up somebody and it does some weird things to the sound. So, you have to be able to dodge around that stuff. And the group and effects crowd in there help to fill it in and give us some layers of depth.”
“It’s an avalanche of audio,” laments Ozanich. “It’s a ton of dialogue because you’re locked into it and when you cut back and forth between takes, there’s going to be jumps.”
The audio was orchestrated throughout, as with a symphony, including every detail from Cooper’s rhythmic delivery of lines (which he kept up between takes), to the birdsong in the background of a bucolic setting, to a sudden gust of wind. Such keen attention to craft is part of what garnered the film seven Oscar nominations in all, including best picture and lead actor for Cooper.
“He’s very interested in collaboration as opposed to workers doing their job,” Ozanich says of Cooper. “He wants you to have an opinion, have some input and partake in it. I watched him learn very rapidly on ‘A Star Is Born.’ You could tell he was becoming a student of sound. He was trying to understand it.”
Both Ozanich and Morrow were nominated for “A Star Is Born,” and Ozanich received another for “The Joker.” They’re currently working together on “Joker: Folie à Deux,” and Morrow is working on “Juror #2,” reuniting with Clint Eastwood, with whom he’d worked with on 2018’s “The Mule.”
“We run a tight set to make sure we’re not wasting valuable time,” he says of working with the 93-year-old icon. “Everybody is on the same page trying to get what he wants.” As for the legendary Eastwood one-take method, he says, “I’ve always heard that, but working with him, he’ll be happy to take another one or two. And if the actors said, can I get another one? No problem at all. He gives it to them. But for the most part, we don’t do many takes. Clint’s very focused on what he wants.”
For Ozanich, the recognition from his peers that comes with a nomination is an award in itself. “There are so many great artists and people in this business that inspired me and I look up to the work they did. And to have those people say, ‘Whoa, you did a really great job on this!’ That’s the award. ‘Maestro’ is a very unique sound job and you never quite know if people are going to get it, or appreciate it for what it is. So, I think that would be the biggest thing. Wow, they got it.”
Morrow’s first nomination was for “La La Land.” “When we lost, I felt devastated for weeks because you figure that’s it, I’m never going to get nominated again. Then it happens a few more times and now, I don’t know, you’d have to ask me after the win, if we win. But I feel like it’s a special experience to be included in the discussion of what people found great for the year. For me, that’s it. You look at a guy like Bradley who’s been nominated 12 times, hasn’t won. I don’t think that lessens the amount of sacrifice he did to get there. I think that’s the same for all of us. But you hope the producers that usually hire you don’t think all of a sudden you’re twice the price, because you’d never get hired again.”
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?
Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.
movie review
HOPPERS
Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.
“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine.
Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”
Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”
What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence.
Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.
What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”
Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity.
The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared.
So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.
From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out.
Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power.
Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”
That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities.
No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression.
Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it.
But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.
“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.
Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.
Entertainment
Ulysses Jenkins, Los Angeles artist and pioneer of Black experimental video, dies at 79
Ulysses Jenkins, the pioneering Los Angeles-born video artist whose avant-garde compositions embodied Black experimentalism, has died. He was 79.
Jenkins’ death was confirmed by his alma mater Otis College, where he studied under renowned painter and printmaker Charles White in the late 1970s and returned as an instructor years later. The Los Angeles art and design school shared a statement from the Charles White Archive, which said, “Jenkins had a profound impact on contemporary art and media practices.”
“A trailblazing figure in Black experimental video, he was widely recognized for works that used image, sound, and cultural iconography to examine representation, race, gender, ritual, history, and power,” the statement said.
A self-proclaimed “griot,” Jenkins throughout his decades-spanning career maintained an art practice grounded in the tradition of those West African oral historians who came before him. Through archival documentaries like “The Nomadics” and surrealist murals like “1848: Bandaide,” he leveraged alternative media to challenge Eurocentric representations of Black Americans in popular culture.
He was both an artist and a storyteller who sought to “reassert the history and the culture,” he told The Times in 2022. That year, the Hammer Museum presented Jenkins’ first major retrospective, “Ulysses Jenkins: Without Your Interpretation.”
“Early video art was about the problems with the media that we are still having today: the notions of truth,” Jenkins said. “To that extent, early video art was a construct that was anti-media … a critical analysis of the media that we were viewing every night.”
Born in 1946 to Los Angeles transplants from the South, Jenkins was ambivalent about the city, which offered his parents some refuge from the blatant systemic racism they encountered in their hometowns, but housed an entertainment industry that had long perpetuated anti-Black sentiment.
“What Hollywood represents, especially in my work, is the classic plantation mentality,” Jenkins told The Times in 1986. “Although people aren’t necessarily enslaved by it, people enslave themselves to it because they’re told how fantastic it is to help manifest these illusions for a corporate sponsor.”
Jenkins, who participated in a group of artists committed to spontaneous action called Studio Z, was naturally drawn to video art over Hollywood filmmaking. “I can address any issue and I don’t have to wait for [the studios’] big OK. I thought this was a land of freedom, and video allows me that freedom and opportunity that I can create for myself and at least feel that part of being an American,” he said.
Jenkins went on to deconstruct Hollywood’s vision of the Black diaspora in experimental video compositions including “Mass of Images,” which incorporates clips from D.W. Griffith’s notoriously racist “The Birth of a Nation,” and “Two-Tone Transfer,” which depicts, in Jenkins’ words, a “dreamscape in which the dreamer awakens to a visitation of three minstrels who tell the story of the development of African American stereotypes in the American entertainment industry.”
Jenkins’ legacy is not only artistic but institutional, with the luminary having held teaching appointments at UCSD and UCI, where he co-founded the digital filmmaking minor with fellow Southern California-based artists Bruce Yonemoto and Bryan Jackson.
As artist and educator Suzanne Lacy penned in her social media tribute to Jenkins, which showed him speaking to students at REDCAT in L.A., “he has been an important part of our histories here in Southern California as video and performance artists evolved their practices.”
Movie Reviews
Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar
4/5 stars
Bounding into cinemas just in time for spring, the latest Pixar animation is a pleasingly charming tale of man vs nature, with a bit of crazy robot tech thrown in.
The star of Hoppers is Mabel Tanaka (voiced by Piper Curda), a young animal-lover leading a one-girl protest over a freeway being built through the tranquil countryside near her hometown of Beaverton.
Because the freeway is the pet project of the town’s popular mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who is vying for re-election, Mabel’s protests fall on deaf ears.
Everything changes when she stumbles upon top-secret research by her biology professor, Dr Sam Fairfax (Kathy Najimy), that allows for the human consciousness to be linked to robotic animals. This lets users get up close and personal with other species.
-
World5 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts5 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO5 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
News1 week agoWorld reacts as US top court limits Trump’s tariff powers