Connect with us

Business

Russell Simmons sued for defamation by former Def Jam executive who accused him of sexual assault

Published

on

Russell Simmons sued for defamation by former Def Jam executive who accused him of sexual assault

Hip-hop impresario and entrepreneur Russell Simmons is being sued for defamation by Drew Dixon, a former Def Jam Recordings executive who also has accused Simmons of sexual assault and harassment during her time at the label in the 1990s.

The complaint, filed Thursday in New York Supreme Court, claims that last December Simmons “subjected Ms. Dixon to public ridicule, contempt, and disgrace by, among other things, calling Ms. Dixon a liar in published statements with the malicious intent of discrediting and further damaging Ms. Dixon worldwide.” The suit further alleges that Simmons has “continued this pattern of defamation” through January of this year.

A representative for Simmons could not immediately be reached for comment. Simmons has previously denied Dixon’s and other accusers’ allegations.

It was the second lawsuit filed against Simmons this week.

On Tuesday, another woman, identified as a Jane Doe, sued Russell for rape in a separate complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The accuser, who said she worked as a senior music executive at Def Jam, alleged that she was “sexually harassed, assaulted, sexually battered, and raped” by Simmons when she worked at the label during the 1990s.

Advertisement

“I have never engaged in nonconsensual sex. I would not, did not, and never will,” said Simmons in a statement to The Times in regards to the Jane Doe suit. A representative for Simmons said that the music mogul “has voluntarily taken numerous lie detector tests all of which support his statement.”

In 1994, Dixon, then 23, began working at Def Jam as director of A&R (artists and repertoire), in what she called “her dream job,” according to the suit.

At the label, Dixon garnered immediate success, conceiving and spearheading chart-topping songs such as “I’ll Be There for You — You’re All I Need” by Method Man, featuring Mary J. Blige.

But Dixon claims she was subjected to “persistent, nightmarish sexual harassment that culminated in a violent sexual assault by the man she once admired,” Simmons, her boss and co-founder of Def Jam.

Simmons “fostered a chaotic workplace environment where he thrived on the sexual exploitation of individuals who were dependent on access to his opinion and approval in order to perform their jobs and succeed in their careers,” states the complaint.

Advertisement

According to her suit, Dixon claims Simmons’ abuse began as soon as she started working at the label.

Dixon alleges that despite constantly rebuffing his alleged advances, Simmons “routinely attempted to grope her and kiss her.” Once he “forcibly pushed” her into a broom closet at a restaurant where he tried to kiss her, the suit says. Dixon alleges that Simmons “regularly exposed his erect penis” and “talked about how much she turned him on.”

Then she alleges that in 1995, Simmons raped her in his Manhattan apartment after she ran into him on the street. Dixon told him she was going to an ATM and he “ordered her into his car.” Once they arrived at his apartment, she said he asked her to come upstairs to listen to a new CD.

However, once inside his apartment, when Dixon opened the CD tray, she found it was empty. “Moments later Mr. Simmons grabbed Ms. Dixon from behind. He was naked except for a condom. He proceeded to pin her down on the bed and violently rape her,” according to the suit.

After the alleged assault, Dixon resigned from Def Jam.

Advertisement

According to Dixon’s complaint, Simmons has engaged in a “concerted and malicious campaign to discredit” her “and to so damage her reputation that Ms. Dixon’s factual reporting of what he did to her would not be credited.”

Dixon cites several statements Simmons made in a podcast interview with journalist Graham Bensinger that she claims reference her own public comments concerning her abuse allegations.

For instance, during the podcast, Simmons said, “Yeah, [rape is] a serious word, but I think they’ve changed the meaning,” according to the complaint.

“Ms. Dixon has taken enough abuse,” said Dixon’s lawyer Sigrid McCawley in a statement. “Not only was she violently raped by Russell Simmons — profoundly disrupting her personal and professional life — but after she tried to move forward and heal, he then further abused her by publicly proclaiming that she lied about the rape in search of ‘fame.’ Mr. Simmons has used his public platform to re-traumatize and terrorize Ms. Dixon, and the time has now come to hold him accountable for his defamatory statements and to end this cycle of abuse.”

Last November Dixon filed suit against music executive Antonio “L.A.” Reid for sexual assault and harassment, under the Adult Survivors Act.

Advertisement

After Dixon left Def Jam, she went to Arista, where she was vice president of A&R. Reid ran Arista and Epic Records.

In the suit, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, Dixon alleges that Reid “sexually harassed Ms. Dixon and refused to allow her to succeed unless she acquiesced to his demand to be alone and in close proximity to her, where he would create the opportunity to sexually assault her on two separate occasions.”

At the time of the filing, a representative for Reid did not respond to requests for comment.

Dixon first came forward with her abuse allegations against Simmons and Reid in a 2017 New York Times article. She was one of three women who accused Simmons of rape, claiming that he engaged in a pattern of sexual assault and harassment that derailed their careers and damaged their self-confidence.

Three years later, Dixon and other women of color were featured in the documentary “On the Record,” which further detailed abuse claims against Simmons and others in the record industry.

Advertisement

The film premiered at the Sundance Film Festival under a cloud of controversy.

Weeks before Sundance, Oprah Winfrey, one of “On the Record’s” producers, pulled her support from the film and removed her executive producer title from the project. Winfrey asserted that her decision was based on discussions with several individuals who found the film problematic and raised questions about Dixon’s account.

The move quashed the documentary’s distribution deal with Apple TV+. It is currently streaming on HBO Max.

Staff writers August Brown and Alexandra Del Rosario contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Business

Disneyland Resort President Thomas Mazloum named parks chief

Published

on

Disneyland Resort President Thomas Mazloum named parks chief

Disneyland Resort President Thomas Mazloum has been named chairman of Walt Disney Co.’s experiences division, the company said Tuesday.

Mazloum succeeds soon-to-be Disney Chief Executive Josh D’Amaro as the head of the Mouse House’s vital parks portfolio, which has become the economic engine for the Burbank media and entertainment giant. His purview includes Disney’s theme parks, famed Imagineering division, merchandise, cruise line, as well as the Aulani resort and spa in Hawaii.

Jill Estorino will become the head of Disneyland Resort in Anaheim. She previously served as president and managing director of Disney Parks International and oversaw the company’s theme parks and resorts in Europe and Asia.

Estorino and Mazloum will assume their new roles on March 18, the same day as D’Amaro and incoming Disney President and Chief Creative Officer Dana Walden.

“Thomas Mazloum is an exceptional leader with a genuine appreciation for our cast members and a proven track record of delivering growth,” D’Amaro said in a statement. “His focus on service excellence, broad international leadership and strong connection to the creativity that brings our stories to life make him the right leader to guide Disney Experiences into its next chapter.”

Advertisement

Mazloum had been about a year into his tenure at Disneyland. Before that, he was head of Disney Signature Experiences, which includes the cruise line. He was trained in hospitality in Europe.

In his time at Disneyland, Mazloum oversaw the park’s 70th anniversary celebration and recently pledged to eliminate time limitations for park-hopping, which are designed to manage foot traffic at Disneyland and California Adventure.

Mazloum will now oversee a 10-year, $60-billion investment plan for Disney’s overall experiences business, which includes new themed lands in Disneyland Resort and Walt Disney World. At Disneyland, that expansion could result in at least $1.9 billion of development.

The size of that investment indicates how important the parks are to Disney’s bottom line. Last year, the experiences business brought in nearly 57% of the company’s operating income. Maintaining that momentum, as well as fending off competitors such as Universal Studios, is key to Disney’s continued growth.

In his new role, Mazloum will have to keep an eye on “international visitation headwinds” at its U.S.-based parks, which the company has said probably will factor into its earnings for its fiscal second quarter. At Disneyland Resort, that dip was mitigated by the park’s high percentage of California-based visitors.

Advertisement

Times staff writer Todd Martens contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Business

What soaring gas prices mean for California’s EV market

Published

on

What soaring gas prices mean for California’s EV market

It has been a bumpy road for the electric vehicle market as declining federal support and plateauing public interest have eaten away at sales.

But EV sellers could soon receive a boost from an unexpected source: The war in Iran is pushing up gas prices.

As Americans look to save money at the pump, more will consider switching to an electric or hybrid vehicle. Average gas prices in the U.S. have risen nearly 17% since Feb. 28 to reach $3.48 per gallon. In California, the average is $5.20 per gallon.

Electric vehicles are pricier than gasoline-powered cars and charging them isn’t cheap with current electricity prices, but sky-high gas prices can tip the scales for consumers deciding which kind of vehicle to buy next.

“We probably will see an uptick in EV adoption and particularly hybrid adoption” if gas prices stay high, said Sam Abuelsamid, an auto analyst at Telemetry Agency. “The last time we had oil prices top $100 per barrel was early 2022 and that’s when we saw EV sales really start to pick up in the U.S.”

Advertisement

In a 2022 AAA survey, 77% of respondents said saving money on gas was their primary motivator for purchasing an electric vehicle. That year, 25% of survey respondents said they were likely or very likely to purchase an EV.

As oil prices cooled, the number fell to16% in 2025.

In California, annual sales of new light-duty zero-emission vehicles jumped 43% in 2022, according to the state’s Energy Commission. The market share of zero-emission vehicles among all light-duty vehicles sold rose from 12% in 2021 to 19% in 2022.

“Prior to 2022, we didn’t really have EVs available when we had oil price shocks,” Abuelsamid said. “But every time we did, it coincided with a move toward more fuel-efficient vehicles.”

Dealers are anticipating a windfall.

Advertisement

Brian Maas, president of the California New Car Dealers Assn., predicted enthusiasm for EVs will rebound across California if oil prices don’t come down.

“If prior gasoline price spikes are any indication, you tend to see interest in more fuel-efficient vehicles,” he said.

Rising gas prices could be a lifeline for EV makers at a time when federal support for green cars has been declining.

Under President Trump, a federal $7,500 tax incentive for new electric vehicles was eliminated in September, along with a $4,000 incentive for used electric vehicles.

In California, the zero-emission vehicle share of the total new-vehicle market was 22% through the first 10 months of 2025, then dropped sharply to 12% in the last two months of the year, according to the California Auto Outlook.

Advertisement

Meanwhile Tesla, the most popular EV brand in the country, has grappled with an implosion of its reputation with some consumers after its chief executive, Elon Musk, became one of Trump’s most vocal supporters and helped run the controversial Department of Government Efficiency.

Over the last several months, Ford, General Motors and Stellantis have pared back EV ambitions.

Other automakers, including Nissan, announced plans to stop producing their more affordable electric models.

The Trump administration has moved to roll back federal fuel economy standards and revoked California’s permission to implement a ban on new gas-powered car sales by 2035.

David Reichmuth, a researcher with the Clean Transportation program in the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the shift in production plans will affect EV availability, even if demand surges.

Advertisement

That could keep people from switching to cleaner vehicles regardless of higher gas prices.

“This is a transition that we need to make for both public health and to try to slow the damage from global warming, whether or not the price of gasoline is $3 or $5 or $6 a gallon,” he said.

According to Cox Automotive, new EV sales nationally were down 41% in November from a year earlier. Used EV sales were down 14% year over year that month.

To be sure, oil prices can fluctuate wildly in times of uncertainty. It will take time for consumers to decide on new purchases.

Brian Kim, who manages used car sales at Ford of Downtown LA, said he has yet to see a jump in the number of people interested in EVs, hybrids or more fuel-efficient gas-powered engines.

Advertisement

Still, if the price at the pump stays stuck above its current level, it could happen soon.

“Once the gas prices hit six [dollars per gallon] or more and people feel it in their pocket, maybe things will start to change,” he said.

Continue Reading

Business

Nearly 60 gigawatts of U.S. clean power stalled, trade group finds

Published

on

Nearly 60 gigawatts of U.S. clean power stalled, trade group finds

A total of 59 gigawatts of U.S. clean energy projects are facing delays at a time when demand for power from AI data centers is surging, according to a trade group study.

Developers are seeing an average delay of 19 months over issues such as long interconnection times, supply constraints and regulatory barriers, the American Clean Power Assn. said in a quarterly market report.

The backlog is happening despite the growing need for power on grids that are being taxed by energy-hungry data centers and increased manufacturing. The Trump administration has implemented a slew of policies to slow the build-out of solar and wind projects, including delaying approvals on federal lands.

The potential energy generation facing delays is the equivalent of 59 traditional nuclear reactors, enough to power more than 44 million homes simultaneously.

“Current policy instability is beginning to impact investor confidence and negatively impact project timelines at a time when demand is surging,” American Clean Power Chief Policy Officer JC Sandberg said in a statement.

Advertisement

Despite the hurdles, developers were able to bring more than 50 gigawatts of wind, solar and batteries online in 2025, accounting for more than 90% of all new power capacity in the U.S., the report found. Clean power purchase agreements declined 36% in 2025 compared with 2024, signaling that the build-out of clean power in the U.S. could be lower in the 2028 to 2030 time period, according to the report.

Chediak writes for Bloomberg.

Continue Reading

Trending