South-Carolina
Led by Upstate lawmakers, South Carolina a step closer to permitless carry with Senate vote
South Carolina is a step closer to allowing residents to carry firearms without a permit.
On Feb. 1, the state Senate voted 28-15 to approve a House bill deemed “constitutional carry” by proponents. If passed into law, the bill will allow eligible residents of the state to carry firearms, whether openly or concealed, without requiring registration for a state permit or receiving any training.
The bill, H.B. 3594, will return to the House this week for a review of amendments added by senators before it heads to Gov. Henry McMaster’s desk. The legislation was initially introduced in early 2023 by Rep. Bobby Cox, R-Greenville.
Upstate lawmakers were heavily involved in promoting the legislation in both chambers.
Over the past two weeks, the bill was debated in the Senate chambers and largely championed by Sen. Shane Martin, R-Spartanburg, who called the bill’s eventual passage a major victory for Second Amendment rights.
The Senate’s amended version of the bill includes some changes to the House’s original legislation. Senators added graduated penalties for unregistered firearm carriers who violate weapons laws, a requirement for citizens to report stolen guns to law enforcement and an initiative to implement free Concealed Weapon Permit (CWP) training by the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division to encourage gun owners to carry responsibly.
Will SC consider a red flag law? Advocates continue push despite Republican opposition
After some of the more contested debate on the Senate floor, the amended legislation allows businesses owners to retain the right to mark their business as a gun-free zone.
The proposed changes are a departure from the previous legislation passed in 2021 that allows for those 18 or older to own a firearm but requires that individuals be 21 years old to apply for a concealed weapons permit.
Those in opposition to the bill voiced concerns for public safety, specifically for law enforcement.
If signed into law, South Carolina would join 27 other states that have similar permitless carry laws. However, Cox told the Greenville News he is unsure if the House will concur on the revised bill or not.
“A lot of the gun groups are not happy about the amendments that were put into it,” Cox said Monday morning. “The fate of the bill is still up in the air.”
Led by Upstate proponents of “liberty,” here’s what the bill will change to firearm carry law and what’s next
Currently, South Carolina law allows concealed weapon owners to openly carry a handgun if they are at least 21 years old, obtain a permit after taking eight hours of training and pass a background check.
The proposed new law, which will be reviewed by the House this week after the Senate’s passage, would make it so anyone over the age of 18 can possess firearms without needing to register for a permit or receive any training.
The bill loosens restrictions on firearm possession after the passage of the state’s “Open Carry” law in 2021.
Previously: This week in SC politics: House advances ‘Constitutional Carry.’
Last week, Senate Republicans fueled the bill’s support with 27 votes, while 13 Democrats, one Republican and one Independent stood opposed. Sen. Mike Fanning (D-Fairfield) was the sole Democrat to vote for the bill, while three legislators were excused absent.
Proponents of the bill have argued that the Second Amendment negates the need for permit requirements.
Sen. Shane Martin (R-Spartanburg), who asserted these rights are “enshrined” in the Constitution, said the bill was a long-time goal of his during an explanation of the bill last week.
“Since I came into the Senate, I’ve campaigned on this issue, and every election since I’ve campaigned on this,” Martin said. “(People) want the right to exercise their Second Amendment rights without infringement by government.”
Martin denied the bill eliminates the need for CWPs entirely, which can allow people to validly carry a firearm in certain other states.
“Liberty has two parts – freedom and responsibility,” Martin said during introductory remarks for the bill on Wednesday, Jan. 24. “We have the freedom to exercise our rights, but we also have to have the responsibility to exercise those rights. So, anybody that isn’t comfortable or doesn’t know what they need to do with a gun, they need to look in the mirror and check themselves a little bit. But for everybody that knows what they’re doing and is a legal gun owner, they should be able to exercise their Second Amendment rights under the Constitution.”
Rep. Cox sponsored the original version of the bill in the House, which was first read before the House in January 2023.
Cox said the bill will return to the House possibly as early as Wednesday this week, and a debate will take place on whether representatives concur with the Senate’s amendments. If the House doesn’t agree with the changes, members from both chambers will meet in a committee to discuss differences in each version of the bill.
Senate amends legislation to add graduated penalties, optional state CWP training
Senators made several amendments to the House version of the legislation, including free state-sponsored firearm training for citizens, mandated reporting of firearm theft, an age reduction for firearm purchasers and graduated penalties for permitless carriers who commit a crime.
After debate that pitted the individual rights of gun owners and property owners at odds, a section that would allow gun-free zones, such as schools, courts, detention facilities and private businesses, remains intact.
Late Wednesday, an amendment introduced by Sen. Shane Massey, R-Edgefield, and Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Charleston, passed that would mandate SLED to provide free CWP training twice a month in every county. That training would be optional for those wishing to carry, though many Senators broadly agreed that they would prefer those unfamiliar with firearms train.
While Cox said he is “totally in support of” citizens voluntarily training, he objects to another element of the amendment that increases graduated penalties for permitless firearm carriers who commit a crime, but not for CWP holders.
“It gives more penalties to someone who doesn’t have a CWP if they commit a crime, so it almost creates two classes of criminals,” Cox told the News. “I don’t like that amendment. I would like to kind of unify it. A crime’s a crime.”
Under current state penalties, the first offense for a concealed weapons violation is a misdemeanor with a fine of $1000 or up to a year in prison. Massey’s amendment added a second offense misdemeanor penalty carrying a sentence of up to three years, and a felony conviction with up to five years imprisonment for third and subsequent offenses.
In post on X Thursday evening, Governor Henry McMaster called the additional penalties a “huge step toward closing the ‘revolving door’ on career repeat criminals.”
An amendment introduced by Sen. Tameika Isaac Devine, D-Richland, established that civilians would have a duty to report the theft of their guns to their local law enforcement agency.
The Senate also reduced the age of handgun carry from 21 to 18, a change Cox says he supports.
Near the end of session Thursday, Sen. Mia McLeod, I-Richland, lamented her fear of the state turning into the “wild, wild west” with the bill’s passage.
Opponents of the bill cite public safety concerns for law enforcement, private citizens
Much debate centered around concerns that permitless carry poses a threat to public safety, and particularly law enforcement.
Sen. Luke Rankin, R-Horry, was the sole Republican to vote against the bill. Rankin cited concerns by law enforcement and questioned whether incentivizing handgun training, rather than requiring it, would be effective.
“I pray that everyone who picks up a gun (is motivated to train),” Rankin said during his remarks on the bill Thursday, shortly before it passed. “To all the CWP holders out there, God bless you for the training.”
According to CWP data from SLED, almost 3,000 permits were denied in 2023 and 1,605 permits were revoked. At the end of 2023, over half a million South Carolinians had an active CWP.
At a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing in April 2023, several local police chiefs voiced their objections to the bill. Rankin cited the testimony of chiefs from the cities of Conway and Myrtle Beach, both in his district, during debate.
City of Anderson Police Chief Jim Stewart also spoke at the April hearing.
“I believe there is a need for some type of training for safety reasons,” Stewart said. “We’ve seen law enforcement officers over the years that are in this position, and they’re put in that position and they freeze up. I would hate to see someone with no training whatsoever period enter a situation where their own weapon could be used against them.”
Some legislators also voiced concern that the legislation would put guns in the hands of those breaking the law.
“To give law abiding citizens and ruthless criminals equal access to guns…is senseless and reckless,” McLeod said.
‘We have to make this debate personal:’ Greenville advocates talk gun violence awareness
Advocacy groups against gun violence, like Moms Demand Action, have also consistently spoken out against the bill citing concerns for public safety. On Thursday, Devine thanked the group for showing up “every single day” of debate.
In response to Martin’s explanation of the bill, Devine also referenced national gun theft from vehicles data that put Greenville in the top 10 of cities analyzed at a rate of 141.7 per 100,000 people. Columbia and North Charleston placed third and fourth, respectively, and Charleston was also within the top 20.
According to four-year estimates of mortality data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from 2018 to 2021, 1,044 people die on average each year in South Carolina from gun violence.
Data directly from the CDC from 2021, the most recent available, shows South Carolina had a firearm mortality rate of 22.4 per 100,000 people, the 11th highest rate in the country.
Chalmers Rogland covers public safety for the Spartanburg Herald-Journal and USA Today Network. Reach him via email at crogland@gannett.com.
South-Carolina
Nancy Mace’s foul-mouthed airport tirades roil race for South Carolina governorship as rival slams ‘spoiled brat’
New disclosures of a foul-mouthed tirade by Rep. Nancy Mace in the Charleston airport have roiled the South Carolina governor’s race and ignited angry accusations between the lawmaker and one of her competitors in the Republican primary.
Her rival, state AG Alan Wilson, called Mace a “spoiled brat” who treats cops like “servants,” at a time when the two of them are furiously competing for support from voters – and President Trump.
Mace back in August called herself “Trump in high heels” and acknowledged “I would really like his support for governor.” So far, Trump hasn’t given it – to anybody.
Mace this week slammed an internal Charleston Airport Authority investigation that probed her profanity-laced “spectacle” Oct. 30, when Mace chewed out police officers and TSA agents over expedited security for her outbound flight, after a planned VIP escort fell through.
New details are still coming to light – including an earlier incident in April where Mace allegedly blew up at agents who wouldn’t let her bring a family member through expedited security, according to the investigation report.
“This is the only airport that gives me s–t,” she complained, according to one of the numerous law enforcement officers interviewed as part of the probe.
The investigative report was obtained by The Post through a public documents request.
One interviewed TSA agent quotes Mace as telling a cop following the botched Oct. 30 escort for her arrival at an airport gate, “I’m sick of your s–t, I’m tired of having to wait.”
Another officer, an explosives tech, described Mace as being “very nasty, very rude.” She said she could hear Mace calling police officers “f–king idiots” and “f–king incompetent” and stating that she was a “f–king representative.”
Yet the airport was “not busy at all” at the time of the incident, the officer said.
A TSA agent said during the interaction Mace “literally was on that phone talking and texting her life away” as well as “saying rude things,” according to the investigative report.
One TSA officer who had been at the airport 23 years told investigators “every VIP or whomever, dignitary, that we’ve been across and had to deal with, we never, never had this problem.”
Mace hired an attorney and threatened weeks ago to sue the airport over the October incident, but has yet to do so.
The report revealed the April confrontation when agents wouldn’t let Mace bring a family member through expedited security. TSA later let her take family members with her when she got screened.
“I thought that the way she acted showed a sense of entitlement – [that] she is entitled to special protection, she is entitled to special treatment. When she doesn’t get special treatment, she throws a tantrum. To me that harkens back to a child not getting their way,” Wilson told The Post in an interview.
“These are public servants, not personal servants,” he said of law enforcement at the airport.
Mace told CNN in an interview this week the report had been “falsified,” without providing evidence. In response to Wilson’s “brat” comment, she wrote: “Imagine being ‘Attorney General’ and flying 500 miles for the sole purpose of dismissing death threats against a single mom.”
She told The Post she has received numerous credible death threats, and said on Friday a judge denied bond to a man accused of making online threats against her. She said during the April incident TSA had violated its own policy allowing federal officials to bring a guest and separated her from her child.
Mace has been taking her case to the airwaves in a week where she trashed the House Republican leadership in a Washington Post op-ed.
A consultant to Mace’s campaign, Austin McCubbin, resigned Dec. 1, accusing her of turning her back on MAGA and trying to “hug the political cactus that is the [Sen.] Rand Paul [and Rep.] Thomas Massie wing of the Party.”
South-Carolina
A Stronger Rail Network Is a Win for South Carolina’s Economy – FITSNews
“The combined rail system would offer the reliability our business community has been asking for…”
by NATHAN BALLENTINE
***
For as long as I’ve served in the South Carolina House, I’ve believed that strong infrastructure is the backbone of a strong economy. Whether talking about roads, bridges, broadband, or freight mobility, our ability to efficiently move people and goods determines how competitive our state will be in the decades ahead. South Carolina continues to grow at one of the fastest rates in the country, and with that growth comes a responsibility to ensure our logistics network can meet the demands of modern commerce.
That is why the proposed merger between Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS) deserves thoughtful consideration, not just at the national level, but here at home. South Carolina’s economic success is directly tied to reliable freight transportation. From advanced manufacturing in the Upstate, to the distribution and warehousing centers in the Midlands, to the countless businesses that depend on steady supply chains, every region of our state relies on a freight system that works smoothly and predictably.
When freight rail is fragmented across multiple networks, bottlenecks and delays become far more common. Businesses, especially those operating with tight production schedules and narrow delivery windows, feel the impacts immediately. A delayed railcar can throw off inventory planning, disrupt operations, and create ripple effects that stretch across an entire supply chain. These unpredictable slowdowns can be enormously costly for the companies that keep South Carolina’s economy moving.
***
The Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger aims to address many of these longstanding challenges. By creating a unified network connecting more than 50,000 miles of track and linking 43 states with over 100 ports nationwide, the combined rail system would offer something our business community has been asking for: reliability. Studies indicate the merger could generate approximately $1 billion in annual cost savings and improve freight-car velocity by around 10 percent. These aren’t abstract figures, they reflect tangible improvements that would strengthen operations for employers, distributors, retailers, and consumers alike.
***
“Economic development teams would also have an even stronger pitch when attracting new employers to South Carolina…”
***
A more dependable rail network means companies can plan with greater precision, suppliers can manage logistics with fewer surprises, and transportation partners can commit to schedules with increased confidence. Economic development teams would also have an even stronger pitch when attracting new employers to South Carolina: not just a skilled workforce and business-friendly climate, but a transportation network capable of supporting long-term growth.
Improved rail performance also benefits South Carolina’s infrastructure more broadly. Rail is one of the most efficient ways to move goods long distances. Every shipment that travels by rail instead of truck reduces congestion on our highways, lowers fuel costs, and decreases wear and tear on roads that taxpayers ultimately fund. Better rail capacity complements, rather than replaces, our ongoing efforts to invest in roads and bridges across the state. It allows us to stretch transportation dollars further and focus on the improvements most needed in fast-growing communities.
Another important factor is competitiveness. States across the Southeast are aggressively investing in logistics infrastructure to position themselves as national leaders in manufacturing and distribution. If South Carolina wants to stay ahead, and continue attracting companies that create stable, high-quality jobs, we must support improvements that strengthen the reliability and efficiency of our freight network. The Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger presents an opportunity to do just that.
***
RELATED | SOURCES: S.C. LAWMAKERS THREATEN SUPREME COURT
***
As someone who has spent nearly two decades advocating for responsible, forward-looking growth in our state, I believe that modernizing our freight system is not just a transportation issue, it is an economic necessity. Ensuring that goods can move quickly, safely, and predictably is fundamental to the success of our businesses and the financial well-being of South Carolina families.
Federal regulators will ultimately determine the path forward, and their review should be thorough and transparent. But from where I sit, the potential benefits to our state are clear. A more integrated, efficient rail system will help South Carolina businesses compete, help consumers by keeping costs lower, and help our state maintain the strong economic momentum we’ve built over the past decade.
A stronger rail network means a stronger South Carolina, and that is a future we should fully support.
***
ABOUT THE AUTHOR…

Nathan Ballentine represents the citizens of House District 71 in the S.C. General Assembly.
***
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.
South-Carolina
LIVE: SC AG Alan Wilson, state, national leaders hold press conference on statewide drug busts
Statehouse Reporter Mary Green will have more on this tonight.
COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – South Carolina Attorney General and other officials will be holding a press conference Friday at 9:30 a.m. to talk about statewide drug busts.
Wilson is set to be joined by South Carolina Law Enforcement Division Chief Mark Keel, representatives from the Drug Enforcement Administration and Homeland Security, as well as several local sheriffs and other law enforcement partners.
Watch the full press conference in the video above.
Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.
Copyright 2025 WIS. All rights reserved.
-
Alaska7 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Texas1 week agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Washington4 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa6 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Miami, FL6 days agoUrban Meyer, Brady Quinn get in heated exchange during Alabama, Notre Dame, Miami CFP discussion
-
Cleveland, OH6 days agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World6 days ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans