Connect with us

South-Carolina

Haley moves on to South Carolina despite GOP pressure to drop out

Published

on

Haley moves on to South Carolina despite GOP pressure to drop out


Nikki Haley is facing broadening calls to drop out of the GOP primary even as she publicly signals no intention to do so ahead of South Carolina’s contest next month. 

The head of the Republican National Committee (RNC), the Georgia Republican Party and growing numbers of GOP lawmakers are urging her to drop out, arguing she has no realistic path to the nomination against frontrunner former President Trump. 

There are incentives for Haley to keep going, but also risks. She’s up to 17 delegates after New Hampshire and has the potential to win more in the coming primaries, which could set her up to be an alternate nominee to Trump as he faces myriad legal battles. 

At the same time, Haley could become demonized within the GOP if her campaign ends up angering rank-and-file Republican voters who want the party to unify behind its likely nominee. 

Advertisement

By sticking in the race, Haley risks being “persona non grata with MAGA world, and Trump and his entourage,” said Republican strategist Brendan Steinhauser.  

“She’ll be vilified in that space,” he said, arguing Haley will be “seen as being obstinate” in the face of top party voices calling for support to rally behind Trump.  

One Trump ally in the RNC submitted a draft resolution that made headlines this week, proposing the party declare the former president as its “presumptive 2024 nominee” even as he boasts just 32 of the 1,215 delegates needed to get the nod.  

The draft argued there was no path forward for Haley and moved to kick the party into “full general election mode welcoming supporters of all candidates as valued members of Team Trump 2024.”  

But although Trump has suggested Haley should suspend her campaign, he came out quickly to call for the RNC to back off reviewing the proposal “for the sake of PARTY UNITY,” stressing the party should “finish the process off AT THE BALLOT BOX.” 

Advertisement

The draft was reportedly withdrawn before it could come under consideration at the RNC’s winter meeting next week. 

Trump’s move to intervene in the effort — which could have cut the primary race short after just two states weighed in — suggests he’s confident he can win in South Carolina, Haley’s home state and the next major test in the presidential race.

“He wants to be able to say, ‘we were head-to-head, and I beat her handily, and I don’t need the party to necessarily pave the way for me,’” Steinhauser said.  

At the same time, it also indicates the former president is aware of fissures within his party, and is working to get ahead of them as he guns toward the general.  

“He’s got to have the support of Haley’s people in the general,” said South Carolina-based Republican strategist Chip Felkel.  

Advertisement

The numbers out of New Hampshire show Haley has the backing of some disaffected Republicans, moderates and independents, Felkel noted, and Trump must work to avoid alienating those groups as he knocks his primary rival.  

“He’s got to have those votes if he’s going to beat Biden,” Felkel said.  

But even though Trump stepped in to put down the RNC draft resolution, he and his allies are still upping pressure on Haley to drop out of the race on her own.  

Trump — who in 2020 sought to claim victory even as votes were still being counted and continues to deny the results of the election — was noticeably annoyed by Haley’s positive framing of her second-place New Hampshire win.  

His campaign sent out a fundraising email with the subject line, “Suspend your campaign!” targeting Haley, and the Trump-aligned super PAC, MAGA Inc., said after New Hampshire that it was time for Haley to drop out.  

Advertisement

“Every day that Nikki Haley stays in the race is an in-kind contribution to the Biden campaign,” Karoline Leavitt, the Trump campaign’s national press secretary, wrote on X

RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel said after Trump’s back-to-back wins in Iowa and New Hampshire that the party needs to unify “around our eventual nominee, which is going to be Donald Trump.”    

And in an unusual move that drew criticism from some conservatives, the Georgia GOP also directly urged the party “to move to the general election phase of this campaign” and unite behind “eventual nominee” Trump so resources can focus on the likely head-to-head with Biden. 

The chair of the Republican Senate campaign arm, Sen. Steve Daines (Mont.), also said this week the Republican nomination fight is over and agreed that Haley should exit the field. 

But as Trump’s allies tighten the screws on the former U.N. ambassador, Haley is marching forward to South Carolina, which votes Feb. 24. 

Advertisement

“This race is far from over. There are dozens of states left to go,” Haley said in her post-New Hampshire remarks.    

“South Carolinians don’t want the DC swamp telling them what to do. They know this race is far from over!” she said Friday on X. Her campaign is already running ads and making appearances in preparation for the first-in-the-South primary. 

Strategists are nevertheless split on whether the former South Carolina governor will stay in the race until her home state contest.  

Polling averages for South Carolina put Trump more than 30 points above Haley, according to The Hill/Decision Desk HQ, and some observers are skeptical of whether she has the momentum to keep going — and whether she’ll want to risk embarrassment on her home turf.  

Steinhauser thinks the pressure to drop out is “only going to increase” as the next major primary nears and doesn’t think it’s a “foregone conclusion” that she stays in until South Carolina. 

Advertisement

But with the race now a one-on-one between Haley and Trump, Steinhauser suggested she’s also relishing the media attention, the continued support of her backers and her elevated national profile.  

Felkel predicted she’ll stay in until her home state — and might even hang on if she loses there, too. 

“She’s playing the long game. Maybe she’s counting on a little help from some juries,” Felkel said, with a nod to Trump’s various legal battles.  

Trump is campaigning amid multiple criminal indictments, and some have floated that Haley is waiting in the wings in case the former president’s bid is curtailed by his courtroom battles.  

She’s leaned into her electability argument as she campaigns, highlighting polling that shows her putting up a better fight than Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head matchup with Biden.

Advertisement

“If Republicans want to beat Biden, they should nominate Nikki Haley because she’s the only candidate who crushes him by double digits in all the polls. Trump barely squeaks by on a good day. That won’t change as millions more voters get to have a say in choosing our candidate,” a Haley campaign spokesperson told The Hill.

As long as Haley carries on, the former president will not be able to tap into a joint fundraising deal with the RNC that would allow donors to max out contributions and boost the former president’s coffers ahead of what is shaping up to be a lengthy general election campaign. 

“Any day the Trump campaign is focused on Nikki Haley is a day they could be going after Joe Biden,” said GOP strategist Brian Seitchik.

“The longer this thing drags out, the more enemies she’s going to make, the more incoming she’s going to take, the less likely it’s going to be that she has an opportunity to get a promotion down the road,” Seitchik said.

But Felkel argued Haley’s probably already angered the former president on that front, and therefore unlikely to score a potential Trump Cabinet position or other gains by dropping out at this point. “What’s she got to lose?”

Advertisement

Brett Samuels contributed.

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.





Source link

South-Carolina

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston

Published

on

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston


Six Republican candidates vying to become South Carolina’s next governor met in downtown Charleston for a wide-ranging debate that put abortion, infrastructure and the future of data centers at the center of the race.

The forum was held at the Sottile Theatre, where Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, state Sen. Josh Kimbrell, U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, Lowcountry businessman Rom Reddy and Attorney General Alan Wilson took the stage.

Questions included whether they would support a state hate crime law, how they would address concerns about growth and infrastructure, how to navigate collaboration, abortion and the future of data centers in the state.

One issue that drew near-unanimous opposition was state Senate Bill 1095, a proposed total abortion ban that passed out of committee earlier in the day. All of the candidates opposed the bill, but they differed on what they would do if it reached the governor’s desk.

Advertisement

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Norman said he would sign it.

“You know, this is an emotional issue, but I will tell you if this bill came to my desk as governor. If it passed the House and the Senate, I would sign it,” Norman said.

All of the other candidates on stage said they would veto the bill if it came across their desk as governor, with Reddy arguing the question should be decided by voters.

“The Supreme Court did not say the loudest voice in the ruling class prevails. It said it’s up to the people in the state, so let’s put it to a referendum,” Reddy said.

Advertisement

On infrastructure, candidates discussed reforming the South Carolina Department of Transportation and allowing private-sector involvement to help pay for improvements.

Wilson outlined ideas that included leasing interstate easements and expanding private express lanes.

“We privatized that grass between the interstates. We turn it into private express lanes that can be told we leased the easements on the sides of interstates to telecommunication companies and energy companies, and charge them for natural gas line and fiber optic fiber optic cables,” Wilson said.

Evette also pointed to public-private partnerships and the possibility of fast-pass lanes.

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Advertisement

“We want to make sure that we’re innovative public private partnerships coming in and creating fast pass lanes to allow people that are in a hurry to be able to utilize that,” Evette said.

The final question focused on data centers, with candidates agreeing corporations should “pay their way.”

“They should pay for their water. They should pay for their infrastructure, any roads around it, and we should look at what Governor Ron DeSantis has done in Florida with the large data centers that are coming to Florida. That should be the model in South Carolina and everywhere,” Mace said.

Kimbrell said the state should set limits to protect natural resources and guard against higher power costs for residents.

“Put parameters around data centers to ensure that the water consumption does not impact places like the ACE Basin,” Kimbrell said. “Ensuring that the Public Service Commission makes absolutely sure nobody’s power rate goes up and we try to get behind the meter energy grids in place so they can be self-sufficient.”

Advertisement

Two more debates are planned ahead of the primaries on June 9.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances

Published

on

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances


A bill that could make it a felony for doctors to perform an abortion is moving to the full South Carolina Senate with just a few weeks left in the legislative session.

The South Carolina Senate medical affairs committee continued a debate of Senate Bill 1095 on April 21 in Columbia. The bill, sponsored by State Sen. Richard Cash, R-Anderson, builds on a restrictive abortion bill that failed to progress in the fall.

The committee passed the measure in an 8-4 vote, moving it to the full Senate for consideration. Lawmakers have until May 14, the last day of the 2026 legislative session, to pass the bill for it to become law.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 1095, also called the “Unborn Child Protection Act,” bans performing an abortion or supplying abortion drugs. It makes it illegal for a woman to get an abortion, with the only exception being to save a pregnant woman’s life.

It also makes mifepristone and misoprostol Schedule IV controlled substances. Alprazolam (Xanax) and zolpidem (Ambien) are two other examples of Schedule IV substances.

Pro-Life Greenville, an anti-abortion organization based in Greenville, responded to the bill’s progress with “full endorsement” of the legislation.

“Unborn children, like all human beings, deserve to have their lives protected under law here in the Palmetto State,” Pro-Life Greenville stated. “Today’s vote by the SC Senate Medical Affairs Committee brings that urgent need one step closer to reality.”

Advertisement

Under the bill, a woman who has an abortion could face misdemeanor charges. The maximum sentence would be two years in jail with a $1,000 fine.

Those found guilty of performing an abortion or providing a pregnant woman with abortion-inducing drugs could face felony charges, a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail, and a possible $100,000 fine.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT), a firm opponent of the bill, decried the Senate committee passage. PPSAT Director of Public Affairs Vicki Ringer said in a statement that the bill will cost people their lives, and it will make it more difficult for women to get reproductive and pregnancy healthcare.

“Abortion bans have and will continue to cost people their lives,” Ringer stated. “As this ban inches closer to the governor’s desk, it is becoming increasingly clear just how many of our lives anti-abortion lawmakers are willing to endanger in service to their agenda.”

Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@gannett.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Midlands

Published

on

SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Midlands


BARNWELL, S.C. (WRDW/WAGT) – An officer was injured, and the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) has issued a Blue Alert for an “armed and dangerous” woman.

According to the Blue Alert, Cushman is wanted in connection with an officer being injured.

The location of the assault was Gardenia Road in Blackville, S.C.

On Monday night around 10:35 p.m., officials said they were looking for Lacey Cushman, 37, a white woman who is 5 feet 9 inches tall and weighs about 210 pounds.

Advertisement
SLED issues Blue Alert for armed, dangerous woman in Barnwell County(WRDW)

According to SLED, she has brown eyes and an unknown hair color. Her hairstyle and clothing are unknown.

She was last seen driving a 2011 white Chevrolet Traverse with an S.C. tag, 706IRU, in Barnwell County.

Her last known direction of travel was toward Bamberg County.

If you see her or have information, call 911 immediately.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with FOX Carolina. For more free content like this, download our apps.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WHNS. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending