Connect with us

Connecticut

Poor Need Much More Housing, Not Protection From Eviction

Published

on

Poor Need Much More Housing, Not Protection From Eviction


Many elected officials make a living by causing problems and then purporting to solve them. So it is with the Eviction Protection Act recently re-introduced in Congress by Connecticut U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District. 

The legislation would have the federal government offer financial grants to state governments that provide lawyers to represent low-income people facing eviction from their apartments, as Connecticut and several other states do.

The proposal implies that the country’s housing problem is largely a matter of unscrupulous landlords gouging innocent tenants. But the housing disaster results mostly from the dislocations to the economy caused by government’s excessive restrictions during the recent virus epidemic; and then the money created and distributed by government to compensate for lost income; and then the money created and distributed by government to pay for the explosion of all kinds of spending under the Trump and Biden administrations — money created far out of proportion to the economy’s actual production.

These policies have devastated the poor — cutting their incomes through restrictions on commerce and again through inflation, which is far higher than the heavily manipulated official figures. Meanwhile inflation also has sharply increased the expenses of landlords. They pay more for nearly everything required to maintain their property, and their extra costs are passed along to tenants via rents.

Advertisement

The legislation for federal grants for state eviction-protection agencies identifies no source of funding for them. For financing for the whole federal government now is based largely on money creation — that is, on inflation. 

For Congress has fallen in love with a school of economic thought called Modern Monetary Theory, which is built on the truism that government can create money without levying taxes and that any government that can create money can never go broke. But Congress has ignored the remainder of Modern Monetary Theory — that the danger of money creation is not bankruptcy but currency devaluation. This devaluation — inflation — already become oppressive.

Then there is the problem of insufficient housing construction, especially construction of less expensive, multi-family housing. More than lawyers to delay their eviction, the poor need greater housing supply. But nearly everyone who already has housing doesn’t want more housing in his neighborhood, and nearly everyone who owns his housing has a selfish financial interest in perpetuating housing scarcity.

That’s why Representative DeLauro has not proposed legislation requiring or facilitating construction of multi-family housing in the comfortable suburbs of her district, like Woodbridge, Orange, Bethany, Guilford, and Durham.. It’s so much safer politically for her to pretend that the housing problem is unscrupulous landlords. 

Like most members of Congress, DeLauro is confident that few voters will ever learn that inflation is not like the weather, not an act of God, but an act of those who go to Congress and pose as protectors of the working class.

Advertisement

COMMUNISM IN CONNECTICUT: The Yankee Institute reports that some Democratic state legislators played footsie again the other day with Connecticut’s Communist Party, attending or sending greetings to the party’s Amistad Awards ceremony, which honored state Sen. Gary Winfield, D-New Haven, state employee union leader Stacie Harris-Byrdsong, and immigrant rights advocate Luis Luna. The award winners also received congratulatory citations from the General Assembly.

Connecticut’s Communist Party is no threat to national security. It has few members and little presence outside New Haven’s nutty politics, and Communist parties abroad now are mainly ordinary totalitarians and crony capitalists, not revolutionaries. But communism’s record remains one of mass oppression and murder. Why should anyone help celebrate that?

Yet while they are paling around with Communists, Connecticut Democrats are calling Connecticut Republicans extremist for supporting or tolerating Donald Trump.

The program book for the Amistad Awards ceremony was full of advertisements from government employee unions, including the American Federation of Teachers, the New Haven Federation of Teachers, and the University of Connecticut chapter of the American Association of University Professors. Apparently with the unions there can be no enemies on the left, no matter how bloody their hands throughout history.     

——

Advertisement

Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. (CPowell@cox.net)





Source link

Connecticut

Connecticut Democrats to bring back legislation giving parents control over social media 

Published

on

Connecticut Democrats to bring back legislation giving parents control over social media 


Democrats plan to revive a proposal to give parents greater control over how children use social media.  

“If they don’t like what we’re going to protect the kids, what is your plan to protect the kids?” Gov. Ned Lamont (D-Connecticut) said. “Otherwise, we’ll keep going with this.”  

Leaders of the legislature’s General Law Committee joined Lamont for a press conference at the Capitol, saying they’ll introduce the bill once the legislative session starts on Feb. 4.  

The bill would require parental approval before anyone under 18 years old can open a social media account.  

Advertisement

Additionally, parents would need to approve the content children can view, set time limits for usage, and decide whether their accounts are public. 

Attorney General William Tong (D-Connecticut) said the law would require parents to opt in to ensure they give consent.  

That means social media platforms can’t, for example, make a minor’s account public as a default setting.  

Lastly, the bill would prohibit social media companies from sending push notifications to children between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. 

“What this specifically does is highlight a very vulnerable population and says there needs to be protections in place,” Rep. Roland Lemar (D-New Haven) said. “Children need to have these protections. 

Advertisement

Lemar said social media can be a valuable resource, but he wants to safeguard children against potential harm.  

Some experts have been raising concerns that social media platforms can become addictive, especially since they allow users to scroll content endlessly.  

Those experts have also warned about increased risks of depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues among children and teenagers.  

“They’re still children, and they’re still vulnerable in how they’re developing those individual identities,” Connecticut Children’s pediatrician Dr. Robert Keder said. “They are subject to things like FOMO, or fear of missing out, or influencing body image.”  

Tech companies pushed back against the bill last year, saying they’re already putting tools in place for parents.  

Advertisement

Instagram, for example, announced a teen-friendly version of its app in October, with more age-appropriate content.  

Christopher Gilrein, executive director with the lobbying firm Technet, said last year that “the industry has a longstanding commitment to provide parents and guardians with resources to help ensure a safe online experience for their children, and the industry has been at the forefront of educating parents and guardians about safety.”  

Last year’s version received a 121-26 vote in the House, but the Senate failed to raise it for debate before the session ended.  

A few Republicans raised concerns about whether the state could enforce the bill.  

One of those Republicans, Rep. Lezlye Zupkus (R-Prostect), said she’ll need to review this year’s bill, but she supports the concept.  

Advertisement

“We need to look at what our kids are looking at and what is age-appropriate for them and what they should be doing,” she said



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

House destroyed after fire in Tolland

Published

on

House destroyed after fire in Tolland


Fire crews were dispatched to Bonair Hill Rd for a structure fire around 11:30 p.m. on Tuesday.

When they arrived, the single-family home was fully involved, according to Town Manager Brian Foley.

Foley said in a post on Facebook that an adult male was outside on the property in serious medical distress and was transported to Rockville hospital. He also mentions that several family members got out safely and were staying at a neighbor’s house.

The home was completely destroyed, and the town staff and Red Cross are working to ensure the displaced family has access to any needed services, Foley said.

Advertisement

Local CT State Fire Marshals are on scene investigating the incident.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Connecticut kids enjoying back-to-back snow day as crews continue to clean up

Published

on

Connecticut kids enjoying back-to-back snow day as crews continue to clean up




Connecticut kids enjoying back-to-back snow day as crews continue to clean up – NBC Connecticut



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending