Cultural Cringe and ‘The Lost City of Melbourne’

The Australia Letter is a weekly publication from our Australia bureau. Join to get it by e-mail.

Guests to New York usually comment that it seems like getting into a movie set. To stroll by way of Central Park is to hint the footsteps of Harry and Sally, Spider-Man or numerous Muppets. Momentary glimpses of the Chrysler Constructing or the New York Public Library work virtually as an establishing shot: That is New York Metropolis, child.

Melbourne has little such on-screen cachet. Its skyline barely sticks within the reminiscence. As an alternative, these architectural elements that linger are on a much smaller scale: the lacy ironwork that fringes cottages and terraced homes; the unusually broad streets of the central metropolis; the impartial cinemas unfold throughout city — the Astor, the Palace, the Solar Theatre — with their grand facades and gently creaking seats.

And whereas folks in New York rejoice its cycles of growth and bust, ask Melburnians about their metropolis’s current historical past and plenty of draw a clean. It barely options at school curriculums, which take a broader method. Even on the municipal museum, the wing devoted to the town’s historical past dwells on its colonial roots, earlier than galloping by way of the final century.

A brand new documentary, “The Misplaced Metropolis of Melbourne,” goes some technique to explaining why the town appears to be like the best way it does. In lower than 90 minutes, the film retraces Melbourne’s architectural historical past, eulogizing among the magnificent Nineteenth-century buildings felled within the title of glass-fronted progress within the Fifties, Nineteen Sixties and early Seventies.

The movie premiered earlier this 12 months at Melbourne’s Worldwide Movie Competition. Since then, screenings at impartial cinemas throughout the town have usually bought out, as Melburnians rush to be taught extra in regards to the place they name house.

Gus Berger, the film’s director and an impartial cinema proprietor in Thornbury, began the self-funded undertaking in lockdown. “It was actually like exploring one other metropolis,” he instructed me lately. “Despite the fact that I do know Melbourne so nicely and I’ve lived right here all my life, it was similar to exploring a type of secret metropolis, if you happen to like — a metropolis that I wasn’t conversant in.”

Whereas the film seeks to rejoice what Melbourne nonetheless has, it additionally mourns the “cultural cringe” — a well-known phrase coined by the Australian critic A. A. Phillips in 1950 — that led builders and planners to raze among the metropolis’s most splendid Victorian buildings.

“We determined we had been too old school and too Victorian for the world’s gaze, as we approached the Olympic Video games and the queen’s go to,” stated Mr. Berger, referring to occasions that came about in 1956 and 1954. “Everybody appeared to be shifting ahead and modernizing, and I believe that Melburnians simply felt that they weren’t, and so they didn’t wish to be left behind.”

Watching the film, I used to be reminded of “Hovering,” a current novel by the Australian author Rhett Davis in regards to the metropolis of Fraser, a Melbourne analog. A personality describes her onetime desperation to flee this “proverbial outpost”: “It was nothing, this metropolis. It was no New York, or London, or Hong Kong, or Rome. No little one puzzled the place it was on this planet, imagined what it will be prefer to go there.”

Do Melburnians nonetheless really feel like this? Principally not, however perhaps a little bit. “Cultural cringe” isn’t so overbearing, no less than, {that a} wrecking ball threatens the town’s most iconic websites — however it additionally explains why Mr. Berger and his audiences have needed to go to such lengths to find out about what got here earlier than.

And although viewers, by and enormous, have cherished the movie, the anxiousness at its heart — is Melbourne sufficient for the world? — filters by way of to its reception. “I’m not positive how this documentary would resonate with non-Melburnians,” one reviewer frets. One other questions whether or not the movie can have “issues reaching an viewers that isn’t invested within the metropolis.”

The residents of Eighties Melbourne would have had no such qualms. A London journalist, visiting in 1885, referred to as it “Marvelous Melbourne,” writing: “The entire metropolis, in brief, teems with wealth, even because it does with humanity.” It was wealthy and exquisite, and migrants had been drawn by the promise of a land growth, which led to land in some elements of the town being as worthwhile as that of London. Over the course of the last decade, the inhabitants virtually doubled, from 280,000 folks in 1880 to 490,000 in 1890.

“The Misplaced Metropolis of Melbourne” goes some technique to recapturing that civic satisfaction. It’s spellbinding, heartfelt and deeply, proudly native, however it additionally makes a compelling case that the world’s eyes must be skilled on this pearl of a city, because it was and as it’s.

Listed here are the week’s tales.