Connect with us

Utah

Utah candidates divided over Ukraine aid. Here’s how the 3rd District Republicans would have voted in Congress.

Published

on

Utah candidates divided over Ukraine aid. Here’s how the 3rd District Republicans would have voted in Congress.


“Ronald Reagan supported the people who are willing to fight for freedom,” said candidate Stewart Peay, a military veteran.

(Spenser Heaps | Pool) Case Lawrence and Stewart Peay, two of the five candidates in the Republican primary for Utah’s 3rd Congressional District, take part in a televised debate at the Eccles Broadcast Center in Salt Lake City on Wednesday, June 12, 2024. Also debating are JR Bird, John Dougall and Mike Kennedy.

The five Republicans running to replace Rep. John Curtis in Utah’s 3rd Congressional District voiced support for Ukraine’s fight against Russia’s invasion. Where they differed during Wednesday night’s primary election debate was on whether the United States should continue to provide weapons, ammunition and other financial support, or even if America should honor its commitment to NATO.

Stewart Peay, the only candidate in the pentad to serve in the U.S. military, said America cannot afford to waver in its support for Ukraine, because it will likely embolden other countries.

Advertisement

“Right now, we see an evil block of Iran, North Korea, China and Russia coalescing against America and its interests. Ukrainians are on the front lines. We should provide them with the weapons and and ammunition they need to hold the line,” Peay said. “The one time they struggled was when we failed to support them.”

Roosevelt Mayor JR Bird said he was not in favor of providing more aid to Ukraine, but suggested the U.S. is not doing enough to punish Russian aggression through sanctions.

“Russia is laundering oil through Greece and India, and we’re buying those products. They’re being funded on the backside that way,” Bird said. “There is so much more we can do to starve Russia that we’re not doing.”

(Spenser Heaps | Pool) JR Bird, John Dougall, Mike Kennedy, Case Lawrence and Stewart Peay, candidates in the Republican primary for Utah’s 3rd Congressional District, shake hands after taking part in a televised debate at the Eccles Broadcast Center in Salt Lake City on Wednesday, June 12, 2024.

State Auditor John Dougall, who has built much of his political identity around fiscal austerity, said it’s imperative that the U.S. continue to support Ukraine.

Advertisement

“Defense is the key reason for the federal government. We need to support Ukraine. I’d rather send bullets than boys. I don’t want boots on the ground,” he said.

[READ: Five Republicans vie for Utah’s empty seat in Congress. Here’s their views on abortion, immigration and water.]

Entrepreneur Case Lawrence said his support for Ukraine would depend on certain variables.

“I don’t believe in foreign aid. I believe in foreign investment and investment in American interests. Future aid to Ukraine will be based on facts on the ground and how those affect American interests,” Lawrence said.

(Spenser Heaps | Pool) Case Lawrence, a candidate in the Republican primary for Utah’s 3rd Congressional District, takes part in a televised debate at the Eccles Broadcast Center in Salt Lake City on Wednesday, June 12, 2024.

Advertisement

That answer drew the ire of Peay who called out Lawrence during the post-debate question and answer with reporters.

“That answer tonight, we would have to make the decision based on facts on the ground. Ronald Reagan rolled over in his grave when he heard that. Ronald Reagan supported the people who are willing to fight for freedom,” Peay said.

State Sen. Mike Kennedy was sympathetic to the plight of the Ukrainian people, but expressed a preference for a more isolationist policy, saying America “cannot be the police officer of the whole world.”

When asked if they would have voted in favor of the $61 billion aid package for Ukraine approved by Congress in April, Kennedy was the only candidate who refused to answer, saying he had not read the bill. When pressed on why he dodged the question, Kennedy said campaigning gets in the way of boning up on the topic.

“If you’ve ever run a campaign, you have no idea how complicated it is. I keep in touch with the complicated issues of the day, but I am focused on marketing my message and winning this campaign,” Kennedy said.

Advertisement

The remaining four candidates were split on whether they would have voted in favor of the aid package: Peay and Lawrence were in the yea column, while Dougall and Bird would have been a nay. In April, Utah Reps. Blake Moore and John Curtis voted for the aid package and Celeste Maloy and Burgess Owens voted against.

Kennedy was the only candidate who said he would not support sending American troops into the conflict if Vladimir Putin were to invade one of the NATO member countries, which is one of the provisions of the NATO treaty.

“When it comes to our NATO allies, we’ve agreed to support them, but that does not mean we send our young men and young women to give their lives for a foreign conflict that does not directly implicate our national security interests,” Kennedy said. “We can support our NATO allies without the blood of our young men and young women.”

(Spenser Heaps | Pool) JR Bird, left, and John Dougall, right, candidates in the Republican primary for Utah’s 3rd Congressional District, take part in a televised debate moderated by Thomas Wright at the Eccles Broadcast Center in Salt Lake City on Wednesday, June 12, 2024.

Aside from foreign policy, Wednesday’s debate touched on a handful of other topics, too. The candidates agreed that the federal government did not have a role to play in addressing housing affordability. Instead, they said the government should work to reduce regulations to empower the private sector.

Advertisement

On the topic of energy policy, all five said the federal government should do more to incentivize all forms of energy production and slow down the push toward renewables.

“Americans demand reliable, affordable energy. And that’s what we should be providing. We need a free market with all of the above energy solutions, with green solutions and traditional sources that are reliable,” Dougall said.



Source link

Utah

Utah Jazz vs. Golden State Warriors: Recap and Final Score

Published

on

Utah Jazz vs. Golden State Warriors: Recap and Final Score


The Utah Jazz have extended their losing skid to three games with a loss against the Golden State Warriors. The final score was 114-123.

Here are the biggest takeaways from the night:

Defense folds again under Curry takeover

Utah controlled the first half of this game. At one point they held a 12 point lead.

Advertisement

But at 37 years old, Steph Curry can still do some amazing things. Curry went for 20 points in the third-quarter, frazzled the Jazz, and they never really recovered after that. Part of this was Curry being the greatest shooter of all time, but part of it was Utah struggling to defend at the point of attack and off screens. They weren’t particularly physical, particularly attached, or particularly effective at shrinking Curry’s space. It’s same story from most night’s this season.

The Jazz are a solid offensive team – 16th best in offensive rating to be exact. They continue to lead the league in sharing the ball with a 72% assist rate and have weapons at every level, especially when Walker Kessler returns. But they are still the worst defensive team in the league at 30th in defensive rating. This is good news for pro-tank fans, but bad for the Jazz becoming a competitive team under this core.

Who is Utah’s third piece

Keyonte George is clearly playing at an All-Star and Most Improved Player of the Year level. He finished tonight with 22 points and nine assists. His third-year jump is real and he’s solidified himself as a core of the franchise moving forward.

Lauri Markkanen is still playing at an All-NBA level. He finished tonight with 35 points and five rebounds. He’s one of the best scorers in the league this season and a great companion next to George.

Advertisement

When both of Utah’s stars are playing, it’s easy to convince yourself that the Jazz just need one more core player to pop to enter win-now mode. But it isn’t very clear who that player is. Is it Ace Bailey? Maybe, but that will take another two-three seasons to find out. It’s clear it’s not Cody Williams, Taylor Hendricks, or any other role player on the roster. It’s a shame that Walker Kessler is out for the season, because if the shooting was real, he might be a suitable answer.

The truth is that the next core piece is probably not on the roster right now. Let’s hope that comes from the draft if the Jazz keep their pick.

A note on tonight’s whistle

Praising the referees is usually not something people like to read about, especially when the Jazz lose. I’m doing it anyway, apologies.

Tonight’s crew chief was the fan-favorite Bill Kennedy. He was joined by 16-year veteran Kevin Cutler and 6-year veteran Simone Jelks. The crew did two things that I haven’t seen much of this season:

Advertisement

(1) The crew did not penalize defenders for simply existing while offensive players generated contract. Keyonte George, for one, was someone who struggled with this. George (smartly) has learned that the NBA has decided that offensive players can initiate contact at will, enter the established space of the defender, and be rewarded with free throws. It’s partly why he’s shooting 7.4 free throws a game. In my opinion, this is bad for basketball.

To be clear, I don’t blame George for doing this. The most talented players at manipulating this part of the game are elite scorers in the league (Shai Gilgeous-Alexander or Austin Reaves, for example). But tonight, the crew didn’t reward George, Curry, Butler, or Markkanen with any of these types of plays and I think it led to a more competitive, faster, and more enjoyable watching experience.

(2) The crew treated Draymond Green like every other player when it comes to technical fouls. It’s no secret that Green gets a much longer leash than most when it comes to berating the officials. Watching him get two technicals after complaining on a meaningless play was nice to see, for once.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

White scores 25 to help Utah women hand No. 8 TCU its 1st loss, 87-77 in overtime

Published

on

White scores 25 to help Utah women hand No. 8 TCU its 1st loss, 87-77 in overtime


SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Lani White scored 25 points to lead Utah past No. 8 TCU 87-77 in overtime Saturday night.

Reese Ross added 15 points and Maty Wilke had 12 for the Utes. Evelina Otto finished with 10 points and eight rebounds. Utah (11-4, 2-1 Big 12) made 13 3-pointers and shot 56.5% from long distance.

Olivia Miles had 31 points, seven rebounds and seven assists to pace the Horned Frogs (14-1, 2-1). Marta Suarez added 23 points and 11 rebounds. TCU shot just 37% from the field, including 9 of 39 from 3-point range.

Advertisement

White forced overtime by making a 3-pointer that tied it 67-all with 12 seconds left in regulation. Utah never trailed in OT and went up 76-69 with 2:47 left after White capped a 9-2 run with her fourth outside basket.

TCU used a 7-0 spurt to erase a four-point deficit in the final minute of the fourth quarter. Back-to-back 3-pointers from Suarez and Donovyn Hunter put TCU up 66-64 with 49 seconds remaining.

Ross had a chance to tie it on two free throws with 33.3 seconds left, but missed both. Miles made one of two foul shots with 22 seconds to go before White tied it.

Utah took advantage of cold shooting by the Horned Frogs to pull ahead in the third quarter. Back-to-back baskets from Suarez were TCU’s only field goals over an eight-minute stretch. The Utes scored on three straight possessions, culminating in a layup from Wilke, to take a 52-48 lead.

Miles made back-to-back baskets to put the Horned Frogs back up 58-56. Utah used a 7-0 run, punctuated by a 3-pointer from Ross, to go ahead 63-58 with 4:32 left in regulation.

Advertisement

Up next

TCU hosts Oklahoma State on Wednesday.

Utah plays at Kansas on Wednesday.

___

Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP women’s college basketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-womens-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/womens-college-basketball.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Judge files ruling allowing for appeal to Utah Supreme Court in redistricting case

Published

on

Judge files ruling allowing for appeal to Utah Supreme Court in redistricting case


The judge in Utah’s redistricting case filed a ruling making it possible for the Legislature to appeal to the Utah Supreme Court, but not without a strong rebuke of their process.

On Friday, Judge Dianna Gibson ruled partially in favor of the Legislature’s most recent request in the redistricting case, certifying its August 25th ruling as final in order to allow them to appeal to the Utah Supreme Court.

However, she strongly denied their request to enter a final judgment and end the case, saying, “This case is far from over.”

MORE | Utah Redistricting:

File – Utah Congressional Redistricting Maps (Image: KUTV)

Advertisement

“Quite literally – this Court is between the proverbial rock and a hard spot. This entire case is not ‘final,’” Gibson wrote in the ruling. “But the Court agrees that the important legal issues decided by this Court and reflected in each of its rulings … should be reviewed by the Utah Supreme Court as quickly as possible.”

Gibson said it was the legislative defendant’s “duty to seek appellate review” regarding any of her interlocutory, or non-final orders, within 21 days of the rulings. She said they repeatedly claimed they would but never did.

Now, they are requesting she finalize the case, or at the very least one of her orders, to allow them to file an appeal.

Because Gibson does not want to delay appellate review, she agreed to certify the August 25, 2025 Ruling and Order as final.

“Every Utah voter, every Utah congressional candidate and arguably every Utah citizen is impacted by this case. Issuing a final ruling – on even a portion of this case – ultimately serves the public’s interest and will lead to a faster resolution of the entire case,” she wrote.

Advertisement

The redistricting case dates back to 2018, when voters passed a ballot initiative to create a commission to redraw the congressional district boundaries.

State legislators repealed the ballot initiative in 2020, and attempted to draw their own congressional map the following year.

This prompted a lawsuit, which has led to several rulings, including the one on August 25th, which declared that the Utah Legislature violated voters’ rights by approving congressional boundaries that split Salt Lake County.

“Until there is a final decision on these legal issues from our Supreme Court, there will be a cloud on Utah’s congressional elections and an open question regarding the power of the Legislature and the power of the people,” Gibson wrote in her most recent ruling.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement

___



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending