It’s time for another check-in for the latest mock drafts around the league. We’re seeing a lot of smoke screens out there, but with that smoke, is there some fire? Last time we did a roundup, it was chalk across the board with AJ Dybantsa to Washington, Darryn Peterson to Utah, Cam Boozer to Memphis, and Caleb Wilson to Chicago. Will it be the same with this latest version? After a few weeks, there were some interesting changes.

It’s a pretty huge change to have Cam Boozer go #1 in Ricky O’Donnell’s latest mock drat but I respect the willingness to go with what you feel. Personally, I feel like if I’m the Wizards or the Jazz, I would want a playmaking wing or guard with that top pick, which is what you have in Darryn Peterson and AJ Dybantsa. Boozer does project to be a point-forward type in the NBA with his impressive skill set, but I’m not sure he’s the Jokic-level initiator that some are projecting.

It’s also the first change seeing Darryn Peterson go #1 in Salerno’s mock. Darryn Peterson was considered by many to be the #1 pick going into this season, but we all know about the struggles to stay healthy and the cramping. If the medicals look good, it wouldn’t be a surprise to see him go #1 given his elite talent.

Over at FanDuel, the odds have not switched. Currently, they have AJ Dybantsa with the best odds to go #1, followed by Darryn Peterson and Cam Boozer.

Over the weekend I risked life and limb in the name of fun because that is the Utah summer way.

Or at least that’s the Utah summer way according to the very fun and very adventurous friends who continue inviting me to southern Utah for hikes where the red rock landscapes are breathtaking and the terrain is slick sandstone and one wrong move means instant death.

Honestly, I’m surprised they invited me again this year after I was VERY dramatic about completing The Subway last June. I was assured that this year’s hike in Coyote Gulch was much less canyoneering and much more traditional hiking with “just one steep incline at the end.”

Coyote Gulch is in the heart of Escalante’s canyon country, in south-central Utah, which, for my money, is the most beautiful part of our great state. There’s something about driving a hilly highway through a lush desert landscape while cattle graze on either side of the road that feels completely whimsical. Like it’s a location that should only exist in cinema.

For dinner we stopped at Hell’s Backbone Grill, one of Utah’s most renowned culinary destinations. The restaurant has been selected as a James Beard Award semifinalist and finalist, and deemed the best restaurant in southern Utah by a number of publications. For good reason. The food is locally sourced and fresh and the setting, next to their farm, cannot be beat.

If I’m being completely honest I was hoping that after dinner we’d all decide that dinner on the patio had been worth the three hour drive and provided the outdoorsyness for which the group seemed to year, and that we should spend the next day lounging about, perhaps enjoying a spa, taking in the scenery from a temperature-controlled room with cucumber water on tap.

But that is not what happened. Instead we went to bed and woke up at FIVE O’CLOCK. IN THE MORNING. We left our accommodations at FIVE THIRTY IN THE MORNING and began the drive to the Crack-in-the-wall trailhead, only a portion of which was paved and the rest was sand.

The hike itself, or at least the way we did it, was 12ish miles through an initial slot canyon, in the gulch along the tributary, around a number of waterfalls, under two arches and a natural bridge, and up and over petrified dunes.

We started actually hiking at 7 a.m., and though sandier than most terrain I’ve traversed, there wasn’t anything especially difficult about the first couple of miles. Then we reached the titular crack in the wall, and I learned we were meant to drop down into it. Which I had no idea how to do, but successfully imitated the people who went ahead of me.

Then, once we arrived at the gulch, we spent the next eight or so miles trudging in and out of water which was honestly not as terrible as it sounds. Or maybe it was terrible but I just didn’t notice because the scenery was so lovely and the wildlife was so fun to observe. Birds and toads and lizards punctuated our path as we enjoyed the shade of the tall canyon walls.

Our ultimate destination was the Jacob Hamblin Arch, which simply must be seen to be believed and numbers among the most spectacular natural wonders I’ve been fortunate enough to witness. It was well worth the 10-mile hike.

But then we had to get out of the gulch. And it was then that I learned I don’t actually understand what 45% means in practice. I thought I knew what a 45% incline looked like, but I swear when I saw the alleged 45%, it looked more like 150%.

I watched some of the seasoned climbers in our group scamper up the cliff side like they were possessed mountain goats, and then I was handed the rope and instructed to make my way up. Which I did. With remarkable speed. Because I was terrified.

It turns out that the cliche “Don’t look down” exists for a reason. About halfway up the rock I looked behind to see if other hikers were approaching, and when I did I saw just how far I would fall if the rope slipped. Survival seemed impossible. So I skedaddled, with the strength and speed of a Bornean Orangutan up the rope until I hit high, flat ground. Because I guess fear is what really motivates me to accomplish physical feats. During my next race I might pay someone to chase me with a knife so I can finally get that PR I’ve been seeking

The next two miles were a monotonous up and down over solidified sand and just when I said I was ready to lay down and die, we turned a corner and saw the parking lot. I do believe there is no sight more beautiful, not even the Jacob Hamblin Arch, than the parking lot at the end of the hike. When (if) I get to heaven, I bet it will feel the same as seeing your Subaru parked in the shade at a trailhead, knowing an icy Diet Coke waits within.

As soon as we reached our vehicles and I was able to remove my muddy socks and put on sandals I had already forgotten the trials and tribulations of half an hour ago. I was ready to declare it the best day ever. Just like I said about last year’s adventure.

Can’t wait for next year’s hike.

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah Rep. Celeste Maloy secured $10 million to create a new Great Salt Lake Watershed Recovery Program in a spending bill which received congressional committee approval Wednesday.

This is the first step, Maloy says, toward obtaining the $1 billion requested by President Donald Trump in April after he discussed the Great Salt Lake at length with Utah Gov. Spencer Cox in February.

“I don’t think we’re going to get a billion dollars in one year. We’re going to get a billion dollars over a series of years,” Maloy told the Deseret News after the 3rd District Republican primary debate Monday.

As the only Utahn on the House Appropriations Committee — and as vice chair of the Subcommittee on Interior and Environment — Maloy is in a unique position to make Trump’s request a reality.

But $1 billion is a big ask.

In May, Maloy told the Deseret News editorial board she is working to get as much money as she can for the Great Salt Lake by focusing her fellow lawmakers on long-term water sustainability across the West.

“I’m doing what I can right now to help my colleagues from other states understand why this is so important to Utah, and even to the president of the United States that he would put that big of an emphasis in his budget,” she said.

Federal dollars should go to interventions with regional, or national impact, Maloy said after Monday’s debate. This includes mitigating toxic dust blowing off of the lake bed and removing invasive plant species.

What would the new program do?

The Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies spending bill was approved by a 35-27 vote on Wednesday. It directs $10 million to “support the long-term sustainability of the Great Salt Lake watershed.”

It instructs the Department of Interior to submit a report within 180 days outlining plans for the lake, specific accomplishments for a successful program, the federal investment needed to do it, and a timeline.

A separate report would detail the watershed activities as they are started and associated costs. Projects could include vegetation management, meadow restoration, plant removal and drainage improvements.

The bill would create a new position within the Department of Interior to oversee disbursement of funds related to near-term conservation and restoration efforts, primarily increasing water flows into the Great Salt Lake.

Maloy previously said she is working on specific language instructing agencies how they will be expected to use the funds. And the bill will include additional planning and coordination requirements to guide future decisions.

Partnerships between the state and the White House will be important to getting the Great Salt Lake the resources it needs, Gov. Cox told the Deseret News in a statement. The governor praised Maloy, while crediting the president for “this initial investment.”

“President Trump’s commitment to the Great Salt Lake helped elevate this issue nationally, and we’re encouraged to see funding included in this year’s appropriations bill,” Cox said. “Protecting the Great Salt Lake will require sustained effort over many years.”

Will Congress get it passed?

While the appropriations process is just beginning, Utah’s delegation has its work cut out for it to get Great Salt Lake money across the finish line. The House must pass spending bills before they receive Senate amendments.

Every dollar spent on a new program has to be taken from somewhere else, according to Maloy, and there is only a brief time in which the president’s recommendations can be incorporated into the overall budget.

But Trump’s endorsement carries its own momentum.

“We’re having collaboration, the likes of which I have not seen before on water issues in the West, and that gives me hope,” Maloy told the Deseret News editorial board.

“We’ve never had a president of the United States, to my knowledge, say we want to make sure that we’re taking care of the Great Salt Lake — and we have that right now.”

Any solution requires coordination between federal, state and local policymakers, according to Maloy. Most water law is state law, but Utah will need help from Washington, D.C., to craft a long-term plan, she said.

In a statement to the Deseret News, Utah House Speaker Mike Schultz, R-Hooper, said “Restoring and protecting the Great Salt Lake is a long-term effort that will require partnership between state, federal, and local leaders.”

“We look forward to continuing to work with Congresswoman Maloy, Utah’s congressional delegation and the administration to secure resources and advance meaningful solutions for the lake now and in the years ahead.”

High-profile committees on board

Protecting the Great Salt Lake has long been the sole responsibility of the state, Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton, told the Deseret News. But that looks like it is about to change with greater national recognition.

Adams noted the importance of Trump’s decision to highlight the lake in his budget recommendations after speaking with Cox, but pointed to Maloy’s “leadership” for translating it into the appropriations process.

“For a natural resource that has historically received little federal attention and remains one of the only major natural water resources in the country without dedicated federal funding, today’s investment represents significant progress,” Adams said.

Candidates for the 1st Congressional District, Rep. Blake Moore and state lawmaker Karianne Lisonbee, also participated in a debate on Monday, where they were asked how they would help deliver federal funds to the lake.

Moore, a member of Republican caucus leadership who sits on the Ways and Means Committee, said he had a private meeting with Trump’s director of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, about this exact issue.

Moore committed to work closely with Vought to ensure the subcommittee spending bill clearly explains how the money will be used, ranging from eliminating invasive Phragmites and increasing conservation infrastructure.

Lisonbee expressed concern about the price tag, questioning how $1 billion in federal funding would hurt taxpayers and whether it would be the most effective approach, since most remedies exist at the state level.

‘The only one’

Ultimately, Maloy hopes that the federal funding that is allocated for the Great Salt Lake this year is used to support the state in achieving its goals, and providing helpful resources, instead of taking the project out of local hands.

As Maloy defends her record in a race against former lawmaker Phil Lyman, she has framed her exclusive committee roles in the U.S. House as making her Utah’s best bet at getting help for the Great Salt Lake.

“This is an issue that matters the most in Utah. I’m the only Utahn on appropriations,” Maloy said in May. “So it’s going to take a lot of work on my part, but I’m really the only one in a position to do it right now.”