Man suing Gwyneth Paltrow to testify in Utah ski crash trial

PARK CITY, Utah (AP) — The person suing Gwyneth Paltrow over a 2016 collision at some of the upscale ski resorts in North America is anticipated to take the stand on Monday because the carefully watched trial goes into its second week in Utah.

Attorneys mentioned Friday that retired optometrist Terry Sanderson, 76, would probably testify first on Monday, earlier than his attorneys relaxation and hand the courtroom over to Paltrow’s protection group to make their case. Paltrow’s attorneys are anticipated to name her two kids — Moses and Apple — and a ski teacher who was current the day of the collision.

Sanderson is suing Paltrow for greater than $300,000, claiming she skied recklessly into him from behind, breaking 4 of his ribs and head trauma that post-accident manifested as post-concussion syndrome. Paltrow has countersued for $1 and legal professional charges, alleging that Sanderson was at fault and veered into her from behind.

After Paltrow testified Friday that the collision started when Sanderson’s skis veered between her two legs, attorneys will probably query Sanderson on his recollections. Craig Ramon, the only eyewitness of the crash, testified that he heard a loud scream and noticed Paltrow hit Sanderson, inflicting his skis to fly up into the air earlier than he plumetted down on the newbie run in a “unfold eagle” place.

Attorneys can even probably query Sanderson on the post-concussion signs that medical specialists and his medical doctors testified about final week. And Paltrow’s attorneys are anticipated to ask about his references to Paltrow’s fame and whether or not the lawsuit quantities to an try to use it.

Although the courtroom in Park Metropolis, Utah, was removed from full all through the primary week of the trial, the case has emerged as probably the most carefully watched superstar trial since Johnny Depp took Amber Heard to court docket virtually a yr in the past in Virginia. Clips of legal professional outbursts and Paltrow’s Friday testimony have been lower and circulated broadly on social media, whereas observers have debated the motivations on each side to maintain the extended authorized battle seven years after the collision.

The sum of money at stake for each side pales compared to the everyday authorized prices of a multiyear lawsuit, non-public safety element and professional witness-heavy trial.