Connect with us

Utah

Inside Voices: Utah parents describe the ‘painful’ choice of returning to work

Published

on

Inside Voices: Utah parents describe the ‘painful’ choice of returning to work


Happy Friday, and welcome to Inside Voices, a weekly newsletter that features a collection of ideas, perspectives and solutions from across Utah — without any of the vitriol or yelling that’s become all too common on other platforms. Subscribe here.

Happy Friday, readers.

We so often hear Utah referred to as a “family-friendly” state, but data can be revealing and The Tribune has shared a lot recently on some not-so-friendly trends.

For example: Child care is becoming more expensive, housing is unaffordable for people earning the median income, women face a major wage gap and parental penalties are still prevalent for many working Utahns.

Advertisement

I’ve been curious about how Utah parents feel, so I asked. Here’s what you shared:

  • “Although I graduated at the top of my pre-law class, I postponed my continuing education to have children,” said Denee in Orem. “When I returned, I chose a much lower paying profession because it was more ‘child-rearing friendly’ and allowed me summers off. I have lost retirement opportunities because of it.”

  • “My wife let her guard down and married me when she was 20 years old. At the time, she worked full-time at the University of Utah. It’s now 40 years later and she continues to work full-time at the U,” said Steven in Holladay. “We have two daughters. She was forced to return to work after six weeks with each child. We couldn’t afford child care, so she felt like she had no choice but to return to work. The thing is, I have learned since, she feels like it was the most painful thing in her life that she couldn’t have more time with each child and be a full-time mother … As a male in management and executive positions, I was told to offer women less for positions because ‘they will just get pregnant and leave, and we will have to absorb the cost of recruiting and training a replacement.’ I was told to limit my recruiting efforts to women who were past child bearing years or were unmarried. We *never* held a position for a woman who took maternity leave — if we even offered it. I am ashamed that I participated in such activities.”

  • “I was an Army wife and stay-at-home mom for 22 years,” said Gina in Taylorsville. “My experience moving back to Utah, where I grew up, has been painful and difficult. Not only am I treated like I’ve never worked as I’ve entered the workforce, I question whether my age is a factor in being able to find anything that pays a living wage. I went to school for two years to get a paralegal degree and have worked as a legal assistant, one step down from a paralegal position, barely making enough.”

  • “I have a bachelor’s degree, and I would love to use it, but all jobs aren’t flexible with kids,” said Heather in Lehi. “I would love just to have 20 to 30 hours in my field, but I take low-paying, entry-level jobs because they have different hour shifts so I can take kids to and from school around their schedule. My husband doesn’t have flexibility either, so he’s not able to take part of the burden.”

  • “I knew I wanted to have a kid and started looking into my former company’s policies a year in advance,” said Rachel in South Jordan. “It’s a global company, so I was extremely disappointed to find that our locations in Europe received almost a year of time off whereas I was only offered six weeks (partial pay as it was short term disability) with an additional six weeks covered by FMLA at no pay. I fought for and championed a parental leave policy at that company (non-child-bearing partners had no allowed paid leave) and saw an incremental improvement of four weeks fully paid added to the policy — so 10 weeks of some kind of pay for a child bearing mother. I was ecstatic! Until I read the fine print and realized I wouldn’t be eligible. My baby was due in September and the policy didn’t kick in until December with no retroactive payment offered. I missed an entire month more of sanity and bonding with my child because of some inane date. I ended up going back to work after just six weeks because I am the sole provider for my family (my husband is in medical school).”

I asked the same respondents what family-friendly policy looks like to them.

  • Denee: “Parental leave with a guaranteed job when you return, an equal pay law and child care subsidies where needed.”

  • Steven: “On-site 10-hour child care or equivalent paid 100% . One-year parental leave (male and female) with guaranteed position upon return, six months paid for one parent. Universal Healthcare (for everyone) but starting with kids until 18.”

  • Gina: “Equal pay laws, maternity leave for both parents, everything people younger than me need to thrive. I also believe this state needs to do more for women my age who find themselves at the bottom after working for a lifetime to build a family. I see too many women at every age suffering in Utah.”

  • Heather: “Encouraging work from home! Flexible hours, with the ability to take an hour here or there if you make it up at other times.”

  • Rachel: “Affordable daycare, maybe based on income? Workplaces that accommodate kid schedules, drop offs, pick ups, soccer practices, etc. Company culture that doesn’t look down on a woman for leaving her career or staying and putting her kid in daycare … and parental leave/maternity leave that makes sense. The two are very different, too. Maternity leave should be considered separate from taking care of a young child because honestly you’re just trying to recover mentally and physically from a major trauma. Then you have a newborn and sleepless nights to top it all off. I honestly think the time for a childbearing mother should be a minimum of six months (sleep training doesn’t even happen until 4 months old!).”

With school fast approaching, I’d love to hear from Utah teachers about how they’re feeling. Are you an educator? Tell me whether you’ve considered leaving the profession — and why or why not.

Utah Voices

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Smoke rises up behind homes near the Sandhurst Fire in Salt Lake City on July 20, 2024.

  • “Thinning trees and brush can leave unsightly marks on the landscape. Prescribed burns, one of the most effective means of reducing fuel loads, can temporarily increase air pollution. Thinning projects may require heavy equipment to spend several days parked on an otherwise pristine hillside,” writes Jamie Barnes, the Utah State Forester and Director of the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands. “These short-term impacts are necessary to reduce Utah’s wildfire risks. While a thinning project may alter the view of the mountains from your backyard, the payoff will be worth it if it reduces the damage of future wildfires.” Read more.

  • “I recently completed a driving trip to the Navajo Nation and transited Salt Lake City via the freeways,” writes Steve Wheeler, a visitor from Oregon. “I count myself lucky to have survived the experience. Salt Lake is the only city I’ve ever driven in that has so many drivers going at least 80 MPH in the city limits. And if you’re not doing 80, you’re forcing other drivers to swerve around you like they’re driving the Indy 500.” Read more.

  • “As policymakers consider ways to address concerns around privacy protections of personal data and market concentration of the large tech platforms, there is a critical need to muster up some human intelligence to craft a more nuanced, smart policy on digital advertising,” writes small business owner Lauren Spatafore. “Policymakers will best serve the public interest by avoiding the penchant for overregulating and increasing the cost of doing business for me and fellow entrepreneurs.” Read more.

  • “Utah should deregulate liquor sales,” Parker McCumber told Tribune reporter Kolbie Peterson. “Allowing private businesses to compete would drive competition and better prices. It’s time to trust adults and embrace liberty by ending state control over liquor sales.” Read more.

Share Your Perspective

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) An empty classroom at Bonneville Elementary School, on Friday, Dec. 11, 2020.

Advertisement

Are you a Utah educator? Tell me whether you’ve considered leaving the profession — and why or why not.

From Bagley’s Desk

The Last Happy Meal | Pat Bagley

I’m always looking for unique perspectives, ideas and solutions that move our state forward. Learn more about our guidelines for an op-ed, guest essay, letter to the editor and more here, and drop me a note at voices@sltrib.com.



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Utah, Salt Lake County awarded grants for community cleanup

Published

on

Utah, Salt Lake County awarded grants for community cleanup


SALT LAKE CITY — The Environmental Protection Agency awarded Utah and Salt Lake County a total of $3.5 million in grants to assess potentially polluted properties for eventual cleanup and redevelopment.

The agency announced a $2 million grant to Utah’s Department of Environmental Quality and $1.5 million to Salt Lake County to conduct environmental assessments and inventory brownfield sites for cleanup. Brownfields are sites that may be difficult to redevelop or expand because of “the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant,” according to the agency.

“These brownfields grants will help Utah communities clean up contaminated sites and unlock opportunities for redevelopment and investment,” EPA Regional Administrator Cyrus Western said in a news release announcing the grants earlier this week. “By transforming underused properties into community assets, EPA is helping create healthier neighborhoods and stronger local economies.”

The two grants awarded to Utah and Salt Lake County are among more than $248 million awarded to nearly 200 communities nationwide for brownfield assessment and cleanup. Utah’s Department of Environmental Quality plans to focus the resources on several areas in Ogden, Heber City and Fillmore, among others, according to Bill Rees, who leads Utah’s brownfield cleanup program.

Advertisement

“What we do is work to secure the funding and then begin to reach out to our communities across the state, say, ‘Listen, there’s opportunity to do some assessment work in your community if you’re interested,’ and then work with our rural partners, work with our urban partners to see if there are sites that will fit that bill,” he told KSL.

The state has received similar grants in the past, and Rees said the money can help local governments determine what to do with ailing properties such as old schools, hospitals or private property that have gone to waste.

“Is there asbestos in it, or is there hazardous material in it? Or could there be something that’s impacting the soil or the groundwater, and a policymaker needs to make a decision?” asked Rees. “Knowledge allows you to make good decisions.”

The $1.5 million awarded to Salt Lake County is the largest brownfields assessment grant the county has ever received, according to a county press release.

“This grant is a real win for our communities,” said Mayor Jenny Wilson. “This funding will let us do vital environmental work on a larger scale and in more neighborhoods. It reflects exactly the kind of partnership between local and federal government that gets results for residents.”

Advertisement

The county grant funds will be used to help create cleanup plans in three areas, including a vehicle storage yard in Salt Lake City’s Ballpark Neighborhood, a 4.26-acre vacant lot in Millcreek and a small commercial building in Magna that was damaged during an earthquake in March 2020, according to the EPA.

Contributing: Don Brinkherhoff

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Utah weather conditions trigger historic red flag warning as wildfires rage in state

Published

on

Utah weather conditions trigger historic red flag warning as wildfires rage in state


The National Weather Service in Salt Lake City issued red flag warning Friday morning as emergency workers continued to battle one of the state’s largest wildfires in its history.

The red flag warning, issued when critical fire warnings are occurring or imminent, was to be in place through midnight Saturday.

This is the FIRST Particularly Dangerous Situation Red Flag Warning issued in NWS Salt Lake City history. This is an exceptionally rare event,” the federal agency said in its warning.

A map of the area under the warning covered much of central and southwest Utah, with an area of the southwest, central and southern mountains also outlined as “particularly dangerous red flag.”

Close-up aerial video showing large billowing flames and massive plumes of smoke surrounding mountains in Eureka, Utah, on June 24, 2026.
Large billowing flames and massive plumes of smoke surrounded mountains in Eureka, Utah, on June 24.Courtesy Jefe Lobo

The particularly dangerous area includes the Cottonwood Fire, near the town of Beaver, which started Monday and had grown to covering almost nearly 71,000 acres by Thursday, 15 News reported. The fire forced evacuations.

The NWS warned that gusty winds and dry conditions would lead to rapid fire growth.

Utah also was dealing with the Iron Fire, which started June 19, and nearly destroyed the town of Eureka. The fire was about 27% contained Friday morning.

Advertisement

The fire danger led Utah Gov. Spencer Cox to issue executive order restricting fireworks statewide during the July 4 holiday, which marks the nation’s 250th birthday this year. The ban is in effect through July 5.

“Nothing about this decision was easy,” Cox said in a statement issued by his office Thursday.

“This is unlike anything we’ve seen in recent memory. We’re seeing fires spread farther and faster under conditions that defy historical expectations” Jamie Barnes, Utah state forester and director of the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands, added in the statement.

Cox allowed cities and local communities to set aside areas where fireworks could be safely used. The city of Provo announced it would enforce a citywide prohibition on fireworks and would not designate a safe area for fireworks.

“This year is different,” Provo Mayor Marsha Judkins said in a statement. “The wildfire danger facing our community is real, and protecting lives, homes, and our natural spaces must come first.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Lawsuit claims Utah prison wrongfully conducted mass strip search of more than 100 women

Published

on

Lawsuit claims Utah prison wrongfully conducted mass strip search of more than 100 women


Earlier this month, 2News Investigates brought you a former inmate’s federal lawsuit alleging Utah Department of Corrections leaders failed to address reports of alleged sexual assault by correctional officers. Now, 2News Investigates examines another key claim in that lawsuit.

MORE: Federal lawsuit alleges Utah prison leaders covered up guards’ sexual assaults on inmates

The lawsuit alleges a mass cross-gender strip-search operation – women being viewed by men was intended to further silence female inmates.

Federal law generally prohibits cross-gender strip searches of female inmates except during emergencies or when conducted by medical personnel. UDC says that during body-search procedures, male correctional officers are not allowed in the immediate area and inmate privacy is maintained. Former inmates say that couldn’t be further from the truth.

Advertisement

Three former inmates agreed to speak with 2News Investigates but asked that their identities not be revealed.

“It was very traumatic.”

According to the lawsuit, on May 13, 2025, UDC carried out a large-scale operation known as a “reset” in women’s housing units at the Utah State Correctional Facility (USCF) in Salt Lake City.

Wendy: “They call it a reset. What do you call it?”

“A violation.”

Advertisement

“It’s like a rape.”

The lawsuit alleges UDC Deputy Warden Derick Zorn and Warden Sharon D’Amico directed the operation, along with more than a dozen members of the Critical Incident Response Team, or CIRT.

According to the plaintiffs, officers stormed dormitories, shouted profanities, and issued conflicting commands.

The women say and the lawsuit states they were ordered to pack their belongings into totes and change into state-issued uniforms in front of male CIRT officers. They were then marched to the Emerald Building for processing.

“It felt almost like we were at a concentration camp.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit alleges the women were required to undergo body scans and then strip completely naked. Plaintiffs claim they were ordered to lift their breasts, spread their buttocks, and cough while visible to male staff.

Women who were menstruating allegedly were instructed to remove menstrual products in full view of others.

“Just use one hand to remove it. Hold it up in front of you.”

“I felt really small and worthless.”

The lawsuit alleges some women were forced to hold soiled menstrual pads while performing physical maneuvers.

Advertisement

“I just did what I was told. I just wanted to get it over with.”

The plaintiffs also claim they were required to sit on toilets or squat to provide urine samples while completely naked and visible to male officers.

“It was humiliating. It was degrading.”

The lawsuit further alleges cell doors were left open, exposing naked women to other inmates and male staff.

An overhead observation booth with reflective glass overlooked the strip-search area. Plaintiffs say they observed movement inside and believed they were being watched from above.

Advertisement

The lawsuit alleges the female inmates were being watched from above during a mass strip search on May 13, 2025

“I could see in the overhead, the two-way mirror. There were multiple men walking around up there who had direct vision inside those cells.”

The lawsuit alleges Captain Jared Beers and Lieutenant Matthew Coombs were inside the booth and that Deputy Warden Derick Zorn observed women in various states of undress.

“I made eye contact with Officer Arroyo, and I also saw Deputy Zorn.”

“I knew if I could see the male officers, they could see me.”

Advertisement

One former inmate described the experience as state-sanctioned sexual violence.

“When that happens, and you’ve gone through the same kind of thing as a child, it’s very traumatic.”

The lawsuit alleges Warden D’Amico knew male officers were viewing naked female inmates and “ratified, condoned, and failed to stop it.”

An allegation in the lawsuit filed on May 15, 2026

An allegation in the lawsuit filed on May 15, 2026

“You’re pretty much a hostage.”

Advertisement

UDC Executive Director Jared Garcia declined repeated requests for an on-camera interview. A letter sent said:

“During the body search process in female living areas, male correctional officers are not allowed in the immediate area, and privacy is maintained. In general, resets are conducted routinely, according to UDC policy and under strict protocols designed to ensure safety while also preserving the privacy and dignity of incarcerated individuals.”

“The manner matters.”

Walter Mason represents the plaintiffs.

He told 2News Investigates, “The law protects inmates from being exposed to members of the opposite sex viewing their naked bodies unless there’s an emergency. Unless there’s what the law calls an exigent circumstance, the prison can take necessary actions to protect safety. There was no emergency. There was no exigency.”

Advertisement

UDC says the reset involved approximately 150 trained staff members and was conducted according to department policy.

UDC’s letter goes on to say:

“Every effort was made to treat belongings with care and document confiscated items appropriately. UDC stands by our methods and policies, which are intended to maintain the highest standards of integrity, safety, and efficiency during the reset process.”

Written response from the Utah Department of Corrections regarding 2News investigations

Written response from the Utah Department of Corrections regarding 2News investigations

I asked UDC whether any exigent circumstances existed on May 13, 2025, during the reset operation.

Advertisement

The response:

“No exigent circumstances occurred on May 13, 2025.”

I also requested information about what items were confiscated. UDC said it could not provide a specific list.

Response to questions posed by 2News Investigates to UDC regarding mass strip search and if exigent circumstances existed that day

Response to questions posed by 2News Investigates to UDC regarding mass strip search and if exigent circumstances existed that day

The lawsuit seeks a jury trial and accuses the defendants, all supervisors, of participating in a “coordinated effort to humiliate, mock, and psychologically degrade the plaintiffs … operating with a brazen and intentional disregard for clearly established law, fueled by an institutional custom of impunity.”

Advertisement

_____



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending