Connect with us

Seattle, WA

Instacart, DoorDash, and other apps appear to be trying to roll back Seattle's new laws for gig workers

Published

on

Instacart, DoorDash, and other apps appear to be trying to roll back Seattle's new laws for gig workers


On February 29, Instacart sent an email with a link to a survey to its gig worker shoppers in Seattle. Its stated purpose: To figure out what its shoppers thought of the city’s new law on gig work.

But in the preamble to the survey, Instacart indicated it already had thoughts about how things were going. “Some shoppers are seeing a negative impact on earnings, limited service areas for batches, and decreased order frequency,” the email read. “That’s why it’s crucial we hear from you about exactly how these changes have influenced you and your work with Instacart.”

The survey is one example of how Instacart, DoorDash, and other gig work companies have been pushing back on a law that took effect in Seattle this past January. The law, one of multiple proposals known collectively as “Pay Up,” most notably aims to increase delivery workers’ pay to a rate comparable with Seattle’s $19.97 minimum wage.

The companies lobbied against the proposals before the Seattle City Council. But they haven’t given up the fight just because they’ve become law.

Advertisement

Some of the questions in Instacart’s survey asked shoppers about how their earnings or wait times for orders had changed since the pay law took effect.

One asked shoppers whether they supported or opposed Pay Up — but only after offering Instacart’s own explanation in the previous questions about the law.

That’s caught some workers’ attention.

“There were so many red flags in that survey that, of course, I didn’t want to bother to do it,” one Instacart shopper who delivers orders in Seattle told Business Insider. The shopper asked not to be identified for fear of having their Instacart account deactivated, but BI verified their employment and identity.

The survey also asked shoppers whether they were waiting longer to claim orders to shop or earning more or less from Instacart customer tips — even though Instacart itself plays a commanding role in determining both, the shopper told BI.

Advertisement

After Pay Up took effect, for instance, Instacart reduced the default tip on orders within Seattle to 0%. Before the law took effect, it was 5%. The survey also didn’t mention that Instacart had increased fees for customers since the law took effect, the shopper said.

On Wednesday, Instacart said that the survey had garnered responses from “more than 250 shoppers.” The summary touted that a super-majority of shoppers in Seattle said their experience on the app had gotten worse since Pay Up became law in January, with earnings down and wait times to claim orders up.

“A staggering 82% have said tips are down since PayUp took effect,” the summary says, for example, without mentioning Instacart’s change to its default tip in Seattle.

A spokesperson for Instacart told Business Insider that “the voice of shoppers is critical in helping to shape public policy across the country, and we regularly reach out to shoppers to understand their experience on the platform. In one recent survey, 72% of shoppers surveyed in Seattle told us their experience has been worse since the PayUp law took effect.

“Elected officials, especially in Seattle, rely heavily on the voices of local constituents — including workers, businesses, and customers — to inform the direction of their policy proposals,” they continued. “Instacart will continue to listen to shoppers and help empower them to make their voices heard in important policy conversations.”

Advertisement

About a month later, in March, Instacart sent out another email to shoppers. While it didn’t reference the survey, it did claim that the company had heard from shoppers whose pay had gone down and who were waiting longer to claim batches of orders. “It’s clear that this new law isn’t working and unfortunately, this is exactly what we warned the Council would happen,” the email read.

The message included a link to a form with a pre-written letter, which pointed to many of the same issues that the survey had alluded to, including lower pay and wait times. It instructed shoppers to add their own experiences and then submit it to Instacart as a testimonial for the city council.

Some shoppers posted the email on Reddit. One poster, who included screenshots of the message, encouraged other Instacart shoppers to turn the pre-written letter to the city council around. “Instead, tell them to crack down on Instacart’s retaliation,” the post read, referring to the costs that the company passed on to customers.

“I actually removed some of the text and I rephrased it to say, ‘Thank you for passing Pay Up,’” the Instacart shopper who spoke with BI said.

Other companies have made their gig workers aware of their stance on Seattle’s new law, even if they haven’t issued calls to action like Instacart’s.

Advertisement

About a week after Seattle’s pay law took effect, DoorDash sent an email to its workers in Seattle with claims that Dashers would see fewer offers and wait longer to claim them. DoorDash also said in the message that it would end its Top Dasher and Priority Access programs in Seattle, both of which allow delivery workers access to better-paying batches if their metrics, such as customer ratings, are high enough.

“These new rules restrict platforms from rewarding high quality Dashers,” the email read, referencing Pay Up.

“It’s painfully clear from listening to Dashers, merchants and consumers that this new law simply isn’t working,” a DoorDash spokesperson told BI.

“The regulatory response fee in Seattle helps offset the costs associated with the current law,” the spokesperson said. “If those costs can be decreased through reform legislation, we will explore all options to increase affordability for consumers, including a reduction of the fee.”

Uber Eats and Grubhub have also put out statements saying that things have gotten worse for their gig workers since Seattle’s law took effect. The companies have also added fees for customers since Pay Up took effect. DoorDash, for instance, has added a $4.99 charge to orders in Seattle, though nothing in the Pay Up legislation required it.

Advertisement

Seattle’s city council is considering significant changes to Pay Up in hopes that the companies will take away those fees, local news outlets reported in recent weeks.

Anna Powell, a DoorDash government relations manager, told GeekWire in February that the company’s goal was more ambitious.

“We would like to see a repeal of the ordinance,” Powell said.

Do you work for Instacart, DoorDash, Walmart Spark, or another gig delivery service and have a story idea to share? Reach out to this reporter at abitter@businessinsider.com



Source link

Advertisement

Seattle, WA

Ticket Alert: Thundercat, Michelle Branch, and More Seattle Events Going On Sale This Week – The Stranger

Published

on

Ticket Alert: Thundercat, Michelle Branch, and More Seattle Events Going On Sale This Week – The Stranger


Get ready to rumble with tickets to these newly announced shows. Groovy genre-bending bassist Thundercat will come through Seattle to support his recent release, Distracted. Pop-rock singer-songwriter Michelle Branch has announced a new album and cross-country tour for the fall. Plus, Daily Show correspondent and former pro tennis player Michael Kosta brings his Big Dad Energy stand-up special to Seattle next spring. Read on for details!

ON SALE FRIDAY, JULY 17

MUSIC

The Amity Affliction: House of Cards 2026
Showbox SoDo (Fri Nov 27)

Bravo the Bagchaser & Peysoh
The Crocodile (Wed Sept 23)

Advertisement

Candlebox – Can’t Quit You Tour
Paramount Theatre (Fri Sept 25)

See more on EverOut!

Advertisement

EverOut is The Stranger’s new website devoted to things to do in Seattle and across the Pacific Northwest. It has all the same things you’re used to seeing from Stranger EverOut Staff, just in a new spot!…
More by EverOut Staff

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Trump immediately fires the new court-appointed top prosecutor in Seattle | CNN Politics

Published

on

Trump immediately fires the new court-appointed top prosecutor in Seattle | CNN Politics



SeattleAP — 

President Donald Trump fired the new top US prosecutor in Seattle on Wednesday less than an hour after the attorney was unanimously appointed by the federal judges in the district, highlighting tensions between the courts and the president over the powerful positions.

Roger Rogoff, a former judge and veteran state and federal prosecutor, was sworn in as US attorney before 8 a.m. at the courthouse in downtown Seattle. In a phone interview, he said he then went to the US Attorney’s Office and asked to meet with Charles Neil Floyd, whose 120-day interim term in the position ended in February.

As he waited in a lobby, Rogoff said, he received an email from the Trump administration informing him he’d been removed. He is consulting with other lawyers about suing over his firing, he said.

Advertisement

Presidents normally appoint US attorneys, the top federal prosecutor in each judicial district. The positions require Senate confirmation, except in temporary appointments. When temporary appointments expire before a nominee is confirmed, the judges in a judicial district can name a US attorney.

But under Trump, the Justice Department has sought to leave unconfirmed prosecutors in their positions indefinitely, often through novel personnel maneuvers.

“District court judges can appoint a temporary U.S. Attorney, and POTUS can fire them,” Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a social media post Wednesday. He added that the judges who appointed Rogoff “abandoned the time-honored process of consultation with the administration so that the selected U.S. Attorney is qualified to serve in the administration.”

Trump named Floyd, who previously served as an immigration judge, interim US attorney last October but never forwarded his nomination to the Senate. When Floyd’s time as interim US attorney expired, Trump simply shifted his title, a tactic the administration has also tried in other federal judicial districts: It named him first assistant US attorney, while leaving the top post empty.

In May, a US appeals court panel expressed skepticism that the maneuver was legal. The federal judges in the city decided to take applications for the position, and it appointed a bipartisan panel to review the applications.

Advertisement

On Wednesday morning the court — comprising 17 active and senior judges appointed by five presidents — issued its unanimous order naming Rogoff the US attorney for western Washington.

Democratic Washington Sen. Patty Murray, who had opposed Floyd for the US attorney job, blasted Rogoff’s quick firing.

“Throughout his career, he has demonstrated an outstanding commitment to public service, and he was appointed legally by the federal judges in the Western District of Washington,” the senator said in a written statement. “This administration doesn’t want to deal with advice and consent—they just want to install cronies to carry out a corrupt political agenda.”

In December, Alina Habba resigned as the top federal prosecutor for New Jersey after an appeals court said she had been serving in the post unlawfully.

Lindsey Halligan, who pursued indictments against a pair of Trump’s adversaries, left her position as an acting US attorney in Virginia after a judge concluded her appointment was unlawful and that indictments she brought against James and former FBI Director James Comey must be dismissed.

Advertisement

The judges there named James Hundley, who had handled criminal and civil cases for more than 30 years, but the administration fired him. It also fired a court-appointed US attorney in northern New York.

Rogoff, who spent 20 years as a state prosecutor and six as a federal prosecutor before becoming a state judge, said he knew the administration might fire him immediately. But he said he had no qualms about the potential conflict he was walking into. Being US attorney is “the best job there is” for a prosecutor, he said.

“I’m really proud of my career,” Rogoff said. “The fact that the judges of this district — most of whom I’ve spent my career appearing in front of, or trying cases against, or working with — believed that I was the right person to do this work is just really humbling and amazing.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Outreach groups respond to the reported relocation cycle of Ballard’s homeless population

Published

on

Outreach groups respond to the reported relocation cycle of Ballard’s homeless population


As people voice concerns about an encampment in Seattle’s Ballard neighborhood, outreach groups are detailing their efforts and fighting back against encampment removals.

The outreach group We Heart Seattle said it checks on the people in an encampment of at least 20 people weekly to offer water, snacks, personal hygiene items, and access to treatment.

RELATED | Ballard encampment grows after city removes nearby site along Burke-Gilman Trail

The group told KOMO it believes more can be done at the city level, from policy to housing, to get the homeless connected with shelter and services.

Advertisement

A woman working at the Fred Meyer off NW 45th Street and 9th Avenue captured video of a fire near tents at an encampment across the street. A day later, off camera, she told KOMO News she worries about the safety of the people living in the tents and Ballard neighbors, in addition to concerns about alleged open-air drug use at the encampment.

“We became homeless because of certain situations, and we turned to drugs, and unfortunately, addiction comes next, you know?” Crystal Rawlings told KOMO News. She has set up her tent on multiple streets in Ballard, and said she’s approaching one year of being opioid-free.

She believes there’s been more city outreach since the start of the new mayoral administration to connect people living on the streets with services, but knows there’s not enough transitional housing for everyone who needs or wants it.

She and the Ballard Community Task Force on Homelessness and Hunger urge the city to stop encampment removals that push this group to another block.

RELATED | City removes Ballard encampment as neighboring businesses raise housing concerns

Advertisement

“We’re not abominations. We’re not obstructions, and we’re not trash, so stop sweeping us,” Rawlings stated.

The city is still aiming to reach Mayor Katie Wilson’s goal of adding 1,000 new units of shelter in 2026 and recently opened a tiny home village in nearby Interbay, but fell short of the goal of 500 new units by June.

Andrea Suarez with We Heart Seattle estimates at least 20 people living on the street keep getting moved around Ballard, from behind the Albert Lee store to Leary Avenue to NW 45th Street behind the Fred Meyer.

“This encampment has people that’ve been homeless for more than five years. We know their names and faces. They’re still here. They’re still stuck in late-phase addiction, frankly because it’s permitted,” Suarez explained.

RELATED | Viral makeshift homeless shelter with chimney dismantled by Seattle city crews

Advertisement

She believes a camping ban on city sidewalks would help encourage more people to accept shelter, and help stop the cycle of moving people without

“It is an underserved community. I think it is unfair,” Suarez added. “We’ve tried to balance between enablement and really giving people a hand up, but without the teeth and backup for the work of outreach workers, it starts to feel futile, and that’s why we get burned out.”

The mayor’s office was working to send data about its homeless response in Ballard as of Wednesday afternoon.

The Ballard Community Task Force on Homelessness and Hunger estimates there have been nine Ballard-area encampment removals so far this year.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending