Connect with us

Seattle, WA

How the Seattle Storm became the highest valued WNBA franchise of all time | CNN

Published

on

How the Seattle Storm became the highest valued WNBA franchise of all time | CNN




CNN
 — 

Women’s basketball is seeing a surge in popularity – especially at collegiate level – but this isn’t an upsurge that’s happened overnight, or without investment.

A boom in interest in the WNBA has been fueled in part by the induction of a powerhouse rookie class that includes the likes of Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese, but as Ginny Gilder, co-owner of the Seattle Storm notes, the growth in popularity and profitability of the league is “not at all by accident.”

This May, the WNBA recorded its highest attended opening month in 26 years, and noted that arenas were filled to a 94% capacity, up 17% from last year. Meanwhile, viewership of WNBA games has nearly tripled since last season’s average of 462,000 viewers, averaging 1.32 million viewers, nearly tripling last season’s average across ABC, ESPN, ESPN2 and CBS.

Advertisement

Gilder, who has co-owned the Storm since 2008, is part of a group that has managed to grow the value of the team from $10 million to $151 million in just 15 years. On Thursday, the Storm beat the Fever 89-77 in front of 18,000 fans with Sue Bird, Megan Rapinoe and the Milwaukee Bucks star Damian Lillard watching on.

A rower and Olympic silver medalist in the sport, Gilder was living in Seattle and a Storm season-ticket holder when the Storm and the NBA’s SuperSonics were sold to businessman Clay Bennett in 2006. Soon after, Bennett made it clear that he wanted to move the franchises to Oklahoma, much to the dismay of fans.

So Gilder, along with Microsoft executives Dawn Trudeau and Lisa Brummel, and former court judge Anne Levinson decided to try and buy the Storm to keep them close to fans, who “deserved not to lose their team.”

Though Bennett and his associates bought both the men’s and women’s teams for a reported $350 million, they parted with the latter for just $10 million.

“It wasn’t considered a very good business investment back then. Oklahoma was not going to care about a women’s team,” Gilder explains.

Advertisement

Gilder and her co-owners set about changing that – and for them, the marker of their success wasn’t just on-court wins, but also to ensure that their business was profitable.

“If you can’t sell all that you’ve invested in, it’s a hobby, or it’s a charity. And frankly, the last thing women’s sports needs is to be viewed as a charity,” she adds. One way to achieve this is to price tickets competitively, and not for $10 a ticket, she tells CNN Sport.

Now, the Storm is the WNBA’s most valuable team after it was valued at $151 million in 2023.

The Storm became the first women’s professional sports team to visit the White House during the Biden administration, something notable in its own right as no WNBA team had visited the White House since 2016, President Barack Obama’s final year in office.

This year, the Storm opened the doors to a new $64 million purpose built training facility – making it the second WNBA franchise to open their own practice facility – complete complete with two indoor professional basketball courts, two outdoor 3×3 courts, and an exclusive suite for the Seattle Storm that includes a locker room, a nutrition center, and a player lounge.

Advertisement

This year, former Storm player Sue Bird – one of the sport’s greats – joined the ownership group after playing her entire 19-year WNBA career with the team.

“We’ve won three championships,” said Gilder. “The franchise now has four but we won three in our 16 years. And we built a business that can stand on its own – last year when we raised some funds so that we could invest in building our practice facility, we were the first franchise in WNBA history to sell part of itself at a non-depressed price,.”

Gilder got her start in professional sports after spotting a group of rowers during a trip to the river in 1974. A year later she started at Yale and joined the school’s rowing program, where two fellow students were trying out for the Olympics.

“It was one of those classic examples of see and do it,” she explains.

However, while the men had adequate facilities close to the boathouse, the women didn’t have locker rooms, showers, or a place to change.

Advertisement

“We’d all go out on the water together. The men would row, the women would row, we’d come back, everyone would be sweaty, wet from the water. The women would go sit on the bus. The men would go take showers,” she explains.

Sick of the status quo, Gilder was among a group of students who organized a “strip in” – where in 1976 a group of rowers stripped naked in the office of the university’s director of physical education – to force the university to comply with Title IX legislation, which prohibits sex-based discrimination in federally funded education programs.

“It worked. They ended up building an addition to the boathouse the next year,” she explains.

Gilder’s experience as an athlete influenced her decision to invest in the Storm.

“I really did it from the perspective of my commitment to social justice for women,…if I could help create this one pathway for women athletes to do what they love, and get paid for it the way men did.

Advertisement

“Whenever you just normalize women and girls being athletes, as opposed to something that only weird people do, it just makes it part of the background of life. That this is something girls can do,” she adds.

Gilder adds that when women break barriers in sport and other industries, it allows other women and girls to excel.

“Creating a vision for yourself and then fulfilling it when the world isn’t exactly aligned with you takes a huge amount of emotional energy. So now girls don’t have to generate that energy – that energy to break a barrier, they can just pour that energy into pursuing something they love.”



Source link

Advertisement

Seattle, WA

New Ben & Jerry’s location opening at Seattle waterfront’s Pier 54

Published

on

New Ben & Jerry’s location opening at Seattle waterfront’s Pier 54


Anyone waiting for the ferry, taking a stroll along the revamped Seattle waterfront or visiting the Seattle Aquarium just got a new option for finding a sweet treat: Ben & Jerry’s is coming to Pier 54.

A lease announcement last week shared that the new shop will be operated by local franchise owners Lance and Moria Blair, owners of the Green Lake and Gig Harbor Ben & Jerry’s locations. They pair is also opening another Seattle location in Northgate soon.

The permanent shop announcement comes after Ben & Jerry’s operated a pop-up at the waterfront location last simmer.

“As a Seattle native, the waterfront holds a special place in my heart,” Lance Blair said in a news release. “I could not be more excited to be a part of bringing Ben & Jerry’s to Pier 54 and continue building connections with the local community while serving visitors from around the world.”

Advertisement

The new location comes as local ice cream chains Molly Moon’s and Salt & Straw have also expanded into the downtown area in the past year.

Where is the new Ben & Jerry’s location?

The new Ben & Jerry’s is located at Pier 54 on the Seattle Waterfront: 1001 Alaskan Way, Seattle, WA 98104.

The shop will be open Monday through Friday from 11:30 a.m. – 8:30 p.m.

Where are the other Ben & Jerry’s locations in Seattle?

The ice cream chain operates four other locations in the Seattle area:

Advertisement
  • Alki Beach: 2742 Alki Ave SW, Seattle, WA 98116
  • Bellevue: 166 Bellevue Way NE Bellevue, WA 98004
  • Green Lake: 7900 E Green Lake Drive N Suite 104, Seattle, WA 98103
  • Kirkland: 176 Lake Street South, Kirkland, WA 98033

How many locations does Ben & Jerry’s have in Washington?

Ben & Jerry’s has ten locations across Washington, including two in Issaquah and three in the Spokane area. See the full list of locations at benjerry.com/ice-cream-near-me.

Zachary Fletcher is a trending news reporter with USA TODAY Network’s Washington state team. Keep up with him on X (@zdfletch), BlueSky (@zfletcher.bsky.social) or reach him at zfletcher@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

VIDEO: Mayor Wilson proposes renewing, expanding Seattle Transit Measure by doubling the sales-tax percentage that funds it.

Published

on

VIDEO: Mayor Wilson proposes renewing, expanding Seattle Transit Measure by doubling the sales-tax percentage that funds it.


Advertisement

Through the end of this year, 0.15% of the sales tax you pay funds the voter-approved Seattle Transit Measure. That would double to 0.30% if the City Council and Seattle voters approve the renewal/expansion that Mayor Katie Wilson officially introduced this afternoon. She said it’ll make living in Seattle more affordable by enabling more people to “live car-free or car-light.” She acknowledged that raising the sales tax isn’t ideal but noted that it’s one of the few revenue-raising tools available under state law. Besides paying for more transit – 280,000 additional Metro bus trips a year, 100,000 more than the current measure funds – it also would pay for 22,000 free ORCA transit passes, more than double what the city provides now, said acting SDOT director Angela Brady during the announcement event at City Hall. The passes are now available to Seattle Promise scholars, low-income Seattle Preschool Program families, and Seattle Housing Authority residents. The measure’s renewal/expansion would also make those passes available to Housing Choice Voucher participants.

The mayor’s announcement says the Transit Measure isn’t just about buses: It also would “support the design and delivery of Sound Transit’s West Seattle Link Extension, Ballard Link Extension, and Graham Street Station.” The 0.30% sales tax would generate an estimated $138 million average per year for the 10 years of this measure, which is proposed to go to voters in November. Council review starts this Thursday and will be led by District 1 City Councilmember Rob Saka, who chairs the council committee that oversees transportation. We’ll add the specific text of the proposal when we get it; the slide deck for Thursday’s council meeting is now available, and we’ll add some highlights from that soon.





Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Seattle mayor is violating city law over CCTV cameras ahead of FIFA World Cup, CM says

Published

on

Seattle mayor is violating city law over CCTV cameras ahead of FIFA World Cup, CM says


With less than two weeks before Seattle hosts matches during the 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup, Seattle City Council Public Safety Committee Chair Bob Kettle is escalating his criticism of Mayor Katie Wilson’s decision not to activate newly installed CCTV cameras in the Stadium District and suggesting she is violating established law.

In a sharply worded letter sent Monday, Kettle argues that the mayor’s decision to pause activation of the city’s Technology-Assisted Public Safety Pilot Program is inconsistent with city law and the ordinances approved by the Seattle City Council.

RELATED | Mayor Wilson hosts discussion on surveillance and security, takes questions from public

“I believe that she is not operating according to the ordinances, the law with respect to the stadium ordinances, and her duties under the charter,” Kettle said in an interview on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The dispute centers on 22 CCTV cameras that have already been installed in and around Seattle’s Stadium District but remain inactive as city leaders debate privacy concerns and the circumstances under which the system should be used.

Kettle said the approaching World Cup is what prompted him to send the letter.

“Basically, we’re less than two weeks out from the World Cup, and we’re not ready,” Kettle said. “We have capacity with these stadium cameras, they’re up, they’re installed, but they’re not turned on.”

In his letter, Kettle argues that the council already approved the surveillance technology through council-approved ordinances, specifically outlining the limited circumstances under which the program can be paused.

According to Kettle, those conditions include situations where the city is compelled to release camera data for civil immigration enforcement, gender-affirming care investigations, or reproductive healthcare matters, or when city leaders determine the technology is being used for those purposes.

Advertisement

RELATED | City leaders say Seattle ready for World Cup, despite concerns with surveillance, drones

“Neither condition has occurred that would merit a temporary program pause,” Kettle wrote.

The councilmember contends that the Seattle Municipal Code and the approved surveillance impact report provide no authority for the mayor to indefinitely delay the program’s implementation beyond those specified exceptions.

The mayor’s office has defended its position, saying activation decisions will be guided by public safety experts and intelligence assessments ahead of the World Cup.

“Mayor Wilson continues to consult public safety officials regarding circumstances that might warrant use of the expanded set of cameras during the FIFA World Cup,” the mayor’s office said in a previous statement. “We appreciate councilmembers’ perspectives, and those will be part of ongoing discussions.”

Advertisement

The previous statement continued:

“With regard to credible threats: Identifying a credible threat involves multiple experts from federal, state, and local agencies monitoring and assessing various streams of information. In collaboration with one another, they weigh incoming intelligence and jointly recommend whether to elevate security operations. Mayor Wilson’s decision whether to activate the Stadium District cameras will be informed by this group’s recommendation.”

The mayor’s office has been asked if there is a change in perspective given Kettle’s letter. In a new statement obtained by KOMO News on Tuesday, the mayor’s office said Wilson’s position remains “unchanged.”

“Per our legal review, we believe council has the authority to pause the use of adopted surveillance technology but cannot require its use,” the mayor’s office said in Tuesday’s statement. “The Mayor is ensuring that our use of surveillance technology is protective of civil rights, liberties, and privacy and provides sufficient data privacy safeguards. The Mayor has a duty to make sure our use of these technologies is responsible.”

Kettle argues that waiting for a specific threat before activating the cameras misunderstands modern security planning.

Advertisement

SEE ALSO | Seattle mayor’s verbal missteps prompt national and viral attention, leadership questions

“There are credible concerns,” Kettle said, citing worries about drones and other security issues surrounding a major international event.

He pointed to examples, including the 1996 Atlanta Olympic bombing and the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, arguing that public officials often do not receive advance warning before attacks occur.

“This idea that you’re going to get a credible threat warning is not right. It’s not the professional standard,” Kettle said. “The 22 cameras are installed, they’re ready to go, they just need to be turned on.”

Opponents of the camera expansion have raised concerns that footage could potentially be sought by federal immigration authorities or used in ways that conflict with Seattle’s sanctuary city policies.

Advertisement

Kettle dismissed those concerns, arguing that the council built extensive safeguards into the legislation governing the cameras.

“We don’t have facial recognition,” Kettle said, noting the city established restrictions and oversight measures as part of the technology program.

He also argued that federal agencies have their own surveillance capabilities and do not need Seattle’s camera network to conduct enforcement operations.

Kettle said he sought legal guidance before sending the letter and believes the mayor’s decision is inconsistent with the ordinances governing the program.

“I asked the question, if Mayor Harrell had to do all this in terms of ordinances, why is it that Mayor Wilson does not?” Kettle said. He said attorneys reviewing the issue identified concerns centered on the language governing when the program may be “paused.”

Advertisement

While Kettle stopped short of calling for legal action against the mayor, he said he wanted to publicly highlight what he views as a conflict between the administration’s actions and council-approved law.

“Her move related to the pause is not right, and essentially a violation,” Kettle said.

Kettle said Seattle is the only one of the 11 World Cup host cities that does not have its full camera system operational and warned that the city is running out of time.

“We have to take action now to get ourselves ready for the World Cup,” he said. “That is ensuring that we have all the pieces in place, and that we’re using the capacities that we have to their full ability.”

Kettle said he was scheduled to meet with members of the mayor’s team on Tuesday and hopes a resolution can be reached before the first World Cup matches arrive in Seattle.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending