Connect with us

Seattle, WA

FC Seattle: The Bridge Between the Eras

Published

on

FC Seattle: The Bridge Between the Eras


Overseas tours, matches versus national teams and first division clubs from abroad makes Football Club Seattle seem almost exotic nowadays. Yet in truth, it was simply an effort to keep local pro soccer’s flame flickering when the light had all but been extinguished.

For seven seasons, FC Seattle more than just kept the lights on.

• It provided a platform for the best male and female players in Puget Sound to pursue their craft and vie for a place on the national team. 

• It gave fans a traditional alternative to the thumping beat, laser lights and frenetic pace of the indoor game, then at its peak.

Advertisement

• It became the first Seattle pro or semipro club to play outside North America.

• And it reinforced the region’s image as a bastion for the game by contending for multiple league championships and winning one. 

Dark Times

To understand just how important FC Seattle was to the creation of what we now take for granted as an American soccer capital, top MLS market and 2026 World Cup city, one needs to take the time machine back to the dystopian landscape of American footy in 1984.

Imagine a day when professional, traditional soccer has gone dark. No MLS, no USL. And there’s no telling when it will return. Where crowds had regularly numbered about twentysomething-thousand, there are vast swaths of empty seats. Once an adored club, the Sounders’ name and reputation was in tatters.

Suddenly, the game had retrenched. Franchises had folded, leaving a frayed fabric across the continent where, just a few years before, crowds had been huge, and young U.S. talent was just beginning to bloom.

Advertisement

FC Seattle owner Bud Greer had flirted with rescuing the Sounders prior to their demise in 1983. Instead, Greer was gung-ho on providing his existing network of youth clubs and premier men’s and women’s teams what was lacking: professionally run programs that would test themselves against the very best.

The Challenge

A cadre of ex-Sounders would guide the men, beginning with an ambitious challenge series. Coaching director Jimmy Gabriel and head coach Tommy Jenkins, both Sounders alums, picked a team of college stars and ex-pros to face Vancouver, Minnesota and New York of the North American Soccer League at Memorial Stadium. 

The four-game series would culminate with a sendoff match against the U.S. Olympic Team. Those matches, starting with a 2-2 draw versus Vancouver, were all competitive, and attendance averaged nearly 7,000.

“The opportunity is the biggest thing it presented the college guys in the area,” observed Tad Willoughby, who played five seasons with FC Seattle, “because the NASL folding hurt our cause, our hope of playing professionally anywhere. It gave us that footing, that opportunity to play those professional teams.”

Notable Names and Feats

International teams and nominal pay were brought into the mix in 1985. Among those who found playing for their hometown teams against all-comers were some recognizable figures. Tacoma native Jeff Durgan, captain of the U.S. national team and 1980 NASL Rookie of the Year, declined offers to stay with the Cosmos to come home. After winning an indoor championship with San Diego, Brian Schmetzer joined his twin younger brothers.

Advertisement

But a FIFA ban on English clubs following the Heysel Stadium disaster prompted FC Seattle and three like-minded clubs to form a league, the Western Soccer Alliance.  The WSA would expand each summer, eventually becoming the Western Soccer League, with 11 teams in seven states. Seven WSL players would represent the United States at the 1990 World Cup.

Greer, who back in 1984 had considered the Sounders brand damaged, added a nickname in 1986. The Storm were runners-up in the WSA their first three seasons before a dominant 1988 season was capped by a 5-0 demolition of the San Jose Earthquakes. All 11 starters in the final had attended either high school or college in Puget Sound. 

Life Experience

In lieu of pay, Greer gave players a life experience. The Storm embarked on postseason tours of Britain in 1987 and 1988, playing five preseason friendlies against clubs from various divisions, including Middlesbrough, QPR, Portsmouth and Bournemouth.

“When we went to England, that was huge,” said Jeff Koch, Storm goalkeeper from 1986-89. “You’re playing against all those teams you might’ve only heard and read about. To go over there and experience English professional soccer at a young age and realize we’re not that far off, that we can play. I would take that trip in a heartbeat over pay.”

More Than A Team

FC Seattle was funded to the tune of about $1 million per year ($2.7M in 2024 dollars) and that money was spread beyond the Storm.

Advertisement

“Bud Greer deserves a ton of thanks and love for what he gave all of us,” said Peter Fewing, who played six years with the club. “Bud made it first class and lost a lot of money on that deal.”

The organization brought a women’s premier team into the fold in 1987. The Cozars, founded by Booth Gardner before he was elected governor and featuring future World Cup stars Michelle Akers and Shannon Higgins, then won the WSA women’s tournament and were national runners-up.

The FC Seattle City League featured men’s and women’s teams in six Puget Sound cities and fed talent to the senior teams. There were school assembly demonstrations, day camps and clinics throughout each year and fundraising and promotion for the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and Washington Special Olympics. A 1988 Sounders reunion game resulted in FC Seattle’s largest attendance in four years. 

Locals Hold Their Own

“In the beginning it was all guys you grew up playing with on clubs, a chance to play meaningful games against quality opposition. Unfortunately, we didn’t get paid for it,” said Peter Hattrup. “In ’88 I wish there had been a final against the ASL winner, because I think we were better than anybody we would’ve played.”

In its final two seasons, FC Seattle brought in more proven pros. Among them were USMNT captain and former Cosmos regular Ricky Davis and Tacoma native Brent Goulet, the 1987 U.S. Soccer Player of the Year. Both were bidding, unsuccessfully in the end, to become part of the World Cup squad. 

Advertisement

“People talk about (the WSL) not being first division and that, but before MLS, all the players were playing in the MISL (indoor), WSL, APSL or whatever leagues were happening at the time,” said Chance Fry, a U.S. international who played for the Storm as well as both the NASL and A-League Sounders. 

Rising Costs

Just as the sun seemed to be rising on American soccer’s horizon, with the prospect of hosting the 1994 World Cup, FC Seattle would pass into history. 

The WSL and East Coast-based ASL agreed to merge and form a national circuit, the APSL, a.k.a. the A-League. That would require owners to ante up still more money for salaries and travel, and Greer was unconvinced it made financial sense. After a year of dormancy, the Storm was shuttered in 1991.

“The Storm’s never been really recognized because we weren’t called the Sounders,” claimed Eddie Henderson. “That’s all. It wasn’t because of the quality of players. I would even argue that the FC Seattle team was as good as any of the A-League Sounders teams that won championships.”

What’s In A Name?

However, FC Seattle left a weighty legacy. The WSL, which was run by Storm management, is at the root of the A-League and the USL, which is still thriving. A handful of those players proceeded to become successful college head coaches, while countless others are involved in youth clubs and academies. Chris Henderson, Wade Webber and Schmetzer have been immensely influential and involved in the success of the MLS Sounders.

Advertisement

The most direct effect of FC Seattle on the Sounders’ trajectory came only a few years after the final match. Nine alumni eventually played for Seattle’s next A-League team, and when the Sounders claimed their first of two consecutive championships in 1995, Webber, Fry and Hattrup (the league MVP) were vital cogs.

“FC Seattle was a great vehicle to bridge the gap until the A-League Sounders emerged on the other side,” noted Bruce Raney, an NASL draftee out of Seattle Pacific and scorer of FC Seattle’s first goal. “It was a fantastic bridge between the original and the next stage which finally led to Major League Soccer.”

A three-part FC Seattle series is available at Frank MacDonald’s blog, frankmacdonald.net.



Source link

Advertisement

Seattle, WA

New Ben & Jerry’s location opening at Seattle waterfront’s Pier 54

Published

on

New Ben & Jerry’s location opening at Seattle waterfront’s Pier 54


Anyone waiting for the ferry, taking a stroll along the revamped Seattle waterfront or visiting the Seattle Aquarium just got a new option for finding a sweet treat: Ben & Jerry’s is coming to Pier 54.

A lease announcement last week shared that the new shop will be operated by local franchise owners Lance and Moria Blair, owners of the Green Lake and Gig Harbor Ben & Jerry’s locations. They pair is also opening another Seattle location in Northgate soon.

The permanent shop announcement comes after Ben & Jerry’s operated a pop-up at the waterfront location last simmer.

“As a Seattle native, the waterfront holds a special place in my heart,” Lance Blair said in a news release. “I could not be more excited to be a part of bringing Ben & Jerry’s to Pier 54 and continue building connections with the local community while serving visitors from around the world.”

Advertisement

The new location comes as local ice cream chains Molly Moon’s and Salt & Straw have also expanded into the downtown area in the past year.

Where is the new Ben & Jerry’s location?

The new Ben & Jerry’s is located at Pier 54 on the Seattle Waterfront: 1001 Alaskan Way, Seattle, WA 98104.

The shop will be open Monday through Friday from 11:30 a.m. – 8:30 p.m.

Where are the other Ben & Jerry’s locations in Seattle?

The ice cream chain operates four other locations in the Seattle area:

Advertisement
  • Alki Beach: 2742 Alki Ave SW, Seattle, WA 98116
  • Bellevue: 166 Bellevue Way NE Bellevue, WA 98004
  • Green Lake: 7900 E Green Lake Drive N Suite 104, Seattle, WA 98103
  • Kirkland: 176 Lake Street South, Kirkland, WA 98033

How many locations does Ben & Jerry’s have in Washington?

Ben & Jerry’s has ten locations across Washington, including two in Issaquah and three in the Spokane area. See the full list of locations at benjerry.com/ice-cream-near-me.

Zachary Fletcher is a trending news reporter with USA TODAY Network’s Washington state team. Keep up with him on X (@zdfletch), BlueSky (@zfletcher.bsky.social) or reach him at zfletcher@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

VIDEO: Mayor Wilson proposes renewing, expanding Seattle Transit Measure by doubling the sales-tax percentage that funds it.

Published

on

VIDEO: Mayor Wilson proposes renewing, expanding Seattle Transit Measure by doubling the sales-tax percentage that funds it.


Advertisement

Through the end of this year, 0.15% of the sales tax you pay funds the voter-approved Seattle Transit Measure. That would double to 0.30% if the City Council and Seattle voters approve the renewal/expansion that Mayor Katie Wilson officially introduced this afternoon. She said it’ll make living in Seattle more affordable by enabling more people to “live car-free or car-light.” She acknowledged that raising the sales tax isn’t ideal but noted that it’s one of the few revenue-raising tools available under state law. Besides paying for more transit – 280,000 additional Metro bus trips a year, 100,000 more than the current measure funds – it also would pay for 22,000 free ORCA transit passes, more than double what the city provides now, said acting SDOT director Angela Brady during the announcement event at City Hall. The passes are now available to Seattle Promise scholars, low-income Seattle Preschool Program families, and Seattle Housing Authority residents. The measure’s renewal/expansion would also make those passes available to Housing Choice Voucher participants.

The mayor’s announcement says the Transit Measure isn’t just about buses: It also would “support the design and delivery of Sound Transit’s West Seattle Link Extension, Ballard Link Extension, and Graham Street Station.” The 0.30% sales tax would generate an estimated $138 million average per year for the 10 years of this measure, which is proposed to go to voters in November. Council review starts this Thursday and will be led by District 1 City Councilmember Rob Saka, who chairs the council committee that oversees transportation. We’ll add the specific text of the proposal when we get it; the slide deck for Thursday’s council meeting is now available, and we’ll add some highlights from that soon.





Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Seattle mayor is violating city law over CCTV cameras ahead of FIFA World Cup, CM says

Published

on

Seattle mayor is violating city law over CCTV cameras ahead of FIFA World Cup, CM says


With less than two weeks before Seattle hosts matches during the 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup, Seattle City Council Public Safety Committee Chair Bob Kettle is escalating his criticism of Mayor Katie Wilson’s decision not to activate newly installed CCTV cameras in the Stadium District and suggesting she is violating established law.

In a sharply worded letter sent Monday, Kettle argues that the mayor’s decision to pause activation of the city’s Technology-Assisted Public Safety Pilot Program is inconsistent with city law and the ordinances approved by the Seattle City Council.

RELATED | Mayor Wilson hosts discussion on surveillance and security, takes questions from public

“I believe that she is not operating according to the ordinances, the law with respect to the stadium ordinances, and her duties under the charter,” Kettle said in an interview on Tuesday.

Advertisement

The dispute centers on 22 CCTV cameras that have already been installed in and around Seattle’s Stadium District but remain inactive as city leaders debate privacy concerns and the circumstances under which the system should be used.

Kettle said the approaching World Cup is what prompted him to send the letter.

“Basically, we’re less than two weeks out from the World Cup, and we’re not ready,” Kettle said. “We have capacity with these stadium cameras, they’re up, they’re installed, but they’re not turned on.”

In his letter, Kettle argues that the council already approved the surveillance technology through council-approved ordinances, specifically outlining the limited circumstances under which the program can be paused.

According to Kettle, those conditions include situations where the city is compelled to release camera data for civil immigration enforcement, gender-affirming care investigations, or reproductive healthcare matters, or when city leaders determine the technology is being used for those purposes.

Advertisement

RELATED | City leaders say Seattle ready for World Cup, despite concerns with surveillance, drones

“Neither condition has occurred that would merit a temporary program pause,” Kettle wrote.

The councilmember contends that the Seattle Municipal Code and the approved surveillance impact report provide no authority for the mayor to indefinitely delay the program’s implementation beyond those specified exceptions.

The mayor’s office has defended its position, saying activation decisions will be guided by public safety experts and intelligence assessments ahead of the World Cup.

“Mayor Wilson continues to consult public safety officials regarding circumstances that might warrant use of the expanded set of cameras during the FIFA World Cup,” the mayor’s office said in a previous statement. “We appreciate councilmembers’ perspectives, and those will be part of ongoing discussions.”

Advertisement

The previous statement continued:

“With regard to credible threats: Identifying a credible threat involves multiple experts from federal, state, and local agencies monitoring and assessing various streams of information. In collaboration with one another, they weigh incoming intelligence and jointly recommend whether to elevate security operations. Mayor Wilson’s decision whether to activate the Stadium District cameras will be informed by this group’s recommendation.”

The mayor’s office has been asked if there is a change in perspective given Kettle’s letter. In a new statement obtained by KOMO News on Tuesday, the mayor’s office said Wilson’s position remains “unchanged.”

“Per our legal review, we believe council has the authority to pause the use of adopted surveillance technology but cannot require its use,” the mayor’s office said in Tuesday’s statement. “The Mayor is ensuring that our use of surveillance technology is protective of civil rights, liberties, and privacy and provides sufficient data privacy safeguards. The Mayor has a duty to make sure our use of these technologies is responsible.”

Kettle argues that waiting for a specific threat before activating the cameras misunderstands modern security planning.

Advertisement

SEE ALSO | Seattle mayor’s verbal missteps prompt national and viral attention, leadership questions

“There are credible concerns,” Kettle said, citing worries about drones and other security issues surrounding a major international event.

He pointed to examples, including the 1996 Atlanta Olympic bombing and the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, arguing that public officials often do not receive advance warning before attacks occur.

“This idea that you’re going to get a credible threat warning is not right. It’s not the professional standard,” Kettle said. “The 22 cameras are installed, they’re ready to go, they just need to be turned on.”

Opponents of the camera expansion have raised concerns that footage could potentially be sought by federal immigration authorities or used in ways that conflict with Seattle’s sanctuary city policies.

Advertisement

Kettle dismissed those concerns, arguing that the council built extensive safeguards into the legislation governing the cameras.

“We don’t have facial recognition,” Kettle said, noting the city established restrictions and oversight measures as part of the technology program.

He also argued that federal agencies have their own surveillance capabilities and do not need Seattle’s camera network to conduct enforcement operations.

Kettle said he sought legal guidance before sending the letter and believes the mayor’s decision is inconsistent with the ordinances governing the program.

“I asked the question, if Mayor Harrell had to do all this in terms of ordinances, why is it that Mayor Wilson does not?” Kettle said. He said attorneys reviewing the issue identified concerns centered on the language governing when the program may be “paused.”

Advertisement

While Kettle stopped short of calling for legal action against the mayor, he said he wanted to publicly highlight what he views as a conflict between the administration’s actions and council-approved law.

“Her move related to the pause is not right, and essentially a violation,” Kettle said.

Kettle said Seattle is the only one of the 11 World Cup host cities that does not have its full camera system operational and warned that the city is running out of time.

“We have to take action now to get ourselves ready for the World Cup,” he said. “That is ensuring that we have all the pieces in place, and that we’re using the capacities that we have to their full ability.”

Kettle said he was scheduled to meet with members of the mayor’s team on Tuesday and hopes a resolution can be reached before the first World Cup matches arrive in Seattle.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending