San Francisco, CA
London Breed calls for overhaul of San Francisco city charter
San Francisco Mayor London Breed is proposing the first overhaul of the city’s charter since 1995.
Breed called on city and county leaders to start the process of comprehensive charter reform and examine potential changes that could be put before voters in November 2026.
As the city and county’s “fundamental law,” the city and county charter is its governing document that defines its governance structure and government duties.
In an executive directive on Tuesday, Breed did not lay out any specific proposals, but said broadly that the changes should “improve the effectiveness of government and improve the delivery of services to our residents.”
The directive also took aim at the ballot measure process, saying it had added too many layers of bureaucracy to the city’s government. Eight measures will go before voters this fall.
The closest the directive comes to specifics is its component that calls on city leaders to gather data related to potential reforms, including “consolidating City Departments, overhauling Commission structures, improving accountability in the Executive Branch, and updating the legislative process to ensure that new rules can be implemented,” according to the executive directive.
Breed said she thought now was the time for wholesale reform.
“Over the last three decades, the Charter has been amended over and over, adding new departments, creating new positions, setting in place new legal requirements, restricting city spending, and adding other bureaucratic barriers that have not been created through a holistic view of what it means to govern,” Breed’s directive said.
Breed also included the nonprofit San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association, known as SPUR, as a participant in the process. The organization has made specific recommendations for a new charter, including reducing redundancies, adding a legislative analyst to the Board of Supervisors, and restoring the mayor’s ability to hire and fire department heads.
The organization has also suggested “raising the bar” for getting measures on the local ballot, something Breed’s directive hinted at. The organization said in its newly released report, “Designed to Serve,” that any potential measure put forth by the county Board of Supervisors and be subject to a mayoral veto, and that any measure proposed by the mayor should first be passed by the Board.
It also suggested raising the signature threshold from 2% to 5% of registered voters’ signatures to qualify a measure for the ballot.
The mayor’s executive directive calls on the city controller and city administrator to work with other city leaders and good government experts like SPUR to prepare for putting proposed changes before voters in fall 2026 by collecting data, preparing outreach and stakeholder input, and, ultimately, make a range of recommendations for reforms.
“It’s the right time to ensure that laws are keeping pace with our ever-evolving city,” said San Francisco Controller Greg Wagner.
County Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, who, like Breed, was interviewed for SPUR’s report, agreed that a lot of “dysfunction is baked into our Charter.”
“Too often, our City government acts more like a collection of loosely affiliated departments than a unified municipal government with clear lines of accountability and oversight,” Mandelman said.
SPUR’s President and CEO, Alicia John-Baptiste, agreed it was time for a broad reexamination of the charter.
“Sometimes, it’s important to step back and evaluate whether the system we have in place is structured to allow the government to play this critical role effectively and if not, how it should change,” John-Baptiste said.
Borg has made several questionable calls from
One pedestrian died at the hospital and three others suffered non-life-threatening injuries after a driver struck them in SF’s Mission District earlier this week.
The San Francisco Police Department arrested a driver suspected of fatally striking four pedestrians in the area of 16th and Mission streets Monday morning, as KRON4 reports.
Officers responded to the scene at 12:13 am and found medics treating one pedestrian with life-threatening injuries. The person later died at a nearby hospital, and three other pedestrians sustained non-life-threatening injuries.
The driver was reportedly detained soon after the collision. The department has not announced what charges they will receive.
“We hold the victim and their loved ones in our thoughts, and grieve this loss of life on San Francisco’s streets,” said Jodie Medeiros, executive director for Walk SF, in a release. “We all deserve to be able to get around safely in our city.”
This marks the ninth pedestrian death in San Francisco this year. It’s also the second such death in the Mission, following the tragic death of local musician Danielle Spillman at Mission Street and South Van Ness Avenue in April, as SFist reported previously.
Four pedestrians were killed throughout the month of March, including deaths in Chinatown, the Financial District, North Beach, and the Outer Mission. In late February, a two-year-old was run over in Mission Bay.
Anyone with information may contact the SFPD at 415-575-4444 or text “TIP411,” beginning with “SFPD.”
Wife of SoMa Hit-and-Run Suspect Says ‘My Husband Is Not a Villain’
Image: Google Maps
San Francisco, CA
California Supreme Court ruling on bail sparks debate over what it means for San Francisco’s safety
A recent California Supreme Court ruling is changing how bail is set across the state, and it’s sparking a sharp debate in San Francisco about what it could mean for public safety.
Inside her office, District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said every decision carries weight. She views her role through one lens: protecting the public.
“My responsibility to San Francisco is public safety,” Jenkins said. “And to be transparent to me in achieving that safety. This is a ruling that has real-life consequences, and deny that would be untruthful and would not help people understand why we may see retraction from our progress.”
The ruling requires judges to set bail at levels defendants can afford, shifting the focus away from cash bail and toward whether someone poses a risk to public safety.
Jenkins said she believes that shift could have serious consequences.
“I knew it would be immediately be devastating to public safety and the state of California and had a lot of concerns that I thought needed to be shared with the public and other city leaders,” she said.
She warns that the change could make it easier for repeat offenders, particularly those involved in drug-related crimes, to be released before trial.
“These judges don’t live in San Francisco, many of them,” Jenkins said. “They don’t live in places like the Tenderloin that are most affected by these issues. They are ruling in a way that has impacts on other people’s lives.”
But not everyone agrees with that assessment.
San Francisco Defense Attorney Marsanne Weese said the ruling does not eliminate accountability and that courts still have tools to detain people who pose a threat.
“In regards to her statements, there is no basis for it,” Weese said. “And the justices pointed out that there are a number of non-financial tools the lower courts can use and should use.”
Those tools include options like pretrial detention and supervised release, which allow judges to consider risk without relying solely on a person’s ability to pay bail.
“So, in regards to this being a drastic change, yes, it will be a drastic change, but not to safety,” Weese added.
For Jenkins, the concern is not just the intent of the law, but how it will be applied in real-world courtrooms and what that means on city streets.
For now, there is unease for some, optimism for others, and a growing debate over what public safety will look like under this new system.
-
Wyoming6 minutes agoAlbany County sheriff reports inmate death at detention center
-
Crypto9 minutes agoCryptoquant’s Ki Young Ju Warns Bitcoin’s Bear Market Could Run Into Early 2027
-
Finance14 minutes agoBank Regulation and Risks to Financial Stability | The Regulatory Review
-
Fitness20 minutes agoReviewers Share the Only Gear You Need for the Ultimate Home Gym Setup
-
Movie Reviews29 minutes agoFilm Review: “Pitfall” – MediaMikes
-
World39 minutes ago
AI helped a musician with Parkinson’s finish his new album when he could no longer play guitar
-
News44 minutes agoVideo: Judge Orders Removal of Trump’s Name From Kennedy Center
-
Lifestyle1 hour agoBack from Cannes, a critic shares the films he’s most excited to see again
