Opinion: Newsom’s second term is assured. So is little state progress, unless he changes his ways.

The editorial board operates independently from the U-T newsroom however holds itself to related moral requirements. We base our editorials and endorsements on reporting, interviews and rigorous debate, and attempt for accuracy, equity and civility in our part. Disagree? Tell us.

To nobody’s shock, Gov. Gavin Newsom dominated Tuesday’s early election outcomes, touchdown him in a runoff in November towards little-known, calmly funded Republican candidate Brian Dahle, a state senator from rural Northern California. The previous San Francisco mayor is nicely on his approach to being the most recent incumbent California governor to simply win re-election. However not like the final two, Newsom doesn’t have a signature accomplishment in workplace. Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger simply held onto the seat in 2006 after working with Democratic lawmakers to attain the most efficient session of the Legislature in years — most memorably enacting the state’s landmark International Warming Options Act. Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown additionally simply received one other time period in 2014 after a bravura show of robust fiscal administration that obliterated the trope that California was “ungovernable.”

Against this, regardless of report income and heavy Democratic majorities in Sacramento, Newsom has made little to no progress on key, high-profile state points. He governs as an incrementalist with out a broad, daring imaginative and prescient of how the Golden State ought to reply to its issues. This should change.

On housing and the intertwined concern of homelessness, Newsom has by no means come near assembly the targets he set out in 2018 of including 500,000 new housing models a yr. Regardless of sweeping new legal guidelines that make it far simpler so as to add properties on present single-family tons, California doesn’t even construct a 3rd that many models. In the meantime, the price of shelter retains hitting new report highs, impoverishing middle-income households. And regardless of unprecedented infusions of billions of {dollars} in new state funds to homelessness applications, issues are getting worse in most cities, together with in San Diego.

So what can a governor do? Change the fundamentals of the talk. Make daring adjustments to permit for the straightforward conversion of empty malls and workplace buildings into housing, recognizing that each on-line buying and the variety of those that work at home are solely going to extend. Use tax incentives to get builders to construct big dormitory-style residential buildings with shared bogs and kitchens. Embrace factory-built properties that may go up for a fraction of the standard price. However above all, don’t deal with “course of” victories — new legal guidelines and regulatory adjustments — as precise victories. Demand outcomes.

On schooling, Newsom retains breaking information on how a lot funding his budgets present Ok-12 lecture rooms. However simply as many schooling consultants have stated for years, college high quality shouldn’t be solely a perform of faculty spending. The persistent achievement hole leaving many Black and Latino college students behind acquired even worse when lecture rooms closed throughout the pandemic. But as an alternative of turning to what has labored in various, extremely populated liberal states like Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York — fastidiously measuring scholar and trainer efficiency and creating rigorous greatest practices — California has made it even tougher to make use of such instruments. The state should measure how it’s spending that cash.

On water, with the governor’s name to cut back water consumption going largely unheeded, the local weather emergency has made it needed for state leaders to think about taking the momentous step of placing limits on use by farms, which eat 4 occasions as a lot of the state’s out there water as cities (40 p.c versus 10 p.c). Agriculture is now solely about 2 p.c of the state’s economic system. In a historic drought like this, prudent limits on water use for closely exported crops like alfalfa and almonds make sense. Many different reforms to restrict the losing of water and so as to add reservoirs make sense. However none can present the aid within the quick time period that will come from a brand new method to agriculture.

Newsom was elected in 2018 speaking about massive, furry audacious targets. It’s time for achievements. He defends his report with a vigor that belies how tough life is for a lot of Californians. But when he needs to go down in historical past, he should change his cautious methods and stroll the stroll in addition to speak the speak.